Order of the Court of First Instance of 26 January 2004 in Case T-386/02 Lamprecht A.G. against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (trade marks and designs) (OHIM)
Date: 2004-04-17
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), clothing, textile industry, trade-mark law

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/41

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 6 January 2004

in Case T-113/02 Gustaaf van Dyck v Commission of the
European Communities (1)

(Staff case — Action for annulment — Act adversely
affecting the applicant — Inadmissibility)

(2004/C 94/117)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

In Case T-113/02: Gustaaf van Dyck, an official of the Commis-
sion of the European Communities, residing in Wuustwezel
lawyer, and by A.E.
(Belgium), represented by S. Corbanie,
the European
Bywater, Solicitor, against Commission of
Communities
(Agents: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and H.M.H.
Speyart), application for annulment of the Commission's deci-
sion of 10 January 2002 rejecting the complaint of 14 August
2001, of the Commission's decision of 5 July 2001 rejecting
the informal appeal of 1 July 2001 and of the Commission's
alleged decision of unknown date revising the applicant's staff
report, the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed
of H. Legal, President, and V. Tiili and M. Vilaras, Judges; H.
Jung, Registrar, made an order on 16 January 2004, the opera-
tive part of which is as follows:

1. The application is rejected as inadmissible;

2. The parties shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ 2002 C 131, 1.6.02

public works contract relating to studies for, and the construc-
tion, self-financing and operation of, the Thessaloniki Metro —
the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H.
Legal, President, V. Tiili and M.Vilaras, Judges; H. Jung, Regis-
trar, made an order on 14 January 2004, the operative part of
which is as follows:

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. The applicants shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ No C 274, 9.11.2002.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 26 January 2004

in Case T-386/02 Lamprecht A.G. against Office for
Harmonisation in the Internal Market (trade marks and
designs) (OHIM) (1)

(Not necessary to give judgment)

(2004/C 94/119)

(Language of the case: Spanish)

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 14 January 2004

in Case T-202/02 Makedoniko Metro and Michaniki AE
against the Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Public works contracts — Failure to initiate the Treaty
infringement procedure — Article 3 of Directive
89/665/EEC — Action for damages — Inadmissible)

(2004/C 94/118)

(Language of the case: Greek)

In Case T-386/02: Lamprecht A.G., established in Zurich (Swit-
zerland), represented by E. Armijo Chávarri and A. Castán
Pérez-Gómez, lawyers, against the Office for Harmonisation in
the Internal Market (trade marks and designs) (OHIM) (Agents:
the other party to the
S. Laitinen and J. García Murillo),
proceedings before the Board of Appeal of
the Office for
Harmonisation in the Internal Market (trade marks and designs)
being Clickview Ltd (formerly J. Tricot & Sons Ltd), established
in London — action for annulment brought by the proprietor
of the national word mark ‘EMOSWISS’ in respect of goods in
Classes 10, 24 and 25 against Decision R 275/2001-2 of the
Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the
Internal Market (trade marks and designs) of 12 July 2002
the
dismissing the appeal brought against
Opposition Division which rejected the opposition of the appli-
cant to registration of the Community word mark ‘EMOS’ for
certain goods in Class 25 — the Court of First Instance (Second
Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, A.W.H. Meij and
N.J. Forwood, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 26
January 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

the decision of

In Case T-202/02: Makedoniko Metro, established in Thessalo-
niki (Greece), and Michaniki AE, established in Marousi, Attica
(Greece), represented by C. Gkonis, lawyer, with an address for
service in Luxembourg, against the Commission of the Euro-
pean Communities (Agent: M. Konstantinidis) — application
for compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the appli-
cants consequent upon the decision of the Commission to take
no further action on their complaint No 97/4188/P lodged on
23 January 1997 concerning the award by the Greek State of a

1. It is no longer necessary to give judgment.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ No C 55, 8.3.2003.