do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1355/2005 of 18 August 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables (OJ L 214, 19.8.2005)
Date: 2005-08-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, grape, import price, pip fruit, stone fruit

20.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 216/19

CORRIGENDA

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1355/2005 of 18 August 2005 establishing the standard import
values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

(Official Journal of the European Union L 214, 19 August 2005)

On page 2, the Annex should read as follows:

‘ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 18 August 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry
price of certain fruit and vegetables

CN code

0702 00 00

0707 00 05

0709 90 70

0805 50 10

0806 10 10

0808 10 80

0808 20 50

0809 30 10, 0809 30 90

0809 40 05

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

(EUR/100 kg)

052
999

052
999

052
528
999

388
524
528
999

052
220
400
624
999

388
400
508
512
528
720
804
999

052
388
512
528
999

052
999

052
508
624
999

66,7
66,7

70,9
70,9

78,8
57,8
68,3

66,9
58,9
60,4
62,1

87,8
65,2
135,2
171,2
114,9

64,5
73,1
55,7
67,3
78,5
44,6
78,3
66,0

101,9
76,0
9,9
38,7
56,6

75,6
75,6

78,9
43,6
64,6
62,4

(1) Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code “999” stands for “of

other origin”.’
Amendment by France of public service obligations imposed on scheduled air services between Ajaccio, Bastia, Calvi and Figari, and Lyon, Marseilles, Nice and Paris (Orly)   (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2005-08-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: France, air transport, airline, inland transport, services of general interest, transportation tariff

C 204/2

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

20.8.2005

Amendment by France of public service obligations imposed on scheduled air services between
Ajaccio, Bastia, Calvi and Figari, and Lyon, Marseilles, Nice and Paris (Orly)

(2005/C 204/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

1.
Pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for
Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes, France has decided to amend, from 10 August
2005, the public service obligations imposed in respect of air services operated:

— between Ajaccio, Bastia, Calvi and Figari, and Paris (Orly) published in notice C 85/02 in the Official
Journal of the European Communities of 9 April 2002, revised by the notices in OJ C 118/08 of 20 May
2003 and C 110/06 of 5 May 2005;

— between Ajaccio, Bastia, Calvi and Figari and Marseilles and Nice published in notice C 9/04 in the Offi-
cial Journal of the European Communities of 15 January 2003, revised by the notices in OJ C 102/08 of
29 April 2003 and C 110/06 of 5 May 2005;

— between Lyon, and Ajaccio, Bastia, Calvi and Figari published in notice C 297/04 in the Official Journal
of the European Communities of 19 October 2000, revised by the notices in OJ C 204/08 of 28 August
2002 and C 110/06 of 5 May 2005.

2.

These public service obligations are amended as follows:

For services between Paris (Orly) and Corsica, the maximum fares given in point 2.2 of the public service
obligation are increased by EUR 1.

For services linking Lyon, Marseilles and Nice with Corsica, the maximum fare for certain categories of
passenger given in point 2.2 of the public service obligations is increased by EUR 1.
Election of the President of a Chamber composed of three Judges
Date: 2005-08-20
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: General Court (EU), election, member of the Court of Justice (EU), ordinary court of law, president of an institution

20.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/15

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

Election of the President of a Chamber composed of three
Judges

Second Chamber, sitting with three Judges:

(2005/C 205/27)

Mr Pirrung, President of Chamber,

(a) Mr Meij and Ms Pelikánová, Judges

(b) Mr Forwood and Mr Papasavvas, Judges;

On 7 July 2005 the Court of First Instance, in accordance with
Article 15(3) of the Rules of Procedure, elected Judge García-
Valdecasas President of a Chamber sitting with three Judges for
the period from 1 October 2005 to 30 September 2006.

Third Chamber, Extended Composition, sitting with five
Judges:

Mr Jaeger, President of Chamber, Ms Tiili, Mr Azizi, Ms
Cremona and Mr Czúcz, Judges;

Assignment of Judges to the Chambers

(2005/C 205/28)

On 7 July 2005 the Court of First Instance decided to establish
five Chambers of five Judges and five Chambers of three Judges
for the period from 1 October 2005 to 30 September 2006
and to assign Judges to them as follows:

Third Chamber, sitting with three Judges:

Mr Jaeger, President of Chamber

(a) Ms Tiili and Mr Czúcz, Judges

(b) Mr Azizi and Ms Cremona, Judges;

Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition, sitting with five
Judges:

Mr Legal, President of Chamber, Ms Lindh, Mr Mengozzi, Ms
Wiszniewska-Białecka and Mr Vadapalas, Judges;

Fourth Chamber, sitting with three Judges:

First Chamber, Extended Composition,
Judges:

sitting with five

Mr Legal, President of Chamber

(a) Ms Lindh and Mr Vadapalas, Judges

Mr Vesterdorf, President, Mr García-Valdecasas, Mr Cooke, Ms
Labucka and Ms Trstenjak, Judges;

(b) Mr Mengozzi and Ms Wiszniewska-Białecka, Judges;

First Chamber, sitting with three Judges:

Mr García-Valdecasas, President of Chamber, Mr Cooke, Ms
Labucka and Ms Trstenjak, Judges;

Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition, sitting with five
Judges:

Mr Vilaras, President of Chamber, Ms Martins Ribeiro, Mr
Dehousse, Mr Šváby and Ms Jürimäe, Judges;

Second Chamber, Extended Composition, sitting with five
Judges:

Mr Vilaras, President of Chamber

Mr Pirrung, President of Chamber, Mr Meij, Mr Forwood, Ms
Pelikánová and Mr Papasavvas, Judges;

(b) Mr Dehousse and Mr Šváby, Judges.

(a) Ms Martins Ribeiro and Ms Jürimäe, Judges

Fifth Chamber, sitting with three Judges:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3854 — IPIC/OMV/JV) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2005-08-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: chemical industry, disclosure of information, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, oil industry, restrictive-practice authorisation

C 204/4

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

20.8.2005

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3854 — IPIC/OMV/JV)

(2005/C 204/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 1 August 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to
declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regu-
lation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public
after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This
web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case
number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3854. EUR-Lex is the on-

line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3872 — United Services Group/Solvus) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2005-08-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: disclosure of information, economic concentration, merger control, restrictive-practice authorisation, temporary employment agency

20.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3872 — United Services Group/Solvus)

(2005/C 204/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 2 August 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to
declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regu-
lation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public
after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This
web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case
number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3872. EUR-Lex is the on-

line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3770 — Lufthansa/Swiss)

(2005/C 204/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 4 July 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it
compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No
139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is
cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This
web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case
number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3770. EUR-Lex is the on-

line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)
Case C-264/05: Action brought on 22 June 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Federal Republic of Germany
Date: 2005-08-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Commission, Germany, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, health care profession, national implementing measure, professional qualifications, recognition of diplomas, right of establishment, town-planning profession, vocational training

C 205/14

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

20.8.2005

The applicant claims that the Court should:

the European Parliament and of

— declare that by not adopting the necessary laws, regulations
to transpose Directive
and administrative provisions
2001/19/EC (1) of
the
Council of 14 May 2001 amending Council Directives
89/48/EEC and 92/51/EEC on the general system for the
recognition of professional qualifications and Council Direc-
tives 77/452/EEC, 77/453/EEC, 78/686/EEC, 78/687/EEC,
78/1026/EEC, 78/1027/EEC, 80/154/EEC, 80/155/EEC,
85/384/EEC, 85/432/EEC, 85/433/EEC and 93/16/EEC
concerning the professions of nurse responsible for general
care, dental practitioner, veterinary surgeon, midwife, archi-
tect, pharmacist and doctor, or by not
informing the
Commission of such provisions, the Republic of Austria has
failed to fulfil
its obligations to implement that directive
fully;

— order the Republic of Austria to pay the costs of

the

proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposition of the directive passed on 3
January 2003.

(1) OJ 2001 L 206, p. 1.

Action brought on 22 June 2005 by the Commission of
the European Communities against the Federal Republic of
Germany

(Case C-264/05)

(2005/C 205/26)

(Language of the case: German)

An action against
the Federal Republic of Germany was
brought before the Court of Justice of the European Commu-
nities on 22 June 2005 by the Commission of the European
Communities, represented by Hans Støvlbæk and Andreas
Manville, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

the European Parliament and of

— declare that by not adopting the necessary laws, regulations
to transpose Directive
and administrative provisions
2001/19/EC (1) of
the
Council of 14 May 2001 amending Council Directives
89/48/EEC and 92/51/EEC on the general system for the
recognition of professional qualifications and Council Direc-
tives 77/452/EEC, 77/453/EEC, 78/686/EEC, 78/687/EEC,
78/1026/EEC, 78/1027/EEC, 80/154/EEC, 80/155/EEC,
85/384/EEC, 85/432/EEC, 85/433/EEC and 93/16/EEC
concerning the professions of nurse responsible for general
care, dental practitioner, veterinary surgeon, midwife, archi-
informing the
tect, pharmacist and doctor, or by not
Commission of such provisions, the Federal Republic of
Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations to implement
fully that directive;

— order the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs of

the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposition of the directive passed on 3
January 2003.

(1) OJ 2001 L 206, p. 1.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2005-08-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate

20.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/1

I

(Information)

COMMISSION

Euro exchange rates (1)

19 August 2005

(2005/C 204/01)

1 euro =

Currency

Exchange rate

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

JPY

DKK

GBP

SEK

CHF

ISK

NOK

BGN

CYP

CZK

EEK

HUF

LTL

LVL

MTL

PLN

US dollar

Japanese yen

Danish krone

Pound sterling

Swedish krona

Swiss franc

Iceland króna

Norwegian krone

Bulgarian lev

Cyprus pound

Czech koruna

Estonian kroon

Hungarian forint

Lithuanian litas

Latvian lats

Maltese lira

Polish zloty

RON

Romanian leu

1,2183

134,51

7,4551

0,67840

9,3425

1,5488

78,11

7,9805

1,9558

0,5729

29,410

15,6466

243,59

3,4528

0,6960

0,4293

4,0375

3,5524

SIT

SKK

TRY

Slovenian tolar

Slovak koruna

Turkish lira

AUD Australian dollar

CAD

HKD

Canadian dollar

Hong Kong dollar

NZD New Zealand dollar

SGD

Singapore dollar

239,50

38,605

1,6694

1,6199

1,4831

9,4683

1,7553

2,0324

KRW South Korean won

1 249,49

ZAR

CNY

HRK

IDR

South African rand

Chinese yuan renminbi

Croatian kuna

7,9399

9,8740

7,3830

Indonesian rupiah

12 164,73

MYR Malaysian ringgit

PHP

RUB

THB

Philippine peso

Russian rouble

Thai baht

4,588

68,255

34,8050

50,265

(1) Source:

reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3770 — Lufthansa/Swiss) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2005-08-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: air transport, disclosure of information, economic concentration, merger control, restrictive-practice authorisation, transport company

20.8.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3872 — United Services Group/Solvus)

(2005/C 204/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 2 August 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to
declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regu-
lation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public
after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This
web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case
number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3872. EUR-Lex is the on-

line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3770 — Lufthansa/Swiss)

(2005/C 204/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 4 July 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it
compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No
139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is
cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This
web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case
number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3770. EUR-Lex is the on-

line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)