European Parliament resolution on the Non-Proliferation Treaty 2005 Review Conference — Nuclear arms in North Korea and Iran
Date: 2005-03-10
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: EU relations, Iran, North Korea, common foreign and security policy, international security, nuclear non-proliferation, revision of an agreement

15.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320 E/253

Thursday 10 March 2005

9. Wishes to see egg cell donation, like organ donation generally, strictly regulated in order to protect
both donors and recipients and to tackle all forms of human exploitation;

Stresses that any woman forced to sell any part of her body, including reproductive cells, becomes

10.
prey to organised crime networks that traffic in people and organs;

11. Welcomes the United Nations General Assembly resolution of 8 March 2005 (A/59/516/Add. 1),
which refers explicitly to the need to prevent the exploitation of women, and asks the Commission accord-
ingly to rule out support and funding for human cloning under any EU programme;

Calls on the Commission to ascertain whether such cases also occur in Member States, candidate

12.
countries or third countries;

Calls on the Member States to take measures to prevent the exploitation of women in the application

13.
of life science;

14. Welcomes the decision of the Sixth Committee of the United Nations of 18 February 2005, and asks
the Commission accordingly to exclude human cloning from funding under the 7th Research Framework
Programme;

Asks the Commission to apply the subsidiarity principle in connection with other forms of embryo
15.
research and embryonic stem cell research so that Member States in which this kind of research is legal fund
it from their national budgets; considers that EU funding should concentrate on alternatives like somatic
stem cell and umbilical cord stem cell research, which are accepted in all Member States and have already
led to successful treatment of patients;

Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Presidency of the European Union, the Coun-

16.
cil, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.

P6_TA(2005)0075

Review of the Non-Proliferation Treaty — Nuclear arms in North Korea and Iran

European Parliament resolution on the Non-Proliferation Treaty 2005 Review Conference —
Nuclear arms in North Korea and Iran

The European Parliament,

— having regard to Rule 103(4) of its Rules of Procedure,

A.

B.

taking into account and reiterating its previous resolutions on nuclear disarmament, and in particular
its resolution of 26 February 2004 (1) on the Preparatory Committee meeting for the Non-Proliferation
Treaty Review Conference in 2005,

underlining that the European Security Strategy and the EU's Strategy against the proliferation of
weapons of mass destruction (WMD), as adopted by the enlarged EU, emphasise the importance of
nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament,

C.

recognising that all the Member States are States Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of
Nuclear Weapons (NPT) and that two Member States are nuclear-weapon states as defined in the NPT,

(1) OJ C 98 E, 23.4.2004, p. 152.

C 320 E/254

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

15.12.2005

Thursday 10 March 2005

D.

recalling the statement in the report of the High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change, set up
by the UN Secretary-General, that ‘we are approaching a point at which the erosion of the non-prolife-
ration regime could become irreversible and result in a cascade of proliferation’,

Reaffirms its position that the NPT is of vital importance to the prevention of the proliferation of

1.
nuclear weapons and to nuclear disarmament;

2.
Recalls that the EU's and the NPT's ultimate objective is the complete elimination of nuclear weapons,
and expects both declared and undeclared nuclear-weapon states to engage actively with this issue and to
make further progress towards reducing and eliminating nuclear weapons;

Calls on the EU and its Member States — in a spirit of ‘effective multilateralism’ and solidarity and in
3.
pursuit of the EU Strategy against the proliferation of WMD — to form a common front at the NPT Review
Conference in 2005 and make a positive contribution to the discussions; urges that their statements attach
special importance to new initiatives on nuclear disarmament and the revitalisation of the UN Conference
on Disarmament;

Calls on the Council and the Member States to add further substance to their common statement that
4.
NPT ‘must be preserved’ and — in support of the EU's Common Position on the Universalisation and
Reinforcement of Multilateral Agreements in the Field of Non-Proliferation of WMD and their Means of
Delivery — to make a statement on the EU's Common Position and Strategy at the NPT Review Conference;

5.
Calls on the Council and the Member States to work towards the effective implementation of point
15.3 of the section entitled ‘Article VI and preambular paragraphs 8 to 12’ of the Final Document of the
2000 NPT Review Conference in order to achieve a treaty effectively banning the production of all weapons
making use of fissile materials;

6.
Calls on the EU to work with its international partners, including NATO, to develop and promote the
principles to prevent terrorists, or those that harbour them, from gaining access to weapons and materials
of mass destruction; asks the States Parties to fulfil their commitments made in UN Security Council Resol-
ution 1540 (2004) on non-state actors and proliferation of nuclear weapons;

Calls on the Council and the Commission to set up a programme aimed at preventing the proliferation

7.
of nuclear materials, technology and knowledge in the world;

8.
Calls on all states, and nuclear-weapon states in particular, not to provide assistance or encourage
states which may seek to acquire nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices, in particular those
states which are not parties to the NPT;

9.
Stresses its strong belief that nuclear disarmament activity will contribute significantly to international
security and strategic stability and also reduce the risk of thefts of plutonium or highly enriched uranium by
terrorists; urges the EU to support the new international initiative on new nuclear dangers, as proposed by
UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan and Mohammed El Baradei, Director General of the International Atomic
Energy Agency (IAEA), which points to the need to secure nuclear disarmament by both declared and
undeclared nuclear weapon states;

10.
Urges the EU to work hard for the adoption of the Model Nuclear Weapons Convention that has
already been deposited at the UN and which could provide a framework of steps within a legally binding
disarmament process;

11.
Calls on the Luxembourg Presidency and the Council to provide further substance by outlining how
they aim to achieve their common objective in the EU's WMD Strategy to ‘foster the role of the UN Security
Council, and enhance expertise in meeting the challenge of proliferation’, and, specifically, how the States
Parties to the NPT might retain the unique verification and inspection experience of the UN Monitoring,
Verification and Inspection Commission, for example by means of a roster of experts;

15.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320 E/255

Thursday 10 March 2005

Calls on the Council and the Commission to come forward with a proposal to persuade third states

12.
and the Member States which have not yet done so to sign and ratify the IAEA Additional Protocols;

Calls on the Council and the Member States to clarify and step up their commitment to releasing

13.
financial resources to support specific projects conducted by multilateral institutions, such as the IAEA;

14.
Calls on the EU to propose, at the NPT Review Conference in 2005, that the appropriate subsidiary
body on nuclear disarmament be established by the UN Commission on Disarmament without further
delay;

15.
Calls on the EU to develop the necessary coordination mechanisms (the EU's WMD Monitoring Unit
in liaison with the EU Situation Centre) to ensure that intelligence is used to build solidarity and confidence
between the Member States on WMD policy;

16.
Stresses the importance and urgency of signature and ratification, without delay, without conditions
and in accordance with institutional processes of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), to
ensure its earliest possible entry into force; calls on the Council and the Commission to insist on this in
the dialogue with those partner states which have not yet ratified the CTBT and/or the NPT;

17.
Reiterates its call for the USA to stop the development of new generations of battlefield nuclear
weapons (bunkerbusters) and to sign and ratify the CTBT; also calls on the USA to clarify the situation as
regards the quantity and strategic objectives of its tactical nuclear arsenals stationed on European bases;

18.

Calls on Israel, India and Pakistan to become States Parties to the NPT;

19. Welcomes the appeal, signed by 25 Nobel Prize Winners, calling on the governments of the United
States, Russia, China, France, the United Kingdom, India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea, to support and
implement steps to lower the operational status of their nuclear weapon systems in order to reduce the risk
of nuclear catastrophe; supports the proposal made by the EU's High Representative for the Common Fore-
ign and Security Policy (CFSP) for the establishment of a ‘nuclear-free zone’ in the Middle East, and calls for
an effort to be made to this end;

Renews its support for the international mayors' campaign — initiated by the Mayors of Hiroshima
20.
and Nagasaki — on nuclear disarmament, and recommends that the international community carefully
consider the campaign's ‘Project Vision 2020’, urging a scheduled programme of elimination of all nuclear
weapons;

21. Welcomes the inclusion of Non-Proliferation of WMD clauses in the latest EU agreements with third
countries and actions plans; points out that such measures must be implemented by all the EU partner
countries without exception;

22.
Stresses that the prevention of any threat to the security of any country requires a commitment by
the international community; emphasises the need for stronger regional and multilateral security structures
in the Middle East, the Indian subcontinent and North-East Asia in order to reduce the pressure towards
nuclear proliferation and to achieve the abandonment of nuclear programmes;

Calls for all political and diplomatic avenues to be explored in order to secure a peaceful settlement

23.
to the conflicts linked to nuclear proliferation;

Iran

24.
Notes with concern that Hassan Rowhani, Secretary of the Iranian Supreme National Security Coun-
cil, reiterated on 27 February 2005 that Tehran would not give up its ‘right under the NPT to enrich
uranium’, and calls on the Iranian authorities to stop making confusing and contradictory statements;

C 320 E/256

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

15.12.2005

Thursday 10 March 2005

25.
Takes note that, on 27 February 2005, Russia and Iran signed a nuclear fuel supply agreement
paving the way for Iran to start up its first atomic reactor in Bushehr next year and obliging Tehran to
repatriate all spent nuclear fuel to Russia;

26.
Calls on the Council to open an initiative with the Government of the Russian Federation to obtain
guarantees that its recent agreement with Iran on the delivery of nuclear material is solely intended for
civilian use and to ensure support for EU diplomatic efforts; counts on the IAEA to monitor closely the
fuel transfers between Russia and Iran;

27. Welcomes IAEA Director General Mohammed El Baradei's declaration at the end of January 2005 as
to the progress made by the agency's nuclear safeguard inspectors over the last 15 months in understanding
the nature and scope of Iran's nuclear programme;

28.
Reaffirms its full support for the Paris agreement of 15 November 2004, in which Iran made the
commitment to suspend its uranium enrichment programme, and to the EU-3 approach of dialogue with
the Iranian authorities in order to ensure a peaceful and diplomatic solution to the nuclear issues concern-
ing that country; calls for objective guarantees from the Iranian Government as to the non-military nature
of its nuclear programme;

29.
Calls on Iran to reaffirm its commitment to the NPT and to make permanent its decision to suspend
uranium enrichment, thus providing lasting confidence in the peaceful nature of Iran's intentions and paving
the way for a cooperative partnership between the EU and Iran; insists that negotiations on a Trade and
Cooperation Agreement should be linked to a satisfactory conclusion to the nuclear issue and the establish-
ment of reassuring verification measures;

Calls on the Council and the Commission to enter into negotiations with the Iranian authorities on

30.
the transfer of technology and know-how, as well as on financial support for renewable energy;

Calls on the Iranian Parliament to conclude the parliamentary ratification of the Additional Protocol

31.
to the NPT;

32.
Calls on the US Government to fully support the EU diplomatic approach to resolving this problem,
considers this question essential to a renewed transatlantic agenda and welcomes the recent US statement on
this matter, as well as earlier assertions that it would not engage in preventive military action against Iran;

North Korea

33.
Is deeply concerned that North Korea declared on 10 February 2005 that it possesses nuclear
weapons and suspended its participation in the six-party talks on its nuclear programme for an indefinite
period of time;

Notes North Korea's statement that its ‘end objective is a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula’ and urges it
34.
to abide by its obligations under the NPT, and urges its government and the other parties involved to take
concrete steps in negotiations and adopt a constructive approach;

35.
Urges North Korea to rejoin the NPT, to revoke its decision to withdraw from the six-party talks and
to allow the resumption of negotiations in order to find a peaceful solution to the crisis in the Korean
peninsula;

36.
Urges both North Korea and the US to enable a speedy resolution of the current crisis, initially by
the US offering to recommence the supply of heavy fuel oil in exchange for the verified freezing of the
Yongbyon plant, to avoid further deterioration of the current situation;

37.
Urges the Council to consider once again paying EUR 4 million of the costs of suspension of the
Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organisation to South Korea, taking into account the fact that this
initiative played a significant role in the recent past, and recognising that it could well serve to supply
conventional energy in the future;

15.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320 E/257

Thursday 10 March 2005

Believes that the EU should support renewed efforts to enable North Korea to renounce the further

38.
use of nuclear energy in exchange for guaranteed energy supplies;

39.
Calls on the Council and the Commission to offer financial support for heavy fuel oil supplies to
remedy North Korea's primary energy needs, and asks the Commission and the Council to make the necess-
ary approaches regarding EU participation in future six-party talks while at the same time making it clear
that ‘No Say, No Pay’ is a principle which the EU will follow in its dealings with the Korean Peninsula;

Is aware that central to the ongoing crisis are the claims that North Korea has a full fledged highly
40.
enriched uranium programme and has supplied uranium to Libya; considering, however, that neither of
these claims has been substantiated, asks for a public hearing in the European Parliament to evaluate the
claims;

*

*

*

Calls on both the Council and the Commission to present a progress report to Parliament on the

41.
outcome of the 2005 NPT Review Conference in due time;

42.

Recommends that an official Parliament delegation attend the NPT Review Conference;

Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Presidency in office of the Council, the
43.
Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the UN Secretary-Gen-
eral, the governments and parliaments of Iran and North Korea, all States Parties to the NPT and the IAEA.

P6_TA(2005)0076

Situation in Lebanon

European Parliament resolution on the situation in Lebanon

The European Parliament,

— having regard to its resolution of 16 January 2003 on the conclusion of an Association Agreement

with the Republic of Lebanon (1),

— having regard to its previous resolutions on the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership, particularly that of

23 February 2005 (2),

— having regard to United Nations Security Council Resolution 1559 of 2 September 2004 on Lebanon,

— having regard to the statement on Lebanon of 15 February 2005 by the President of the United Nations

Security Council,

— having regard to the Council's conclusions of 21 February 2005 on the Middle East Peace Process,

— having regard to its resolution of 20 November 2003 on ‘Wider Europe — Neighbourhood: A New

Framework for Relations with our Eastern and Southern Neighbours’ (3),

— having regard to its resolution of 12 February 2004 on reinvigorating EU actions on human rights and

democratisation with Mediterranean partners (4),

— having regard to Rule 103(4) of its Rules of Procedure,

(1) OJ C 38 E, 12.2.2004, p. 307.
(2) Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2005)0046.
(3) OJ C 87 E, 7.4.2004, p. 506.
(4) OJ C 97 E, 22.4.2004, p. 656.