Order of the Court of First Instance of 17 September 2003 in Case T-54/98: Aruba v Commission of the European Communities (Association of the overseas countries and territories — Imports into the Community of sugar originating in Aruba — Regulation (EC) No 2553/97 — Action for annulment — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2003-12-13
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: ACP countries, action for annulment (EU), import licence, overseas countries and territories, regulation (EU), sugar

C 304/28

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

13.12.2003

X. Lewis), Kingdom of Spain (Agent: N. Díaz Abad) and
French Republic (Agents: K. Rispal-Bellanger and C. Chavance),
APPLICATION for annulment of Council Decision 97/803/EC
of 24 November 1997 amending at mid-term, Decision 91/
482/EEC on the association of the overseas countries and
territories with the European Economic Community (OJ 1997
L 329, p. 50), the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber),
composed of: K. Lenaerts, President, J. Azizi and M. Jaeger,
Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has made an order on 17 September
2003, the operative part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible;

The applicant is to bear its own costs and to pay those of the
Council, including those relating to the proceedings for interim
relief;

3.

The interveners are to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 55 of 20.02.1998.

1.

2.

3.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible;

The applicant is to bear its own costs and to pay those of the
Council;

The interveners are to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 137 of 2.5.1998.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 17 September 2003

in Case T-54/98: Aruba v Commission of the European
Communities (1)

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 17 September 2003

(Association of the overseas countries and territories —
Imports into the Community of sugar originating in Aruba
— Regulation (EC) No 2553/97 — Action for annulment
— Inadmissibility)

in Case T-36/98: Aruba v Council of the European
Union (1)

(Association of the overseas countries and territories —
Decision 97/803/EC — Action for annulment — Inadmissi-
bility)

(2003/C 304/52)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

(2003/C 304/51)

(Language of the case: English)

In Case T-36/98: Aruba, represented by P.V.F. Bos and M.
Slotboom, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg,
against the Council of the European Union (Agents: J. Huber
and G. Houttuin), supported by the Commission of
the
European Communities (Agents T. van Rijn and X. Lewis) and
by the Kingdom of Spain (Agent: N. Díaz Abad) — application
for annulment of Council Decision 97/803/EC of 24 Novem-
ber 1997 amending at mid-term, Decision 91/482/EEC on the
association of the overseas countries and territories with the
European Economic Community (OJ 1997 L 329, p. 50) —
the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of
K. Lenaerts, President, J. Azizi and M. Jaeger, Judges; H. Jung,
Registrar, has made an order on 17 September 2003, the
operative part of which is as follows:

In Case T-54/98: Aruba, represented by P. Bos and M. Slot-
boom, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg,
against the Commission of the European Communities (Agent:
T. van Rijn), supported by the Council of the European Union
(Agents: J. Huber and G. Houttuin) and by the United Kingdom
of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Agent: R. Magrill) —
application for annulment of Commission Regulation (EC)
No 2553/97 of 17 December 1997 on rules for issuing import
licences for certain products covered by CN codes 1701, 1702,
1703 and 1704 and qualifying as ACP/OCT originating
products (OJ 1997 L 349, p. 26) — the Court of First Instance
(Third Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, President, J. Azizi
and M. Jaeger, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has made an order
on 17 September 2003, the operative part of which is as
follows:

1.

2.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible;

The applicant is to bear its own costs and to pay those of the
Commission;

13.12.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/29

3.

The interveners are to bear their own costs.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(1) OJ C 166 of 30.5.1998.

of 30 September 2003

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 29 September 2003

in Case T-183/01: Alza Corporation v Office for Harmon-
isation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
(OHIM) (1)

(Community trade mark — Opposition — Amicable settle-
ment — No need to adjudicate)

(2003/C 304/53)

(Language of the case: English)

In Case T-183/01, Alza Corporation, established in Mountain
View, California (United States of America), represented by
lawyer, with an address for service in
M. Edenborough,
Luxembourg, v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: S. Laitinen),
the intervener before the Court of First Instance being: HEXAL
AG, established in Holzkirchen (Germany), represented by A.
Spranger, lawyer: ACTION brought against the decision of the
Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in
the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 May
2001 (Case R 321/1999-2) relating to opposition proceedings
between Alza Corporation and Hexal AG, the Court of First
Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of: V. Tiili, President,
P. Mengozzi and M. Vilaras, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has
made an order on 29 September 2003, the operative part of
which is as follows:

1.

2.

3.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on this action.

The applicant shall bear its own costs, as well as those of the
defendant.

The intervener shall bear its own costs.

in Case T-182/02: Uni-Pharma Kleon Tsetis Farmakeftika
Ergastiria Anonimos Viomichaniki kai Emporiki Eteria
against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market
(Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

(Community trade mark — Opposition — Amicable settle-
ment — Not necessary to give judgment)

(2003/C 304/54)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-182/02: Uni-Pharma Kleon Tsetis Farmakeftika
Ergastiria Anonimos Viomichaniki kai Emporiki Eteria (Uni-
Pharma ABEE), established in Kato Kifisia, Attica (Greece),
represented by M. Bra and E. Gioti-Manthou, lawyers, with
an address for service in Luxembourg, against Office for
(Trade Marks and
Harmonisation in the Internal Market
Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: O. Montalto, E. Joly and O. Wael-
broeck), with BIOFARMA S.A., established in Neuilly-sur Seine
(France) and represented by V. Gil Vega and A. Ruiz López,
intervening before the Court of First Instance —
lawyers,
action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of
Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market
(Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 February 2002 (Case R 725/
2000-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Uni-
Pharma Kleon Tsetis Farmakeftika Ergastiria Anonimos Vio-
michaniki kai Emporiki Eteria (Uni-Pharma ABEE) and
BIOFARMA S.A. — the Court of First
Instance (Fourth
Chamber), composed of V. Tiili, President, P. Mengozzi and
Jung, Registrar, made an order on
M. Vilaras,
30 December 2003, the operative part of which is as follows:

Judges; H.

1.

2.

3.

It is no longer necessary to give judgment on the present
application.

The applicant shall bear its own costs and those of OHIM.

The intervener shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 317 of 10.11.2001.

(1) OJ C 202, 24.8.2002.