do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1644/2004 of 20 September 2004 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2004-09-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, grape, import price, pip fruit, stone fruit

21.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 296/1

I

(Acts whose publication is obligatory)

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1644/2004

of 20 September 2004

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vege-
tables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

(2)

Having regard to the Treaty
Community,

establishing the European

In compliance with the above criteria,
the standard
import values must be fixed at the levels set out in the
Annex to this Regulation,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of
21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the
and in
import
fruit
arrangements
particular Article 4(1) thereof,

and vegetables (1),

for

Whereas:

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 lays down, pursuant to the
outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade nego-
tiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the
standard values for imports from third countries,
in
respect of the products and periods stipulated in the
Annex thereto.

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regu-
lation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex
hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 September 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 September 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ
Agriculture Director-General

(1) OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regu-

lation (EC) No 1947/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17).

L 296/2

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

21.9.2004

to Commission Regulation of 20 September 2004 establishing the standard import values for determining the
entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

ANNEX

CN code

0702 00 00

0707 00 05

0709 90 70

0805 50 10

0806 10 10

0808 10 20, 0808 10 50, 0808 10 90

0808 20 50

0809 30 10, 0809 30 90

0809 40 05

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

(EUR/100 kg)

052
999

052
096
999

052
999

382
388
508
524
528
999

052
220
400
624
999

388
400
508
512
528
800
804
999

052
388
999

052
999

066
094
624
999

34,1
34,1

81,1
12,9
47,0

91,7
91,7

67,7
55,9
37,1
39,7
51,6
50,4

87,8
121,0
170,3
146,2
131,3

87,4
92,4
68,9
106,1
86,4
177,0
93,0
101,6

102,7
79,0
90,9

117,7
117,7

82,3
29,3
117,4
76,3

(1) Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2081/2003 (OJ L 313, 28.11.2003, p. 11). Code ‘999’ stands for

‘of other origin’.
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its 379th meeting on 20 September 2004 concerning a preliminary draft decision in Case COMP/C.37 750 — French beer   (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2004-09-20
Institutions: Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions
Subjects: beverage industry, control of restrictive practices, dominant position, unlawful agreement

C 175/2

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

15.7.2005

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its
379th meeting on 20 September 2004 concerning a preliminary draft decision in Case COMP/
C.37 750 — French beer

(2005/C 175/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

1. The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that in this decision it is not necessary to define

the relevant market.

2. The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission about the existence of an agreement, within the
meaning of Article 81(1) of the Treaty, between Heineken N.V./Heineken France and Danone/Brasseries
Kronenbourg.

3. The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the agreement between Heineken N.V./
Heineken France and Danone/Brasseries Kronenbourg has as its object the restriction of competition
within the meaning of Article 81(1) of the Treaty.

4. The Advisory Committee agrees with Commission on the assessment of the gravity of the infringement,

as described in the draft decision.

5. The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission:

(a) on the aggravating circumstances against Danone/Brasseries Kronenbourg;

(b) that there are no aggravating circumstances against Heineken N.V./Heineken France.

6. The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission:

(a) that there are no attenuating circumstances in favour of Danone/Brasseries Kronenbourg;

(b) that there are no attenuating circumstances in favour of Heineken N.V./Heineken France.

7. The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the Euro-

pean Union.

8. The Advisory Committee asks the Commission to take into account all the other points raised during

the discussion.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1649/2004 of 20 September 2004 determining the world market price for unginned cotton
Date: 2004-09-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: cotton, world market price

21.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 296/15

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1649/2004

of 20 September 2004

determining the world market price for unginned cotton

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty
Community,

establishing the European

Having regard to Protocol 4 on cotton, annexed to the Act of
Accession of Greece, as last amended by Council Regulation
(EC) No 1050/2001 (1),

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1051/2001 of 22
May 2001 on production aid for cotton (2), and in particular
Article 4 thereof,

Whereas:

(1)

In accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No
1051/2001, a world market price for unginned cotton
is to be determined periodically from the price for ginned
cotton recorded on the world market and by reference to
the historical relationship between the price recorded for
ginned cotton and that calculated for unginned cotton.
That historical relationship has been established in Article
2(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1591/2001 of 2
August 2001 laying down detailed rules for applying the
cotton aid scheme (3). Where the world market price
cannot be determined in this way, it is to be based on
the most recent price determined.

(2)

In accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No
1051/2001,
for unginned
the world market price
cotton is to be determined in respect of a product of
specific characteristics and by reference to the most

the

considered representative of

favourable offers and quotations on the world market
among those
real
market trend. To that end, an average is to be calculated
of offers and quotations recorded on one or more
European exchanges for a product delivered cif
to a
port in the Community and coming from the various
supplier countries considered the most representative in
terms of international trade. However, there is provision
for adjusting the criteria for determining the world
market price for ginned cotton to reflect differences
justified by the quality of the product delivered and the
offers and quotations concerned. Those adjustments
are specified in Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No
1591/2001.

(3)

The application of the above criteria gives the world
market price for unginned cotton determined hereinafter,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The world price for unginned cotton as referred to in Article 4
of Regulation (EC) No 1051/2001 is hereby determined as
equalling 20,530 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 September 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 September 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ
Agriculture Director-General

(1) OJ L 148, 1.6.2001, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 148, 1.6.2001, p. 3.
(3) OJ L 210, 3.8.2001, p. 10. Regulation as amended by Regulation

(EC) No 1486/2002 (OJ L 223, 20.8.2002, p. 3).