do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3774/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update on the use of funds from the Leonardo programme for the Terni municipality.
Date: 2003-12-11
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Italy, action programme, education policy, local government, vocational training

C 78 E/320

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

27.3.2004

(2004/C 78 E/0326)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3773/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject: Update on the use of funds from the Leonardo programme for the Siena municipality

In response to my previous question (E-1073/03 (1)) asking whether the Siena municipality had submitted
projects and obtained funding under the Leonardo programme, the Commission stated on 8 May 2003
that Siena had not applied for such funding.

Will the Commission state, again in respect of centrally managed funds, whether any projects were
submitted subsequently and, if so, what decision has been taken on them?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 151.

(2004/C 78 E/0327)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3774/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject: Update on the use of funds from the Leonardo programme for the Terni municipality

In response to my previous question (E-1074/03 (1)) asking whether the Terni municipality had submitted
projects and obtained funding under the Leonardo programme, the Commission stated on 8 May 2003
that Terni had not applied for such funding.

Will the Commission state, again in respect of centrally managed funds, whether any projects were
submitted subsequently and, if so, what decision has been taken on them?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 151.

(2004/C 78 E/0328)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3775/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject: Update on the use of funds from the Leonardo programme for the Ancona municipality

In response to my previous question (E-1062/03 (1)) asking whether the Ancona municipality had
submitted projects and obtained funding under the Leonardo programme, the Commission stated on
8 May 2003 that Ancona had not applied for such funding.

Will the Commission state, again in respect of centrally managed funds, whether any projects were
submitted subsequently and, if so, what decision has been taken on them?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 151.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3806/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update on use of funding from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Florence.
Date: 2003-12-11
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Italy, action programme, cultural policy, local government, project evaluation

C 78 E/324

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

27.3.2004

(2004/C 78 E/0338)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3805/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Carrara

In its answer to question E-0979/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Carrara had submitted
projects or secured funding under the Culture 2000 programme, the Commission stated, on 30 July 2003,
that the municipality had not submitted any projects by 2002. Can the Commission say if this has been
the case subsequently and up to the present?

(1) OJ C 242 E, 9.10.2003, p. 200.

(2004/C 78 E/0339)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3806/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Florence

In its answer to question E-0980/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Florence had submitted
projects or secured funding under the Culture 2000 programme, the Commission stated, on 30 July 2003,
that the municipality had not submitted any projects by 2002. Can the Commission say if this has been
the case subsequently and up to the present?

(1) OJ C 242 E, 9.10.2003, p. 200.

(2004/C 78 E/0340)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3807/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Livorno

In its answer to question E-0981/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Livorno had submitted
projects or secured funding under the Culture 2000 programme, the Commission stated, on 30 July 2003,
that the municipality had not submitted any projects by 2002. Can the Commission say if this has been
the case subsequently and up to the present?

(1) OJ C 242 E, 9.10.2003, p. 200.

(2004/C 78 E/0341)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3808/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Macerata

In its answer to question E-0982/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Macerata had submitted
projects or secured funding under the Culture 2000 programme, the Commission stated, on 30 July has
been the case subsequently and up to the present?

(1) OJ C 242 E, 9.10.2003, p. 200.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3765/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update on the use of funds from the Leonardo programme for the Carrara municipality.
Date: 2003-12-11
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Italy, action programme, education policy, local government, vocational training

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78 E/317

Specifically, with regard to the Júcar-Vinalopó water transfer scheme, does the Commission believe that it
has been provided with sufficient information for it to determine who are the beneficiaries of the work
concerned, whether they will be able to contribute to the recovery of
the costs, and whether all
beneficiaries, or a group of beneficiaries, are going to be exonerated from contributing to this recovery of
costs?

Has the Spanish Government informed the Commission of its intention of exonerating, in any way, all or
some of the beneficiaries from contributing to the recovery of costs?

(1) OJ L 161, 26.6.1999, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p. 1.

Answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(3 February 2004)

The Commission is collecting the information it needs to answer the question. It will communicate its
findings as soon as possible.

(2004/C 78 E/0318)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3765/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject: Update on the use of funds from the Leonardo programme for the Carrara municipality

In response to my previous question E-1063/03 (1) asking whether the Carrara municipality had submitted
projects and obtained funding under the Leonardo programme, the Commission stated on 8 May 2003
that Carrara had not applied for such funding.

Will the Commission state, again in respect of centrally managed funds, whether any projects were
submitted subsequently and, if so, what decision has been taken on them?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 151.

(2004/C 78 E/0319)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3766/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject: Update on the use of funds from the Leonardo programme for the Florence municipality

In response to my previous question E-1064/03 (1) asking whether the Florence municipality had
submitted projects and obtained funding under the Leonardo programme, the Commission stated on
8 May 2003 that Florence had not applied for such funding.

Will the Commission state, again in respect of centrally managed funds, whether any projects were
submitted subsequently and, if so, what decision has been taken on them?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 151.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3797/03 by Chris Davies (ELDR) to the Commission. Sustainable fisheries.
Date: 2003-12-11
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Community certification, common fisheries policy, fishery management, non-governmental organisation, standardisation

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78 E/859

(2004/C 78 E/0912)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3797/03

by Chris Davies (ELDR) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject: Sustainable fisheries

What use has the Commission made to date, or does it intend to make, of Maríne Stewardship Council
certification as a means of developing a sustainable fisheries strategy?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(21 January 2004)

The Maríne Stewardship Council (MSC) certification scheme is a private initiative which rewards certain
fishing practices with a distinctive label at the request of fishing operators so that consumers can direct
their choices towards their products. While the Commission has no intention of promoting the use of any
private certification scheme as a means of developing a sustainable fisheries strategy, it will continue to use
its initiative powers to propose legislation and transmit guidelines to fishing, processing and marketing fish
in a context of sustainability.

(2004/C 78 E/0913)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3821/03

by Joan Vallvé (ELDR) to the Commission

(12 December 2003)

Subject: Environmental impact of the extension of the Eivissa Airport

My question E-0209/03 (1) of 3 February 2003 addressed the environmental
caused by the scheme to enlarge Eivissa Airport.

impact which would be

In its reply of 14 March 2003, the Commission stated that it was processing a complaint lodged in this
in Question E-2745/03 (2) I asked whether the Commission had
connection. On 11 September 2003,
reached any specific conclusions as a result of the complaint lodged.

Mrs Wallström’s latest reply, of 16 October 2003, stated that the Commission had approached the Spanish
authorities to request full details of the scheme in question, a copy of the impact statement and of the
measures adopted to respect the obligations deriving from Article 6 of Council Directive 92/43/EEC of
21 May 1992, on the conservation of natural habitats and woodland fauna and flora (3).

Furthermore, the Commission said that it intended that this case should form part of an exchange with the
Spanish authorities within the framework of the bilateral meeting to be held on October 2003, which
would consider the whole picture of complaints and infringements in the environmental sphere involving
Spain.

Has the Commission now received the information requested from the Spanish authorities? Has the
planned bilateral meeting been held? If so, what conclusions were reached with regard to resolving the
problem of the infringement of various EU environmental directives in connection with the enlargement of
Eivissa Airport?

(1) OJ C 222 E, 18.9.2003, p. 163.
(2) See page 161.
(3) OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3793/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update on funding for the city of Pisa under the Leonardo programme.
Date: 2003-12-11
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Italy, action programme, education policy, local government, vocational training

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78 E/321

(2004/C 78 E/0329)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3793/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject: Update on funding for the city of Pisa under the Leonardo programme

In reply to my earlier question E-1070/03 (1) asking whether the city of Pisa had submitted projects and
obtained funding under the Leonardo programme, the Commission said on 8 March 2003 that the city
had not submitted any application.

As regards the proportion of funds managed centrally, can the Commission say whether any new projects
have been submitted since that date and what the outcome was?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 151.

Joint answer
to Written Questions E-3765/03, E-3766/03, E-3767/03,
E-3768/03, E-3769/03, E-3770/03, E-3771/03, E-3772/03,
E-3773/03, E-3774/03, E-3775/03 and E-3793/03
given by Mrs Reding on behalf of the Commission

(15 January 2004)

Some of the funds awarded under the Leonardo da Vinci programme are managed decentrally by national
agencies, in particular the transnational mobility projects, whose total budget takes up almost 40 % of the
annual budget for the programme.

The Honourable Member should contact the national agency in Italy for further information on these
projects: ISFOL, Via G.B. Morgagni 30/e, I-00161 Roma, tel. (+39-06) 44.59.01 fax (+39-06) 44.59.04.75.

With regard to the funds managed centrally by the Commission (pilot projects, thematic actions, language
skills, transnational networks, reference tools), the search check for the municipalities of Ancona, Carrara,
Firenze, Livorno, Macerata, Massa, Perugia, Pisa, Pistoia, Prato, Siena e Terni showed that none of them
presented any proposals in the context of the 2003 Leonardo da Vinci call for proposals (selection
completed in July 2003).

(2004/C 78 E/0330)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3794/03

by Chris Davies (ELDR) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject: Fisheries certification

Has the Commission any plans to establish a transparent and comparable method of determining which
EU fisheries are being managed in a sustainable manner;
for example, along similar lines to the
certification scheme established by the Maríne Stewardship Council?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(14 January 2004)

The consolidation of last year’s reform of the Common Fisheries Policy will make it necessary to properly
address the issue of eco-labelling at this juncture. To this end, the Commission intends to present in the
first half of 2004 the Council and the Parliament with a communication, the purpose of which should be
to consider available options and, thus, to launch an in-depth debate with all interested parties.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3788/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update on funding for the municipality of Pistoia under the action programme to promote civil protection.
Date: 2003-12-11
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, Tuscany, action programme, aid to disaster victims, civil defence, environmental risk prevention, local government

C 84 E/100

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

3.4.2004

(2004/C 84 E/0135)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3788/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject: Update on funding for the municipality of Pistoia under the action programme to promote civil

protection

In reply to my earlier question E-1100/03 (1) asking whether the municipality of Pistoia had submitted
projects and obtained funding under the action programme to promote civil protection, the Commission
said on 22 April 2003 that the municipality had not submitted any application.

Can the Commission say whether, since that date, any projects have been submitted and what the outcome
was?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 144.

(2004/C 84 E/0136)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3789/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject: Update on funding for the municipality of Prato the action programme to promote civil protection

In reply to my earlier question E-1101/03 (1) asking whether the municipality of Prato had submitted
projects and obtained funding under the action programme to promote civil protection, the Commission
said on 22 April 2003 that the municipality had not submitted any application.

Can the Commission say whether, since that date, any projects have been submitted and what the outcome
was?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 144.

(2004/C 84 E/0137)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3790/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject: Update on funding for the city of Siena under the action programme to promote civil protection

In reply to my earlier question E-1102/03 (1) asking whether the city of Siena had submitted projects and
obtained funding under the action programme to promote civil protection, the Commission said on
22 April 2003 that the municipality had not submitted any application.

Can the Commission say whether, since that date, any projects have been submitted and what the outcome
was?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 144.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3789/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update on funding for the municipality of Prato the action programme to promote civil protection.
Date: 2003-12-11
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, Tuscany, action programme, aid to disaster victims, civil defence, environmental risk prevention, local government

C 84 E/100

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

3.4.2004

(2004/C 84 E/0135)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3788/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject: Update on funding for the municipality of Pistoia under the action programme to promote civil

protection

In reply to my earlier question E-1100/03 (1) asking whether the municipality of Pistoia had submitted
projects and obtained funding under the action programme to promote civil protection, the Commission
said on 22 April 2003 that the municipality had not submitted any application.

Can the Commission say whether, since that date, any projects have been submitted and what the outcome
was?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 144.

(2004/C 84 E/0136)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3789/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject: Update on funding for the municipality of Prato the action programme to promote civil protection

In reply to my earlier question E-1101/03 (1) asking whether the municipality of Prato had submitted
projects and obtained funding under the action programme to promote civil protection, the Commission
said on 22 April 2003 that the municipality had not submitted any application.

Can the Commission say whether, since that date, any projects have been submitted and what the outcome
was?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 144.

(2004/C 84 E/0137)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3790/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject: Update on funding for the city of Siena under the action programme to promote civil protection

In reply to my earlier question E-1102/03 (1) asking whether the city of Siena had submitted projects and
obtained funding under the action programme to promote civil protection, the Commission said on
22 April 2003 that the municipality had not submitted any application.

Can the Commission say whether, since that date, any projects have been submitted and what the outcome
was?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 144.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3768/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update on the use of funds from the Leonardo programme for the Macerata municipality.
Date: 2003-12-11
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Italy, action programme, education policy, local government, vocational training

C 78 E/318

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

27.3.2004

(2004/C 78 E/0320)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3767/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject: Update on the use of funds from the Leonardo programme for the Livorno municipality

In response to my previous question E-1065/03 (1) asking whether the Livorno municipality had submitted
projects and obtained funding under the Leonardo programme, the Commission stated on 8 May 2003
that Livorno had not applied for such funding.

Will the Commission state, again in respect of centrally managed funds, whether any projects were
submitted subsequently and, if so, what decision has been taken on them?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 151.

(2004/C 78 E/0321)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3768/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject: Update on the use of funds from the Leonardo programme for the Macerata municipality

In response to my previous question(E-1066/03 (1) asking whether the Macerata municipality had
submitted projects and obtained funding under the Leonardo programme, the Commission stated on
8 May 2003 that Macerata had not applied for such funding.

Will the Commission state, again in respect of centrally managed funds, whether any projects were
submitted subsequently and, if so, what decision has been taken on them?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 151.

(2004/C 78 E/0322)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3769/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject: Update on the use of funds from the Leonardo programme for the Massa municipality

In response to my previous question E-1067/03 (1) asking whether the Massa municipality had submitted
projects and obtained funding under the Leonardo programme, the Commission stated on 8 May 2003
that Massa had not applied for such funding.

Will the Commission state, again in respect of centrally managed funds, whether any projects were
submitted subsequently and, if so, what decision has been taken on them?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 151.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3780/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update on funding for the municipality of Cararra under the action programme to promote civil protection.
Date: 2003-12-11
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, Tuscany, action programme, aid to disaster victims, civil defence, environmental risk prevention, local government

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84 E/97

(2004/C 84 E/0126)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3779/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject: Update on funding for the municipality of Terni under the action programme to promote civil

protection

In reply to my earlier question E-1103/03 (1) asking whether the municipality of Terni had submitted
projects and obtained funding under the action programme to promote civil protection, the Commission
said on 22 April 2003 that the municipality had not submitted any application.

Can the Commission say whether, since that date, any projects have been submitted and what the outcome
was?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 144.

(2004/C 84 E/0127)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3780/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject: Update on funding for the municipality of Cararra under the action programme to promote civil

protection

In reply to my earlier question E-1092/03 (1) asking whether the municipality of Cararra had submitted
projects and obtained funding under the action programme to promote civil protection, the Commission
said on 22 April 2003 that the municipality had not submitted any application.

Can the Commission say whether, since that date, any projects have been submitted and what the outcome
was?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 144.

(2004/C 84 E/0128)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3781/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject: Update on funding for the city of Florence under the action programme to promote civil

protection

In reply to my earlier question E-1094/03 (1) asking whether the city of Florence had submitted projects
and obtained funding under the action programme to promote civil protection, the Commission said on
22 April 2003 that the municipality had not submitted any application.

Can the Commission say whether, since that date, any projects have been submitted and what the outcome
was?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 144.