Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 March 2005 in Case C-467/03: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München in Ikegami Electronics (Europe) GmbH v Oberfinanzdirektion Nürnberg (Common Customs Tariff — Tariff headings — Tariff classification of a digital recording machine — Classification under the Combined Nomenclature)
Date: 2005-05-28
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, common customs tariff, interpretation of the law, tariff nomenclature, video surveillance

C 132/10

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

28.5.2005

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 14 April 2005

in Case C-335/03: Portuguese Republic v Commission of
the European Communities (1)

(EAGGF — Beef premium — Monitoring — Representative-
ness of sampling — Transposition of monitoring results to
the preceding years — Reasons)

(2005/C 132/17)

(Language of the case: Portuguese)

In Case C-335/03 Portuguese Republic (Agent: L. Fernandes,
assisted by C. Botelho Moniz and E. Maia Cadete) v Commis-
sion of the European Communities (Agents: A. Alves Vieira and
L. Visaggio, assisted by N. Castro Marques and F. Costa Leite)
— action for annulment under Article 230 EC, brought on 25
July 2003, — the Court
(Second Chamber), composed of
C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, R. Silva de
Lapuerta (Rapporteur), C. Gulmann, R. Schintgen and J.
Klučka,, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; K. Sztranc,
Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 14 April
2005, in which it:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 239 of 04.10.2003.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 17 March 2005

in Case C-467/03: Reference for a preliminary ruling from
Finanzgericht München in Ikegami Electronics
the

(Europe) GmbH v Oberfinanzdirektion Nürnberg (1)

(Common Customs Tariff — Tariff headings — Tariff classi-
fication of a digital recording machine — Classification
under the Combined Nomenclature)

(2005/C 132/18)

(Language of the case: German)

In Case C-467/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under
Article 234 EC from the Finanzgericht München (Germany),

made by decision of 24 June 2003, received at the Court on 6
November 2003, in the proceedings between Ikegami Electro-
nics (Europe) GmbH and Oberfinanzdirektion Nürnberg — the
Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts (Rapporteur),
President of the Chamber, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues and E. Levits,
Judges; J. Kokott, Advocate General; K. Sztranc, Administrator,
for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 17 March 2005, the
operative part of which is as follows:

for video-surveillance purposes, records signals
A machine which,
from cameras and, after compressing them,
them on
screen, performs a specific function other than data processing within
the meaning of Note 5(E) to Chapter 84 of the Combined Nomencla-
ture of the Common Customs Tariff in Annex I to Council Regulation
(EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical
nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2031/2001 of 6 August 2001.

reproduces

(1) OJ C 21 of 24.01.2004.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 10 March 2005

in Case C-469/03: Reference for a preliminary ruling from
the Tribunale di Bologna Filomeno Mario Miraglia (1)

(Article 54 of the Convention implementing the Schengen
Agreement — Principle ne bis in idem — Scope — Decision
of a Member State's judicial authorities to discontinue prose-
cution by reason solely of the initiation of similar proceedings
in another Member State)

(2005/C 132/19)

(Language of the case: Italian)

In Case C-469/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under
Article 35 EU from the Tribunale di Bologna (Italy), made by
decision of 22 September 2003, received at
the Court on
10 November 2003, in the in the criminal proceedings brought
against Filomeno Mario Miraglia — the Court (Fifth Chamber),
composed of R. Silva de Lapuerta, President of the Chamber, R.
Schintgen (Rapporteur) and P. Kūris, Judges; A. Tizzano, Advo-
cate General; L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator, for the Regis-
trar, gave a judgment on 10 March 2005, the operative part of
which is as follows: