European Parliament resolution on the state of regional integration in the western Balkans
Date: 2005-04-14
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, EU relations, European integration, European neighbourhood policy, International Criminal Tribunal, Kosovo, North Macedonia, Serbia and Montenegro, accession to the European Union, economic situation, judicial cooperation, regional integration, regional security, war crime

9.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 33 E/565

TEXT PROPOSED
BY THE COMMISSION

Thursday 14 April 2005

AMENDMENTS
BY PARLIAMENT

Amendment 25
ARTICLE 22A (new)

Article 22a

Report on the recovery plan

The Commission shall submit a report to the European Parlia-
ment and the Council setting out the conclusions relating to
the application of the recovery plan for the Southern hake and
Norway lobster stocks, including socio-economic data linked to
the plan. This report shall be submitted two years after the
entry into force of this Regulation.

Amendment 26
ANNEX

This annex is deleted.

P6_TA(2005)0131

Regional integration in the western Balkans

European Parliament resolution on the state of regional integration in the western Balkans

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the European Commission's Annual Reports on the Stabilisation and Association

Process (SAP) for South-East Europe,

— having regard to its previous resolutions on south-east European countries and the SAP, in particular

that of 20 November 2003 (1),

— having regard to the historic visit of the Prime Minister of Croatia to Serbia and Montenegro on
15 November 2004, and to the signing of a Joint Declaration on that occasion stressing both coun-
tries' commitment to joining the European Union and their desire to settle outstanding issues, includ-
ing protection of minorities, the return of Serb refugees to Croatia and the whereabouts of Croats who
went missing in the war,

— having regard to its resolution of 17 November 2004 on the European Agency for Reconstruction (2),
and to the oral questions put to the Council (B6-0026/2004) and the Commission (B6-0025/2004),

— having regard to Rule 103(2) of its Rules of Procedure,

A. whereas, in 1999, the EU initiated the Stabilisation and Association Process (SAP) for the countries of
the western Balkans (Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia and Montenegro, and the
Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) as its main contribution to the Stability Pact establishing
strategic frameworks for these countries' relations with the EU and combining new contractual rela-
tionships (Stability and Association Agreements) and an assistance programme (CARDS),

B.

C.

whereas bilateral relations complement a multilateral framework in which to develop regional coop-
eration and good neighbourly relations as pre-conditions for a concrete membership perspective,

whereas the European Council in Thessaloniki in 2003 explicitly recognised the European vocation of
the countries included in the SAP process and their potential as candidates for EU membership,

(1) OJ C 87 E, 07.04.2004, p. 521.
(2) P6_TA(2004)0056.

C 33 E/566

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

9.2.2006

Thursday 14 April 2005

D. whereas progress has been made by the countries in question, but whereas many challenges still lie
ahead before they complete their transition to fully functioning democracies and market economies
and before they are able to sustain a closer relationship with the EU; and whereas, ultimately, while
their European vocation is indisputable, further progress along these lines will depend on the ability of
the individual countries themselves to make marked improvements,

E.

F.

whereas the state union of Serbia and Montenegro, created at the initiative of the EU to promote the
process of democratic and economic reforms and to speed up its integration into the EU, is currently
not meeting expectations, and its parliament has effectively ceased to function as of 3 March 2005,

whereas the establishment of a democratic Kosovo not only for the ethnic majority but for all ethnic
groups living there must be the objective of EU action, and whereas present and future assistance must
be based on such principles; whereas the results of this endeavour are not satisfactory; whereas the
situation in Kosovo and the lack of security for the remaining members of the Serbian and other non-
Albanian communities, particularly after the eruption of ethnic violence in March 2004, is also having
a negative impact on the situation in Serbia,

G. whereas the provisions of UN Security Council resolution 1244 (1999) on the return of Serb and

other refugees to their homes in Kosovo are still not being complied with,

H. whereas the large numbers of internally displaced persons in Serbia and Croatia represent an addi-

tional financial burden for both countries,

I.

J.

K.

L.

whereas the presence of state-like entities and their persisting undefined status contribute to the insta-
bility of the region,

whereas the present institutional framework stemming from the Dayton accords undermines the via-
bility of Bosnia and Herzegovina and represents an obstacle to European integration,

whereas the failure in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia of the referendum of 7 November
2004 has cleared the way for the full implementation of the Ohrid agreement and accelerated the pace
of European integration,

whereas the forthcoming opening of accession negotiations with Croatia once the International Crimi-
nal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) commitments are fulfilled, should be regarded as a
positive signal sent to all the countries in the region as regards their European prospects,

M. whereas the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia has also submitted its membership application

and expects to receive an opinion from the Commission in due course,

1.
Stresses that, in line with the European Security Strategy adopted in December 2003, the western
Balkans constitutes a region of the highest priority for the EU, and that the future of the region is certainly
one of European integration, but that this future depends to a very large extent on the countries in the
region themselves;

2.
Notes that political ownership and knowledge of the technical mechanisms for European integration
are important elements, but that the relevant institutions, in particular elected bodies (in the countries of the
region), need to be strengthened, and recognises that this will require considerable additional financial
resources;

3.
Expresses its serious concern at the economic and social situation in the region; stresses that the
solution to this crucial question is one of the main keys to the stable development of those countries;
calls on governments and the EU to make social and economic development one of the top priorities;

4.
Recalls that, at a summit held in July 2002 between the Heads of State of Bosnia and Herzegovina,
Croatia and Serbia and Montenegro, a joint declaration was agreed on implementing the Dayton agreement,
maintaining the inalterability of borders, promoting the return of refugees, and cooperation on European
integration;

9.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 33 E/567

5. Welcomes the bilateral Agreement on the Protection of Minorities concluded on 15 November 2004
between Croatia and the state union of Serbia and Montenegro indicating the Parties' willingness to recog-
nise national minorities as an asset enriching society;

Thursday 14 April 2005

Bosnia and Herzegovina

6.
Notes that, ten years after the signing of the Dayton agreement, crucial political problems remain
unresolved, the country is deeply divided and political stability is vulnerable; takes the view that new politi-
cal initiatives based on a bottom-up participation of the three peoples living there and living in a sustainable
peace as neighbours are urgently needed; underlines therefore the need for a revision of the Dayton accords;

7.
Draws attention to the priorities which have not yet been met: full cooperation with the ICTY, security
issues, institution-building, infrastructure, energy; welcomes the decision by the EU to take over peace-keep-
ing operations from the SFOR led by NATO, whose mandate expired on 2 December 2004, and in this
regard stresses the enormous importance of the EU's largest military mission so far, which will give the EU
significant visibility in Bosnia; takes note that this will make the EU the main international player in Bosnia,
with not only military instruments at its disposal but also civilian instruments, including aid, trade, and
political dialogue; points out the contradiction inherent in some political forces in Bosnia and Herzegovina,
which openly support European integration but obstruct the indispensable reforms needed for a functioning
state;

8. Welcomes the fact that the EU is ready to assume more responsibilities with regard to the stability of
Bosnia and Herzegovina than in the past; notes that the EU's largest military mission, EUFOR, is a com-
plementary element to the EU Police Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina; stresses, therefore, that the take-
over of the NATO-led peace-keeping operation SFOR in December 2004 is a major opportunity for further
progress ten years after Dayton; takes note of the inclusion of military as well as police components; calls
on the Council to ensure maximum coordination between the multiplicity of actors and to ensure that the
European Parliament is well informed and given specific information on EUFOR;

9. Welcomes the work of the newly instituted Directorate for European Integration in the government of
Bosnia and Herzegovina; recognises the positive developments which have taken place; reiterates the import-
ance for the authorities of further pursuing the reform process and turning their attention to priorities such
as tackling corruption and organised crime, tracking down war criminals still at large and dealing with a
severely depressed economy, the prohibitive costs of keeping the administration functioning and the general
lack of administrative capacity;

Regrets the decision taken by the United States — which came into force in June 2003 — granting
10.
US citizens in Bosnia immunity from prosecution by the International Criminal Court in The Hague, follow-
ing ratification by Bosnia and Herzegovina's Parliament;

11.
Calls on the Bosnian authorities, in particular the government of the Republika Srpska, to cooperate
fully with the ICTY in its pursuit of persons indicted for war crimes and, if this proves to be the case,
supports a future invitation to Bosnia to participate in the Partnership for Peace programme; stresses that
the most serious issue remains the continued impunity of indicted war criminals and the problem with their
extradition, which represents an obstacle to reconciliation and the development of mutual trust between the
peoples; calls on the authorities of Bosnia and Herzegovina at all levels of the administration, civil society,
the Orthodox church, and all other responsible actors, to do their utmost to bring Karadzic and Mladic
before the ICTY; welcomes, in this respect, the recent arrests by the Republika Srpska police of 8 persons on
local war crimes warrants and the decision of the Council to freeze the assets of an increased number of
indicted war criminals;

12.
Is deeply alarmed at the discovery by United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) scientists of
depleted uranium contamination of water and ground samples taken from some parts of Bosnia and Her-
zegovina; expresses its concern at the lack of action in response to UNEP's recommendations that the
polluted areas be decontaminated;

C 33 E/568

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

9.2.2006

Thursday 14 April 2005

13. Welcomes the reconnection of electric generators in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the Former
Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and Serbia and Montenegro to western Europe's UCTE system, which
was interrupted in 1991; believes that the reunification of the Bosnian market, formerly divided into the
Federation and Republika Srpska entities, will boost Bosnia's economic recovery;

14.
Recognises that the Office of the High Representative is still needed in Bosnia and Herzegovina;
demands greater transparency and (European) parliamentary oversight regarding its activities and decisions,
especially in the light of the planned gradual transfer of its activities to Bosnia and Herzegovina's own
authorities; in this context, asks the High Representative to refrain from making too extensive use of the
so-called ‘Bonn Powers’, given that these means of government are an obstacle to the establishment of the
rule of law in Bosnia and Herzegovina;

Urges the Commission to support the country's political forces in finding a consensus to reform the
15.
political framework as set out in the Dayton agreement, in order to establish effectively functioning adminis-
trative structures in Bosnia and Herzegovina;

Serbia and Montenegro

16.
Points out that the next two years will be critical for the state union in Serbia and Montenegro, as
finding a mutually satisfactory solution will be a key factor for the stability of the region as a whole; reiter-
ates that the EU should be ready to assist Serbia and Montenegro to work out a lasting arrangement, while
adopting a neutral stance on which form that relationship should take;

17.
Regrets that there is still a lack of cooperation from Serbia with the ICTY and calls on the authorities
to make further progress with military and police reform, with a special focus on the secret police; wel-
comes the recent surrender to the ICTY of indicted, high-ranking war criminals, and expects the Serb auth-
orities to speed up their cooperation with the ICTY;

Reminds the government of Serbia and Montenegro that respect for fundamental rights and free-
18.
doms, including those of ethnic and national minorities, is one of the Copenhagen criteria, and a prerequi-
site for further involvement in the SAP that might eventually lead to EU membership;

Takes note of the findings of the European Parliament's ad hoc mission to Voyvodina and its report
19.
concerning ethnic and social tension in the province; reminds the Serb authorities of their responsibility to
secure law and order throughout the country and for all inhabitants; recognises the potential of Voyvodina
to become a model for the rest of Serbia in securing peaceful coexistence among all the different ethnic
groups and to fully benefit from EU initiated/assisted regional and trans-border programmes;

Kosovo

Calls on the Commission to expedite and complete work on its feasibility study with a view to
20.
starting negotiations as soon as possible on the conclusion of a stabilisation and association agreement
with the European Union;

Recognises that future decisions taken on the status of Kosovo will have political implications for
21.
Serbia, and therefore invites Belgrade and Pristina to engage in a cooperative dialogue and find a construc-
tive solution for the future of Kosovo;

22. Welcomes the decision of former Kosovo Prime Minister Ramush Haradinaj to resign and surrender
himself to the ICTY; hopes that his voluntary surrender will act as an example for other indicted war
criminals in the region and increase respect for, and the standing of, the ICTY;

Notes the outcome of the recent (23 October 2004) elections, but regrets the low turnout and in
23.
particular the mass boycott by Kosovo's minority Serbs and the fact that this highlights the deep divisions
still plaguing the territory;

Is aware that a review on the implementation of the standards will take place in mid-2005 with a

24.
view to deciding on the possibility of opening discussions on the future status of Kosovo;

9.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 33 E/569

Thursday 14 April 2005

25.
Expects the Council, in particular the High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security
Policy, and the Commission to play their full part, together with the UN, the US, NATO and all other
relevant actors, in preparing the ground for the forthcoming talks on the future of Kosovo; stresses, in
this respect, that all parties must be fully aware of the shared European future of the whole region;

Calls on the Council and the Commission to take the leading role in preparing the negotiations on

26.
final status and to exclude in advance, in order to speed up the process, the following options:

— return to a constitutional relationship with Serbia and Montenegro;

— unification with Albania or any other state or territory in the region;

— partition of Kosovo;

Insists, however, on the need for the authorities in Kosovo to take decisive steps to increase security

27.
for all citizens of Kosovo;

Recognises the importance of the SAP Tracking Mechanism (STM) as a way of supporting Kosovo in

28.
its EU-compatible structural reforms and preparing for Kosovo's future inside the European Union;

29.
Points out that, more than five years after the conflict, the fate of almost 3 500 Kosovars has not
been resolved; calls on the Serbian government to cooperate actively in providing all information concern-
ing the missing persons; likewise calls on the Kosovo authorities to provide all information concerning the
500 Kosovo Serbs still missing;

Calls on the authorities of Kosovo to respect the rights of the Serb community, to facilitate the return
30.
of Serb and other non-Albanian refugees, to comply with UN Security Council Resolution 1244 (1999) and
to tackle organised crime and drug trafficking more vigorously;

Albania

31.
Is concerned that the political climate in Albania is problematic, with tensions within the ruling party
having led to a split within the party; condemns the Albanian government's inability to act effectively;
expects all political parties to take practical steps to improve the political climate;

32.
Stresses the necessity of improving Albania's administrative capacity and the fight against arbitrary
actions by the authorities; recommends that enhanced actions be taken to provide the means needed in the
fight against corruption, organised crime, trafficking in human beings, arms and drugs; and calls for
improvements aimed at achieving an independent and efficient judicial system, especially the development
of a functioning jurisdiction for the administrative sector;

Recognises that, with the role it has to play in the fight against organised crime, Albania is a key

33.
player in the stabilisation of the region;

Is aware that much still has to be done to develop the economic sector (e.g. a quarter of the popu-
34.
lation is living below the poverty line), tackle corruption and increase transparency; draws attention to the
difficult situation in the education sector with regard, in particular, to the urgency of guaranteeing equal
education opportunities for children all over the country;

Calls on the Albanian government and authorities to respect the rights of the ethnic Greek minority,
35.
and points out that progress in the negotiation of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement and Alban-
ia's European future are closely linked to respect for human and minority rights;

Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

36.
Is of the view that the full participation of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia in the
European integration process will be beneficial not only for the country itself but also for the entire region;

C 33 E/570

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

9.2.2006

Thursday 14 April 2005

37. Welcomes the answers of the government of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to the
Commission questionnaire on the political and economic issues and the EU ‘acquis’; expects the Commis-
sion to deliver its opinion on the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia's application for EU membership
as soon as possible; stresses that obtaining candidate status at the December 2005 European Council will
encourage the country to achieve further results in the reform process, and will strengthen stability in the
region;

38. Welcomes the efforts made by the government in the implementation of the decentralisation reforms
as part of the Framework Agreement signed in Ohrid in 2001; welcomes the outcome of the referendum of
November 2004, which demonstrated the support for the European course of the country and creates
conditions for further reforms; points out that the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia's efforts to
decentralise should be adequately backed up by EU support programmes, which should be further ‘decon-
centrated’ to bring in the expertise of national and local authorities;

39.
Regrets that the March 2005 local elections were, according to OSCE monitors, marred by irregular-
ities, and calls on the authorities of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia immediately to take the
necessary measures so as to bring the electoral standards into line with the requirements of the Office for
Democratic Institutions and Human Rights;

40.
Is of the opinion that the failure of the referendum regarding the feasibility of the territorial division
ensures a continuing reconciliation between the two main ethnic groups along the lines of the Ohrid agree-
ment, with a view to making the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia a model of peaceful coexistence
and contributing to the stabilisation of the whole region;

41.
Takes the view that the various EU bodies acting in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
should improve their coordination; is of the opinion, in this regard, that the Commission should play a
pivotal role in the implementation of EU policies in the country;

42.
Takes the view that full support for the ICC is a basic element of cooperation between the EU and
the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia; points out, in this respect, that in view of the Former Yugoslav
Republic of Macedonia's application for membership the so-called ‘exemption treaty’ between the Former
Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and the USA, signed in 2003, should be annulled;

43.
Regrets that, according to the OCSE reports on the local elections, irregularities were observed in a
number of municipalities; calls, therefore, for further efforts to be directed towards strengthening the elec-
tion procedures in the future, particularly at local level;

Croatia

44. Welcomes the decision taken on 18 June 2004 (1) to grant Croatia candidate status;

Takes note of the Council's decision to postpone the opening of accession talks with Croatia due to

45.
the absence of a common agreement about this country's full cooperation with the ICTY;

46. Welcomes,
in this respect, the decision of the Council to adopt the negotiating framework with
Croatia and calls on the Croatian government to do its utmost to prove it is fully cooperating with the
ICTY; takes the view that this is a basic test for all the countries in the region and expresses its full support
for the difficult work carried out by the ICTY;

47.
Calls on Croatia to settle the remaining border disputes through dialogue with Slovenia and to avoid
unilateral acts which intend to prejudice the determination of the Slovenian-Croatian border and affect the
demarcation of the border without consent;

48.
Takes note of the November 2004 visit by Croatian Prime Minister Sanader to Belgrade, the first
such official visit since the collapse of the former Yugoslavia; notes the fact that Prime Minister Sanader and
Serbia and Montenegro President Marovic signed agreements regarding national minorities and on technical
and scientific cooperation, and that they concurred that the future of both Croatia and Serbia and Mon-
tenegro must include European Union membership;

(1) See Council Conclusions, 17-18 June 2004 (10679/2/04 REV 2).

9.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 33 E/571

Calls on the authorities to take significant steps to facilitate the return of refugees and to guarantee

49.
fair and effective domestic trials for war crimes;

Thursday 14 April 2005

Urges the Council and the Commission to send the Monitoring Task Force to Croatia as soon as

50.
possible in order to provide the next Council meeting with reliable results on which to base decisions;

General points

Calls for the international action in the region to be better coordinated; notes that, with numerous
51.
actors playing a role in the region, there is a need for a definition/allocation of competences among them;
draws particular attention to the need for a clear allocation of responsibilities/competences between the
European Agency for Reconstruction and the ‘deconcentrated’ delegations of the European Commission in
the region;

52.
Calls on the Council and the Commission to lay down a clear roadmap and accession strategy for the
western Balkan countries over the next few years and, especially in view of the opening of negotiations with
Croatia, asks that the EU send out an unambiguous message to the other south-east European states;

Points out that the SAP in the western Balkans constitutes an essential framework for the countries'

53.
journey towards the EU;

Points out that the roles of the SAP and the Stabilisation and Association Agreements should be

54.
strengthened and that the EU should provide a clear, step-by-step integration agenda;

55.
Calls on the EU to encourage and support all governments in the region to prepare EU-compatible
provisional National Development Plans similar to the one Turkey has prepared in order to build institu-
tional absorption capacity for future EU assistance, especially in the areas of rural, infrastructure and human
resources development;

56.
Points out that free trade between south-east European countries and the EU market is hampered by
the issue of rules of origin because, in most cases, these countries have not signed the pan-European agree-
ment on rules of origin; calls on the Commission to give top priority to helping these countries conduct
any negotiations and necessary procedures;

Notes that budgetary allocations for relations with the western Balkans have been constantly and
57.
significantly reduced every year since 2002; and is determined to provide adequate funding for the region
in the next financial perspective taking into account the crucial challenges of the region, the gradual shift
from physical reconstruction to institution-building and pre-accession assistance, as well as the region's
strategic importance to the European Union;

58.
Calls on the Council and the Commission, in the light of the need to embrace the whole of society,
in particular opinion-formers, within the process of advancing the region's journey towards the EU, to take
urgent action to strengthen cooperation on border controls as part of a wider justice and home affairs
strategy for the region, which should include a study by the Commission on the effects of a progressive
easing of visa requirements for the countries of the region, its conclusions to be presented by the end of
2005; considers that the study should focus in particular on how to facilitate the movement of students,
NGO representatives, economic actors and representatives of political institutions and business people;

59.
Calls on the authorities in the countries of the region to strengthen their efforts to bring before
domestic courts all those responsible for war crimes, regardless of the ethnicity of the victims and the
perpetrators, and to do this in accordance with internationally recognised fair trial standards, and in coop-
eration with the ICTY;

C 33 E/572

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

9.2.2006

Thursday 14 April 2005

Stresses that the countries of the region can do much to help themselves to achieve further progress

60.
on the road to EU integration by fulfilling the following conditions:

— cooperation with the ICTY;

— implementation of an effective policy in favour of the return of refugees and displaced persons;

— respect for human and minority rights;

— implementation of active policies against corruption, organised crime and trafficking in human beings,

arms and drugs;

— effective economic cooperation;

61. Welcomes the Sofia declaration on a Decade for Roma Inclusion and asks the Commission to sup-
port the efforts of the countries of the region in improving the situation of the Roma population decisively;

62.
Notes that the key objectives of EU policy should include a systematic and progressive transfer of
responsibilities regarding the implementation and management of EU assistance, increasing the role of local
and national authorities and a steadily increasing engagement of civil society and democratic forces, as and
when the countries in question have the capacity to do so;

Asks the Commission to now include the countries' institutions directly in the Financial Management

63.
System of EU Assistance as envisaged in the CARDS programme;

Calls on all the countries in the region to work together on the coordination of regional infrastruc-

64.
ture, as development in this sector is essential if the region is to integrate economically;

Regrets that the return of refugees and internally displaced persons in the region has still to be fully

65.
implemented;

Continues to be seriously concerned about the exodus of youth and the brain drain in the region and

66.
about the not-unrelated levels of poverty and unemployment;

67.
Notes that minefields in the Balkans are still a major obstacle to the development and integration of
the regions of south-eastern Europe and that, although much work has been successfully undertaken in the
past years, the EU's Mine Action activities in countries of the region need to continue in order for the
Ottawa Convention's objective of declaring mine-safe areas by 2010 to be achieved;

68.
Is of the opinion that the development of, and support for, a genuine civil society is an indispensable
factor which is bound to strengthen democratic institutions and pave the way for a full reconciliation
between the parties;

69.
Calls on the Commission to make further efforts to assist the countries of the region in having their
multi-ethnic heritage fully reflected in their education systems, and to ensure that they can take part in
European Union educational exchange programmes;

70.
Urges the Commission to come up with a concrete project on the creation of areas of facilitated
freedom of movement between neighbouring regions, which will thus enhance the development of cross-
border and regional cooperation;

71.
Urges the Commission to promote and support the setting-up of twinning programmes at municipal
level and to support all actions facilitating networking among the various actors in the EU and SAP coun-
tries;

72.
Proposes that the EU, acting in cooperation with the UN, play a decisive role in creating the platform
for immediate talks between all relevant political stakeholders on the status of Kosovo, and looks forward to
a productive outcome to these discussions;

9.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 33 E/573

Thursday 14 April 2005

73.

Urges western Balkan states to adopt and implement the EU Code of Conduct on arms exports;

74.
Calls on the Commission and the Agency for Reconstruction to further encourage and support a
broad-based truth and reconciliation process, complementary to the judicial processes, which should involve
civil society, political actors and cultural figures, and lay the ground for lasting peace and stability in the
region; considers that this reconciliation process must, in particular, target young people and should include
a thorough review of school books and curricula for history studies;

*

*

*

75.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments
and parliaments of the Member States and candidate countries, all the governments and parliaments in the
region, the EU Special Coordinator of the Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe, the EU Special Represen-
tatives in the region, the UN Special Representative in Kosovo (UNMIK), the OSCE and the Council of
Europe.

P6_TA(2005)0132

Common Foreign and Security Policy (2003)

European Parliament resolution on the annual report from the Council to the European Parliament
on the main aspects and basic choices of CFSP, including the financial implications for the general
budget of the European Communities — 2003 (8412/2004 — 2004/2172(INI))

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, signed in Rome on 29 October

2004,

— having regard to the European Security Strategy adopted by the European Council on 12 December

2003,

— having regard to the 2003 Annual Report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main
aspects and basic choices of CFSP, including the financial implications for the general budget of the
European Communities (8412/2004),

— having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament,
the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary pro-
cedure (1), point 40,

— having regard to Article 21 of the EU Treaty,

— having regard to its resolution of 12 January 2005 on the Treaty establishing a Constitution for

Europe (2),

— having regard to its resolution of 23 October 2003 on the progress achieved in the implementation of

the common foreign and security policy (3),

— having regard to its resolution of 29 January 2004 on the relations between the European Union and

the United Nations (4),

— having regard to its resolution of 20 November 2003 on ‘Wider Europe — Neighbourhood: A New

Framework for Relations with our Eastern and Southern Neighbours’ (5),

— having regard to its resolution of 10 April 2003 on the new European security and defence architec-

ture — priorities and deficiencies (6),

(1) OJ C 172, 18.6.1999, p. 1.
(2) P6_TA(2005)0004.
(3) OJ C 82 E, 1.4.2004, p. 599.
(4) OJ C 96 E, 21.4.2004, p. 79.
(5) OJ C 87 E, 7.4.2004, p. 506.
(6) OJ C 64 E, 12.3.2004, p. 599.