Order of the court of first instance of 9 February2004 in Case T-120/03 Synopharm G,bH & Co. KG v Officefor Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Communitytrade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2004-04-30
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), cosmetic product, medicinal product, pharmaceutical product, trade-mark law

C 106/64

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

30.4.2004

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 19 February 2004

Vilaras and N. J. Forwood, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an
order on 1 March 2004, the operative part of which is as
follows:

in Case T-300/97 DEP: Benito Latino v Commission of the
European Communities (1)

1) There is no need to give a ruling in the present application.

(Procedure — Taxation of costs)

(2004/C 106/129)

(Language of the case: French)

2) The applicant is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the
Commission's costs. The Kingdom of the Netherlands is ordered to
pay its own costs.

(1) OJ C 6 of 8.1.2000

L.

represented

by G. Vandersanden,

In Case T-300/97 DEP: Benito Latino, a former official of the
Commission of the European Communities, residing in Brus-
sels,
and
A. Finchelstein, avocats, against Commission of the European
Communities (Agent: J. Currall) – application for taxation of
costs following the judgment of the Court of 15 December
1999 in Case T-300/97 Latino v Commission [1999] SC
I-A-259 and II-1263 – the Court (Second Chamber), composed
of: J. Pirrung, President, A.W.H. Meij and N.J. Forwood, Judges;
H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 19 February 2004, the
operative part of which is as follows:

Levi

(1) The total amount of costs recoverable pursuant to the judgment
of 15 December 1999 in Case T-300/97 Latino v Commission
is set at EUR 11 000.

(1) OJ C 41 of 7.2.98.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 1 March 2004

in Case T-210/99 Johan Henk Gankema v Commission of
the European Communities (1)

(Annulment action — Inaction by the applicant — No need
to give judgment)

(2004/C 106/130)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

In Case T-210/99: Johan Henk Gankema, residing in Veendam
(Netherlands), represented by E. Maas, lawyer, with an address
for service in Luxembourg, supported by the Kingdom of the
Netherlands (Agents: originally M. Fierstra and L. Cuelenaere,
then L. Cuelenaere and V. Koningsberger, and finally H. G.
Sevenster) against the Commission of the European Commu-
nities (Agents: originally G. Rozet and H. Speyart, then G.
Rozet and H. van Vliet):– Application for annulment of
Commission Decision 1999/705/EC of 20 July 1999 on the
State aid implemented by the Netherlands for 633 Dutch
service stations located near the German border – the Court of
(Second Chamber, Extended Composition),
First
composed of J. Pirrung, President, V. Tiili, A..W. H. Meij, M.

Instance

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 9 February 2004

in Case T-120/03 Synopharm G,bH & Co. KG v Office for
Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and
Designs) (1)

(Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the
opposition — No need to adjudicate)

(2004/C 106/131)

(Language of the case: German)

(Trade Marks and Designs)

In Case T-120/03 between Synopharm GmbH & Co. KG, repre-
sented by G. Hodapp, lawyer, and the Office for Harmonisation
in the Internal Market
(OHIM)
(Agents: G. Schneider and U. Pfleghar), the other party to the
the Office for
proceedings before the Board of Appeal of
Harmonisation in the Internal Market
(Trade Marks and
Designs) being Pentafarma – Sociedad Técnico-Medicinal Lda,
represented by J. Pereira da Cruz,
lawyer – Action brought
against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office
for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and
Designs) of 15 January 2003 (Case R 44/2002-3) relating to
the opposition proceedings between Synopharm GmbH & Co.
KG and Pentafarma – Sociedad Técnico-Medicinal Lda – the
instance (Second Chamber), composed of
Court of
J. Pirrung, President, A.W.H. Meij and N.J. Forwood, Judges;
H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 9 February 2004, the
operative part of which is as follows:

first

1. There is no need to rule on the action;

2. The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and

each pay half of those incurred by the defendant.

(1) OJ 2003 C 171.