Common Position (EC) No 24/2004 of 26 February 2004 adopted by the Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, with a view to adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on minimum safety requirements for tunnels in the trans-European road network
Date: 2004-02-26
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: common transport policy, road network, road safety, safety standard, trans-European network, transport safety, tunnel

20.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95 E/31

COMMON POSITION (EC) No 24/2004

adopted by the Council on 26 February 2004

with a view to the adoption of a Directive 2004/. . ./EC of the European Parliament and of the
Council of . . . on minimum safety requirements for tunnels in the trans-European road network

(2004/C 95 E/05)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF
THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community, and in particular Article 71(1) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and
Social Committee (1),

Having regard to the opinion of
Regions (2),

the Committee of

the

Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article
251 of the Treaty (3),

Whereas:

(1)

In its White Paper of 12 September 2001 entitled
‘European transport policy for 2010: time to decide’ the
Commission announced that it would propose minimum
safety requirements for tunnels belonging to the trans-
European road network.

(2) The

the

system,

notably

transport

trans-European
transport network defined in Decision No 1692/96/EC
of the European Parliament and the Council of 23 July
1996 on Community guidelines for the development of
the trans-European transport network (4), is of paramount
importance
in supporting European integration and
ensuring a high level of well-being among Europe's
citizens. The European Community has the responsibility
of guaranteeing a high, uniform and constant level of
security, service and comfort on the trans-European road
network.

(3) Long tunnels of over 500 m in length are important
structures which facilitate communication between large
areas of Europe and play a decisive role in the functioning
and development of regional economies.

(1) OJ C 220, 16.9.2003, p. 26.
(2) OJ C 256, 24.10.2003, p. 64.
(3) Opinion of the European Parliament of 9 October 2003 (not yet
published in the Official
Journal), Council common position of
26 February 2004 and position of the European Parliament of
. . . (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(4) OJ L 228, 9.9.1996, p. 1. Decision as amended by Decision

No 1346/2001/EC (OJ L 185, 6.7.2001, p. 1).

(4) The European Council on several occasions, and notably at
its meeting on 14 and 15 December 2001 in Laeken,
underlined the urgency to take measures in order to
improve tunnel safety.

(5) On 30 November 2001, the transport ministers of Austria,
France, Germany, Italy and Switzerland met in Zurich and
the
adopted a
alignment of national
recent
harmonised requirements for improving safety in long
tunnels.

common declaration recommending

legislation on the most

(6) Since the objectives of the proposed action, namely the
achievement of a uniform, constant and high level of
protection for all European citizens
in road tunnels,
cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States
and can therefore, by reason of the level of harmonisation
required, be better achieved at Community level,
the
Community may adopt measures, in accordance with the
principle of subsidiarity, as set out in Article 5 of the
Treaty. In accordance with the principle of proportionality,
this Directive does not go
as set out
to achieve those
beyond what
objectives.

is necessary in order

in that Article,

(7) Recent accidents in tunnels emphasise their importance in

human, economic and cultural terms.

(8) Some tunnels in Europe, put into operation a long time
ago, were designed at a time when the technical possi-
transport were very
bilities
and the
different
from today's. There are thus disparate safety
levels and these need to be improved.

conditions of

(9) Safety in tunnels requires a number of measures relating,
the tunnel and its
to the geometry of
among others,
design, safety equipment,
traffic
management, training of the emergency services, incident
management, information to users on how best to behave
in tunnels and better communication between the auth-
orities in charge and emergency services such as the
police, fire-brigades and rescue teams.

including road signs,

(10) As the work of the United Nations Economic Commission
for Europe (UNECE) has already made clear, the conduct
of road users is a decisive aspect of tunnel safety.

(11) Safety measures should enable people involved in incidents
to rescue themselves, allow immediate intervention of road
users to prevent greater consequences, ensure efficient
action by emergency services and protect the environment
as well as limit material damage.

C 95 E/32

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

20.4.2004

(12) The improvements brought by this Directive will improve
safety conditions for all users, including disabled persons.
However, as disabled persons have more difficulties
escaping in case of emergency, particular consideration
should be given to their safety.

(20) Further technical progress is still necessary to improve
tunnel
safety. A procedure should be introduced to
allow the Commission to adapt the requirements of this
Directive to technical progress. That procedure should also
be used to adopt a harmonised risk analysis method.

(13) In order to implement a balanced approach and due to the
high cost of the measures, minimum safety equipment
should be set
the type and the
expected traffic volume of each tunnel.

taking into account

(21) The measures necessary for the implementation of this
Directive should be adopted in accordance with Council
Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the
procedures
implementing powers
the exercise of
conferred on the Commission (1).

for

recommendations

(14) International bodies such as the World Road Association
and the UNECE have for a long time been making
invaluable
and
harmonise safety equipment and traffic rules in road
these recommendations are not
tunnels. However, as
binding, their full potential can only be maximised if the
requirements they identify are made obligatory through
legislation.

to help

improve

(15) Maintaining a high safety level requires proper main-
tenance of the safety facilities in tunnels. An exchange
of information on modern safety techniques and accident/
should be
incident data between the Member States
systematically organised.

(16) In order to ensure that the requirements of this Directive
are properly applied by the tunnel managers, Member
should designate one or more authorities at
States
national, regional or local
level with responsibility for
ensuring that all aspects of the safety of a tunnel are
respected.

(17) A flexible

timescale

and progressive

is needed for
this Directive. This will allow for
implementation of
completion of the most urgent works without creating
major disturbances in the transport system or bottlenecks
in public works in the Member States.

(18) The

of

cost

tunnels

existing

refurbishing

from one Member

varies
considerably
to another,
particularly for geographical reasons, and Member States
should be allowed to spread any refurbishment works
needed to meet the requirements of this Directive where
the density of tunnels on their territories is well in excess
of the European average.

State

(22) Member States should submit a report to the Commission
on the measures
the
requirements of this Directive, with a view to synchro-
nising works at Community level
in order to reduce
traffic disturbances.

they plan to adopt

to meet

(23) When the requirements of this Directive necessitate the
construction of a second tube for a tunnel in the design
or construction phase, this second tube to be constructed
should be considered as a new tunnel. The same applies if
the requirements of this Directive necessitate the opening
of new legally obligatory planning procedures,
including
planning permission hearings for all related measures.

(24) Work should continue in the appropriate fora in order to
arrive at a large degree of harmonisation as regards the
signs and pictograms used on variable message signs in
tunnels. Member
to
should be
harmonise the user interface for all
tunnels on their
territory.

encouraged

States

(25) Member States

should be encouraged to implement
comparable safety levels for road tunnels located in their
territory that do not form part of the European road-
transport network and consequently do not fall within
the scope of this Directive.

(26) Member States should be encouraged to develop national

provisions aiming at a higher tunnel safety level,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

Article 1

Subject matter and scope

(19) For tunnels already in operation or tunnels whose design
has been approved but which have not been opened to the
public within 24 months following the entry into force of
this Directive, Member States should be allowed to accept
the adoption of risk-reduction measures as an alternative
to the requirements of the Directive, where the tunnel
does not allow for structural solutions to be implemented
at reasonable cost.

1.
This Directive aims at ensuring a minimum level of safety
for road users in tunnels in the trans-European road network
by the prevention of critical events that may endanger human
life, the environment and tunnel installations, as well as by the
provision of protection in the case of accidents.

(1) OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23.

20.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95 E/33

It shall apply to all tunnels in the trans-European road
2.
network with lengths of over 500 m, whether they are in
operation, under construction or at the design stage.

The administrative authority may be set up at national,

2.
regional or local level.

Article 2

Definitions

For the purposes of this Directive, the following definitions
shall apply:

1.

2.

‘trans-European road network’ means the road network
identified
to Decision
No 1692/96/EC and illustrated by maps and/or described
in Annex II to that Decision;

Section 2 of Annex

in

I

‘emergency services’ means all local services, whether public
or private, or part of the tunnel staff, which intervene in the
event of an accident, including police services, fire brigades
and rescue teams;

3.

‘tunnel length’ means the length of the longest traffic lane,
measured on the fully enclosed part of the tunnel.

Article 3

Safety measures

1. Member States shall ensure that tunnels in their territory
falling within the scope of this Directive meet the minimum
safety requirements laid down in Annex I.

requirements

the alternative measures will

2. Where certain structural
laid down in
Annex I can only be satisfied through technical solutions
which either cannot be met or can be met only at dispropor-
the administrative authority as referred to in
tionate cost,
Article 4 may accept
the implementation of risk-reduction
measures as an alternative to those requirements, provided
in equivalent or
that
improved protection. The efficiency of these measures shall
be demonstrated through a risk analysis in conformity with
the provisions of Article 13. Member States shall inform the
the risk-reduction measures accepted as an
Commission of
alternative and provide justification therefor. This paragraph
shall not apply in respect of tunnels at the design stage as
referred to in Article 9.

result

States may

3. Member
provided they do not contravene the requirements of
Directive.

requirements,
this

stricter

specify

Article 4

Administrative authority

shall

States

designate

administrative
(an)
1. Member
authority(ies), hereinafter
referred to as ‘the administrative
authority’, which shall have responsibility for ensuring that
all aspects of the safety of a tunnel are respected, and which
shall take the necessary provisions to ensure compliance with
this Directive.

3.
Each tunnel in the trans-European network located in the
territory of a single Member State shall fall under the respon-
sibility of a single administrative authority. For each tunnel
located on the territory of two Member States, either each
Member State shall designate an administrative authority, or
alternatively, the two Member States shall designate a joint
administrative authority.
If there are two different adminis-
trative authorities, the decisions of each one in exercise of its
respective competencies and responsibilities related to tunnel
safety shall be adopted with the previous agreement of the
other authority.

The administrative authority commissions tunnels as

4.
described in Annex II.

5. Without prejudice to further arrangements on this subject
at national level, the administrative authority shall have power
to suspend or restrict
if safety
It shall specify the conditions
requirements are not met.
under which normal traffic conditions may be re-established.

the operation of a tunnel

The

6.
following tasks are performed:

administrative

authority shall

ensure

that

the

(a) testing and inspecting tunnels on a regular basis and the
drawing-up of safety requirements pertaining thereto;

(b) putting in place organisational and operational schemes
(including emergency response plans) for the training and
equipping of emergency services;

(c) defining the procedure for immediate closure of a tunnel in

case of an emergency;

(d) implementing the necessary risk-reduction measures.

7. Where bodies designated as administrative authorities
existed prior to the designation referred to in this Article,
those administrative authorities may continue to exercise
their previous activities provided they comply with this
Directive.

Article 5

Tunnel manager

1.
For each tunnel on the territory of one Member State,
whether it is in the design, construction or operating stage, the
administrative authority shall
identify as tunnel manager the
public or private body responsible for the management of
the
administrative
authority itself may perform this function.

concerned. The

tunnel

stage

the

at

2.
For each tunnel located on the territory of two Member
States, the two administrative authorities or the joint adminis-
trative authority shall recognise only one body in charge of the
operation of the tunnel.

C 95 E/34

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

20.4.2004

Any significant incident or accident occurring in a tunnel
3.
shall be the subject of an occurrence report prepared by the
tunnel manager. This report shall be forwarded to the safety
officer provided for in Article 6, to the administrative authority
and to the emergency services within a maximum period of
one month.

4. Where an investigation report is drawn up analysing the
referred to in
the incident or accident
circumstances of
paragraph 3 or the conclusions that can be drawn from it,
forward this report to the safety
the tunnel manager shall
officer,
emergency
services no later than one month after he/she receives it
himself/herself.

authority and the

administrative

the

Article 6

Safety officer

1.
For each tunnel, the tunnel manager shall nominate one
safety officer who must be previously accepted by the adminis-
trative authority and who shall coordinate all preventive and
safeguard measures to ensure the safety of users and operation
staff. The safety officer may be a member of the tunnel staff or
the emergency services, shall be independent in all road tunnel
safety-related issues and shall not be subject to instructions
from an employer in respect of those issues. A safety officer
may perform his/her tasks and functions in several tunnels in a
region.

The safety officer shall perform the following tasks/

2.
functions:

(a) ensure coordination with emergency services and take part

in the preparation of operational schemes;

(b) take part in the planning, implementation and evaluation of

emergency operations;

(c) take part in the definition of safety schemes and the spec-
the structure, equipment and operation in
ification of
respect of both new tunnels and modifications to existing
tunnels;

(d) verify that operational staff and emergency services are
in the organisation of exercises

trained, and take part
which are held at regular intervals;

(e) give advice on the

commissioning of

the

structure,

equipment and operation of tunnels;

(f) verify that the tunnel structure and equipment are main-

tained and repaired;

Article 7

Inspection entity

Member States shall ensure that inspections, evaluations and
tests are carried out by inspection entities. The administrative
authority may perform this function. Any entity performing
the inspections, evaluations and tests must have a high level
of competence and high quality of procedure and must be
functionally independent from the tunnel manager.

Article 8

Notification of the administrative authority

The Member States shall notify the Commission of the names
and addresses of the administrative authorities by . . . (*). They
shall notify within three months any subsequent changes to
this information when they occur.

Article 9

Tunnels whose design has not yet been approved

Any tunnel whose design has not been approved by the
to the

1.
responsible authority by . . . (*)
requirements of this Directive.

shall be subject

The tunnel shall be commissioned in accordance with the

2.
procedure laid down in Annex II.

Article 10

Tunnels whose design has been approved but which are
not yet open

1.
In the case of tunnels whose design has been approved
but which have not been opened by . . . (*) to public traffic, the
administrative authority shall assess their compliance with the
requirements of this Directive, with specific reference to the
safety documentation provided for in Annex II.

2. Where the administrative authority finds that a tunnel
this Directive,
does not comply with the provisions of
it
shall notify the
relevant measures
necessary to increase safety must be taken and inform the
safety officer.

tunnel manager

that

The tunnel shall then be commissioned in accordance

3.
with the procedure laid down in Annex II.

Article 11

Tunnels already in operation

In the case of tunnels which are already open to public
1.
traffic by . . . (*), the administrative authority shall have until
. . . (**)
tunnel with the
requirements of this Directive, with specific reference to the
safety documentation provided for in Annex II and on the basis
of an inspection.

compliance of

to assess

the

(g) take part in the evaluation of any significant incident or

Directive.

accident as referred to in Article 5(3) and (4).

(**) Thirty months after the date of entry into force of this Directive.

(*) Twenty-four months after the date of entry into force of this

20.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95 E/35

The tunnel manager shall,

if necessary, propose to the
2.
administrative authority a plan for adapting the tunnel to the
provisions of this Directive and the remedial measures he/she
intends to put in place.

The administrative authority shall give its approval to the

3.
remedial measures or ask for them to be modified.

if

the

Thereafter,

any
4.
substantial modification in the construction or operation,
then once these measures have been taken,
the procedure
laid down in Annex II shall be implemented.

remedial measures

include

5. Member States shall submit by . . . (*) a report to the
Commission on how they plan to meet the requirements of
this Directive, on planned measures, and, where appropriate,
on the consequences of opening or closing the main access
In order to minimise disturbances to
roads to the tunnels.
traffic at European level, the Commission may comment on
the timetable of the work intended to ensure that tunnels
comply with the requirements of this Directive.

The refurbishment of

6.
according to a schedule and shall be finished by . . . (**).

shall be carried out

tunnels

Article 13

Risk analysis

Risk analyses, where necessary, shall be carried out by a
1.
from the tunnel
functionally independent
body which is
manager. The content and the results of
the risk analysis
shall be included in the safety documentation submitted to
the administrative authority. A risk analysis is an analysis of
risk for a given tunnel, taking into account all design factors
and traffic conditions that affect safety, notably traffic charac-
teristics, tunnel length, type of traffic and tunnel geometry, as
well as the forecast number of heavy goods vehicles per day.

available practices,

level, a
2. Member States shall ensure that, at national
detailed and well-defined methodology, corresponding to the
best
inform the
Commission of the methodology applied, which will make
form to other
this
Member States.

information available

is used and shall

in electronic

By . . . (***) the Commission shall publish a report on the
3.
it
practice applied in the Members States. Where necessary,
shall make proposals
common
the
harmonised risk analysis methodology in accordance with the
procedure referred to in Article 17(2).

adoption of

for

a

7. Where the total tube length of existing tunnels divided by
the total length of the part of the trans-European road network
located on their
territories exceeds the European average,
Member States may extend the period stipulated in paragraph
6 by five years.

Article 12

Periodic inspections

The administrative authority shall verify that

regular
1.
inspections are carried out by the inspection entity to ensure
that all
this Directive
comply with its provisions.

tunnels falling within the scope of

The period between two consecutive inspections of a

2.
given tunnel shall not exceed six years.

3. Where, on the basis of the report of the inspection entity,
the administrative authority finds that a tunnel does not
comply with the provisions of this Directive,
it shall notify
the tunnel manager and the safety officer that measures to
increase tunnel safety must be adopted. The administrative
authority shall define the conditions for the continued tunnel
operation or for the re-opening of the tunnel which will apply
until
the remedial measures, and any
further relevant restrictions or conditions.

the achievement of

If the remedial measures include any substantial modifi-
4.
cation in the construction or operation,
then once these
measures have been taken, the tunnel shall be the subject of
a new authorisation to operate in accordance with the
procedure laid down in Annex II.

(*) Thirty-six months after

the date of entry into force of

this

Directive.

Article 14

Derogation for innovative techniques

1.
In order to allow the installation and use of innovative
safety equipment or the use of innovative safety procedures,
which provide an equivalent or higher protection level than
current technologies, as prescribed in this Directive, the admin-
istrative
derogation from the
grant
requirements of the Directive on the basis of a duly docu-
mented request from the tunnel manager.

authority may

a

If the administrative authority intends to grant the dero-
2.
first submit a derogation
gation,
application to the Commission containing the initial request
and the opinion of the inspection entity.

the Member State shall

The Commission notifies the application to the Member

3.
States within one month after its reception.

If, within a period of

4.
the
Commission nor a Member State formulates objections, the
derogation is considered accepted and the Commission shall
inform all Member States accordingly.

three months, neither

5.
If objections are expressed, the Commission shall make a
in accordance with the procedure referred to in
proposal
Article 17(2). Where the decision is negative, the administrative
authority shall not grant the derogation.

After an examination in accordance with the procedure
6.
referred to in Article 17(2), a decision to grant a derogation
may allow this derogation to be applied to other tunnels.

(**) Ten years after the date of entry into force of this Directive.

(***) Five years after the date of entry into force of this Directive.

C 95 E/36

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

20.4.2004

7. Whenever the derogation requests submitted justify it, the
Commission shall publish a report on the practice applied in
the Member States and if necessary, make proposals for
amendments to this Directive.

Article 15

Reporting

Every two years, Member States shall compile reports on
1.
fires in tunnels and on accidents which clearly affect the safety
of road users in tunnels, and on the frequency and causes of
such incidents, evaluate them and provide information on the
actual role and effectiveness of safety facilities and measures.
These reports will be transmitted to the Commission by the
Member States before the end of September of
the year
following the reporting period. The Commission will make
the reports available to all Member States.

2. Member States shall make a plan which includes a
timetable for the gradual application of the provisions of this
Directive to tunnels already in operation as described in Article
11 and notify it by . . . (*) to the Commission. Thereafter,
Member States shall inform the Commission every two years
of the state of implementation of the plan and of possible
adaptations to it, until the end of the period referred to in
Article 11(6) and (7).

Article 16

Adaptation to technical progress

The Commission shall adapt the Annexes to this Directive to
technical progress, in accordance with the procedure referred
to in Article 17(2).

2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 5 and
7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the
provisions of Article 8 thereof.

The period laid down in Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/468/EC
shall be set at three months.

3.

The Committee shall adopt its Rules of Procedure.

Article 18

Transposition

1. Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations
and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this
immediately forward to the
Directive by . . . (**). They shall
Commission the text of
together with a
table correlating those provisions with this Directive.

those provisions,

2.
The provisions adopted by the Member States shall
contain a reference to this Directive or be accompanied by
such a reference on the occasion of their official publication.
Member States shall determine how such reference is to be
made.

Article 19

Entry into force

This Directive shall enter into force on the date of its publi-
cation in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Article 20

This Directive is addressed to the Member States.

Article 17

Committee procedure

1.

The Commission shall be assisted by a Committee.

For the European Parliament

The President

For the Council

The President

Done at . . .

(*) Thirty months after the date of entry into force of this Directive.

Directive.

(**) Twenty-four months after the date of entry into force of this

20.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95 E/37

ANNEX I

SAFETY MEASURES AS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 3

1.

Basis for deciding on safety measures

1.1.

Safety parameters

1.1.1.

Safety measures to be implemented in a tunnel shall be based on a systematic consideration of all aspects of the
system composed of the infrastructure, operation, users and vehicles.

1.1.2. The following parameters shall be taken into account:

— tunnel length,

— number of tubes,

— number of lanes,

— cross-sectional geometry,

— vertical and horizontal alignment,

— type of construction,

— unidirectional or bidirectional traffic,

— traffic volume per tube (including its time distribution),

— risk of congestion (daily or seasonal),

— access time of the emergency services,

— presence and percentage of heavy goods vehicles,

— presence, percentage and type of dangerous goods traffic,

— characteristics of the access roads,

— lane width,

— speed considerations,

— geographical and meteorological environment.

1.1.3. When a tunnel has a special characteristic as regards the aforementioned parameters, a risk analysis according
to Article 13 shall be carried out to establish whether additional safety measures and/or supplementary
equipment is necessary to ensure a high level of tunnel safety. This risk analysis shall take into consideration
possible accidents which clearly affect safety of road users in tunnels, which might occur during the operating
stage, and the nature and magnitude of their possible consequences.

1.2.

Minimum requirements

1.2.1. At least the safety measures required by the following paragraphs shall be implemented in order to ensure a
minimum safety level in all the tunnels concerned by the Directive. Limited deviations from these requirements
may be allowed provided that the following procedure has been completed successfully. Member States or the
administrative authority shall send to the Commission information on the following:

— the limited deviation(s) envisaged,

— the imperative reasons underlying the limited deviation envisaged,

— the alternative risk-reduction measures which are to be used or reinforced in order to ensure at least an

equivalent level of safety, including proof therefor in the form of an analysis of relevant risks.

C 95 E/38

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

20.4.2004

The Commission shall transmit this request for a limited deviation to the Member States as soon as possible,
and in any case within one month after its reception.

If, within a period of three months after reception of the request by the Commission, neither the Commission
nor a Member State formulates objections, the limited deviation is considered accepted and the Commission
shall inform all Member States accordingly. If objections are expressed, the Commission shall make a proposal
in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 17(2). Where the decision is negative, the limited
deviation shall not be allowed.

1.2.2.

In order to provide a unified interface in all tunnels to which this Directive applies, no deviation from the
requirements of the following paragraphs shall be allowed regarding the design of the safety facilities at the
disposal of the tunnel users (emergency stations, signs, lay-bys, emergency exits, radio re-broadcasting when
required).

1.3.

Traffic volume

1.3.1. Where ‘traffic volume’ is mentioned in this Annex, it refers to the annual average daily traffic through a tunnel
per lane. For the purpose of determining the traffic volume, each motor vehicle shall be counted as one unit.

1.3.2. Where the number of heavy goods vehicles over 3,5 t exceeds 15 % of the annual average daily traffic, or a
seasonal daily traffic significantly exceeds the annual average daily traffic, the additional risk will be assessed and
taken into account by increasing the traffic volume of
the following
paragraphs.

for the application of

the tunnel

2.

Infrastructure measures

2.1.

Number of tubes and lanes

2.1.1. The main criteria in deciding whether to build a single or a twin-tube tunnel shall be projected traffic volume

and safety, taking into account aspects such as percentage of heavy goods vehicles, gradient and length.

2.1.2.

In any case, where, for tunnels at the design stage, a 15-year forecast shows that the traffic volume will exceed
10 000 vehicles per day and per lane, a twin-tube tunnel with unidirectional traffic shall be in place at the time
when this value will be exceeded.

2.1.3. With the exception of the emergency lane, the same number of lanes shall be maintained inside and outside the
tunnel. Any change in the number of lanes shall occur at a sufficient distance in front of the tunnel portal; this
distance shall be at least the distance travelled in 10 seconds by a vehicle at the maximum allowed speed. When
geographic circumstances prevent that this distance can be respected, additional and/or reinforced measures
shall be taken to enhance the safety.

2.2.

Tunnel geometry

2.2.1.

Safety shall be specially taken into consideration when designing the cross-sectional geometry and the hori-
zontal and vertical alignment of a tunnel and its access roads, as these parameters have a large influence on the
probability and severity of accidents.

2.2.2.

Longitudinal gradients above 5 % shall not be permitted in new tunnels, unless no other solution is
geographically possible.

2.2.3.

In tunnels with gradients higher than 3 %, additional and/or reinforced measures shall be taken to enhance
safety on the basis of a risk analysis.

2.2.4. Where the width of the slow lane is less than 3,5 m and heavy goods vehicles are allowed, additional and/or

reinforced measures shall be taken to enhance safety on the basis of a risk analysis.

2.3.

Escape routes and emergency exits

2.3.1.

In new tunnels without an emergency lane, emergency walkways, elevated or not, to be used by tunnel users in
case of a breakdown or an accident shall be provided. This provision does not apply if the construction
characteristics of the tunnel do not allow it or allow it only at disproportional cost and the tunnel is unidi-
rectional and is equipped with a permanent surveillance and lane-closure system.

2.3.2.

In existing tunnels where there is neither an emergency lane nor an emergency walkway, additional and/or
reinforced measures shall be taken to provide for safety.

20.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95 E/39

2.3.3.

Emergency exits allow tunnel users to leave the tunnel without their vehicles and reach a safe place in case of
an accident or a fire and also provide an access on foot to the tunnel for emergency services. Examples of such
emergency exits are:

— direct exits from the tunnel to the outside,

— cross-connections between tunnel tubes,

— exits to an emergency gallery,

— shelters with an escape route separate from the tunnel tube.

2.3.4.

Shelters without an exit leading to escape routes to the open shall not be built.

2.3.5.

Emergency exits shall be provided if an analysis of relevant risks including the smoke extension and spreading
velocity under local conditions shows that the ventilation and other safety provisions are insufficient to ensure
the safety of road users.

2.3.6.

In any case, in new tunnels, emergency exits shall be provided where the traffic volume is higher than 2 000
vehicles per lane.

2.3.7.

In existing tunnels longer than 1 000 m, with a traffic volume higher than 2 000 vehicles per lane, the
feasibility and effectiveness of the implementation of new emergency exits shall be evaluated.

2.3.8. Where emergency exits are provided, the distance between two emergency exits shall not exceed 500 m.

2.3.9. Appropriate means, such as doors, shall prevent the propagation of smoke and heat into the escape routes
behind the emergency exit, so that the tunnel users can safely reach the outside and the emergency services can
have access to the tunnel.

2.4.

Access for emergency services

2.4.1.

In twin-tube tunnels where the tubes are at the same level or nearly, cross-connections shall be suitable for the
use of emergency services at least every 1 500 m.

2.4.2. Wherever geographically possible, crossing of the central reserve (median strip) shall be made possible outside
each portal of a twin or multitube tunnel. This measure will allow emergency services to gain immediate access
to either tube.

2.5.

Lay-bys

2.5.1.

For new bidirectional tunnels longer than 1 500 m where traffic volume is higher than 2 000 vehicles per lane,
lay-bys shall be provided at distances which do not exceed 1 000 m, if emergency lanes are not foreseen.

2.5.2.

In existing bidirectional tunnels longer than 1 500 m with a traffic volume higher than 2 000 vehicles per lane,
which do not have emergency lanes, the feasibility and effectiveness of the implementation of lay-bys shall be
evaluated.

2.5.3.

If the construction characteristics of the tunnel do not allow it or allow it only at disproportionate cost, lay-bys
do not have to be provided if the total tunnel width which is accessible to vehicles, excluding elevated parts and
normal traffic lanes, is at least equal to the width of one normal traffic lane.

2.5.4.

Lay-bys shall include an emergency station.

2.6.

Drainage

2.6.1. The drainage of flammable and toxic liquids shall be provided for through well-designed slot gutters or other
measures within the tunnel cross sections, where the transport of dangerous goods is permitted. Additionally,
the drainage system shall be designed and maintained to prevent fire and flammable and toxic liquids from
spreading inside a tube and between tubes.

2.6.2.

If, in existing tunnels, such requirements cannot be met or can be met only at disproportionate cost, this shall
be taken into consideration when deciding whether to allow the transport of dangerous goods on the basis of
an analysis of relevant risks.

C 95 E/40

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

20.4.2004

2.7.

Fire resistance of structures

The main structure of all tunnels where a local collapse of the structure can have catastrophic consequences, e.g.
immersed tunnels or tunnels which can cause the collapse of important neighbouring structures, shall ensure a
sufficient level of fire resistance.

2.8.

Lighting

2.8.1. Normal lighting shall be provided so as to ensure an appropriate visibility for drivers in the entrance zone as

well as in the interior of the tunnel during day and night.

2.8.2.

Safety lighting shall be provided to allow a minimum visibility for tunnel users to evacuate the tunnel in their
vehicles in case of a breakdown of the power supply.

2.8.3.

Evacuation lighting, such as evacuation marker lights, at a height of no more than 1,5 m, shall be provided to
guide tunnel users to evacuate the tunnel on foot, in case of emergency.

2.9.

Ventilation

2.9.1. The design, construction and operation of the ventilation system shall take into account:

— the control of pollutants emitted by road vehicles, under normal and peak traffic flow,

— the control of pollutants emitted by road vehicles in case the traffic is stopped due to an incident or an

accident,

— the control of heat and smoke in case of a fire.

2.9.2. A mechanical ventilation system shall be installed in all tunnels longer than 1 000 m with a traffic volume

higher than 2 000 vehicles per lane.

2.9.3.

In tunnels with bidirectional and/or congested unidirectional traffic, longitudinal ventilation shall be allowed
only if a risk analysis according to Article 13 shows it is acceptable and/or specific measures are taken, such as
appropriate traffic management, shorter emergency exit distances or smoke exhausts at intervals.

2.9.4. Transverse or semi-transverse ventilation systems shall be used in tunnels where a mechanical ventilation system
is necessary and longitudinal ventilation is not allowed according to 2.9.3. These systems shall be able to
exhaust smoke in case of fire.

2.9.5.

For tunnels with bidirectional traffic, with a traffic volume higher than 2 000 vehicles per lane, longer than
3 000 m and with a control centre and transverse and/or semi-transverse ventilation, the following minimum
measures shall be taken as regards ventilation:

— air and smoke-extraction dampers shall be installed which can be operated separately or in groups,

— the longitudinal air velocity shall be monitored constantly and the steering process of the ventilation system

(dampers, fans, etc.) adjusted accordingly.

2.10.

Emergency stations

2.10.1. Emergency stations are intended to provide various items of safety equipment, in particular emergency tele-

phones and extinguishers, but are not intended to protect road users from the effects of fire.

2.10.2. Emergency stations can consist of a box on the sidewall or preferably a recess in the sidewall. They shall be

equipped with at least an emergency telephone and two fire extinguishers.

2.10.3. Emergency stations shall be provided near the portals and inside at intervals which for new tunnels shall not

exceed 150 m and which in existing tunnels shall not exceed 250 m.

2.11. Water supply

A water supply shall be provided for all tunnels. Hydrants shall be provided near the portals and inside at
intervals which shall not exceed 250 m. If a water supply is not available,
it is mandatory to verify that
sufficient water is provided otherwise.

20.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95 E/41

2.12.

Road signs

Specific signs shall be used for all safety facilities provided for tunnel users. Signs and panels for use in tunnels
are given in Annex III.

2.13.

Control centre

2.13.1. A control centre shall be provided for all tunnels longer than 3 000 m with a traffic volume higher than 2 000

vehicles per lane.

2.13.2. Surveillance of several tunnels may be centralised into a single control centre.

2.14. Monitoring systems

2.14.1. Video monitoring systems and a system able automatically to detect traffic incidents (such as stopping vehicles)

and/or fires shall be installed in all tunnels with a control centre.

2.14.2. Automatic fire-detection systems shall be installed in all tunnels which do not have a control centre, where the
operation of mechanical ventilation for smoke control is different from the automatic operation of ventilation
for the control of pollutants.

2.15.

Equipment to close the tunnel

2.15.1. In all tunnels longer than 1 000 m, traffic signals shall be installed before the entrances so that the tunnel can
be closed in case of an emergency. Additional means, such as variable message signs and barriers, can be
provided to ensure appropriate obedience.

2.15.2. Inside all tunnels longer than 3 000 m, with a control centre and a traffic volume higher than 2 000 vehicles
per lane, equipment to stop vehicles in case of an emergency is recommended at intervals not exceeding
1 000 m. This equipment shall consist of traffic signals and possibly additional means, such as loudspeakers,
variable message signs and barriers.

2.16.

Communication systems

2.16.1. Radio re-broadcasting equipment

for emergency service use shall be installed in all tunnels longer than

1 000 m with a traffic volume higher than 2 000 vehicles per lane.

2.16.2. Where there is a control centre, it shall be possible to interrupt radio re-broadcasting of channels intended for

tunnel users, if available, in order to give emergency messages.

2.16.3. Shelters and other facilities where evacuating tunnel users must wait before they can reach the outside shall be

equipped with loudspeakers in order to inform users.

2.17.

Power supply and electrical circuits

2.17.1. All tunnels shall have an emergency power supply able to ensure the functioning of safety equipment which is

indispensable for the evacuation until all users have evacuated the tunnel.

2.17.2. Electrical, measurement and control circuits shall be designed in such a way that a local failure, such as that due

to a fire, does not affect unimpaired circuits.

2.18.

Fire resistance of equipment

The level of fire resistance of all tunnel equipment shall take into account the technological possibilities and aim
at maintaining the necessary safety functions in case of a fire.

2.19.

Table displaying informative summary of minimum requirements

The table hereafter gives an informative summary of the minimum requirements of the previous paragraphs.
The minimum requirements are those set out in the operative text of this Annex.

C 95 E/42

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

20.4.2004

INFORMATIVE SUMMARY OF MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS

Traffic £ 2 000
vehicles per lane

Traffic > 2 000 vehicles per
lane

500 to
1 000 m

>
1 000 m

500 to
1 000 m

1 000 to
3 000 m

>
3 000 m

Additional conditions for implementation to be
mandatory, or comments

Mandatory for all tunnels

Mandatory with exceptions

Not mandatory

Recommended

Structural
measures

Two tubes or more

Gradients £ 5 %

Emergency walkways

2.1

2.2

2.3.1
2.3.2

Emergency exits at least
every 500 m

2.3.3-
2.3.9

Cross-connections for
emergency services at least
every 1 500 m

2.4.1

/

Crossing of the central
reserve outside each portal

2.4.2

Lay-bys at least every
1 000 m

2.5

/

/

Drainage for flammable and
toxic liquids

2.6

Fire resistance of structures

2.7

Lighting

Normal lighting

Safety lighting

Evacuation lighting

2.8.1

2.8.2

2.8.3

Mandatory where
shows that traffic > 10 000 vehicle/lane

a 15-year

forecast

Mandatory unless not
possible

geographically

Mandatory where there is no emergency
lane, unless the condition in 2.3.1 is
respected.
tunnels where
there is neither an emergency lane, nor
an emergency walkway additional/rein-
forced measures shall be taken

In existing

Implementation of emergency exits in
existing tunnels to be evaluated case by
case

Mandatory in twin-tube tunnels longer
than 1 500 m

Mandatory outside twin or multitube
tunnels wherever geographically possible

/

Mandatory in new bidirectional tunnels
> 1 500 m without emergency lanes. In
existing bidirectional tunnels > 1 500 m:
depending on analysis. For both new and
existing tunnels, depending on extra
usable tunnel width

Mandatory where transport of dangerous
goods is allowed

Mandatory where a local collapse can
have catastrophic consequences

20.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95 E/43

Traffic £ 2 000
vehicles per lane

Traffic > 2 000 vehicles per
lane

500 to
1 000 m

>
1 000 m

500 to
1 000 m

1 000 to
3 000 m

>
3 000 m

Additional conditions for implementation to be
mandatory, or comments

Ventilation

Mechanical ventilation

2.9

Special provisions for (semi-)
transverse ventilation

2.9.5

Emergency
stations

At least every 150 m

2.10

Water supply

At least every 250 m

2.11

Road signs

Control centre

Monitoring
systems

Video

Automatic incident detection
and/or fire detection

2.12

2.13

2.14

2.14

Equipment to
close the
tunnel

Traffic signals before the
entrances

2.15.1

Traffic signals inside the
tunnel at least every
1 000 m

2.15.2

Communi-
cation systems

Radio re-broadcasting for
emergency services

2.16.1

Emergency radio messages
for tunnel users

2.16.2

Loudspeakers in shelters and
exits

2.16.3

Emergency power supply

Fire resistance of equipment

2.17

2.18

Mandatory in bidirectional tunnels where
there is a control centre

Equipped with telephone and 2 extin-
guishers. A maximum interval
of
250 m is allowed in existing tunnels

If not available, mandatory to provide
sufficient water otherwise

For all safety facilities provided for tunnel
users (see Annex III)

Surveillance of several
centralised into a single control centre

tunnels may be

Mandatory where there is a control centre

least one of

is
At
mandatory in tunnels with a control
centre

the two systems

Recommended if there is a control centre
and the length exceeds 3 000 m

Mandatory where radio is re-broadcasted
for tunnel users and where there is a
control centre

Mandatory where evacuating users must
wait before they can reach the outside

To ensure
the
pensable safety equipment at
during evacuation of tunnel users

functioning of

indis-
least at

Shall aim to maintain the necessary safety
functions

C 95 E/44

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

20.4.2004

3.

Measures concerning operations

3.1.

Operating means

The operation shall be organised and have appropriate means so as to ensure the continuity and safety of the
traffic through the tunnel. The personnel involved in the operation as well as the emergency services shall
receive appropriate initial and continuous training.

3.2.

Emergency planning

Emergency response plans shall be available for all tunnels. In tunnels starting and finishing in different Member
States, a single binational emergency response plan shall involve the two countries.

3.3.

Works in tunnels

Complete or partial closure of lanes due to construction or maintenance works planned in advance shall always
begin outside the tunnel. Variable message signs, traffic signals and mechanical barriers may be used for this
purpose.

3.4.

Management of accidents and incidents

In the event of a serious accident or incident, all appropriate tunnel tubes shall be closed immediately to traffic.

This shall be done by simultaneous activation not only of the abovementioned equipment before the portals,
but also of variable message signs, traffic signals and mechanical barriers inside the tunnel, if available, so that
all the traffic can be stopped as soon as possible outside and inside the tunnel. In tunnels of less than 1 000 m,
the closure may be effected by other means. Traffic shall be managed in such a way that unaffected vehicles can
quickly leave the tunnel.

The access time for emergency services in the event of an incident in a tunnel shall be as short as possible and
shall be measured during periodic exercises. In addition, it may be measured during incidents. In major bidi-
rectional tunnels with high traffic volumes, a risk analysis according to Article 13 shall establish whether
emergency services shall be stationed at the two extremities of the tunnel.

3.5.

Activity of the control centre

For all tunnels requiring a control centre, including those starting and finishing in different Member States, a
single control centre shall have full control at any given time.

3.6.

Tunnel closure

In the event of tunnel closure (long or shortterm), users shall be informed of the best alternative itineraries, by
means of easily accessible information systems.

Such alternative itineraries shall form part of systematic contingency plans. They should aim to maintain traffic
flow as much as possible and minimise secondary safety effects on the surrounding areas.

Member States should make all reasonable efforts to avoid a situation in which a tunnel located on the territory
of two Member States can not be used due to the consequences of bad weather conditions.

3.7.

Transport of dangerous goods

The following measures shall be applied concerning access into tunnels of vehicles transporting dangerous
goods, as defined in the relevant European legislation regarding the transport of dangerous goods by road:

— perform a risk analysis in accordance with Article 13 before the regulations and requirements regarding

dangerous goods through a tunnel are defined or modified,

— place appropriate signs to enforce the regulation before the last possible exit before the tunnel and at tunnel

entrances, as well as in advance to allow drivers to choose alternative routes,

— consider specific operating measures designed to reduce the risks related to some or all of the vehicles
transporting dangerous goods in tunnels, such as declaration before entering or passage in convoys escorted
by accompanying vehicles, on a case-by-case basis further to the aforementioned risk analysis.

20.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95 E/45

3.8.

Overtaking in tunnels

A risk analysis shall be carried out in order to decide whether heavy goods vehicles should be allowed to
overtake in tunnels with more than one lane in each direction.

3.9.

Distances between vehicles and speed

The appropriate speed of vehicles and the safe distance between them are especially important in tunnels and
shall be given close attention. This shall include advising tunnel users of appropriate speeds and distances.
Enforcement measures shall be initiated as appropriate.

Road users driving passenger cars should maintain under normal conditions a minimum distance equivalent to
the distance travelled by a vehicle in two seconds from the vehicle in front of them. For heavy goods vehicles
these distances should be doubled.

When traffic stops in a tunnel, road users should maintain a minimum distance of five metres to the vehicle in
front, except if this is not possible due to an emergency stop.

4.

Information campaigns

Information campaigns regarding safety in tunnels shall be regularly organised and implemented in conjunction
with interested parties on the basis of the harmonised work of international organisations. These information
campaigns shall cover the correct behaviour of road users when approaching and driving through tunnels,
especially in connection with vehicle breakdown, congestion, accidents and fires.

Information on the safety equipment available and proper road user behaviour in tunnels shall be provided in
convenient places for tunnel users (for example at rest areas before tunnels, at tunnel entrances when the traffic
is stopped or on the Internet).

C 95 E/46

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

20.4.2004

ANNEX II

APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN, SAFETY DOCUMENTATION, COMMISSIONING OF A TUNNEL, MODIFI-
CATIONS AND PERIODIC EXERCISES

1. Approval of the design

1.1. The provisions of this Directive shall be applied from the preliminary design stage onward.

1.2. Before any construction work begins, the tunnel manager shall compile the safety documentation described in 2.2
and 2.3 for a tunnel at the design stage and shall consult the safety officer. The tunnel manager shall submit the
safety documentation to the administrative authority and attach the opinion of the safety officer, and/or of the
inspection entity when available.

1.3. The design, as appropriate, shall be approved by the responsible authority, which shall inform the tunnel manager

and the administrative authority of its decision.

2.

Safety documentation

2.1. The tunnel manager shall compile safety documentation for each tunnel and keep it permanently up to date.

He/she shall provide a copy of the safety documentation to the safety officer.

2.2. The safety documentation shall describe the preventive and safeguard measures needed to ensure the safety of
users, taking into account people with reduced mobility and disabled people, the nature of the route, the config-
uration of the structure, its surroundings, the nature of the traffic and the scope for action by the emergency
services defined in Article 2 of the Directive.

2.3. In particular, the safety documentation for a tunnel at the design stage shall include:

— a description of the planned structure and access to it, together with the plans necessary for understanding its

design and anticipated operating arrangements,

— a traffic forecast study specifying and justifying the conditions expected for the transport of dangerous goods,

together with the risk analysis requested by point 3.7 of Annex I,

— a specific hazard investigation describing possible accidents which clearly affect the safety of road users in
tunnels which might occur during the operating stage and the nature and magnitude of their possible conse-
quences; this investigation must specify and substantiate measures for reducing the likelihood of accidents and
their consequences,

— an opinion on safety from an expert or organisation specialising in this field, which could be the inspection

entity.

2.4. The safety documentation for a tunnel which is at the commissioning stage shall also include besides those at

design stage:

— a description of the organisation, human and material resources and instructions specified by the tunnel

manager to ensure operation and maintenance of the tunnel,

— an emergency response plan drawn up jointly with the emergency services which also takes into account

people with reduced mobility and disabled people,

— a description of the system of permanent feedback of experience through which significant incidents and

accidents can be recorded and analysed.

2.5. The safety documentation for a tunnel which is in operation shall also include besides those at commissioning

stage:

— a report and analysis on significant incidents and accidents, which have taken place since the entry into force

of this Directive,

— a list of the safety exercises carried out and an analysis of the lessons learned from them.

20.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95 E/47

3. Commissioning

3.1. The initial opening of a tunnel to public traffic shall be subject to authorisation by the administrative authority

(commissioning) in accordance with the following procedure.

3.2. This procedure also applies to the opening of a tunnel to public traffic after any major change in construction and
operation or any substantial modification work on the tunnel which might significantly alter any of the constituent
components of the safety documentation.

3.3. The tunnel manager shall transmit the safety documentation mentioned in 2.4 to the safety officer, who shall give

his/her opinion on the opening of the tunnel to public traffic.

3.4. The tunnel manager shall forward this safety documentation to the administrative authority, and shall attach the
opinion of the safety officer. The administrative authority shall decide whether or not to authorise the opening of
the tunnel to public traffic, or whether to do so with restrictive conditions, and shall notify this to the tunnel
manager. A copy of this decision shall be forwarded to the emergency services.

4. Modifications

4.1. For any substantial modification in the structure, equipment or operation, which might significantly alter any of the
constituent components of the safety documentation, the tunnel manager shall ask for a new authorisation of
operation following the procedure described in point 3.

4.2. The tunnel manager shall inform the safety officer of any other change in construction and operation. Furthermore,
prior to any modification work on the tunnel, the tunnel manager shall provide the safety officer with documen-
tation detailing the proposals.

4.3. The safety officer shall examine the consequences of the modification and in any event give his/her opinion to the

tunnel manager, who shall send a copy to the administrative authority and to the emergency services.

5.

Periodic exercises

The tunnel manager and the emergency services shall, in cooperation with the safety officer, organise joint periodic
exercises for tunnel staff and the emergency services.

Exercises:

— should be as realistic as possible and should correspond to the defined incident scenarios,

— should yield clear evaluation results,

— should prevent any damage to the tunnel,

— may also, in part, be conducted as table-top or computer simulation exercises for complementary results.

(a) Full-scale exercises under conditions that are as realistic as possible shall be conducted in each tunnel at least
every four years. Tunnel closure will only be required if acceptable arrangements can be made for diverting
traffic. Partial and/or simulation exercises shall be conducted every year in between. In areas where several
tunnels are located in close proximity to each other, the full-scale exercise must be conducted in at least one of
those tunnels.

(b) The safety officer and the emergency services shall evaluate jointly these exercises, draw up a report and make

appropriate proposals.

C 95 E/48

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

20.4.2004

ANNEX III

SIGNING FOR TUNNELS

1. General requirements

The following are road signs and symbols to be used for tunnels. Road signs mentioned in this section are
described in the Vienna Convention on Road Signs and Signals of 1968, unless otherwise specified.

In order to facilitate international understanding of signs, the system of signs and signals prescribed in this Annex
is based on the use of shapes and colours characteristic of each class of sign, and wherever possible, on the use of
graphic symbols rather than inscriptions. Where Member States consider it necessary to modify the signs and
symbols prescribed, the modifications made shall not alter their essential characteristics. Where Member States do
not apply the Vienna Convention, the prescribed signs and symbols may be modified, provided that the modifi-
cations made shall not alter their essential intent.

1.1. Road signs shall be used to designate the following safety facilities in tunnels:

— lay-bys;

— emergency exits: the same sign shall be used for all kinds of emergency exits;

— escape routes: the two nearest emergency exits shall be signed on the sidewalls at distances of no more than
25 m, at a height of 1,0 to 1,5 m above escape-route level, with an indication of the distances to the exits;

— emergency stations: signs to indicate the presence of emergency phones and fire extinguishers.

1.2. Radio:

In tunnels where users can receive information via their radio, appropriate signs placed before the entrance shall
inform users on how to receive this information.

1.3. Signs and markings shall be designed and positioned so that they are clearly visible.

2. Description of signs and panels

Member States shall use appropriate signs, if necessary, in the advance warning area of the tunnel, inside a tunnel
and after the end of a tunnel. When designing the signs for a tunnel, local traffic and construction conditions as
well as other local conditions shall be considered. Signs according to the Vienna Convention on Road Signs and
Signals shall be used, except in Member States which do not apply the Vienna Convention.

2.1. Tunnel sign

The following sign shall be put at each entrance of the tunnel:

Sign E11A for road tunnels of the Vienna Convention

The length shall be included either in the lower part of the panel or on additional panel H2.

For tunnels over 3 000 m, the remaining length of the tunnel shall be indicated every 1 000 m.

The name of the tunnel may also be indicated.

20.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95 E/49

2.2. Horizontal signing

Horizontal delineation should be used at the roadside edge.

In the case of bidirectional tunnels, clearly visible means should be used along the median line (single or twin)
separating the two directions.

2.3. Signs and panels for signing of facilities

Emergency stations

Emergency stations shall bear informative signs, which shall be F signs according to the Vienna Convention and
indicate the equipment available to road users, such as:

Emergency telephone

Extinguisher

In emergency stations which are separated from the tunnel by a door, a clearly legible text, written in appropriate
languages, shall indicate that the emergency station does not ensure protection in case of fire. An example is given
below:

‘THIS AREA DOES NOT PROVIDE PROTECTION FROM FIRE

Follow signs to emergency exits’

Lay-bys

The signs to indicate lay-bys should be E signs according to the Vienna Convention. Telephones and fire extin-
guishers shall be indicated by an additional panel or incorporated in the sign itself.

Emergency exits

The signs to indicate Emergency exits should be G signs according to the Vienna Convention. Examples are shown
below:

C 95 E/50

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

20.4.2004

It is also necessary to sign the two nearest exits on the sidewalls. Examples are shown below.

Lane signals

These signs can be circular or rectangular

Variable message signing

Any variable message signs shall have clear indications to inform tunnel users of congestion, breakdown, accident,
fire or any other hazards.

20.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95 E/51

STATEMENT OF THE COUNCIL'S REASONS

I. INTRODUCTION

the European Parliament of 9 October 2003 (1),

In the framework of the codecision procedure (Article 251 of the EC Treaty), after receiving the
the Council drew up its common
opinion of
position, which it adopted on 26 February 2004.
In taking its position, the Council also took
account of the opinions of the European Economic and Social Committee (2) and of the Committee
of the Regions (3).

The first objective of the draft directive is the prevention of serious accidents that endanger human life
and the environment, as well as damage tunnel installations. As a second objective, the draft directive
aims at reducing the possible consequences of tunnel accidents.

II. ANALYSIS OF THE COMMON POSITION

Whilst the Council fully supports the aim and scope of the Commission's proposal, in view of its
commitment to improve the safety of tunnels throughout the Union, it felt that the automatic classi-
fication system as proposed by the Commission would be too rigid for an optimal and cost-effective
application of the directive to the large variety in tunnels such as they exist in the territory of the
Union. Therefore, Council opted for a more fine-tuned and pragmatic system, whereby each individual
safety requirement for a tunnel is based on one or more relevant parameters.

Amendments of the European Parliament

— Amendments concerning the administrative structure

Council was not able to accept all amendments relating to the administrative structure (administrative
authority, inspection entity, tunnel manager and safety officer), notably amendments 2, 10 to 25, 27 to
33, 58, 61 and 72 to 75.

In this respect,
it should be pointed out that, whilst the administrative structure proposed by the
Commission did not fully take into account or cater for existing administrative structures within the
Member States, the Council was nevertheless able to accept the overall proposed structure, and to
safeguard the benefits flowing from a clear definition and demarcation of tasks and responsibilities
between the actors. At the same time, the text was amended in certain respects so as to adapt it to a
certain extent to existing agencies and other actors involved in tunnel safety,
in order to avoid
unnecessary costly changes in the existing structures.

Furthermore, the acceptance of certain amendments concerning core elements of the administrative
structure was impeded by the close interlinkages between the administrative structure and the technical
requirements described in the three technical Annexes.

Against this background, the Council felt that it was undesirable to unravel the ‘package’ as regards the
administrative structure. In fact, the Council considers that the end result of its work provides every
intended safeguard in terms of transparency and the division of tasks and responsibilities.

Nevertheless, whilst keeping the basic administrative structure of the common position intact, the
Council was able to accept,
in spirit or in part — and in some cases in full — amendments 10,
14, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 72 and 73.

— Amendments concerning disabled persons

As regards amendments 9, 70 and 71 which concern special provisions for disabled persons, the
Council fully agreed with the need for specific consideration which should be given to disabled
persons within the context of
therefore accepted, with some changes in the
It
wording, amendments 70 and 71, and included a specific recital 12 devoted to disabled persons.

the directive.

(1) Doc. 13381/03 CODEC 1340 TRANS 248.
(2) OJ C 220, 16.9.2003, p. 26.
(3) OJ C 256, 24.10.2003, p. 64.

C 95 E/52

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

20.4.2004

— Amendments concerning the technical Annexes I, II and III

As regards the large number of amendments which concern the technical Annexes (amendments 7 to
8, 34 to 56, 62 to 69 for Annex I, amendments 70 to 75 for Annex II and amendments 76 to 78 for
Annex III), the Council was able to accept a great number of these, either in full, in part or in spirit.
The Council acknowledged that this was due to a large extent to Parliament's agreement to use the
more flexible approach also advocated by the Council: namely, to introduce a system whereby each
individual safety requirement for a tunnel is based on one or more relevant parameters of the tunnel in
question.

— Other amendments

The first part of amendment 1, which highlights the importance of road user behaviour for tunnel
safety, was accepted (cf. recital 10).

As regards amendment 3, concerning the financing for structural adjustments to tunnels through the
TEN budget, Council felt that, in view of the ongoing legislative process on the proposed decision on
the revision of guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network, on the one
hand, and the proposed directive on the charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain
infrastructures, on the other, it was not appropriate to incorporate this element in this directive.

Although the Council fully supports the substance of amendment 4, which makes a specific reference
to the implementation of the directive in the future Member States, the Council held the opinion that
such a provision would be redundant.

Amendment 5, which refers to the implementation of comparable safety standards for tunnels outside
the scope of this directive, was accepted (cf. recital 25). In this context, the Council also would like to
bring to the attention of Parliament the related recital 26, which furthermore encourages Member
States ‘to develop national provisions aiming at a higher tunnel safety level’.

The Council did not accept amendment 6 which concerns the subject matter of the directive, since it
was of the opinion that the text of the common position describes more precisely the aim of the
directive.