European Parliament resolution on the draft Commission decision amending for the purposes of adapting to the technical progress the Annex to Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (CMT-2005-151 and CMT-2005-642)
Date: 2005-04-12
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: European Commission, European Parliament, comitology, dangerous substance, electrical equipment, electronic equipment, interinstitutional relations (EU), powers of the institutions (EU), product safety

9.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 33 E/157

Tuesday 12 April 2005

P6_TA(2005)0090

Hazardous substances

European Parliament resolution on the draft Commission decision amending for the purposes of
adapting to the technical progress the Annex to Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament
and of the Council on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and
electronic equipment (CMT-2005-151 and CMT-2005-642)

The European Parliament,

— having regard to Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January
2003 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equip-
ment (1),

— having regard to the draft Commission decision amending for the purposes of adapting to the technical
progress the Annex to Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of
27 January 2003 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and elec-
tronic equipment (CMT-2005-151 and CMT-2005-642),

— having regard to the opinion delivered on 16 March 2005 by the committee referred to in Article 7 of

Directive 2002/95/EC,

— having regard to Article 8 of Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the pro-
cedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (2), and the Agreement
between the European Parliament and the Commission on procedures for implementing Council Deci-
sion 1999/468/EC (3),

— having regard to Article 95(3) of the EC Treaty,

— having regard to Rule 81 of its Rules of Procedure,

A. whereas Article 4(1) of Directive 2002/95/EC restricts the use of lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent
chromium, polybrominated biphenyls (PBB) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) in new elec-
trical and electronic equipment put on the market from 1 July 2006 unless exempted under the Annex,

B. whereas, on 10 December 2004, the committee established under Article 7 of Directive 2002/95/EC
voted in favour of a draft Commission Decision to amend the Annex to Directive 2002/95/EC in order
to add new exemptions and modify existing ones,

C. whereas Article 7(3) of Decision 1999/468/EC and point 1 of the Agreement provide that the European
Parliament ‘is to receive, at the same time as the members of the committees and on the same terms,
the draft agendas for committee meetings, the draft implementing measures submitted to the commit-
tees… and the results of voting and summary records of the meetings and lists of the authorities to
which the persons designated by Member States to represent them belong’,

D. whereas Parliament received the draft decision by virtue of its right of scrutiny pursuant to Decision

1999/468/EC only on 28 January 2005 and only upon request,

E. whereas, by that date, Parliament had received almost none of the documents that it should have
received in relation to the meetings of the committee for the adaptation to scientific and technical
progress of EC legislation on waste in the course of 2004,

F. whereas the committee responsible in Parliament raised the Commission's non-compliance with Deci-
sion 1999/468/EC and the Agreement with the Commission on 3 February 2005; whereas the Com-
mission undertook to start a new comitology procedure and to submit all the missing documents on
16 February 2005,

(1) OJ L 37, 13.2.2003, p. 19.
(2) OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23.
(3) OJ L 256,10.10.2000, p. 19.

C 33 E/158

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

9.2.2006

Tuesday 12 April 2005

G. whereas Parliament received a new draft decision on 25 February 2005,

H. whereas Article 5(1) of Directive 2002/95/EC allows for amendments necessary to adapt the Annex to

scientific and technical progress,

I. whereas safer alternatives to the hazardous substances covered by Article 4(1) of Directive 2002/95/EC

are available or being developed for applications that currently benefit from an exemption,

J. whereas Article 5(1)(b) of Directive 2002/95/EC provides for ‘exempting materials and components of
electrical and electronic equipment from Article 4(1) if their elimination or substitution via design
changes or materials and components which do not require any of the materials or substances referred
to therein is technically or scientifically impracticable, or where the negative environmental, health
and/or consumer safety impacts caused by substitution are likely to outweigh the environmental, health
and/or consumer safety benefits thereof’,

K. whereas Article 5(1)(b) of Directive 2002/95/EC lays down the only criteria that can be taken into

consideration with a view to preparing a draft decision for additional exemptions,

L. whereas the Commission asserts in recital 2 of its draft decision that the ‘use of these hazardous

substances in those specific materials and components is still unavoidable’,

M. whereas, pursuant to Article 5(2) of Directive 2002/95/EC, the Commission shall

inter alia consult
stakeholders before amending the Annex and ‘shall provide an account of the information it receives’,

N. whereas scrutiny of the stakeholder consultation revealed the following problems:

— the burden of proof concerning the validity or non-validity of the requested exemptions was put

on the stakeholders and not on the applicant,

— the requests for exemptions have not been made publicly available, which jeopardises Parliament's
ability to exercise effective scrutiny, in particular to assess whether the statement in recital 2 of the
draft decision is justified,

— cost considerations were included in the stakeholder consultation, although Directive 2002/95/EC
does not include cost considerations; whereas the undue consultation about costs raises doubts
about the basis of the draft decision,

O. whereas scrutiny of the report commissioned by the Commission to assess the validity of the requests

revealed the following problems:

— costs are explicitly considered a criterion for granting exemptions, which runs counter to the
provisions of Directive 2002/95/EC; whereas the undue consideration about costs calls into ques-
tion the validity of the report,

— the major difference between expiry dates providing a clear signal to economic operators and a
general review clause which is open by nature is not understood; whereas a general review clause
cannot be considered to be equal to clear expiry dates,

— information about currently available substitutes does not fully reflect the actual situation; whereas
this calls into question the validity of the report for assessing the criteria of Article 5(1)(b),

P. whereas scrutiny of the draft decision in light of the limited information available from the stakeholder
consultation and the report commissioned by the Commission revealed the following problems,
in
particular with the annex thereto:

— exemptions have been provided where substitutes are available (points 7 (second indent), 10, 12, 13

and 14), contrary to Article 5(1)(b),

— one exemption was extended without any stakeholder consultation (point 8, cadmium in electrical

contacts), contrary to Article 5(2),

9.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 33 E/159

Tuesday 12 April 2005

— the expiry date for point 7 (second indent) of 2010 was removed with no justification,
— no other expiry dates were set by the decision — not even on point 7 (third indent), contrary to

the clear mandate in point 10 of the Annex to Directive 2002/95/EC,

— expiry dates suggested on a number of items by the applicants themselves have not been included

(points 10, 11, 13 and 14),

— some exemptions have been given a broader scope than requested and/or justified (points 10 and

12), contrary to Article 5(1)(b),

— exemptions have been provided on the basis of unsubstantiated or unquantified technical dis-

cussions (points 7 (second indent), 10 and 14), contrary to Article 5(1)(b),

— the erroneous numbering of point 10 of the Annex was reintroduced, although the Commission
had undertaken to rectify it following a misleading interpretation of the Directive due to this num-
bering (point 15),

Q. whereas Article 8 of Decision 1999/468/EC lays down Parliament's right to adopt a resolution to indi-
cate that the draft implementing measures ‘would exceed the implementing powers provided for in the
basic instruments’,

1.
Considers, on the basis of the limited information available, that the Commission has not acted in
accordance with Article 5(1), 5(1)(b) and 5(2) of Directive 2002/95/EC and has therefore exceeded the
implementing powers provided for in that Directive;

2.
Calls on the Commission to re-examine its draft decision amending for the purposes of adapting to
the technical progress the Annex to Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment in the
light of this resolution, and to ensure that any amendment to the Annex fully respects the provisions of that
Directive;

3.
Confirms that subsequent scrutiny of other comitology files has revealed that the Commission's non-
compliance with Decision 1999/468/EC and the Agreement in terms of the procedural provisions is not an
isolated case;

4.
Calls on the Commission to make a detailed assessment of all cases of non-compliance with Decision
1999/468/EC and the Agreement since the modification of the procedures at the end of 2003, specifying
the act and the exact form of non-compliance, and to forward the full assessment to Parliament within three
months;

Calls on the Commission to respect Parliament's right to information and scrutiny pursuant to Deci-

5.
sion 1999/468/EC and the Agreement;

Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and Commission, and the parliaments

6.
and governments of the Member States.

P6_TA(2005)0091

Procedural rights in criminal proceedings *

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council framework decision on
certain procedural rights in criminal proceedings throughout the European Union (COM(2004)
0328 — C6-0071/2004 — 2004/0113(CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the Commission proposal (COM(2004)0328) (1),

— having regard to Article 31(1)(c) of the EU Treaty,

(1) Not yet published in OJ.