European Parliament resolution on Belarus
Date: 2005-03-10
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: Belarus, EU relations, economic sanctions, freedom of expression, freedom of the press, human rights, international sanctions, political situation, political violence

C 320 E/276

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

15.12.2005

Thursday 10 March 2005

26.
Calls on the Commission to establish quotas for the West Balkan countries without delay, and based
on duly confirmed historical data, in a way which ensures that these quotas will not overrun the net balance
of domestic production and consumption, and, consequently, will not allow them to re-export sugar to the
EU;

27.
Calls on the Commission to improve the control systems put in place to verify whether the rules of
origin are respected, especially since increased access to the European market through the EBA scheme may
create price differences which could incite fraudulent practices;

28.
Calls on the Commission to urgently propose proper flanking measures to assist ACP countries
depending heavily on sugar exports to the EU in increasing their competitiveness and enhancing their
capacity to diversify their economic base;

Calls on the Commission to ensure that the current reform is built into the European Union's posi-
29.
tion in the WTO negotiations so that future multilateral commitments do not require further reform, which
would result in producers having to pay twice;

Urges the Commission to take into consideration the impact of the reform in particular in Brazil,
30.
where sugar production and processing is controlled by a small number of individuals, to the detriment of
the many who work in the sugar fields and factories; considers that the EU has a moral responsibility to
ensure that its reforms do not facilitate the unsustainable latifundary method of sugar production as prac-
tised in Brazil;

31.
Calls on the Commission to negotiate coupling of the reform of the European common organisation
of the market in sugar to similar reforms of the sugar market organisation in other countries, predomi-
nantly the United States of America;

Calls on the Commission to do its utmost to reach international agreements within the WTO frame-

32.
work on the control of sugar production and sugar prices;

Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Parliaments of

33.
the EU Member States and the Governments and Parliaments of the ACP and LDC countries.

*

*

*

P6_TA(2005)0080

Belarus

The European Parliament,

European Parliament resolution on Belarus

— having regard to its previous resolutions on the situation in Belarus, in particular that of 16 September
2004 (1) and that of 28 October 2004 on the political situation in Belarus after the parliamentary
elections and referendum of 17 October 2004 (2),

— having regard to Opinion No 314/2004 on the referendum of 17 October 2004 in Belarus, adopted by

the Council of Europe's Venice Commission at its 60th Plenary Session on 8/9 October 2004,

— having regard to the final conclusions of the International Election Observation Mission of the OSCE

Parliamentary Assembly of 9 December 2004,

— having regard to the resolutions by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on the situ-
ation in Belarus and, in particular, to its Resolution 1372 (2004) of 28 April 2004 on the persecution
of the press in the Republic of Belarus,

(1) Texts Adopted of that date, P6_TA(2004)0011.
(2) Texts Adopted of that date, P6_TA(2004)0045.

15.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320 E/277

Thursday 10 March 2005

— having regard to the declaration of the Head of the OSCE Office in Minsk of September 2004 on the
prison sentences passed on two members of the Belarus opposition accused of defaming the President
of Belarus,

— having regard, in particular, to the ‘EU action plan for promoting democracy in Belarus’ adopted by the

European Parliament's Delegation for relations with Belarus on 23 February 2005,

— having regard, in particular, to its resolution of 11 February 2003 on relations between the European

Union and Belarus: towards a future partnership (1),

— having regard to its Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought, which was awarded to the Belarusian

Association of Journalists in December 2004,

— having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 12 May 2004 on the European Neigh-

bourhood Policy (COM(2004)0373),

— having regard to the resolution on the situation of human rights in Belarus adopted by the UN Com-

mission on Human Rights on 15 April 2004,

— having regard to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and in particular to Articles 19

and 21 which guarantee the right to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly,

— having regard to the EU sanctions adopted on 2 July 2004 against Belarusian officials following the

disappearance of three Belarusian opposition leaders and one journalist,

— having regard to Rule 115(5) of its Rules of Procedure,

A. whereas the Parliamentary Troika concluded that neither the parliamentary nor the presidential elec-
tions of 2000 and 2001 were free and fair and that they were preceded by arbitrary action by the
government against the political opposition, independent media and election-observing organisations,
which constituted serious disrespect for democratic principles,

B. whereas, instead of improving, the situation in Belarus continues to deteriorate, which has led to a
situation where human rights and the rights of minorities are blatantly violated, the Lower House is
deprived of its legislative rights, and economic life is controlled by the President; whereas these viol-
ations include imprisonment of members of the democratic opposition and other forms of repression
against them, the de-registration of political parties in the run-up to the elections, harassment and
intimidation of opposition candidates and the banning of representatives of opposition parties at pol-
ling stations,

C. whereas the EU has repeatedly condemned the arrest of prominent opposition leaders by the Luk-
ashenko government and whereas no progress has been made in the unsolved cases of a number of
disappeared persons,

D. whereas Mikhail Marynich, ex-Minister for Foreign Economic Relations, former Ambassador and presi-
dential candidate in the mid-2001 elections, was sentenced to five years' imprisonment, which, on
18 February 2005, was reduced to three years and six months,

E. whereas over the past few years several political parties and more than 50 pro-democracy NGOs of
different levels and different political persuasions, 25 independent mass media entities and several edu-
cational establishments have been closed down for ‘technical’ reasons, but whereas it was clear that in
every case these organisations were being punished for criticising the President and his policy,

F. whereas politically motivated arrests and trials of activists belonging to the democratic movement and
independent journalists and deportations of foreign citizens are continually taking place in Belarus;
whereas in September 2004 two members of the Belarus opposition, Valery Levonevsky and Alexander
Vasilyev, were sentenced to two years in prison on a charge of defaming the President of Belarus,

G. whereas the ongoing peaceful protests by small shopkeepers have been met with intimidation by the

government and the organisers of these strikes have been detained and fined,

(1) OJ C 43 E, 19.2.2004, p. 60.

C 320 E/278

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

15.12.2005

Thursday 10 March 2005

H. whereas the resolution of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe of 28 May 2004
acknowledged evidence of involvement of top State officials in the abduction and alleged assassination
of leading opposition figures in 1999, and whereas in May 2004 the Council of Europe rejected an
application from Belarus to renew its special status with the organisation, which had been suspended
when President Lukashenko dissolved Parliament in 1997,

I.

extremely concerned at the decision of the Belarusian authorities to revoke the licence to operate as a
legal entity of
the internationally recognised European Humanities University in Minsk, which is
a remarkable example of academic freedom and the pursuit of true European values in teaching and
research programmes, with dire consequences for the academic future of hundreds of students and
teachers,

J. whereas in April 2004 the UN Commission on Human Rights criticised Belarus on account of con-
tinued reports of arbitrary arrest and detention and for harassing non-governmental organisations and
opposition political parties and those engaged in democratic activities,

1.
Strongly condemns the systematic and increasing harassment and intimidation carried out by State
officials, in particular the Ministry of Information, against journalists, editors and media outlets that are
critical of the President of the Republic or the Government of Belarus; equally condemns indiscriminate
attacks against members of the opposition, human rights activists and any person who attempts freely to
voice criticism of the President and the regime, as manifested through arbitrary arrests, ill-treatment of
detainees, disappearances, politically motivated persecution and other acts of repression that flout the basic
principles of democracy and the rule of law;

2.
Believes that the trial of Mr Marynich was politically motivated and that the conviction was a politi-
cally motivated abuse of the judicial system which is further evidence of the lack of judicial independence in
Belarus, betraying a general lack of respect for the rule of law and an overall climate of political repression;

3.

Calls on the Belarus authorities to release Mikhail Marynich immediately and unconditionally;

Calls on the Belarus authorities to release immediately Valery Levonevsky, Alexander Vasilyev and all

4.
other imprisoned political opponents of the regime;

5.
Reiterates its call for the immediate release of Professor Bandazhevsky, a medical academic specialising
in nuclear medicine who was sentenced to eight years' imprisonment on 18 June 2001 for his open criti-
cism of the State authorities related to scientific research into the Chernobyl nuclear reactor disaster of
1986;

6.
Calls for an independent investigation to be opened under a neutral investigator regarding the case of
the disappearance of Yuri Zakharenko, the former Minister of the Interior, Victor Gonchar, former Vice-
President of the Parliament of Belarus, Anatoly Krasovsky, a businessman, and Dmitry Zavadski, a camera-
man for the Russian TV channel ORT;

Calls on the Belarus authorities to allow peaceful protests by small shopkeepers, and to release from

7.
prison the organisers and leaders of these protests;

Regards President Lukashenko's extension of his presidential term by referendum as a further confirm-

8.
ation of the authoritarian way in which he rules the country;

9.
Points out that Belarus is the only European country without contractual relations with the EU due to
massive human rights violations and calls on the Council to condemn the current Belarus regime as a
dictatorship and President Lukashenko as a dictator;

10.
Calls on the Council and the Governments of the Member States to identify and freeze the personal
assets of President Lukashenko and those other senior members of the regime who ensure the continuation
of the dictatorship;

15.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320 E/279

Thursday 10 March 2005

11.
Calls on the Council and the Governments of the Member States to add further names to the list of
representatives of the Belarusian authorities subject to the visa ban, so as to prevent them from entering the
territory of the EU Member States;

12.
Notes that all relevant rules of the UN Convention relating to the Status of Refugees which apply to
political refugees and of European agreements on the granting of asylum are also applicable to the victims
of the Lukashenko regime;

Calls on Belarus to bring the actions of its police and security forces into conformity with its obli-

13.
gations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;

14.
Calls on the Belarus authorities to immediately cease the harassment of all educational institutions in
the country and to respect the basic principles of academic freedom, teaching autonomy and tolerance in
education;

15.
Calls for the creation of a special educational programme to grant scholarships, especially for stu-
dents from the European Humanities University (EHU) in Minsk, who would like to study in the European
Union, and financial support for academic institutions which are prepared to host these students, and calls
for the creation of an ad hoc procedure to allow the transferability of credits earned by students at the EHU;

16.
Stresses that a policy of sanctions against Belarus will target only the authorities of that country and
will not in any way affect Belarusian society, as proposed in the ‘EU action plan for promoting democracy in
Belarus’ recently adopted by the European Parliament's Delegation for relations with Belarus;

Supports the strengthening of civil society in Belarus and welcomes the decision of the Commission

17.
to finance projects in Belarus under the European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR);

18.
Points out that no diplomatic and political efforts should be spared to bring Belarus back to the
European family, thereby enabling it to play the important role which it should in the development of the
European Neighbourhood Policy;

Emphasises once again that the further development of EU relations with Belarus will continue to

19.
depend on the progress made towards democratisation and reform in the country;

Urges the Commission, the Council and the governments of the Member States to draw up an action
20.
plan for further ways to increase support — together with other democratic countries and international
institutes — for all remaining democratic forces in Belarus and to assist more effectively those people in
Belarus civil society working for democratic changes in Belarus;

21.
Supports the creation of alternative and accessible information sources such as TV and radio stations
in the neighbouring countries (Poland and/or Lithuania) with a view to overcoming the isolation of Belarus
and reaching as many of its people as possible;

22.
Is disappointed by the silence of the Commission following last week's EU-Russian Troika concerning
any discussions that may have taken place about the human rights situation in Belarus, particularly the
issues of political disappearances and the ruthless suppression of freedom of speech, this being particularly
deplorable as the Troika was supposed to consider ‘democracy and human rights in the common neigh-
bourhood of the EU and Russia’;

23.
Calls on the EU institutions to insist that human rights issues should be a standing item on the
agenda of all future EU-Russia meetings, and believes that the situation in Belarus should also feature on
the agenda of all regular consultations between the EU and Russia;

24.
Calls on the Council and the Member States to hold an independent investigation into the political
disappearances in Belarus, and to set up a fund to help the families of the disappeared persons and other
victims of the Belarus regime;

25.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Governments
and Parliaments of the Member States, the Government and Parliament of Belarus and the Parliamentary
Assemblies of the OSCE and the Council of Europe.