Order of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 27 May 2004 in Case T-379/02: Antonio Di Adolfo v Commission of the European Communities (Action for annulment — Time-limits — Claim for compensation — Originating application — Formal requirements — Injunction against an institution — Manifestly inadmissible)
Date: 2004-09-25
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment (EU), business start-up, financial aid, joint venture

25.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/23

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 7 June 2004

in Case T-230/02: X v Commission of

the European

Communities (1)

(Action for damages — Prior complaint through official
channels — Action in part devoid of any legal basis and in
part inadmissible)

(2004/C 239/49)

(Language of the case: French)

residing at Hellerup (Denmark),

In Case T-230/02: X, a former official of the European Commu-
nities,
represented by G.
Bouneou and F. Frabetti, lawyers, with an address for service in
Luxembourg, against Commission of the European Commu-
nities (Agents: C. Berardis-Kayser and D. Martin, with an
address for service in Luxembourg) — application for compen-
sation for the non-material damage allegedly suffered by the
applicant as a result of the Commission's failure to comply
with the judgments of the Court of First Instance and of the
conduct of the applicant's line manager — the Court of First
Instance (Third Chamber), composed of J. Azizi, President, M.
Jaeger and F. Dehousse, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has made an
order on 7 June 2004, in which it:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 247 of 12.10.2002.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fourth
Chamber)

of 27 May 2004

in Case T-379/02: Antonio Di Adolfo v Commission of the
European Communities (1)

(Action for annulment — Time-limits — Claim for compen-
sation — Originating application — Formal requirements —
Injunction against an institution — Manifestly inadmissible)

(2004/C 239/50)

(Language of the case: Italian)

In Case T-379/02: Antonio Di Adolfo, residing at Rome (Italy),
represented by S. Amato, lawyer, against Commission of the
European Communities (Agent: E. Montaguti assisted by A. Dal
Ferro, lawyer) with an address for service in Luxembourg —
application for, on one hand, annulment of the Commission
Decision of 30 October 2001 withdrawing financial assistance
originally granted to the applicant in the context of the Joint

Venture Programme for the incorporation of an Italo-Romanian
joint venture company (JOP Facility 2 — Project in Romania
with Phoenix European S.r.l. - J2BROSEVEN) and, on the other
hand, damages in respect of the loss allegedly caused to the
applicant — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber),
composed of H. Legal, President, V. Tiili and M. Vilaras, Judges;
H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 27 May 2004, the opera-
tive part of which is as follows:

1. The claim is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible;

2. The applicant is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 44, 22.2.2003.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 6 May 2004

in Case T-34/03: André Hecq v Commission of the Euro-
pean Communities (1)

(Staff cases — Act adversely affecting an official — Capacity
to bring proceedings — Official acting personally and not on
behalf of a trade union organisation — Inadmissibility)

(2004/C 239/51)

(Language of the case: French)

lawyer, against

In Case T-34/03: André Hecq, a former official of the Commis-
sion of the European Communities, residing in Mondercange
(Luxembourg), represented by L. Vogel,
the
Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J. Currall
and V. Joris) — application for annulment of the Commission's
decision of 4 October 2002 rejecting the complaint brought by
Mr Hecq, acting both personally and in his capacity as Presi-
dent of the Syndicat des Fonctionnaires Internationaux et Euro-
péens, against various decisions relating to the representation
of staff and the resources made available by the Commission,
and for compensation for the damage allegedly suffered as a
result of those decisions — the Court of First Instance (Fifth
Chamber), composed of P. Lindh, President, R.Garcia-Valde-
casas and J.D. Cooke, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has made an
order on 6 May 2004, in which it:

1. Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

2. Orders the applicant to bear his own costs and pay those of the

Commission.

(1) OJ C 101 of 26.04.2003.