Order of the Court of First Instance of 15 June 2004 in Case T-21/03: S v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Action for annulment — Occupational illness — Recognition of illness as occupational in origin — Request for removal of certain documents from the file held by the medical committee — Refusal — Act adversely affecting an official — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2004-10-09
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment (EU), data protection, occupational disease, personal data, report

C 251/16

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

9.10.2004

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 15 June 2004

in Case T-21/03: S v Commission of the European Commu-
nities (1)

(Officials — Action for annulment — Occupational illness
— Recognition of
in origin —
Request for removal of certain documents from the file held
by the medical committee — Refusal — Act adversely
affecting an official — Manifest inadmissibility)

illness as occupational

(2004/C 251/28)

(Language of the case: French)

residing in Thessaloniki

In Case T-21/03: S, a former official of the Commission of the
European Communities,
(Greece),
represented by A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers, v
Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J. Currall
and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, with an address for service in
Luxembourg) — action for annulment of the Commission's
decision of 11 March 2002 refusing to remove certain docu-
ments from the file held by the medical committee called upon
to consider the applicant's request to have the illness from
which she is suffering recognised as occupational in origin —
the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of P.
Lindh, President, J. D. Cooke and D. Šváby, Judges; H. Jung,
Registrar, made an order on 15 June 2004, the operative part
of which is as follows:

(1) The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

(2) Each of the parties is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ No C 83 of 5.4.2003.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 5 July 2004

in Case T-39/03 DaimlerChrysler AG v Office for Harmo-
nisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
(OHIM) (1)

(Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of
opposition — No need to adjudicate)

(2004/C 251/29)

(Language of the case: German)

lished in Munich (Germany), represented by S. Lüft, lawyer —
action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of
Appeal of OHIM of 4 November 2002 (Case R 329/2001-4) —
the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of: J.
Pirrung, President, N. J. Forwood and I. Pelikánová, Judges; H.
Jung, Registrar, made an order on 5 July 2004, the operative
part of which is as follows:

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action;

2. The applicant shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 101 of 26.4.2003.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 2 July 2004

in Case T-256/03: Bundesverband der Nahrungsmittel- und
Speiseresteverwertung eV and Josef Kloh v Commission
of the European Communities (1)

(Action for annulment — Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 —
Decision 2003/328/EC — Use of catering waste in feed for
pigs — Inadmissible)

(2004/C 251/30)

(Language of the case: German)

In Case T-256/03: Bundesverband der Nahrungsmittel- und
Speiseresteverwertung eV, established in Bochum (Germany),
Josef Kloh, residing in Eichenried (Germany), represented by R.
Steiling and S. von Zimmermann-Wienhues,
lawyers, v
Commission of the European Communities (Agent: G. Braun),
with an address for service in Luxembourg — action for the
partial annulment of Decision 2003/328/EC of 12 May 2003
on transitional measures under Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002
of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the
use of category 3 catering waste in feed for pigs and the intra-
species recycling ban on the feeding of swill to pigs (OJ 2003 L
117, p. 46) — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber),
composed of J. Pirrung, President, A. W. H. Meij and N. J.
Forwood, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 2 July
2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

(1) The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

(2) The applicants are ordered to bear their own costs and those

incurred by the Commission.

In Case T-39/03: DaimlerChrysler AG, established in Stuttgart
lawyer, against Office
(Germany), represented by N. Siebertz,
for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and
Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: G. Schneider), the intervener before
the Court of First Instance being Axon Leasing GmbH, estab-

(1) OJ No C 213 of 6.9.2003.