Order of the Court of First Instance of 28 February 2005 in Case T-445/04 Energy Technologies ET S.A. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Representation by a lawyer — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2005-07-23
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), electronic equipment, spare part, thermal equipment, trade-mark law

C 182/36

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

23.7.2005

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 22 April 2005

in Case T-399/03 Arnaldo Lucaccioni v Commission of the
European Communities (1)

(Officials — Occupational illness — Request for recognition
of aggravation — Implementation of a judgment of the
Court of First Instance — Legal classification of a note of the
Commission — Action for annulment — Inadmissibility)

for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and
Designs) (OHIM), the other party to the proceedings before the
Board of Appeal of OHIM being Aparellaje eléctrico, SL, estab-
lished in Hospitalet de Llobregat (Spain) — action brought
against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 7
July 2004 (Case R 366/2002-4) concerning an application for
registration of the word mark UNEX as a Community trade
Instance (Fourth Chamber),
mark — the Court of First
composed of H. Legal, President, P. Mengozzi and I. Wisz-
niewska-Białecka, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on
28 February 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

(2005/C 182/67)

(Language of the case: French)

lawyers,

against Commission of

In Case T-399/03: Arnaldo Lucaccioni, former official of the
the European Communities, residing in St-
Commission of
Leonards-on-Sea, represented by J. R.
Iturriagagoitia and K.
the European
Delvolvé,
Communities (Agent: J. Currall, assisted by J.-L. Fagnart, lawyer,
with an address for service in Luxembourg) — action for annul-
ment of the decision of the Commission of 10 March 2003
implementing the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 26
February 2003 given in Case T-212/01, and for annulment of
the medical report compiled during that procedure — the
Court of First
J.
Pirrung, President, N.J. Forwood and S. Papasavvas, Judges; H.
Jung, Registrar, made an order on 22 April 2005, the operative
part of which is as follows:

Instance (Second Chamber), composed of

1. The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.

2. The applicant shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 31 of 5.2.2005.

Action brought on 23 March 2005 by Commission of the
European Communities against Impetus Consultants

1. The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(Case T-138/05)

(2005/C 182/69)

(1) OJ C 47, 21.2.2004

(Language of the case: Greek)

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

the company,

An action against
Impetus Consultants, was
brought before the Court of First Instance of the European
Communities on 23 March 2005 by the Commission of the
European Communities, represented by D. Triandafilou, assisted
by N. Kostikas, lawyer.

of 28 February 2005

The applicant claims that the Court should:

in Case T-445/04 Energy Technologies ET S.A. v Office for
Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and
Designs) (OHIM) (1)

(Community trade mark — Representation by a lawyer —
Manifest inadmissibility)

(2005/C 182/68)

(Language of the case: English)

— order the defendant to pay the amount of EUR 235 655,21
comprising EUR 160 380,35, by way of capital, and
EUR 75 274,86, in respect of interest for late payment, as
from the due date on the basis of each debit note;

— order the defendant to pay as from 15 March 2005 until
full settlement the debt arising out of the ‘COP 493 —
Invite’ contract daily interest in the amount of EUR 41,93;
in regard to the debt arising out of the ‘TR 1006 — Ausias’
contract daily interest in the amount of EUR 1,66 and in
regard to the ‘V 2043 — Artis’ contract daily interest of
EUR 1,01;

In Case T-445/04: Energy Technologies ET S.A., established in
Fribourg (Switzerland), represented by A. Boman, against Office

— order the defendant to pay the costs.