Order of the Court of First Instance of 9 September 2004 in Case T-14/04 Alto da Casablanca SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Representation by a lawyer — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2005-01-22
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), trade-mark law, wine

C 19/24

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

22.1.2005

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 9 September 2004

in Case T-14/04 Alto da Casablanca SA v Office for
Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and
Designs) (OHIM) (1)

(Community trade mark — Representation by a lawyer —
Manifest inadmissibility)

(2005/C 19/52)

(Language of the case: English)

In Case T-14/04, Alto da Casablanca SA, established in Casa-
blanca (Chile), represented by A. Pluckrose, against Office for
Harmonisation in the Internal Market
(Trade Marks and
Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: O. Montalto), the other party to the
proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM being
Bodegas Julián Chivite, SL, established in Cintruénigo (Spain) –
application for annulment of the decision of the Second Board
of Appeal of OHIM of 4 November 2003 (Case R 18/2003-2)
concerning an application for registration of the word mark
VERAMONTE as a Community trade mark – the Court of First
Instance (Fifth Chamber) composed of P. Lindh, President, R.
Garcia-Valdecasas and J.D. Cooke, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar,
made an order on 9 September 2004, the operative part of
which is as follows:

(1) The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible;

(2) Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 71 of 20.3.2004.

the European Union
Mercer, barrister, against Council of
(Agents:
J. Monteiro and F. Florindo Gijón), supported by
Commission of the European Communities (Agents: T. van Rijn
and B. Doherty, with an address for service in Luxembourg)
and by Kingdom of Spain (Agents: N. Díaz Abad and E. Braque-
hais Conesa, with an address for service in Luxembourg) –
application for partial suspension of Council Regulation (EC)
No 1954/2003 of 4 November 2003 on the management of
the fishing effort relating to certain Community fishing areas
and resources and modifying Regulation (EC) No 2847/93 and
repealing Regulations (EC) No 685/95 and (EC) No 2027/95
(OJ 2003 L 289, p. 1), in so far as it adversely affects Azorean
in particular, Articles 3, 5(1), 11, 13(b) and 15
waters and,
thereof and the Annex thereto, and/or any other interim
measures deemed to be appropriate – the President of the
Court of First Instance made an order on 7 July 2004, the
operative part of which is as follows:

(1) Porto de Abrigo, Organização de Produtores da Pesca CRL and
GÊ-Questa, Associação de Defesa do Ambiente are granted leave
to intervene in support of the forms of order sought by the appli-
cant;

(2) The application of WWF–World Wide Fund for Nature and Seas

at Risk for leave to intervene is dismissed;

(3) The application for interim measures is dismissed;

(4) Costs are reserved.

Action brought on 24 August 2004 by Bitburger Brauerei
Th. Simon GmbH against the Office for Harmonisation in
the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST
INSTANCE

of 7 July 2004

(Case T-350/04)

(2005/C 19/54)

in Case T-37/04 R Região autónoma dos Açores v Council
of the European Union

(Language in which the application was submitted: German)

(Proceedings for interim relief — Fisheries — Council Regu-
lation (EC) No 1954/2003 — Application for partial suspen-
sion and other interim measures — Admissibility — Urgency
— Intervention)

(2005/C 19/53)

(Language of the case: English)

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
Market (Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the
Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 24
August 2004 by Bitburger Brauerei Th. Simon GmbH, of
represented by Michaela Huth-Dierig,
Bitburg (Germany),
lawyer. Anheuser-Busch,
Inc., of St Louis (United States of
America), was also a party to the proceedings before the Board
of Appeal.

In Case T-37/04 R, Região autónoma dos Açores, represented
by M. Renouf, S. Crosby and C. Bryant, solicitors, and H.

The applicant claims that the Court should: