Order of the Court of First Instance of 18 December 2003 in Case T-215/02: Santiago Gómez-Reino v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Investigation carried out by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) — Duty to assist — Action for annulment and for damages clearly inadmissible and clearly unfounded in law)
Date: 2004-04-03
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: ECHO, European official, action for annulment (EU), disciplinary proceedings, fact-finding mission, fraud against the EU, regulations for civil servants

C 85/26

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

3.4.2004

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 18 December 2003

in Case T-215/02: Santiago Gómez-Reino v Commission
of the European Communities (1)

(Officials — Investigation carried out by the European Anti-
Fraud Office (OLAF) — Duty to assist — Action for
annulment and for damages clearly inadmissible and clearly
unfounded in law)

(2004/C 85/50)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-215/02: Santiago Gómez-Reino, official of the
Commission of the European Communities, resident in Brus-
sels (Belgium), represented by M.-A. Lucas, lawyer, against the
Commission of
the European Communities (Agents: H.-
P. Hartvig and J. Currall) — application, first, for annulment of
a series of measures relating to investigations carried out by
the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and to requests for
assistance under Article 24 of the Staff Regulations of officials
of the European Communities and, second, for compensation
in respect of
the alleged damage — the Court of First
Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President,
A. W. H. Meij and N. J. Forwood, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar,
made an order on 18 December 2003, the operative part of
which is as follows:

1.

2.

The action is dismissed as clearly inadmissible and as clearly
unfounded in law.

The parties shall each bear their own costs, including those
incurred in the proceedings for interim relief in Case T-215/02
R and Case C-471/02 P(R).

(1) OJ C 247, 12.10.2002.

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST
INSTANCE

of 28 November 2003

in Case T-264/03 R: Jürgen Schmoldt and Others against
the Commission of the European Communities

(Application for interim measures — Admissibility —
Urgency)

(2004/C 85/51)

(Language of the case: German)

established in Bremen (Germany), and Hauptverband der
Deutschen Bauindustrie eV, established in Berlin (Germany),
represented by Professor H.-P. Schneider, against the Com-
mission of the European Communities (Agents: K. Wiedner
and A. Böhlke) — application under Article 243 EC for interim
measures, seeking extension of the period of coexistence of
national standards and European standards EN 13162:2001 to
13171:2001 which is provided for by the Commission
Communication of 22 May 2003 published in the framework
of the implementation of Council Directive 89/106/EEC (OJ
2003 C 120, p. 17) — the President of the Court of First
Instance made an order on 28 November 2003 the operative
part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

The costs are reserved.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 2 December 2003

in Case T-334/02 Viomikhania Siskevasias Tipopiisis kai
Sintirisis Agrotikon Proïonton AE against the Com-
mission of the European Communities (1)

(FEOGA — Improvement of the conditions under which
agricultural products are processed and marketed — Request
for abolition of Community financial assistance — Inaction
on the part of the Commission — Action for failure to act)

(2004/C 85/52)

(Language of the case: Greek)

In Case T-334/02: Viomikhania Siskevasias Tipopiisis kai
Sintirisis Agrotikon Proïonton AE, established in Athens
(Greece), represented by I. Stamoulis, lawyer, with an address
for service in Luxembourg, against the Commission of the
European Communities (Agent: M. Kondou-Durande) — appli-
cation for a declaration under Article 232 EC that
the
Commission failed to act in that, first, it did not initiate the
procedure for failure to fulfil obligations in relation to the
Hellenic Republic for a breach of Community law which
harmed the applicant’s economic interests and, second, it did
not abolish ex tunc the financial assistance of the European
Agriculture Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) which
was granted for the purposes of the co-financing of the
applicant’s
investment project as approved by Decision
No 324986/505 of the Greek authorities of 17 February 1994
— the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of
J. Azizi, President, M. Jaeger and F. Dehousse, Judges; H. Jung,
Registrar, made an order on 2 December 2003, the operative
part of which is as follows:

In Case T-264/03 R: Jürgen Schmoldt, resident in Dallgow-
Döberitz (Germany), Kaefer Isoliertechnik GmbH & Co. KG,

1.

The action is dismissed as clearly inadmissible.