Directive 2004/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 on the inspection and verification of good laboratory practice (GLP) (Codified version) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2004-02-11
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: chemical product, disclosure of information, health control, research body, technical standard, testing

L 50/28

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

20.2.2004

DIRECTIVE 2004/9/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

on the inspection and verification of good laboratory practice (GLP)

of 11 February 2004

(Codified version)

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE
EUROPEAN UNION,

(4)

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Com-
munity, and in particular Article 95 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and
Social Committee (1),

Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article
251 of the Treaty (2),

Whereas:

(1)

(2)

(3)

Council Directive 88/320/EEC of 7 June 1988 on the
inspection and verification of Good Laboratory Practice
(GLP) (3) has been significantly amended several times. In
the interests of clarity and rationality the said Directive
should be codified.

The application of standardised organisational processes
and conditions under which laboratory studies are
planned, performed, recorded and reported for the non-
clinical testing of chemicals for the protection of man,
animals and the environment, hereinafter referred to as
‘good laboratory practice’ (GLP), contributes to the reas-
surance of Member States as to the quality of the test
data generated.

the Council of

In Annex 2 to its Decision of 12 May 1981 on the
mutual acceptance of data in the assessment of chemi-
cals,
the Organisation for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD) adopted princi-
ples of good laboratory practice which are accepted
within the Community and are specified in the European
Parliament and Council Directive 2004/10/EC of 11
February 2004 on the harmonisation of laws, regulations
and administrative provisions relating to the application
of the principles of good laboratory practice and the
verification of their applications for tests on chemical
substances (4).

In the conduct of tests on chemicals, it is desirable that
specialist manpower and testing laboratory resources
should not be wasted owing to the need to duplicate
tests because of differences in laboratory practices from
one Member State to another. This applies especially for
animal protection which requires that the number of
experiments on animals be restricted in accordance with
Council Directive 86/609/EEC of 24 November 1986 on
the approximation of laws, regulations and administra-
the Member States regarding the
tive provisions of
protection of animals used for experimental and other
scientific purposes (5). Mutual recognition of the results
of tests obtained using standard and recognised methods
is an essential condition for reducing the number of
experiments in this area.

(5)

(6)

(7)

However, in order to ensure that test data generated by
laboratories in one Member State are also recognised by
other Member States,
it is necessary to provide for a
harmonised system for study audit and inspection of
laboratories to ensure that they are working under GLP
conditions.

Member States should designate the authorities respon-
sible for carrying out monitoring on compliance with
GLP.

A committee, the members of which will be appointed
by the Member States, would be of assistance to the
Commission in the technical application of this Directive
and would cooperate in its efforts to encourage the free
movement of goods through the mutual recognition by
Member States of procedures for monitoring compliance
with GLP. The Committee set up by Council Directive
67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of
laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating
to the
and labelling of
dangerous substances (6) should be used for this purpose.

classification, packaging

(1) OJ C 85, 8.4.2003, p. 137.
(2) Opinion of

the European Parliament of 1 July 2003 (not yet
published in the Official Journal) and Decision of the Council of 20
January 2004.

(3) OJ L 145, 11.6.1988, p.35. Directive as last amended by Regulation
(EC) No 1882/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council
(OJ L 284, 31.10.2003, p. 1).

(4) See page 44 of this Official Journal.

(8)

That Committee may assist the Commission not only in
the application of this Directive but also in contributing
to the exchange of information and experience in this
field.

(5) OJ L 358, 18.12.1986, p. 1.
(6) OJ 196, 16.8.1967, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Council

Regulation (EC) No 807/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 36).

20.2.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 50/29

(9)

(10)

The measures necessary for the implementation of this
Directive should be adopted in accordance with Council
Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down
the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers
conferred on the Commission (1).

This Directive should be without prejudice to the obliga-
tions of the Member States concerning the time-limits
for transposition of the Directives set out in Annex II,
Part B,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

Article 1

1.
This Directive shall apply to the inspection and verifica-
tion of the organisational processes and the conditions under
which laboratory studies are planned, performed, recorded and
reported for the non-clinical testing, carried out in accordance
with the rules and regulations, of all chemicals (e.g. cosmetics,
industrial chemicals, medicinal products, food additives, animal
feed additives, pesticides) in order to assess the effect of such
products on man, animals and the environment.

2.
For the purposes of this Directive, ‘good laboratory prac-
tice’ (GLP), shall mean laboratory practice conducted in accord-
ance with the principles set out in Directive 2004/10/EC.

This Directive does not concern the interpretation and

3.
evaluation of test results.

The authorities referred to in paragraph 1 shall inspect
2.
the laboratory and audit the studies in accordance with the
provisions laid down in Annex I.

Article 4

Each year, Member States shall draw up a report relating

1.
to the implementation of GLP within their territory.

This report shall contain a list of laboratories inspected, the
date on which such inspection was carried out and a brief
summary of the conclusions of the inspections.

The reports shall be forwarded to the Commission each
2.
year, not later than 31 March. The Commission shall communi-
cate them to the Committee referred to in Article 7(1). The
Committee may request
information in addition to those
elements mentioned in paragraph 1 of this Article.

3. Member States shall ensure that commercially sensitive
and other confidential information to which they gain access as
a result of GLP compliance monitoring activities is made avail-
able only to the Commission, to national regulatory and desig-
nated authorities and to a laboratory or study sponsor directly
concerned with a particular inspection or study audit.

The names of

to inspection by a
laboratories subject
4.
designated authority, their GLP compliance status and the dates
upon which laboratory inspections or study audits have been
conducted shall not be considered to be confidential.

Article 2

Article 5

1.
Using the procedure laid down in Article 3, Member
States shall verify the compliance with GLP of any testing
laboratory within their territory claiming to use GLP in the
conduct of tests on chemicals.

1. Without prejudice to Article 6, the results of laboratory
inspections and study audits on GLP compliance carried out by
a Member State shall be binding on the other Member States.

2. Where the provisions of paragraph 1 have been complied
with, and the results of the inspection and verification are satis-
factory, the Member State in question may provide endorse-
ment of a claim by a laboratory that it and the tests that it
carries out comply with GLP, using the formula ‘Assessment of
conformity with GLP according to Directive 2004/9/EC on …
(date)’.

2. Where a Member State considers that a laboratory within
its territory claiming GLP compliance does not in fact comply
with GLP to the extent that the integrity or authenticity of the
studies it performs might be compromised, it shall forthwith
inform the Commission. The Commission shall
inform the
other Member States.

Article 3

Article 6

1. Member States shall designate the authorities responsible
for the inspection of laboratories within their territories and for
the audit of studies carried out by laboratories to assess com-
pliance with GLP.

(1) OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23.

1. Where a Member State has sufficient reason to believe
that a laboratory in another Member State claiming GLP
compliance has not carried out a test in accordance with GLP,
it may request further information from that Member State and
in particular may request a study audit, possibly in conjunction
with a new inspection.

L 50/30

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

20.2.2004

Should it not be possible for the Member States concerned to
reach agreement, the Member States in question shall immedi-
ately inform the other Member States and the Commission,
giving reasons for their decision.

The Commission shall examine as soon as possible the
2.
forward by the Member States within the
reasons put
Committee referred to in Article 7(1);
it shall then take the
appropriate measures in accordance with procedure referred to
in Article 7(2).
It may in this connection ask for expert
opinions from the designated authorities in the Member States.

3.
If the Commission considers that amendments to this
Directive are necessary in order to resolve the matters referred
to in paragraph 1, it shall initiate the procedure referred to in
Article 7(2) with a view to adopting those amendments.

Article 7

1.
The Commission shall be assisted by the Committee set
up in Article 29 of Directive 67/548/EEC, hereinafter ‘the
Committee’.

— the exchange of information on the training of inspectors.

2.
the
The amendments necessary for the adaptation of
formula referred to in Article 2(2) and of Annex I to take
account of technical progress shall be adopted in accordance
with the procedure referred to in Article 7(2).

Article 9

Directive 88/320/EEC is hereby repealed, without prejudice to
the obligations of the Member States concerning the time limits
for transposition of the said Directives as set out in Annex II,
Part B.

References made to the repealed Directive shall be construed as
being made to this Directive and shall be read in accordance
with the correlation table in Annex III.

Article 10

2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 5 and
7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the
provisions of Article 8 thereof.

This Directive shall enter into force on the 20th day following
that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European
Union.

The period laid down in Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/

3.
468/EC shall be set at three months.

4.

The Committee shall adopt its Rules of Procedure.

Article 8

Article 11

This Directive is addressed to the Member States.

1.
The Committee may examine any question which is
referred to it by its chairman either on his own initiative or at
the request of a representative of a Member State, concerning
the
and in particular
regarding:

implementation of

this Directive

— cooperation between the authorities designated by the
Member States in technical and administrative matters
arising from the implementation of GLP, and

Done at Strasbourg, 11 February 2004.

For the European Parliament

The President

P. COX

For the Council

The President

M. McDOWELL

20.2.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 50/31

ANNEX I

The provisions for the inspection and verification of GLP which are contained in Parts A and B are those contained in
Annexes I (Guides for compliance monitoring procedures for good laboratory practice) and II (Guidance for the conduct
of test facility inspections and study audits) respectively of the OECD Council Decision-Recommendation on compliance
with principles of good laboratory practice (C(89)87(Final)) of 2 October 1989 as revised by the OECD Council Decision
amending the Annexes to the Council Decision-Recommendation on compliance with principles of good laboratory
practice of 9 March 1995 (C(95)8(Final)).

REVISED GUIDES FOR COMPLIANCE MONITORING PROCEDURES FOR GLP

PART A

To facilitate the mutual acceptance of test data generated for submission to Regulatory Authorities of the OECD
member countries, harmonisation of the procedures adopted to monitor GLP compliance, as well as comparability of
their quality and rigour, are essential. The aim of this part of this Annex is to provide detailed practical guidance to the
Member States on the structure, mechanisms and procedures they should adopt when establishing national GLP com-
pliance monitoring programmes so that these programmes may be internationally acceptable.

It is recognised that Member States will adopt GLP principles and establish compliance monitoring procedures according
to national legal and administrative practices, and according to priorities they give to, for example the scope of initial
and subsequent coverage concerning categories of chemicals and types of testing. Since Member States may establish
more than one GLP Monitoring Authority due to their legal framework for chemicals control, more than one GLP
compliance programme may be established. The guidance set forth in the following paragraphs concerns each of these
Authorities and compliance programmes, as appropriate.

Definitions of terms

The definitions of terms in the OECD principles of good laboratory practice adopted in Article 1 of Directive 2004/10/
EC of the European Parliament and of the Council are applicable to this part of this Annex. In addition, the following
definitions apply:

— GLP principles: principles of good laboratory practice that are consistent with the OECD principles of good labora-

tory practice as adopted in Article 1 of Directive 2004/10/EC,

— GLP compliance monitoring: the periodic inspection of test facilities and/or auditing of studies for the purpose of

verifying adherence to GLP principles,

— (national) GLP compliance programme: the particular scheme established by a Member State to monitor GLP

compliance by test facilities within its territories, by means of inspections and study audits,

— (national) GLP Monitoring Authority: a body established within a Member State with responsibility for monitoring
the GLP compliance of test facilities within its territories and for discharging other such functions related to GLP as
may be nationally determined. It is understood that more than one such body may be established in a Member
State,

— test facility inspection: an on-site examination of the test facility's procedures and practices to assess the degree of
compliance with GLP principles. During inspections, the management structures and operational procedures of the
test facility are examined, key technical personnel are interviewed, and the quality and integrity of data generated by
the facility are assessed and reported,

— study audit: a comparison of raw data and associated records with the interim or final report in order to determine
whether the raw data have been accurately reported, to determine whether testing was carried out in accordance
with the study plan and standard operating procedures, to obtain additional information not provided in the report,
and to establish whether practices were employed in the development of data that would impair their validity,

— inspector: a person who performs the test facility inspections and study audits on behalf of the (national) GLP Moni-

toring Authority,

— GLP compliance status: the level of adherence of a test facility to the GLP principles as assessed by the (national)

GLP Monitoring Authority,

— Regulatory Authority: a national body with legal responsibility for aspects of the control of chemicals.

L 50/32

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

20.2.2004

Components of good laboratory practice compliance monitoring procedures

Administration

A (national) GLP compliance programme should be the responsibility of a properly constituted, legally identifiable body
adequately staffed and working within a defined administrative framework.

Member States should:

— ensure that the (national) GLP Monitoring Authority is directly responsible for an adequate ‘team’ of inspectors

having the necessary technical/scientific expertise or is ultimately responsible for such a team,

— publish documents relating to the adoption of GLP principles within their territories,

— publish documents providing details of the (national) GLP compliance programme, including information on the
legal or administrative framework within which the programme operates and references to published acts, normative
documents (e.g., regulations, codes of practice), inspection manuals, guidance notes, periodicity of inspections and/or
criteria for inspection schedules, etc.,

— maintain records of test facilities inspected (and their GLP compliance status) and of studies audited for both national

and international purposes.

Confidentiality

(National) GLP Monitoring Authorities will have access to commercially valuable information and, on occasion, may
even need to remove commercially sensitive documents from a test facility or refer to them in detail in their reports.

Member States should:

— make provision for the maintenance of confidentiality, not only by Inspectors but also by any other persons who

gain access to confidential information as a result of GLP compliance monitoring activities,

— ensure that, unless all commercially sensitive and confidential information has been excised, reports of test facility
inspections and study audits are made available only to Regulatory Authorities and, where appropriate, to the test
facilities inspected or concerned with study audits and/or to study sponsors.

Personnel and training

(National) GLP Monitoring Authorities should:

— ensure that an adequate number of inspectors is available.

The number of inspectors required will depend on:

(a) the number of test facilities involved in the (national) GLP compliance programme;

(b) the frequency with which the GLP compliance status of the test facilities is to be assessed;

(c) the number and complexity of the studies undertaken by those test facilities;

(d) the number of special inspections or audits requested by Regulatory Authorities,

— ensure that inspectors are adequately qualified and trained.

Inspectors should have qualifications and practical experience in the range of scientific disciplines relevant to the
testing of chemicals. (National) GLP Monitoring Authorities should:

(a) ensure that arrangements are made for the appropriate training of GLP inspectors, having regard to their indivi-

dual qualifications and experience;

(b) encourage consultations, including joint training activities where necessary, with the staff of (national) GLP Moni-
toring Authorities in other OECD member countries in order to promote international harmonisation in the
interpretation and application of GLP principles, and in the monitoring of compliance with such principles,

— ensure that inspectorate personnel, including experts under contract, have no financial or other interests in the test

facilities inspected, the studies audited or the firms sponsoring such studies,

— provide inspectors with a suitable means of identification (e.g., an identity card).

20.2.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 50/33

Inspectors may be:

— on the permanent staff of the (national) GLP Monitoring Authority,

— on the permanent staff of a body separate from the (national) GLP Monitoring Authority, or

— employed on contract, or in another way, by the (national) GLP Monitoring Authority to perform test facility inspec-

tions or study audits.

In the latter two cases, the (national) GLP Monitoring Authority should have ultimate responsibility for determining the
GLP compliance status of test facilities and the quality/acceptability of a study audit, and for taking any action based on
the results of test facility inspections or study audits which may be necessary.

(National) GLP compliance programmes

GLP compliance monitoring is intended to ascertain whether test facilities have implemented GLP principles for the
conduct of studies and are capable of assuring that the resulting data are of adequate quality. As indicated above,
Member States should publish the details of their (national) GLP compliance programmes. Such information should, inter
alia:

— define the scope and extent of the programme.

A (national) GLP compliance programme may cover only a limited range of chemicals, for example, industrial chemi-
cals, pesticides, pharmaceuticals, etc., or may include all chemicals. The scope of the monitoring for compliance
should be defined, both with respect to the categories of chemicals and to the types of tests subject to it, for
example, physical, chemical, toxicological and/or ecotoxicological,

— provide an indication as to the mechanism whereby test facilities enter the programme.

The application of GLP principles to health and environmental safety data generated for regulatory purposes may be
mandatory. A mechanism should be available whereby test facilities may have their compliance with GLP principles
monitored by the appropriate (national) GLP Monitoring Authority,

— provide information on categories of test facility inspections/study audits.

A (national) GLP compliance programme should include:

(a) provision for test facility inspections. These inspections include both a general test facility inspection and a study

audit of one or more on-going or completed studies;

(b) provisions for special test facility inspections/study audits at the request of a Regulatory Authority, for example,

prompted by a query arising from the submission of data to a Regulatory Authority,

— define the powers of inspectors for entry into test facilities and their access to data held by test facilities (including

specimens, SOPs (standard operating procedures) other documentation, etc.).

While inspectors will not normally wish to enter test facilities against the will of the facility's management, circum-
stances may arise where test facility entry and access to data are essential to protect public health or the environ-
ment. The powers available to the (national) GLP Monitoring Authority in such cases should be defined,

— describe the test facility inspection and study audit procedures for verification of GLP compliance.

The documentation should indicate the procedures which will be used to examine both the organisational processes
and the conditions under which studies are planned, performed, monitored and recorded. Guidance for such proce-
dures is available in part B of this Annex,

— describe actions that may be taken as follow-up test facility inspections and study audits.

Follow-up to test facility inspections and study audits

When a test facility inspection or study audit has been completed, the inspector should prepare a written report of the
findings.

L 50/34

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

20.2.2004

Member States should take action where deviations from GLP principles are found during or after a test facility inspec-
tion or study audit. The appropriate actions should be described in documents from the (national) GLP Monitoring
Authority.

If a test facility inspection or study audit reveals only minor deviations from GLP principles, the facility should be
required to correct such minor deviations. The inspector may need, at an appropriate time, to return to the facility to
verify that corrections have been introduced.

Where no, or where only minor deviations have been found, the (national) GLP Monitoring Authority may:

— issue a statement that the test facility has been inspected and found to be operating in compliance with GLP princi-
ples. The date of the inspections and, if appropriate, the categories of test inspected in the test facility at that time
should be included. Such statements may be used to provide information to (national) GLP Monitoring Authorities
in other OECD member countries,

and/or

— provide the Regulatory Authority which requested a study audit with a detailed report of the findings.

Where serious deviations are found, the action taken by (national) GLP Monitoring Authorities will depend on the par-
ticular circumstances of each case and the legal or administrative provisions under which GLP compliance monitoring
has been established within their countries. Actions which may be taken include, but are not limited to, the following:

— issuance of a statement, giving details of the inadequacies or faults found which might affect the validity of studies

conducted in the test facility,

— issuance of a recommendation to a Regulatory Authority that a study be rejected,

— suspension of test facility inspections or study audits of a test facility and, for example and where administratively
possible, removal of the test facility from the (national) GLP compliance programme or from any existing list or
register of test facilities subject to GLP test facility inspections,

— requiring that a statement detailing the deviations be attached to specific study reports,

— action through the courts, where warranted by circumstances and where legal/administrative procedures so permit.

Appeals procedures

Problems, or differences of opinion, between inspectors and test facility management will normally be resolved during
the course of a test facility inspection or study audit. However, it may not always be possible for agreement to be
reached. A procedure should exist whereby a test facility may make representations relating to the outcome of a test
facility inspection or study audit for GLP compliance monitoring and/or relating to the action the GLP Monitoring
Authority proposes to take thereon.

REVISED GUIDANCE FOR THE CONDUCT OF TEST FACILITY INSPECTIONS AND STUDY AUDITS

PART B

Introduction

The purpose of this part of this Annex is to provide guidance for the conduct of test facility inspections and study audits
which would be mutually acceptable to OECD member countries. It is principally concerned with test facility inspec-
tions, an activity which occupies much of the time of GLP inspectors. A test facility inspection will usually include a
study audit or review as a part of the inspection, but study audits will also have to be conducted from time to time at
the request, for example, of a Regulatory Authority. General guidance for the conduct of study audits will be found at
the end of this Annex.

20.2.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 50/35

Test facility inspections are conducted to determine the degree of conformity of test facilities and studies with GLP prin-
ciples and to determine the integrity of data to assure that resulting data are of adequate quality for assessment and deci-
sion-making by national Regulatory Authorities. They result in reports which describe the degree of adherence of a test
facility to the GLP principles. Test facility inspections should be conducted on a regular, routine basis to establish and
maintain records of the GLP compliance status of test facilities.

Further clarification of many of the points in this part of this Annex may be obtained by referring to the OECD
consensus documents on GLP (on, e.g., the role and responsibilities of the study director).

Definitions of terms

The definitions of terms in the OECD principles of GLP adopted in Article 1 of Directive 2004/10/EC and in Part A of
this Annex are applicable to this part of this Annex.

Test facility inspections

Inspections for compliance with GLP principles may take place in any test facility generating health or environmental
safety data for regulatory purposes. Inspectors may be required to audit data relating to the physical, chemical, toxicolo-
gical or ecotoxicological properties of a substance or preparation. In some cases, inspectors may need assistance from
experts in particular disciplines.

The wide diversity of facilities (in terms both of physical layout and management structure), together with the variety of
types of studies encountered by inspectors, means that the inspectors must use their own judgment to assess the degree
and extent of compliance with GLP principles. Nevertheless, inspectors should strive for a consistent approach in evalu-
ating whether, in the case of a particular test facility or study, an adequate level of compliance with each GLP principle
has been achieved.

In the following sections, guidance is provided on the various aspects of the testing facility, including its personnel and
procedures, which are likely to be examined by inspectors. In each section, there is a statement of purpose, as well as an
illustrative list of specific items which could be considered during the course of a test facility inspection. These lists are
not meant to be comprehensive and should not be taken as such.

Inspectors should not concern themselves with the scientific design of the study or the interpretation of the findings of
studies with respect to risks for human health or the environment. These aspects are the responsibility of those Regula-
tory Authorities to which the data are submitted for regulatory purposes.

Test facility inspections and study audits inevitably disturb the normal work in a facility. Inspectors should therefore
carry out their work in a carefully planned way and, so far as practicable, respect the wishes of the management of the
test facility as to the timing of visits to certain sections of the facility.

Inspectors will, while conducting test facility inspections and study audits, have access to confidential, commercially
valuable information. It is essential that they ensure that such information is seen by authorised personnel only. Their
responsibilities in this respect will have been established within their (national) GLP compliance monitoring programme.

Inspection procedures

Pre-inspection

Purpose: to familiarise the inspector with the facility which is about to be inspected in respect of management structure,
physical layout of buildings and range of studies.

Prior to conducting a test facility inspection or study audit, inspectors should familiarise themselves with the facility
which is to be visited. Any existing information on the facility should be reviewed. This may include previous inspection
reports, the layout of the facility, organisation charts, study reports, protocols and curricula vitae (CVs) of personnel.
Such documents would provide information on:

— the type, size and layout of the facility,

— the range of studies likely to be encountered during the inspection,

— the management structure of the facility.

L 50/36

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

20.2.2004

Inspectors should note, in particular, any deficiencies from previous test facility inspections. Where no previous test
facility inspections have been conducted, a pre-inspection visit can be made to obtain relevant information.

Test facilities may be informed of the date and time of inspector's arrival, the objective of their visit and the length of
time they expect to be on the premises. This could allow the test facility to ensure that the appropriate personnel and
documentation are available. In cases where particular documents or records are to be examined, it may be useful to
identify these to the test facility in advance of the visit so that they will be immediately available during the test facility
inspection.

Starting conference

Purpose: to inform the management and staff of the facility of the reason for the test facility inspection or study audit
that is about to take place, and to identify the facility areas, study(ies) selected for audit, documents and personnel likely
to be involved.

The administrative and practical details of a test facility inspection or study audit should be discussed with the manage-
ment of the facility at the start of the visit. At the starting conference, inspectors should:

— outline the purpose and scope of the visit,

— describe the documentation which will be required for the test facility inspection, such as lists of on-going and
if necessary,

completed studies, study plans, standard operating procedures, study reports, etc. Access to and,
arrangements for the copying of relevant documents should be agreed on at this time,

— clarify or request information as to the management structure (organisation) and personnel of the facility,

— request information as to the conduct of studies not subject to GLP principles in the areas of the test facility where

GLP studies are being conducted,

— make an initial determination as to the parts of the facility to be covered during the test facility inspection,

— describe the documents and specimens that will be needed for on-going or completed study(ies) selected for study

audit,

— indicate that a closing conference will be held at the completion of the inspection.

Before proceeding further with a test facility inspection, it is advisable for the inspector(s) to establish contact with the
facility's quality assurance (QA) unit.

As a general rule, when inspecting a facility, inspectors will find it helpful to be accompanied by a member of the QA
unit.

Inspectors may wish to request that a room be set aside for examination of documents and other activities.

Organisation and personnel

Purpose: to determine whether the test facility has sufficient qualified personnel, staff resources and support services for
the variety and number of studies undertaken; the organisational structure is appropriate, and management has estab-
lished a policy regarding training and staff health surveillance appropriate to the studies undertaken in the facility.

The management should be asked to produce certain documents, such as:

— floor plans,

— facility management and scientific organisation charts,

— CVs of personnel involved in the type(s) of studies selected for the study audit,

— list(s) of on-going and completed studies with information on the type of study, initiation/completion dates, test

system, method of application of test substance and name of study director,

— staff health surveillance policies,

— staff job descriptions and staff training programmes and records,

— an index to the facility's standard operating procedures (SOPs),

— specific SOPs as related to the studies or procedures being inspected or audited,

— list(s) of the study directors and sponsors associated with the study(ies) being audited.

20.2.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 50/37

The inspector should check, in particular:

— lists of on-going and completed studies to ascertain the level of work being undertaken by the test facility,

— the identity and qualifications of the study director(s), the head of the quality assurance unit and other personnel,

— existence of SOPs for all relevant areas of testing.

Quality assurance programme

Purpose: to determine whether the mechanisms used to assure management that studies are conducted in accordance
with GLP principles are adequate.

The head of the QA unit should be asked to demonstrate the systems and methods for QA inspection and monitoring of
studies, and the system for recording observations made during QA monitoring. Inspectors should check:

— the qualifications of the head of QA, and of all QA staff,

— that the QA unit functions independently from the staff involved in the studies,

— how the QA unit schedules and conducts inspections, how it monitors identified critical phases in a study, and what

resources are available for QA inspections and monitoring activities,

— that where studies are of such short duration that monitoring of each study is impracticable, arrangements exist for

monitoring on a sample basis,

— the extent and depth of QA monitoring during the practical phases of the study,

— the extent and depth of QA monitoring of routine test facility operation,

— the QA procedure for checking the final report to ensure its agreement with the raw data,

— that management receives reports from QA concerning problems likely to affect the quality or integrity of a study,

— the actions taken by QA when deviations are found,

— the QA role, if any, if studies or parts of studies are done in contract laboratories,

— the part played, if any, by QA in the review, revision and updating of SOPs.

Facilities

Purpose: to determine if the test facility, whether indoor or outdoor, is of suitable size, design and location to meet the
demands of the studies being undertaken.

The inspector should check that:

— the design enables an adequate degree of separation so that, for example, test substances, animals, diets, pathological

specimens, etc. of one study cannot be confused with those of another,

— environmental control and monitoring procedures exist and function adequately in critical areas, for example, animal

and other biological test systems rooms, test substance storage areas, laboratory areas,

— the general housekeeping is adequate for the various facilities and that there are,

if necessary, pest control

procedures.

Care, housing and containment of biological test systems

Purpose: to determine whether the test facility, if engaged in studies using animals or other biological test systems, has
support facilities and conditions for their care, housing and containment, adequate to prevent stress and other problems
which could affect the test system and hence the quality of data.

A test facility may be carrying out studies which require a diversity of animal or plant species as well as microbial or
other cellular or sub-cellular systems. The type of test systems being used will determine the aspects relating to care,
housing or containment that the inspector will monitor. Using his judgment, the inspector will check, according to the
test systems, that:

— there are facilities adequate for the test systems used and for testing needs,

— there are arrangements to quarantine animals and plants being introduced into the facility and that these arrange-

ments are working satisfactorily,

L 50/38

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

20.2.2004

— there are arrangements to isolate animals (or other elements of a test system, if necessary) known to be, or suspected

of being, diseased or carriers of disease,

— there is adequate monitoring and record-keeping of health, behaviour or other aspects, as appropriate to the test

system,

— the equipment for maintaining the environmental conditions required for each test system is adequate, well main-

tained, and effective,

— animal cages, racks, tanks and other containers, as well as accessory equipment, are kept sufficiently clean,

— analyses to check environmental conditions and support systems are carried out as required,

— facilities exist for removal and disposal of animal waste and refuse from the test systems and that these are operated

so as to minimise vermin infestation, odours, disease hazards and environmental contamination,

— storage areas are provided for animal feed or equivalent materials for all test systems; that these areas are not used
for the storage of other materials such as test substances, pest control chemicals or disinfectants, and that they are
separate from areas in which animals are housed or other biological test systems are kept,

— stored feed and bedding are protected from deterioration by adverse environmental conditions,

infestation or

contamination.

Apparatus, materials, reagents and specimens

Purpose: to determine whether the test facility has suitably located, operational apparatus in sufficient quantity and of
adequate capacity to meet the requirements of the tests being conducted in the facility and that the materials, reagents
and specimens are properly labelled, used and stored.

The inspector should check that:

— apparatus is clean and in good working order,

— records have been kept of operation, maintenance, verification, calibration and validation of measuring equipment

and apparatus (including computerised systems),

— materials and chemical reagents are properly labelled and stored at appropriate temperatures and that expiry dates
are not being ignored. Labels for reagents should indicate their source, identity and concentration and/or other perti-
nent information,

— specimens are well identified by test system, study, nature and date of collection,

— apparatus and materials used do not alter to any appreciable extent the test systems.

Test systems

Purpose: to determine whether adequate procedures exist for the handling and control of the variety of test systems
required by the studies undertaken in the facility, for example, chemical and physical systems, cellular and microbic
systems, plants or animals.

Physical and chemical systems

The inspector should check that:

— where required by study plans, the stability of test and reference substances was determined and that the reference

substances specified in test plans were used,

— in automated systems, data generated as graphs, recorder traces or computer print-outs are documented as raw data

and archived.

Biological test systems

Taking account of the relevant aspects referred to above relating to care, housing or containment of biological test
systems, the inspector should check that:

— test systems are as specified in study plans,

— test systems are adequately and, if necessary and appropriate, uniquely identified throughout the study, and that
records exist regarding receipt of the test systems and document fully the number of test systems received, used,
replaced or discarded,

— housing or containers of test systems are properly identified with all the necessary information,

20.2.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 50/39

— there is an adequate separation of studies being conducted on the same animal species (or the same biological test

systems) but with different substances,

— there is an adequate separation of animal species (and other biological test systems) either in space or in time,

— the biological test system environment is as specified in the study plan or in SOPs for aspects such as temperature,

or light/dark cycles,

— the recording of the receipt, handling, housing or containment, care and health evaluation is appropriate to the test

systems,

— written records are kept of examination, quarantine, morbidity, mortality, behaviour, diagnosis and treatment of

animal and plant test systems or other similar aspects as appropriate to each biological test system,

— there are provisions for the appropriate disposal of test systems at the end of tests.

Test and reference substances

Purpose: to determine whether the test facility has procedures designed (i) to ensure that the identity, potency, quantity
and composition of test and reference substances are in accordance with their specifications, and (ii) to properly receive
and store test and reference substances.

The inspector should check that:

— there are written records on the receipt (including identification of the person responsible), and for the handling,

sampling, usage and storage of tests and reference substances,

— test and reference substances containers are properly labelled,

— storage conditions are appropriate to preserve the concentration, purity and stability of the test and reference

substances,

— there are written records on the determination of identity, purity, composition, stability, and for the prevention of

contamination of test and reference substances, where applicable,

— there are procedures for the determination of the homogeneity and stability of mixtures containing test and reference

substances, where applicable,

— containers holding mixtures (or dilutions) of the test and reference substances are labelled and that records are kept

of the homogeneity and stability of their contents, where applicable,

— when the test is of longer than four weeks duration, samples from each batch of test and reference substances have

been taken for analytical purposes and that they have been retained for an appropriate time,

— procedures for mixing substances are designed to prevent errors in identification or cross-contamination.

Standard operating procedures

Purpose: to determine whether the test facility has written SOPs relating to all the important aspects of its operations,
considering that one of the most important management techniques for controlling facility operations is the use of
written SOPs. These relate directly to the routine elements of tests conducted by the test facility.

The inspector should check that:

— each test facility area has immediately available relevant, authorised copies of SOPs,

— procedures exist for revision and updating of SOPs,

— any amendments or changes to SOPs have been authorised and dated,

— historical files of SOPs are maintained,

— SOPs are available for, but not necessarily limited to, the following activities:

(i) receipt; determination of identity, purity, composition and stability; labelling; handling; sampling; usage; and

storage of test and reference substances;

(ii) use, maintenance, cleaning, calibration and validation of measuring apparatus, computerised systems and envir-

onmental control equipment;

(iii) preparation of reagents and dosing formulations;

(iv) record-keeping, reporting, storage and retrieval of records and reports;

L 50/40

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

20.2.2004

(v) preparation and environmental control of areas containing the test systems;

(vi) receipt, transfer, location, characterisation, identification and care of test systems;

(vii) handling of the test systems before, during and at the termination of the study;

(viii) disposal of test systems;

(ix) use of pest control and cleaning agents;

(x) quality assurance programme operations.

Performance of the study

Purpose: to verify that written study plans exist and that the plans and the conduct of the study are in accordance with
GLP principles.

The inspector should check that:

— the study plan was signed by the study director,

— any amendments to the study plan were signed and dated by the study director,

— the date of the agreement to the study plan by the sponsor was recorded (where applicable),

— measurements, observations and examinations were in accordance with the study plan and relevant SOPs,

— the results of these measurements, observations and examinations were recorded directly, promptly, accurately and

legibly and were signed (or initialled) and dated,

— any changes in the raw data, including data stored in computers, did not obscure previous entries, included the

reason for the change and identified the person responsible for the change and the date it was made,

— computer-generated or stored data have been identified and that the procedures to protect them against unauthorised

amendments or loss are adequate,

— the computerised systems used within the study are reliable, accurate and have been validated,

— any unforeseen events recorded in the raw data have been investigated and evaluated,

— the results presented in the reports of the study (interim or final) are consistent and complete and that they correctly

reflect the raw data.

Reporting of study results

Purpose: to determine whether final reports are prepared in accordance with GLP principles.

When examining a final report, the inspector should check that:

— it is signed and dated by the study director to indicate acceptance of responsibility for the validity of the study and

confirming that the study was conducted in accordance with GLP principles,

— it is signed and dated by other principal scientists, if reports from cooperating disciplines are included,

— a quality assurance statement is included in the report and that it is signed and dated,

— any amendments were made by the responsible personnel,

— it lists the archive location of all samples, specimens and raw data.

Storage and retention of records

Purpose: to determine whether the facility has generated adequate records and reports and whether adequate provision
has been made for the safe storage and retention of records and materials.

The inspector should check:

— that a person has been identified as responsible for the archive,

— the archive facilities for the storage of study plans, raw data (including that from discontinued GLP studies), final

reports, samples and specimens and records of education and training of personnel,

20.2.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 50/41

— the procedures for retrieval of archived materials,

— the procedures whereby access to the archives is limited to authorised personnel and records are kept of personnel

given access to raw data, slides, etc.,

— that an inventory is maintained of materials removed from, and returned to, the archives,

— that records and materials are retained for the required or appropriate period of time and are protected from loss or

damage by fire, adverse environmental conditions, etc.

Study audits

inter alia, study audits, which review on-going or completed studies.
Test facility inspections will generally include,
Specific study audits are also often requested by Regulatory Authorities, and can be conducted independently of test
facility inspections. Because of the wide variation in the types of studies which might be audited, only general guidance
is appropriate, and inspectors and others taking part in study audits will always need to exercise judgment as to the
nature and extent of their examinations. The objective should be to reconstruct the study by comparing the final report
with the study plan, relevant SOPs, raw data and other archived material.

In some cases, inspectors may need assistance from other experts in order to conduct an effective study audit, for
example, where there is a need to examine tissue sections under the microscope.

When conducting a study audit, the inspector should:

— obtain names, job descriptions and summaries of training and experience for selected personnel engaged in the

study(ies) such as the study director and principal scientists,

— check that there is sufficient staff trained in relevant areas for the study(ies) undertaken,

— identify individual items of apparatus or special equipment used in the study and examine the calibration, mainte-

nance and service records for the equipment,

— review the records relating to the stability of the test substances, analyses of test substance and formulations, analyses

of feed, etc.,

— attempt to determine, through the interview process if possible, the work assignments of selected individuals partici-
pating in the study to ascertain if these individuals had the time to accomplish the tasks specified in the study plan
or report,

— obtain copies of all documentation concerning control procedures or forming integral parts of the study, including:

(i) the study plan;

(ii) SOPs in use at the time the study was done;

(iii) logbooks, laboratory notebooks, files, worksheets, print-outs of computer-stored data, etc.; checking of calcula-

tions, where appropriate;

(iv) the final report.

In studies in which animals (i.e., rodents and other mammals) are used, the inspectors should follow a certain percentage
of individual animals from their arrival at the test facility to autopsy. They should pay particular attention to the records
relating to:

— animal body weight, food/water intake, dose formulation and administration, etc.,

— clinical observations and autopsy findings,

— clinical chemistry,

— pathology.

Completion of inspection or study audit

When a test facility inspection or study audit has been completed, the inspector should be prepared to discuss his find-
ings with representatives of the test facility at a closing conference and should prepare a written report, i.e., the inspec-
tion report.

L 50/42

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

20.2.2004

A test facility inspection of any large facility is likely to reveal a number of minor deviations from GLP principles but,
normally, these will not be sufficiently serious to affect the validity of studies emanating from that test facility. In such
cases, it is reasonable for an inspector to report that the facility is operating in compliance with GLP principles according
to the criteria established by the (national) GLP Monitoring Authority. Nevertheless, details of the inadequacies or faults
detected should be provided to the test facility and assurances sought from its senior management that action will be
taken to remedy them.

The inspector may need to revisit the facility after a period of time to verify that necessary action has been taken.

If a serious deviation from the GLP principles is identified during a test facility inspection or study audit which, in the
opinion of the inspector, may have affected the validity of that study, or of other studies performed at the facility, the
inspector should report back to the (national) GLP Monitoring Authority. The action taken by that Authority and/or the
Regulatory Authority, as appropriate, will depend on the nature and extent of the non-compliance and the legal and/or
administrative provisions within the GLP compliance programme.

Where a study audit has been conducted at the request of a Regulatory Authority, a full report of the findings should be
prepared and sent via the relevant (national) GLP Monitoring Authority.

20.2.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 50/43

ANNEX II

PART A

REPEALED DIRECTIVE AND ITS AMENDMENTS

(Article 9)

Council Directive 88/320/EEC

Commission Directive 90/18/EEC

Commission Directive 1999/12/EC

Regulation (EC) No 1882/2003 of the European Parliament and of the
Council, Annex III, point 8 only

(OJ L 145, 11.6.1988, p. 35)

OJ L 11, 13.1.1990, p. 37)

(OJ L 77, 23.3.1999, p. 22)

(OJ L 284, 31.10.2003, p. 1)

PART B

DEADLINES FOR TRANSPOSITION INTO NATIONAL LAW

(Article 9)

Directive

Deadline for transposition

88/320/EEC

90/18/EEC

1999/12/EC

1.1.1989

1.7.1990

30.9.1999

ANNEX III

CORRELATION TABLE

Directive 88/320/EEC

This Directive

Articles 1 to 6

Articles 1 to 6

Article 7

Article 8

Article 9

—

—

Article 10

Annex

—

—

Article 8

Article 7

—

Article 9

Article 10

Article 11

Annex I

Annex II

Annex III