do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 3/2004 of 5 January 2004 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2004-01-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, import price, pip fruit, stone fruit

6.1.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 2/1

I

(Acts whose publication is obligatory)

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 3/2004

of 5 January 2004

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and
vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community,

(2)

In compliance with the above criteria,
the standard
import values must be fixed at the levels set out in the
Annex to this Regulation,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of
21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the
import arrangements
last
amended by Regulation (EC) No 1947/2002 (2), and in particu-
lar Article 4(1) thereof,

fruit and vegetables (1), as

for

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Whereas:

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 lays down, pursuant to the
outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade nego-
tiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the
standard values for imports from third countries,
in
respect of the products and periods stipulated in the
Annex thereto.

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regu-
lation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex
hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 6 January 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 January 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Agriculture Director-General

(1) OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66.
(2) OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17.

L 2/2

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

6.1.2004

to the Commission Regulation of 5 January 2004 establishing the standard import values for determining the
entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

ANNEX

CN code

0702 00 00

0707 00 05

0709 90 70

0805 10 10, 0805 10 30, 0805 10 50

0805 20 10

0805 20 30, 0805 20 50, 0805 20 70,
0805 20 90

0805 50 10

0808 10 20, 0808 10 50, 0808 10 90

0808 20 50

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

(EUR/100 kg)

052
204
999

052
999

052
204
999

204
421
999

052
204
999

052
999

052
600
999

060
400
404
720
999

052
060
064
400
999

90,5
46,4
68,5

149,8
149,8

100,7
33,4
67,1

57,9
37,6
47,8

83,4
58,6
71,0

77,7
77,7

75,3
73,4
74,4

39,4
96,8
94,6
67,1
74,5

92,6
56,8
63,6
97,5
77,6

(1) Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2020/2001 (OJ L 273, 16.10.2001, p. 6). Code ‘999’ stands for

‘of other origin’.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3967/03 by Gian Gobbo (NI) to the Commission. Compensation for expropriated property of Istrian refugees in Croatia.
Date: 2004-01-05
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Croatia, Italy, accession to the European Union, bilateral relations, expropriation, indemnification

C 88 E/478

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

8.4.2004

Nevertheless, as the national legal framework was not in place, the Commission initiated an infringement
procedure under Article 226 of the EC Treaty, considering that Greece had failed to provide the special
protection area with an appropriate legal
framework capable of ensuring its protection and its
conservation. The Commission wishes to assure the Honourable Member that it will not hesitate to take
all the appropriate measures, in order to guarantee the correct application of Community environmental
law.

(1) OJ L 206, 22.7.1992.

(2004/C 88 E/0490)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3967/03

by Gian Gobbo (NI) to the Commission

(5 January 2004)

Subject: Compensation for expropriated property of Istrian refugees in Croatia

In view of the impending decision by the Council to open negotiations with Croatia, does the Commission
not believe it desirable and necessary to raise the sensitive issue of the expropriations suffered by Italian
citizens and other Europeans who were obliged after the Second World War, by the new Yugoslavian
authorities, to abandon their property and land?

Does the Commission not believe that the legislation invoked by the Croatian authorities to justify their
refusal to return this property to the Istrian refugees is contrary to the principles of both the European
Union and the European Convention on Human Rights?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(6 February 2004)

The issue of the expropriations after the Second World War is an open bilateral
countries concerned and the Commission has no legal competence on the matter.

issue between the

However, the Commission, on the basis of the principle of good neighbourly relations, has on several
occasions recommended Croatia to find an acceptable solution to the problem through a dialogue with the
parties concerned. The problem has been mentioned in the last Stabilisation and Association Report on
Croatia of April 2003, and in the regular meetings between the Commission and Croatian Government.

(2004/C 88 E/0491)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3977/03

by Paulo Casaca (PSE) to the Commission

(5 January 2004)

Subject: Mediation in Nepal

The civil war in Nepal has worsened considerably over the last few years, and a number of non-
governmental organisations, some of them based in Nepal and others based in Europe, recently visited the
European Parliament and expressed their concerns.

One of their main concerns is the disastrous impact of the war on children and adolescents, who are
forced to collaborate in guerrilla activities or, even when they have not been involved, are suspected of
doing so and treated accordingly by the authorities.

Does the Commission not believe that the European Union could play a useful mediation role in this
conflict?