do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3706/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update concerning the funds for the Altener II programme for the municipality of Carrara.
Date: 2003-12-10
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, EU programme, Tuscany, local government, pollution control measures, reduction of gas emissions, renewable energy

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84 E/87

Can the Commission provide information on any projects submitted since the date of its reply (25 April
2003)?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.

(2004/C 84 E/0100)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3705/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update concerning the funds for the Altener II programme for the municipality of Ancona

With reference to question E-0961/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of
Ancona (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under
the
Commission replied to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

II programme,

the Altener

Can the Commission provide information on any projects submitted since the date of its reply (25 April
2003)?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.

(2004/C 84 E/0101)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3706/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update concerning the funds for the Altener II programme for the municipality of Carrara

With reference to question E-0962/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of
Carrara (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the Altener II programme, the Commission
replied to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

Can the Commission provide information on any projects submitted since the date of its reply (25 April
2003)?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.

(2004/C 84 E/0102)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3707/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update concerning the funds for the Altener II programme for the municipality of Florence

With reference to question E-0963/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of
Florence (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the Altener
the
Commission replied to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

II programme,

Can the Commission provide information on any projects submitted since the date of its reply (25 April
2003)?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3713/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update concerning the funds for the Altener II programme for the municipality of Pisa.
Date: 2003-12-10
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, EU programme, Tuscany, local government, pollution control measures, reduction of gas emissions, renewable energy

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84 E/89

(2004/C 84 E/0106)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3711/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update concerning the funds for the Altener II programme for the municipality of Perugia

With reference to question E-0967/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of
Perugia (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the Altener II programme, the Commission
replied to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

Can the Commission provide information on any projects submitted since the date of its reply (25 April
2003)?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.

(2004/C 84 E/0107)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3712/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update concerning the funds for the Altener II programme for the municipality of Pesaro

With reference to question E-0968/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of
Pesaro (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the Altener II programme, the Commission
replied to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

Can the Commission provide information on any projects submitted since the date of its reply (25 April
2003)?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.

(2004/C 84 E/0108)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3713/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update concerning the funds for the Altener II programme for the municipality of Pisa

With reference to question E-0969/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of
Pisa (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the Altener II programme, the Commission
replied to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

Can the Commission provide information on any projects submitted since the date of its reply (25 April
2003)?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2159/2003 of 10 December 2003 determining the world market price for unginned cotton
Date: 2003-12-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: cotton, world market price

L 324/22

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

11.12.2003

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2159/2003

of 10 December 2003

determining the world market price for unginned cotton

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community,

Having regard to Protocol 4 on cotton, annexed to the Act of
Accession of Greece, as last amended by Council Regulation
(EC) No 1050/2001 (1),

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1051/2001 of 22
May 2001 on production aid for cotton (2), and in particular
Article 4 thereof,

Whereas:

(1)

In accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No
1051/2001, a world market price for unginned cotton is
to be determined periodically from the price for ginned
cotton recorded on the world market and by reference
to the historical relationship between the price recorded
for ginned cotton and that calculated for unginned
cotton. That historical relationship has been established
in Article 2(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1591/
2001 of 2 August 2001 (3), as amended by Regulation
(EC) No 1486/2002 (4). Where the world market price
cannot be determined in this way, it is to be based on
the most recent price determined.

(2)

In accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No
1051/2001, the world market price for unginned cotton
is to be determined in respect of a product of specific
characteristics and by reference to the most favourable

offers and quotations on the world market among those
considered representative of the real market trend. To
that end, an average is to be calculated of offers and
European
recorded on one or more
quotations
exchanges for a product delivered cif to a port in the
Community and coming from the various supplier coun-
tries considered the most representative in terms of
there is provision for
international
adjusting the criteria for determining the world market
price for ginned cotton to reflect differences justified by
the quality of the product delivered and the offers and
quotations concerned. Those adjustments are specified in
Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1591/2001.

trade. However,

(3)

The application of the above criteria gives the world
market price for unginned cotton determined herein-
after,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The world price for unginned cotton as referred to in Article 4
of Regulation (EC) No 1051/2001 is hereby determined as
equalling EUR 31,969/100 kg.

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 December 2003.

Article 2

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 December 2003.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Agriculture Director-General

(1) OJ L 148, 1.6.2001, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 148, 1.6.2001, p. 3.
(3) OJ L 210, 3.8.2001, p. 10.
(4) OJ L 223, 20.8.2002, p. 3.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3225 — Alcan/Pechiney (II)) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2003-12-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: aluminium, economic concentration, exchange of information, merger control

10.12.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 299/19

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3225 — Alcan/Pechiney (II))

(2003/C 299/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 29 September 2003 the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to
declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(2) of Council Regu-
lation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in English and will be made public
after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

— in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document No 303M3225. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3758/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update on use of funding from the 2000 City Twinning Programme by the municipality of Pisa.
Date: 2003-12-10
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, EU programme, Tuscany, aid system, financial year, support policy, twinning

C 78 E/642

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

27.3.2004

(2004/C 78 E/0681)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3758/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the 2000 City Twinning Programme by the municipality of Pisa

In its answer to question E-1025/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Pisa had submitted
projects and secured funding under the 2000 City Twinning Programme, the Commission stated that no
funding had been granted for the year 2000.

Can the Commission say whether the municipality has submitted any projects and obtained and used any
funding in the budget years since then?

(1) OJ C 242 E, 9.10.2003, p. 208.

(2004/C 78 E/0682)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3759/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the 2000 City Twinning Programme by the municipality of Pistoia

In its answer to question E-1026/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Pistoia had submitted
projects and secured funding under the 2000 City Twinning Programme, the Commission stated that no
funding had been granted for the year 2000.

Can the Commission say whether the municipality has submitted any projects and obtained and used any
funding in the budget years since then?

(1) OJ C 242 E, 9.10.2003, p. 208.

(2004/C 78 E/0683)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3760/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the 2000 City Twinning Programme by the municipality of Siena

In its answer to question E-1028/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Siena had submitted
projects and secured funding under the 2000 City Twinning Programme, the Commission stated that no
funding had been granted for the year 2000.

Can the Commission say whether the municipality has submitted any projects and obtained and used any
funding in the budget years since then?

(1) OJ C 242 E, 9.10.2003, p. 208.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3730/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update concerning the funds for the SAVE II programme for the municipality of Siena.
Date: 2003-12-10
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, EU programme, Tuscany, energy saving, energy use, local government

C 84 E/94

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

3.4.2004

(2004/C 84 E/0121)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3729/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update concerning the funds for the SAVE II programme for the municipality of Prato

With reference to question E-0971/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of
Prato (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the SAVE II programme, the Commission
replied on 25 April 2003 to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

Can the Commission state whether, since then and up to the present, it has received any SAVE II projects
from that municipality?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.

(2004/C 84 E/0122)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3730/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update concerning the funds for the SAVE II programme for the municipality of Siena

With reference to question E-0972/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of
Siena (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the SAVE II programme, the Commission
replied on 25 April 2003 to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

Can the Commission state whether, since then and up to the present, it has received any SAVE II projects
from that municipality?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.

(2004/C 84 E/0123)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3731/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update concerning the funds for the SAVE II programme for the municipality of Terni

With reference to question E-0973/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of
Terni (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the SAVE II programme, the Commission
replied on 25 April 2003 to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

Can the Commission state whether, since then and up to the present, it has received any SAVE II projects
from that municipality?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3716/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update concerning the funds for the Altener II programme for the municipality of Pistoia.
Date: 2003-12-10
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, EU programme, Tuscany, local government, pollution control measures, reduction of gas emissions, renewable energy

C 84 E/90

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

3.4.2004

(2004/C 84 E/0109)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3714/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update concerning the funds for the Altener II programme for the municipality of Prato

With reference to question E-0971/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of
Prato (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the Altener II programme, the Commission
replied to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

Can the Commission provide information on any projects submitted since the date of its reply (25 April
2003)?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.

(2004/C 84 E/0110)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3715/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update concerning the funds for the Altener II programme for the municipality of Siena

With reference to question E-0972/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of
Siena (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the Altener II programme, the Commission
replied to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

Can the Commission provide information on any projects submitted since the date of its reply (25 April
2003)?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.

(2004/C 84 E/0111)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3716/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update concerning the funds for the Altener II programme for the municipality of Pistoia

With reference to question E-0970/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of
Pistoia (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the Altener II programme, the Commission
replied to the effect that a proposal had been submitted but had not been accepted.

Can the Commission provide information on the reasons for this rejection and state whether any other
projects have been submitted since then?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3710/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update concerning the funds for the Altener II programme for the municipality of Massa.
Date: 2003-12-10
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, EU programme, Tuscany, local government, pollution control measures, reduction of gas emissions, renewable energy

C 84 E/88

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

3.4.2004

(2004/C 84 E/0103)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3708/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update concerning the funds for the Altener II programme for the municipality of Livorno

With reference to question E-0964/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of
Livorno (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under
the
Commission replied to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

II programme,

the Altener

Can the Commission provide information on any projects submitted since the date of its reply (25 April
2003)?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.

(2004/C 84 E/0104)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3709/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update concerning the funds for the Altener II programme for the municipality of Macerata

With reference to question E-0965/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of
Macerata (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the Altener II programme,
the
Commission replied to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

Can the Commission provide information on any projects submitted since the date of its reply (25 April
2003)?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.

(2004/C 84 E/0105)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3710/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update concerning the funds for the Altener II programme for the municipality of Massa

With reference to question E-0966/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of
Massa (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the Altener II programme, the Commission
replied to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

Can the Commission provide information on any projects submitted since the date of its reply (25 April
2003)?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3756/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update on use of funding from the 2000 City Twinning Programme by the municipality of Perugia.
Date: 2003-12-10
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, EU programme, Umbria, aid system, financial year, support policy, twinning

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78 E/641

(2004/C 78 E/0678)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3755/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the 2000 City Twinning Programme by the municipality of

Macerata

In its answer to question E-1021/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Macerata had submitted
projects and secured funding under the 2000 City Twinning Programme, the Commission stated that no
funding had been granted for the year 2000.

Can the Commission say whether the municipality has submitted any projects and obtained and used any
funding in the budget years since then?

(1) OJ C 242 E, 9.10.2003, p. 208.

(2004/C 78 E/0679)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3756/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the 2000 City Twinning Programme by the municipality of

Perugia

In its answer to question E-1023/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Perugia had submitted
projects and secured funding under the 2000 City Twinning Programme, the Commission stated that no
funding had been granted for the year 2000.

Can the Commission say whether the municipality has submitted any projects and obtained and used any
funding in the budget years since then?

(1) OJ C 242 E, 9.10.2003, p. 208.

(2004/C 78 E/0680)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3757/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the 2000 City Twinning Programme by the municipality of Pesaro

In its answer to question E-1024/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Pesaro had submitted
projects and secured funding under the 2000 City Twinning Programme, the Commission stated that no
funding had been granted for the year 2000.

Can the Commission say whether the municipality has submitted any projects and obtained and used any
funding in the budget years since then?

(1) OJ C 242 E, 9.10.2003, p. 208.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3755/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update on use of funding from the 2000 City Twinning Programme by the municipality of Macerata.
Date: 2003-12-10
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, EU programme, Marches, aid system, financial year, support policy, twinning

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78 E/641

(2004/C 78 E/0678)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3755/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the 2000 City Twinning Programme by the municipality of

Macerata

In its answer to question E-1021/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Macerata had submitted
projects and secured funding under the 2000 City Twinning Programme, the Commission stated that no
funding had been granted for the year 2000.

Can the Commission say whether the municipality has submitted any projects and obtained and used any
funding in the budget years since then?

(1) OJ C 242 E, 9.10.2003, p. 208.

(2004/C 78 E/0679)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3756/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the 2000 City Twinning Programme by the municipality of

Perugia

In its answer to question E-1023/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Perugia had submitted
projects and secured funding under the 2000 City Twinning Programme, the Commission stated that no
funding had been granted for the year 2000.

Can the Commission say whether the municipality has submitted any projects and obtained and used any
funding in the budget years since then?

(1) OJ C 242 E, 9.10.2003, p. 208.

(2004/C 78 E/0680)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3757/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the 2000 City Twinning Programme by the municipality of Pesaro

In its answer to question E-1024/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Pesaro had submitted
projects and secured funding under the 2000 City Twinning Programme, the Commission stated that no
funding had been granted for the year 2000.

Can the Commission say whether the municipality has submitted any projects and obtained and used any
funding in the budget years since then?

(1) OJ C 242 E, 9.10.2003, p. 208.