Recommendation for a Council opinion in accordance with the third paragraph of Art. 5 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 of 7 July 1997 On the updated stability programme of Luxembourg, 2004-2007
Date: 2005-01-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Luxembourg, budget policy, economic policy, gross domestic product, public finance, stability pact, stability programme













EUR-Lex - 52005SC0013 - EN






Important legal notice




|



52005SC0013

Recommendation for a Council opinion in accordance with the third paragraph of Art. 5 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 of 7 July 1997 On the updated stability programme of Luxembourg, 2004-2007  /* SEC/2005/0013 final */  








Brussels, 11.1.2005SEC(2005) 13 finalRecommendation for aCOUNCIL OPINIONin accordance with the third paragraph of Art. 5 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 of 7 July 1997 On the updated stability programme of Luxembourg, 2004-2007(presented by the Commission)EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUMCouncil Regulation (EC) No. 1466/97 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies[1] stipulates that participating Member States, that is, those which have adopted the single currency, had to submit stability programmes to the Council and the Commission by 1 March 1999. In accordance with Article 5 of this Regulation, the Council had to examine each stability programme based on assessments prepared by the Commission and the Committee set up by Article 114 of the Treaty (the Economic and Financial Committee). On the basis of a recommendation from the Commission and after having consulted the Economic and Financial Committee, the Council delivered an opinion, following its examination of the programme. According to the Regulation, Member States need to submit annual updates of their stability programmes, which may also be examined by the Council in accordance with these same procedures.Luxembourg’s first stability programme covering the period 1998-2002, was submitted on 16 February 1999 and assessed by the Council on 15 March 1999[2]. Updates have been presented every subsequent year, the most recent having been submitted on 30 November 2004. The Commission services have carried out a technical evaluation of this update, taking into account their own autumn 2004 economic forecasts, and having regard to the code of conduct[3], the commonly agreed methodology for the estimation of potential output and cyclically-adjusted balances, the recommendations in the broad economic policy guidelines for the period 2003-2005 and the principles laid down in the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament of 27 November 2002 on strengthening the coordination of budgetary policies and endorsed by the Council[4]. Their evaluation is as follows:-  The 2004 update of Luxembourg’s stability programme, covering the period 2004-2007, was submitted on 30 November 2004 after its approval by the government on 26 November. It partly complies with the data requirements of the “code of conduct on the content and format of stability and convergence programmes” because some compulsory data are missing.-  The macroeconomic scenario presented in the update projects real GDP growth to slow from 4.4% in 2004 to 3.8% in 2005 and 3.3% in 2006 before reaccelerating to 4.3% in 2007. This scenario is plausible: for the period 2004-2006, it is reasonably close to the autumn 2004 forecasts by the Commission services. For the whole period, the real growth rates projected by the programme are consistent with the Commission services’ estimates of potential growth.-  The general government balance having gone from a 0.8% -of-GDP surplus in 2003 to an estimated 1.4%-of-GDP deficit in 2004, the programme aims to reduce the deficit to 1.0% in 2005 and to stabilise it at about the same level in 2006 and 2007. It thus does not envisage a continuation of the reduction in the deficit after 2005 but positively contrasts with the 2003 update, which was based on a significantly less optimistic growth outlook than that of 2004 and anticipated that the general government deficit would widen from 0.6% of GDP in 2003 to around 2% in the remainder of the programme period.-  On the basis of calculations by the Commission services using the commonly agreed methodology, the cyclically-adjusted balance in the 2004 update is expected to post rising surpluses (from a deficit of less than 1% of GDP in 2003) for the rest of the period, reaching 2% of GDP in 2007. However, this dramatic improvement in the cyclically-adjusted balance seems to stem mostly from the unusual margin of uncertainty surrounding estimates of potential growth for Luxembourg rather than to reflect a genuine structural adjustment effort.-  Developments in the general government balance as presented in the programme are significantly better than those projected in the Commission’s autumn 2004 forecasts. This is because the latter were finalised before the 2005 budget was released and, consequently were based on a “no policy change” assumption and on the spending and revenues trends observed in previous years.-  The risks to the budgetary targets of the programme are balanced. On the one hand, revenue estimates in Luxembourg are known to be cautious. On the other hand, however, the programme envisages a slowdown in expenditure growth, which has been very rapid in recent years, but without detailing the measures that should help achieve this. On balance, therefore, the objectives presented in the programme are plausible but hardly ambitious: they should not be difficult to achieve, provided that the authorities stick to their announced intention to rein in the rise in expenditure. In view of this risk assessment, the budgetary stance of the programme as expressed by the evolution of the cyclically-adjusted balance is sufficient to achieve the medium-term objective in the Stability and Growth Pact of a budgetary position close to balance within the programme period (from 2005 onwards). But in nominal terms, the programme does not envisage a continuation of the reduction in the headline deficit after 2005 and contains no commitment to move closer, at least in nominal terms, to a balanced position before the end of the period covered, since the headline deficit remains at around 1% of GDP. However, from 2005 onwards, the budgetary stance in the programme seems to provide a sufficient safety margin within which normal cyclical fluctuations can occur without breaching the 3%-of-GDP deficit threshold.-  The update estimates that the general government debt ratio will decrease from 5.3% of GDP in 2003 to 5.0% in 2004. About half of this debt comes from central government and the other half from local authorities, the debt of the social security institutions being negligible. The debt ratio is forecast to decline somewhat over the time horizon covered by the update, from 5.0% of GDP in 2004 to 4.5% of GDP in 2007. The total net asset position is even more favourable due to the substantial financial assets, estimated at about 50% of GDP, accumulated over past years with fiscal surpluses.-  The programme refers to the measures recently taken in order to rein in the rise in health expenditure, especially the rise in contributions decided in November 2004. It announces additional measures aiming at moderating health expenditure which were incorporated into a bill passed by Parliament in December 2004. The programme also mentions the burden on the pension system that will arise in the coming years from the massive growth in employment in Luxembourg in the last two decades which increasingly comprises non-resident workers . While it does not yet include specific measures to tackle this problem, it announces that this issue will be debated in the course of 2005.-  Due to its very low level of government debt and the considerable reserves that have been accumulated for more than two decades by the social security sector, Luxembourg appears to be in a favourable position with regard to the long-term sustainability of public finances, despite important projected budgetary costs of an ageing population. However, according to a tentative assessment made by the Commission services, on current expenditure projections, the budgetary strategy outlined in the programme would result in a “tax gap” of close to 2% of GDP which would need to be closed in order to fully ensure sustainability. The country has experienced about 20 years of exceptionally strong employment growth, which will progressively translate into a commensurate increase in the number of pensioners. The reserves could significantly contribute to easing the budgetary pressures of this situation and this policy of building up reserves should be continued, along with the adoption of measures aiming at raising the currently low employment rate of residents, especially older ones.Comparison of key macroeconomic and budgetary projections2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 |Real GDP (% change) | SP Nov 2004 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 3.3 | 4.3 |COM | 4.0 | 3.5 | 3.6 | n.a. |SP Nov 2003 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.8 | n.a. |HICP inflation (%) | SP Nov 2004 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 1.5 | 1.7 |COM | 3.0 | 2.3 | 1.6 | n.a. |SP Nov 2003 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.2 | n.a. |General government balance (% of GDP) | SP Nov 2004 | -1.4 | -1.0 | -0.9 | -1.0 |COM2 | -0.8 | -1.6 | -2.0 | n.a. |SP Nov 2003 | -1.8 | -2.3 | -1.5 | n.a. |Primary balance (% of GDP) | SP Nov 2004 | -1.2 | -0.9 | -0.8 | -0.9 |COM2 | -0.6 | -1.4 | -1.8 | n.a. |SP Nov 2003 | -1.6 | -2.1 | -1.5 | n.a. |Cyclically-adjusted balance (% of GDP) | SP Nov 20041 | -0.7 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 2.0 |COM2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.7 | n.a. |SP Nov 20031 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 2.2 | n.a. |Government gross debt (% of GDP) | SP Nov 2004 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 4.6 | 4.5 |COM2 | 4.9 | 4.8 | 4.7 | n.a. |SP Nov 2003 | 5.2 | 5.0 | 4.4 | n.a. |1 Commission services calculations on the basis of the information in the programme 2 Finalised before the presentation of the 2005 budget Sources: Stability programme (SP); Commission services autumn 2004 economic forecasts (COM); Commission services calculations |On the basis of this assessment, the Commission has adopted the attached recommendation for a Council Opinion on the updated stability programme of Luxembourg and is forwarding it to the Council.Recommendation for aCOUNCIL OPINIONin accordance with the third paragraph of Art. 5 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 of 7 July 1997 On the updated stability programme of Luxembourg, 2004-2007THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 of 7 July 1997 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies, and in particular Article 5(3) thereof,Having regard to the recommendation of the Commission,After consulting the Economic and Financial Committee,HAS DELIVERED THIS OPINION:On [18 January] 2005 the Council examined the updated stability programme of Luxembourg, which covers the period 2004 to 2007. The update partly complies with the data requirements of the revised “code of conduct on the content and format of stability and convergence programmes”. In particular, some required data on the macroeconomic assumptions are missing.The update estimates real GDP growth at 4.4% in 2004, from 2.9% in 2003. In 2005 and 2006, growth is projected to decelerate to 3.8% and 3.3% respectively, before reaccelerating to 4.3% in 2007. On the basis of currently available information, this scenario seems to reflect plausible growth assumptions.The budgetary strategy underlying the update aims to slightly reduce the deficit to 1.0% of GDP in 2005 from the 1.4% of GDP estimated for 2004. In 2006 and 2007, the deficit would remain at the 2005 level with both revenues and expenditure projected to remain constant as a percentage of GDP. In cyclically-adjusted terms, the Commission services’ calculations according to the commonly agreed methodology project that a surplus, amounting to 0.3% of GDP, will emerge in 2005 and gradually rise to 2.0% of GDP in 2007, reflecting an estimated widening negative output gap. However, the estimates of output gaps and hence of cyclically-adjusted balances present unusually large margins of uncertainty in the case of Luxembourg, due to the very specific features of its economy, which calls for a very prudent use of such indicators. Over the time horizon covered, the ratio of public investment to GDP would remain broadly constant, at about 5% of GDP, which is well above the EU average.The risks to the budgetary projections in the programme appear broadly balanced. On the one hand, revenue projections in Luxembourg are traditionally cautious, and the 2004 budgetary outcome might be significantly better than currently estimated, which might perhaps entail a favourable base effect for the remaining years of the programme. On the other hand, the programme projects a slowdown in the rise in public spending, which has been particularly rapid in recent years, without detailing the measures that should help achieve this. The budgetary stance in the programme seems to provide a sufficient safety margin against breaching the 3% of GDP deficit threshold with normal cyclical fluctuations. It also seems sufficient to achieve the Stability and Growth Pact’s medium-term objective of a position close to balance within the programme period (from 2005) in cyclically-adjusted terms.The debt ratio is extremely low and is even forecast to decline somewhat over the time horizon covered by the update, from 5.0% of GDP in 2004 to 4.5% of GDP in 2007. The total net asset position is even more favourable due to the substantial financial assets, estimated at about 50% of GDP, accumulated over past years through fiscal surpluses.Luxembourg appears to be in a favourable position with regard to the long-term sustainability of its public finances. The large net positive asset position can be expected to offset at least in part the future costs of ageing. However, the ratio between contributors to and beneficiaries of the pension system will deteriorate, even under a favourable scenario whereby employment growth keeps up with the exceptional rates recorded in the last two decades. Therefore, some restraint is called for in order to ensure that government spending remains in line with revenue and that the policy of accumulating reserves can be maintained, together with the adoption of measures aiming at raising the currently low employment rate of residents, especially older onesKey projections from the updated stability programme of Luxembourg2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 |Real GDP growth (%) HICP inflation (%) General government balance (% of GDP) Primary balance (% of GDP) Cyclically-adjusted balance (% of GDP)1 Government gross debt (% of GDP) | 2.9 2.5 +0.8 +1.0 +1.4 5.3 | 4.4 2.6 -1.4 -1.2 -0.7 5.0 | 3.8 3.2 -1.0 -0.9 +0.3 5.0 | 3.3 1.5 -0.9 -0.8 +1.4 4.6 | 4.3 1.7 -1.0 -0.9 +2.0 4.5 |1 Commission services calculations applying the commonly agreed methodology to the information in the programme |[1] OJ L 209, 2.8.1997. All the documents referred to in this text can be found at the following website: http://europa.eu.int/comm/economy_finance/about/activities/sgp/main_en.htm.[2] OJ C 124, 5.5.1999.[3] Revised Opinion of the Economic and Financial Committee on the content and format of stability and convergence programmes, endorsed by the ECOFIN Council on 10.7.2001.[4] COM(2002) 668 final, 27.11.2002.