European Parliament resolution on patient mobility and healthcare developments in the European Union (2004/2148(INI))
Date: 2005-06-09
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: freedom of movement, health care, health policy, health service, medical data, organisation of health care, patient's rights

25.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 124 E/543

Thursday 9 June 2005

P6_TA(2005)0236

Patient mobility and healthcare developments

European Parliament resolution on patient mobility and healthcare developments in the European
Union (2004/2148(INI))

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the communication from the Commission — Follow-up to the high level reflection
process on patient mobility and healthcare developments in the European Union (COM(2004)0301)
(‘Commission communication on patient mobility’),

— having regard to Article 152 and Articles 5, 18, 43 and 47 of the EC Treaty,

— having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament,
the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions — Modernising
social protection for the development of high-quality, accessible and sustainable health care and long--
coordination’
term care:
(COM(2004)0304) (‘Commission communication on extending the “open method of coordination”’),

strategies using the

‘open method of

the national

support

for

— having regard to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October
1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free
movement of such data (1),

— having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament,
the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions — e-Health —
making health care better for European citizens: an action plan for a European e-Health Area
(COM(2004)0356),

— having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament,
the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions — eEurope 2002:
Quality Criteria for Health related Websites (COM(2002)0667),

— having regard to the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Communities (‘European Court
of Justice’) in Decker (C-120/95, 28 April 1998), Kohll (C-158/96, 28 April 1998), Geraets-Smits &
Peerbooms (C-157/99, 12 July 2001), IKA (C-326/00, 25 February 2003) and Müller-Fauré & van Riet
(C-385/99, 13 May 2003),

— having regard to the Commission Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the

Council on the recognition of professional qualifications (COM(2002)0119),

— having regard to the Commission Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the

Council on services in the internal market (COM(2004)0002),

— having regard to its resolution of 15 January 2003 on the future of health care and care for the

elderly (2) and its resolution of 11 March 2004 on health care and care for the elderly (3),

— having regard to Rule 45 of its Rules of Procedure,

— having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety

(A6-0129/2005),

A. whereas healthcare in the EU is being transformed by developments in medicine, technology, e-health,

patient awareness and law,

(1) OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p. 31.
(2) OJ C 38 E, 12.2.2004, p. 269.
(3) OJ C 102 E, 28.4.2004, p. 862.

C 124 E/544

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

25.5.2006

Thursday 9 June 2005

B. whereas the E111 system for unplanned health treatment when temporarily in another Member State is
being superseded by the European Health Card, and whereas there is a need to replace, or significantly
change, the bureaucratic and restrictive E112 system for planned health treatment in another Member
State,

C. whereas prevention represents a key element of a comprehensive health policy and systematic preven-
tive measures increase life expectancy, lessen discrepancies between social groups in terms of waiting
times in the healthcare system and stop the spread of chronic illnesses, thereby allowing reductions in
treatment costs,

D. whereas European health policy is being driven in a piecemeal fashion by European Court of Justice
rulings on patient mobility, and the process of enlargement will bring even more complex cases for the
European Court of Justice to deal with; whereas it is in both patients' and governments' interests that
clear guidance on policy and procedures should be agreed and put in place without delay,

E. whereas primary responsibility for the organisation, financing and delivery of health services and
medical care lies with the Member States, while the European Union has a responsibility in the fields of
public health, health promotion, research and early detection and a role in cross-border mobility,

F. whereas further clarity is needed to enable patients, healthcare professionals and health budget holders

and insurers to understand and participate in cross-border and transnational healthcare,

G. whereas there are significant logistical, administrative, cultural and clinical challenges in delivering a

consistent, safe and accessible patient mobility framework for the EU,

H. whereas healthcare systems in the Union are founded on the principles of solidarity, equity and univers-
ality, in order to guarantee that all persons, regardless of their income, wealth and age, receive appro-
priate, high-quality care in the event of sickness,

I. whereas patient mobility is a complex issue owing to differences in national healthcare systems and
traditions; whereas, however, this should not prevent efforts being made to resolve coordination and
efficiency problems facing users and to improve services,

1. Welcomes the Commission communication on patient mobility and the ideas it outlines for struc-
turing cooperation in healthcare;

2.
Stresses the need, with due regard for the priority of maintaining and ensuring unrestricted and
universal access to the public health service, for the European Union to develop urgently a coherent policy
on patient mobility in the light of the judgments of the European Court of Justice and the report of the
High Level Process of Reflection on patient mobility and healthcare developments in the European Union
(‘Reflection Process’), and to agree guidelines for use by patients, health professionals and funding agencies;
believes that as a minimum the patient who suffers from a life-threatening condition should have a right
and the possibility to seek timely treatment in another Member State, if this is not available in his/her own
country or not within a reasonable period of time;

3.
Believes that further cooperation between the Member States, coordinated by the Commission where
appropriate, should concentrate on the specific issues related to cross-border health care; believes that, at
the same time, particular attention should be paid to aspects of regional cooperation, and that the experi-
ences gained in border regions should be taken into account appropriately; considers that in this way, solu-
tions tailored to specific regions can be sought to meet people's needs and that practical experiences can
be used in the form of best practice models;

25.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 124 E/545

Thursday 9 June 2005

4.
Believes that the issue of patient mobility needs a separate Commission proposal and that the Services
Directive should concentrate on service mobility rather than patient mobility, but that the Services Direc-
tive should incorporate a call to the Commission to bring forward a proposal on patient mobility within
six months of that measure entering into force; further believes that this proposal should be based on the
work of the High Level Group on Health Services and Medical Care and should address in particular a
framework for guidance to patients, health professionals and health budget managers and proposals to
cover information to patients and patient security and confidentiality;

Regrets that the Commission communication on patient mobility does not provide a timetable for

5.
action and does not make any commitment to an integrated policy on patient mobility;

6.
Considers that the open method of coordination is an appropriate framework for dealing with patient
mobility issues, without simultaneously excluding cooperation between States on matters for which
Member States' health services are responsible;

7.
Believes that guidelines should include procedures to obtain treatment, sources of information about
health professionals and healthcare facilities, mechanisms for paying for care, arrangements for travel and
linguistic support, arrangements for continuing care, follow-up, convalescence and rehabilitation prior to
or after return, complaints and other related procedures and special care for the elderly and pensioners;
points out that mechanisms of payment for care should be uniform and impartial so as to avoid inequal-
ities and the creation of disadvantages to certain patients;

Considers it essential to promote cross-border cooperation in order to provide effective or urgent

8.
treatment, primarily in the case of emergencies, chronic disease, and serious illness or allergy;

9. Welcomes the Commission communication on extending the ‘open method of coordination’ to
healthcare and long-term care and looks forward to follow-up work to provide a mechanism for struc-
turing cooperation between Member States with specific objectives and regular reviews;

10.
Calls for an overall scientific approach aimed at structuring the process of the open method of coor-
dination in the best possible way; considers that this requires Europe-wide data compatibility as well as a
central metalevel index, and that it should be investigated to what extent the data already available can be
integrated;

the 2005 workplan of

11. Welcomes
the Commission's Health and Consumer Protection
Directorate-General, established under the Public Health Framework Programme which includes pilot
proposals for cross-border cooperation in health services, to help develop cooperation and to identify
potential benefits and problems associated with such cooperation;

12.
Considers the lack of progress on patient information as a serious threat to the development of
healthcare in the EU and in particular to the attainment of patient mobility; calls upon the Commission
and the Council urgently to bring forward a framework for everyday patient information;

Criticises the fact that a coordination of the views of the rights and duties of patients — as recom-
13.
mended by the Reflection Process — has not yet been carried out, and calls on the Council and the
Commission to do so without delay; calls on the Member States to adopt a patients' law or patients'
charter in which patients are granted, among others, the following rights:

— the right to appropriate and qualified medical care provided by qualified medical staff,

— the right to easily understandable, expert and appropriate information and advice from the physician,

— the right to self-determination based on full information,

C 124 E/546

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

25.5.2006

Thursday 9 June 2005

— the right to treatment records and to inspection thereof,

— the right to confidentiality and data protection,

— the right to make a complaint,

— the guarantee that no observation or medical experiments will be carried out without prior patient

consent;

14.
Believes that although Member States are better placed to develop clear national patient information
guidance relevant to their national health systems this should not prevent the Commission from estab-
lishing common core elements on patient information, drawing up a guide to health services and setting
out the rights and duties of patients, the treatment covered and reimbursement details;

15.
Calls on the Commission to consider, while respecting national rules, harmonisation of the proce-
dures with regard to reimbursement of costs, as established by Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the Euro-
pean Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (1) as
well as by the judgments of the European Court of Justice, with a view to establishing legal certainty for
patients in the area of reimbursement;

16.
Calls upon the Commission to produce a set of guidelines on core patient mobility issues by 1
January 2007; believes that these should be supported by national guidelines produced by Member States
within a further 12 months;

17.
Considers that priority should be given, in the context of patient mobility, to adopting guidelines
concerning access to treatments which do not exist in the patient's Member State of origin and treatments
for which there is an urgent need but no possibility of immediate availability in the patient's Member State
of origin;

18.
Considers it essential that Member States adopt rules on prescribing, the carrying out of prescription
orders, and the reimbursement of payments made for drugs by patients in another Member State with a
view to further facilitating patient mobility between Member States;

19.
Encourages the Commission to set deadlines for the collection and evaluation of data on existing
cross-border movement of patients and calls on the Commission to make the findings of such studies
known as soon as possible; reiterates the value of evaluating and sharing the experience of cross-border
agreements such as the Euregio projects;

Calls for a report from the Commission on the nature and prevalence of health tourism and the
20.
extent to which it is currently reimbursed by statutory agencies and by the private insurance sector or paid
out of pocket;

Calls on the Commission and the Member States to draw up a report by June 2007 on the extent of

21.
patient mobility and the services received by visitors and residents in both the public and private sectors;

Calls on the Member States to present in good time a clear and transparent framework for

22.
cross-border healthcare purchasing as announced for this year by the High-Level Group;

23.
Strongly endorses efforts to improve knowledge and legislation on the movement of health and
social care professionals; reminds the Commission that effective mechanisms to support high levels of
patient safety must be incorporated in the Directive on the recognition of professional qualifications;

(1) OJ L 166, 30.4.2004, p. 1. Regulation last amended by Regulation (EC) No. 631/2004 (OJ L 100, 6.4.2004, p. 7).

25.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 124 E/547

Thursday 9 June 2005

24.
Recognises the work being undertaken to establish an EU-wide register of doctors and other health
and care professionals suspended or struck off for incompetence or malpractice; believes that this should
be accessible to patients and health purchasers; and requests regular progress reports from the Commis-
sion;

25. Highlights the potential risk of a ‘brain drain’ from the new Member States to those offering higher
salaries, with a subsequent threat to the capacity and standard of their healthcare systems; therefore
encourages research into possible impacts of increased patient mobility on such movements, and research
into the future demand for healthcare professionals and their supply through EU higher education systems;

26.
Emphasises that the free movement of patients constitutes an incentive also for national healthcare
services to meet the highest possible standards and to encourage patients not to take the same treatment
abroad by providing high-quality services;

27. Welcomes efforts to move towards European Centres of Reference and the potential benefits that
this will bring for treatment of rare diseases; recognises that patients affected by a rare disease or condition
may often require greater support in accessing such specialist care; calls for the setting up of European
Centres of Reference not to be limited to rare diseases but to be extended to cover all diseases for which a
special concentration of resources and expertise is available; emphasises that, in addition to treating these
diseases, European Centres of Reference should also play a prominent part in obtaining second opinions
and in further training for medical specialists;

Cautions that additional finances will be required to support a network of European Centres of

28.
Reference;

Believes that the shared use of capacities, particularly in the case of specialised forms of care, can

29.
make an important contribution to increasing the effectiveness of healthcare services;

30. Notes that in a University of York study of UK patients receiving treatment abroad 87 % of patients
stated the prospect of waiting longer for treatment in England as their motivation; nevertheless believes
that the large majority of patients prefer and will continue to prefer to be treated as close to home as
possible;

31. Welcomes the Commission's commitment to upholding existing data protection law; notes the
importance of providing an efficient and secure method of exchanging patient records between Member
States;

32. Welcomes the Commission communication setting out an ‘e-Health action plan’, recognising that
information and communication technologies, in particular the Internet, can help improve access to, and
the quality and effectiveness of, health services, although it may also increase inequalities as a consequence
of the ‘digital divide’; stresses the need to apply quality criteria for health-related websites; recognises the
role that telemedicine and telepsychiatry could play in improving care options for patients and reducing
the need for patient mobility; considers that account should also be taken of inequalities as regards the
elderly and the illiterate;

33.
Encourages the Commission to monitor the deployment of the European Health Card in Member
States to ensure that Member States are providing clear and comprehensible information to the public
about how the card works;

34.
Asks the Commission to consider whether the European Health Card should form the basis for
promoting a common approach to patient identifiers and developing new functions such as the storage of
medical emergency data, in accordance with the eEurope 2005 Action Plan approved by the Seville Euro-
pean Council of 21 and 22 June 2002;

Calls on the Commission to draw up a proposal for recording on the European Health Card, with
35.
the consent of the parties concerned, not only insurance details but also medical data relating to patients,
thereby facilitating their mobility between Member States and likewise ensuring appropriate access to the
care and treatment that their state of health requires;

C 124 E/548

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

25.5.2006

Thursday 9 June 2005

Requests that the Commission consider how the European Health Card can better relate to the needs

36.
of pensioners from one Member State temporarily residing or staying in another Member State;

37. Notes, however, that there must be a high level of data protection in relation to any new functions
of the European Health Card and that data stored on it and information exchanged between competent
authorities must take account of existing provisions on data protection;

38. Welcomes the establishment of the High Level Group in the Commission as well as the establish-
ment of a Health Working Group meeting at official level in the Council; requests that the European Parlia-
ment receive regular updates from the Commission and from the Council on the Groups' activities;
requests also that the European Parliament receive a report from the High Level Group every six months;

39.
Believes that patient safety is critical to the development of effective health policy in the EU; recog-
nises the need to work closely with the WHO World Alliance for Patient Safety; strongly encourages the
High Level Group to bring forward proposals for an EU Patient Safety Network as soon as possible in
2005;

40.
Stresses that healthcare and patient safety considerations must be taken into account in the planning
and implementation of policies in other areas; regrets the occasional friction between internal market and
healthcare objectives; believes that the health of its citizens is a prerequisite to Europe's economic perfor-
mance and competitiveness;

41.
Emphasises that the focal point of the whole system is the patient, who has a natural interest in his
or her own health and in the quality and accessibility of healthcare, who is the recipient of care and who
pays for the care he or she receives, whether directly or through health insurance or taxation; believes,
therefore, that patients are fully entitled to be kept completely informed about their treatment and their
state of health and are fully entitled to be involved in decision-making with regard to healthcare consump-
tion;

Believes that there is a need for a network of relevant information accessible to patients, health
42.
professionals and managers throughout the EU; welcomes, therefore, the establishment by the Commission
of an EU Health Portal, and hopes that the Portal will be online by the end of 2005 as planned;

43.
Agrees that there is a need to provide citizens with legal certainty and a clear overview of their
rights and duties as patients with regard to access to healthcare and reimbursement of costs incurred in
another Member State;

Considers it essential to draw up a Charter of Patients' Rights, which should cover, inter alia, matters

44.
relating to their mobility;

Calls on the Commission to develop guidelines to clearly define terms such as ‘without undue delay’,
45.
‘standard practices’, ‘comparable cost’, ‘hospital care’, ‘major out-patient care’ and ‘minor out-patient care’,
and to ensure maximum uniformity between Member States on prior authorisation requirements and on
the interpretation of the term ‘a medically justifiable time-limit’;

Stresses that cross-border healthcare should be delivered where necessary or in the event of
46.
temporary unacceptable delays in treatment; believes that the responsibility remains with Member States to
ensure the existence of a public health service based on the principle of universal and unrestricted access
that will make large-scale patient mobility unnecessary;

Is concerned that the terms of treatment should not discriminate against low-income patients so

47.
that, for example, they do not have to pay the full cost of treatment before reimbursement;

Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the govern-

48.
ments and parliaments of the Member States.