Resolution of the European Parliament containing the comments accompanying the decision on the discharge to the Director of the European Training Foundation in respect of the implementation of its budget for the financial year 2003
Date: 2005-04-12
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: European Training Foundation, budgetary discharge, financial year, implementation of the budget

L 196/114

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

27.7.2005

RESOLUTION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

containing the comments accompanying the decision on the discharge to the Director of the
European Training Foundation in respect of the implementation of its budget for the financial
year 2003

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

— having regard to the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Training

Foundation for the 2003 financial year together with the Foundation’s replies (1),

— having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 8 March 2005 (6853/2005 — C6-0072/2005),

— having regard to the EC Treaty, and in particular Article 276 thereof,

— having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial
Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (2) and in particular Article
185 thereof, and to Council Regulation (EC) No 1648/2003 of 18 June 2003 amending Regulation
(EEC) No 1360/90 establishing a European Training Foundation (3) and in particular Article 11 thereof,

— having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the
framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation
(EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the
European Communities (4) and, in particular, Article 94 thereof,

— having regard to Rules 70 and 71 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,

— having regard to the Report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A6-0074/2005),

A.

B.

Whereas the European Court of Auditors (ECA) stated, in its abovementioned specific report, that it
obtained reasonable assurance that the annual accounts for the financial year ended 31 December
2003 were reliable and that the underlying transactions, taken as a whole, were legal and regular.

Whereas on 21 April 2004 the European Parliament gave discharge (5) to the Director of the
European Training Foundation (the Foundation) in respect of the implementation of its budget for
the 2002 financial year and in the resolution accompanying the discharge decision, the European
Parliament, inter alia:

— noted progress made by the Foundation in reducing carry-overs and invited it to consider the

possibility of using differentiated appropriations so as to further reduce carry-overs,

— noted the Foundation’s efforts to comply with internal control standards,

— welcomed the solution found as regards the payment by the Commission of the Community

subsidy in instalments so as to avoid the re-emergence of cash-flow problems,

— called for an appropriate solution to be found in cooperation with the Commission as regards the
presentation in the Foundation’s accounts of Community funds related to external programmes
and managed by the Foundation,

(1) OJ C 324, 30.12.2004, p. 68.
(2) OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.
(3) OJ L 245, 29.9.2003, p. 22.
(4) OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72.
(5) OJ L 330, 4.11.2004, p. 46.

27.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 196/115

1.

Notes the following figures for the accounts of the European Training Foundation for the financial
years 2003 and 2002:

Revenue and expenditure account for the financial years 2003 and 2002 (1)

Revenue

Community subsidies

Other donors

Miscellaneous revenue

Financial revenue

Expenditure

Staff — Title I of the budget

Payments

Appropriations carried over

Administration — Title II of the budget

Payments

Appropriations carried over

Operating activities — Title III of the budget

Payments

Appropriations carried over

Earmarked revenues

Payments

Appropriations carried over

(in EUR 1 000)

2003

2002

18 100

13 179

523

17

—

—

23

140

Total revenue (a)

18 640

13 342

10 771

10 153

329

1 076

310

3 396

1 087

237

286

215

805

559

2 307

2 591

—

—

16 631

– 3 289

4 055

424

– 3 352

6

Total expenditure (b)

17 492

Outturn for the financial year (a – b)

Balance carried over from the previous financial year

Appropriations carried over and cancelled

Reimbursements to the Commission

Exchange rate differences

1 148

– 2 155

375

– 703

17

Balance for the financial year

– 1 318

– 2 155

(1) The revenue and expenditure account and balance sheet only take account of the Foundation’s specific activities: they do not

include programmes managed on behalf of the Commission.

Source: Foundation data. This table summarises the date supplied by the Foundation in its own accounts.

2.

Notes that the ECA repeated its observation as regards the correct presentation in the Foundation’s
accounts of Community funds relating to Community’s external programmes that the Foundation
managed (Tempus programme); also notes the Foundation’s reply to the Court’s observation; expects
to be fully informed by the Foundation as to the solution to be applied,
in agreement with the
Commission, concerning the way in which such funds are reflected in the Foundation’s accounts for
2004 on the occasion of the presentation of the relevant Annual Activity Report;

L 196/116

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

27.7.2005

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

Notes also the Court’s finding that due to payment delays of the Community subsidy by the
Commission the temporary cash flow problem had to be remedied by an urgent transfer from
Tempus funds; reiterates its call on the Foundation and the Commission to take all necessary
steps so that such problems do not happen again;

Notes the Foundation’s efforts to remedy problems related to procedures for selecting candidates;
expects it to continue its efforts so that the necessary transparency is consolidated;

Welcomes the results of the cooperation between the Foundation and the European Centre for the
Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop); expects such cooperation to be strengthened and
further developed through the sharing of information and with a view to enhancing the dissemi-
nation of good practice;

Regrets the absence of an equality plan and expects the Foundation to develop a plan shortly in order
to become an equal opportunities employer; expects the Foundation not only to consider equality
issues at the stage of recruitment but also to work proactively and on a long-term basis to promote
gender equality;

Welcomes the Foundation’s communication strategy commitment to informing the general public
through debates and other means of communication;

General points addressed to the Commission and the Agencies

8.

9.

Recalls its position that while it supported the Commission’s efforts to establish a limited number of
models, at least for future ‘regulatory’ agencies, it took the view that the structure of current and
future agencies merited in-depth consideration at interinstitutional level; also stresses that before the
Commission defines the framework conditions for the use of regulatory agencies an Interinstitutional
Agreement should spell out common guidelines; this should happen before setting up a harmonised
framework for the structure of the agencies;

Notes the Commission’s position (1) with regard to delegating responsibility for the execution of tasks
to bodies, including agencies, other than the Commission’s core administration; takes the view that
this does not answer Parliament’s call for in-depth consideration at interinstitutional
level of the
structure of existing agencies; therefore invites the Commission to provide clarification on this point
and on the future overall Interinstitutional Agreement related to the new arrangements to be set up
within or in parallel with the Financial Perspective (2);

10.

Invites the Commission to organise and perform in the medium term, e.g. on a standard three-year
cycle, a cross-cutting analysis of the evaluations carried out on individual Agencies in order to:

(a) reach conclusions with regard to the coherence of Agency activity with EU policies in general and
as regards the synergies existing or to be developed between the agencies and Commission
departments and the avoidance of overlapping between them;

(b) make an assessment of the broader European added value of the Agencies’ outputs in their
the Agency

the relevance, efficiency and effectiveness of

respective area of activity and of
model in implementing or contributing to EU policies;

(c) determine and enhance the impact of the Agencies’ actions in terms of the proximity, accessibility

and visibility of the EU to its citizens;

(1) As set out in Annex 1 to the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament
the enlarged Union 2007-2013’,

‘Building our common future, policy challenges and budgetary means of
(COM(2004) 0101, p. 38).

(2) See Annex to the Commission’s report on the follow-up to 2002 Discharges (COM(2004) 0648, p. 108).

27.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 196/117

11.

12.

Expects such an overall analysis to be available by the end of 2005 so as to cover the three-year
period from the time of the introduction of the new Financial Regulation and the consequent new
framework in the Agencies’ system;

Invites the Agencies to participate actively in such a process and to cooperate with the Commission,
providing the necessary input on matters that they feel are of substance to their functioning, role,
remit and needs, as well as on any matter which could help to improve the whole discharge
procedure, with a view to contributing to the success of such a process and increasing the account-
ability and transparency of the Agencies; invites Agencies to present such input also to its competent
committees;

13.

Calls on the Commission, in parallel with this exercise, to present by the end of 2005 at the latest,
proposals for changes to be made in the existing Agencies’ Constituent Acts with a view, inter alia, to
optimising its relationship with the Agencies; such proposals should aim at:

(a)

increasing communication between the Commission and the Agencies;

(b) establishing or expanding cooperation in defining needs to be covered and objectives, outputs to
be produced and the strategy to achieve them, and in setting standards for monitoring and
evaluation;

(c) enhancing complementary action, better organising the necessary resources and their effective
allocation to produce results, and devising a communication strategy for dissemination of those
results;

14.

Emphasises that, before any decision is taken to propose the creation of a new agency,
the
Commission must undertake a strict evaluation of the need and added value of the function of
this agency, bearing in mind existing structures, the principles of subsidiarity, budgetary austerity and
the simplification of procedures;

15.

Expects the Commission to present swiftly the guidelines concerning staff policy of the Agencies that
the 2005 budgetary
Parliament had requested the Commission to present before the end of
procedure;

General points addressed to the Agencies

16.

17.

18.

Expects to receive from now on, from each of the Agencies, the report summarising information
on the audits carried out by the Internal Auditor, the recommendations made and the action
taken on these recommendations in accordance with Article 72(5) of Regulation (EC, Euratom)
No 2343/2002;

Invites the Agencies to make further efforts to apply correctly the staff regulations and rules
applicable to other civil servants with regard to their staff (recruitment procedures and relevant
decisions taken, personal
files, calculation of remuneration and other entitlements, promotions
policy, percentage of vacant posts, quotas for respecting gender equality, etc.);

Notes that, in general, the respective percentage of male and female employees in the overall staff
composition of the Agencies shows that an imbalance between men and women exists; regrets that
men make up about one third of staff and are over-represented in high grade positions while women
are generally over-represented in low grade positions; expects the Agencies to take immediate and
effective measures to correct this situation;

L 196/118

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

27.7.2005

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

Calls on the Agencies to ensure that all the relevant provisions of Directive 2002/73/EC of the
European Parliament and of
the Council of 23 September 2002 amending Council Directive
76/207/EEC on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as
regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions (1) are
introduced in their respective staff policies;

Expects the Agencies, in response to the relevant observations of the ECA, to comply fully with the
budgetary principles as set out in the Financial Regulation, in particular those of unity and budgetary
accuracy; calls on the Agencies that have not yet done so to fulfil the Financial Regulation’s
requirements on accounting matters and to strengthen further their procedures as regards internal
management and control with the aim of increasing accountability, transparency and European added
value;

Encourages the Agencies, especially those whose activities have points in common with the activities
or missions of other Agencies, to strengthen their cooperation, thus opening up opportunities for
developing synergies; invites them to formalise, where appropriate, such cooperation through specific
agreements (joint declarations, memoranda of understanding, decisions on joint planning and
actions/programmes presenting complementary characteristics) so as to ensure that there is no
duplication of work, that each Agency’s output is clearly identified and that the result of joint
efforts maximises the added value and the impact of their work; expects to be informed regularly
on this issue;

Calls on the Agencies to pay special attention to procedures for the award and management of
contracts; invites them to take all appropriate measures as regards their administrative structures in
order to strengthen their internal control procedures, channels and management; takes the view that
such measures may include, where necessary or feasible, the setting-up of specialised units entrusted
with the task of advising, on the basis of risk analysis, on how best to prepare contract award
procedures, to ensure monitoring and to carry out follow-up, as required; on this matter, calls on the
Commission and the ECA to strengthen cooperation with the Agencies;

Notes the difficulties to which some Directors, in particular of the ‘newly created’ Agencies, referred
with regard to the Agencies’ compliance with the calendar and deadlines for reporting as set in the
Financial Regulation; invites the Agencies’ Directors, in the perspective of the forthcoming review of
the Financial Regulation to be held in 2005, to inform its Committees on Budgets and Budgetary
Control of the difficulties encountered so far so that these may be considered in the framework of the
review; expects the Directors to make specific proposals for alternative arrangements as to deadlines
that may best suit their functioning requirements while respecting the reporting obligations of the
Agencies as provided for in the Financial Regulation;

24.

Notes the positive response by the Agencies’ Directors to the call by Parliament’s committee
responsible for preparing discharge for the establishment of a more precise system of communi-
cation, in particular as regards the transmission by the Agencies to that committee of documents
relating to the Agencies’ reporting obligations; takes the view that better organisation of such
communication will strengthen its cooperation with the Agencies and enhance democratic control;

25.

Invites the Directors of the Agencies from now on to accompany their annual activity report, which
is presented together with financial and management information, with a declaration of assurance
concerning the legality and regularity of operations, similar to the declarations signed by the
Directors-General of the Commission;

(1) OJ L 269, 5.10.2002, p. 15.

27.7.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 196/119

26.

Invites the Agencies to develop a comprehensive strategy of communication addressing the need to
make available, in the appropriate form, the results of their work to the general public beyond the
presentation of such results to the Institutions, Member States’ competent services, specialists,
partners or specific beneficiaries; calls on the Agencies,
in view of the development of such a
to intensify their cooperation and exchange information on best practice aimed at
strategy,
achieving this goal; expects its competent committees to be duly informed by the Agencies, before
the next discharge exercise, on the progress made in devising such a strategy in order to ensure the
effective and timely monitoring of their activities;

General points addressed to the ECA and the Agencies
27. Welcomes the ECA’s initiative to add a table to its specific reports on the Agencies presenting
summary information on the competences, governance, resources available and products/output of
the particular agency; takes the view that this enhances the clarity and transparency of the work of
these Community bodies, while providing a useful basis for comparison, where appropriate, with a
view to helping set up the harmonised framework for the Agencies that Parliament has called for;

28.

29.

Invites the ECA and the Agencies to strengthen their cooperation in order to enhance the procedures
and technical tools to improve the sound management of all the budgetary and finance issues, with
the view to establishing a methodology that prepares the ground for a positive budget discharge from
the start of the process; expects to be informed regularly of the progress made and the implemen-
tation of best practices;

Calls on the ECA and the Agencies to enhance transparency in the procédure contradictoire prior to the
ECA’s final report, so as to avoid any contradiction or ambiguity which could jeopardise the cred-
ibility of the whole exercise;
invites the ECA and the Commission to propose a
feasible way of updating information on the improvements made and/or the problems found, from
the time when the ECA’s preparatory report is first discussed until the time of the decision as to
in order to offer the most accurate picture of the situation of the
whether to grant discharge,
Agencies.

in this respect,