Action brought on 10 February 2004 by Budějovický Budvar, národní podnik, against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Date: 2004-04-17
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), trade-mark law

C 94/58

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

17.4.2004

Action brought on 10 February 2004 by Budějovický
Budvar, národní podnik, against the Office for Harmonisa-
tion in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
(OHIM)

Pleas in law:

(Case T-59/04)

(2004/C 94/150)

(Language of the case: French)

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
Market
(Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the
Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 10
February 2004 by Budějovický Budvar, národní podnik, estab-
lished in České Budějovice (Czech Republic), represented by
Fabienne Fajgenbaum, lawyer.

Anheuser-Busch, Incorporated, was also a party to the proceed-
ings before the Second Board of Appeal.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

— annul

the decision of
Appeal of 3 December 2003;

the defendant's Second Board of

— reject the application for the registration of BUDWEISER
for Classes 35, 38, 41 and 42 filed on 1 April 1996 on
behalf of Anheuser-Busch;

— order Anheuser-Busch to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

Applicant
munity trade mark:

for

Com-

Anheuser-Busch, Incorporated

Community trade mark
sought:

Word mark
‘BUDWEISER’ —
Application No 927533 in respect
of goods in Classes 35, 38, 41 and
42

Proprietor of mark or
sign cited in the opposi-
tion proceedings:

Applicant

Mark or sign cited in
opposition:

Appellations
‘BUDWEISER BIER’,
BIER – BUDVAR’,
BUDVAR’

of

origin
‘BUDWEISER
‘BUDWEISER

the

of Regulation

application of Article
Incorrect
8(4)
(EC) No
40/94 (1). The applicant, entitled
in France
above-
to use
mentioned appellations of origin,
submits that French law enables it
to oppose the registration of the
mark sought without having to
demonstrate that the appellations
in question possess a reputation in
and without having to
France
examine whether the use of the
mark at
issue could have the
consequence of misappropriating
or weakening the reputation of
those appellations.

(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993

on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

Action brought on 10 February 2004 by Budějovický
Budvar, národní podnik, against the Office for Harmonisa-
tion in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
(OHIM)

(Case T-60/04)

(2004/C 94/151)

(Language of the case: French)

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
Market (Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the
Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 10
February 2004 by Budějovický Budvar, národní podnik, estab-
lished in České Budějovice (Czech Republic), represented by
Fabienne Fajgenbaum, lawyer.

Anheuser-Busch, Incorporated, was also a party to the proceed-
ings before the Second Board of Appeal.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

— annul

the decision of
Appeal of 3 December 2003;

the defendant's Second Board of

Decision of the Opposi-
tion Division:

Opposition rejected

Decision of
of Appeal:

the Board

Appeal dismissed

— reject the application for the registration of BUD for Classes
9 and 14 filed on 1 April 1996 on behalf of Anheuser-
Busch;

— order Anheuser-Busch to pay the costs.

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/59

Pleas in law and main arguments:

Applicant
munity trade mark:

for

Com-

Anheuser-Busch, Incorporated

Community trade mark
sought:

Word mark ‘BUD’ – Application
No 739102 in respect of goods in
Classes 9 and 14

Proprietor of mark or
sign cited in the opposi-
tion proceedings:

Applicant

Mark or sign cited in
opposition:

Appellations of origin ‘BUD’

Decision of the Opposi-
tion Division:

Opposition rejected

February 2004 by Budějovický Budvar, národní podnik, estab-
lished in České Budějovice (Czech Republic), represented by
Fabienne Fajgenbaum, lawyer.

Anheuser-Busch, Incorporated, was also a party to the proceed-
ings before the Second Board of Appeal.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

— annul

the decision of
Appeal of 3 December 2003;

the defendant's Second Board of

— reject the application for the registration of BUD for Class
21 filed on 1 April 1996 on behalf of Anheuser-Busch;

— order Anheuser-Busch to pay the costs.

Decision of
of Appeal:

Pleas in law:

the Board

Appeal dismissed

Pleas in law and main arguments:

the

of Regulation

application of Article
Incorrect
8(4)
(EC) No
40/94 (1). The applicant, entitled
in France
above-
to use
mentioned appellations of origin,
submits that French law enables it
to oppose the registration of the
mark sought without having to
demonstrate that the appellations
in question possess a reputation in
and without having to
France
examine whether the use of the
mark at
issue could have the
consequence of misappropriating
or weakening the reputation of
those appellations.

Applicant
munity trade mark:

for

Com-

Anheuser-Busch, Incorporated

Community trade mark
sought:

Word mark ‘BUD’ — Application
No 24737 in respect of goods in
Class 21

Proprietor of mark or
sign cited in the opposi-
tion proceedings:

Applicant

Mark or sign cited in
opposition:

Appellations of origin ‘BUD’

Decision of the Opposi-
tion Division:

Opposition rejected

(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993

on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

Decision of
of Appeal:

Pleas in law:

Action brought on 10 February 2004 by Budějovický
Budvar, národní podnik, against the Office for Harmonisa-
tion in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
(OHIM)

(Case T-61/04)

(2004/C 94/152)

(Language of the case: French)

the Board

Appeal dismissed

the

of Regulation

application of Article
Incorrect
8(4)
(EC) No
40/94 (1). The applicant, entitled
in France
above-
to use
mentioned appellations of origin,
submits that French law enables it
to oppose the registration of the
mark sought without having to
demonstrate that the appellations
in question possess a reputation in
France
and without having to
examine whether the use of the
issue could have the
mark at
consequence of misappropriating
or weakening the reputation of
those appellations.

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
(Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the
Market
Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 10

(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993

on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).