do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
WRITTEN QUESTION P-3893/03 by Chris Davies (ELDR) to the Commission. Health warnings on cigarette packs.
Date: 2003-12-10
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: consumer information, graphic illustration, public health, tobacco industry, virtual library

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78 E/669

(2004/C 78 E/0711)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3893/03

by Chris Davies (ELDR) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Health warnings on cigarette packs

The Commission is currently preparing a library file of illustrations and graphic warnings intended to be
used to complement written health warnings on cigarette packs while conforming to the requirements of
the single market.

When does the Commission now expect this work to be complete, and from what date will those Member
States that wish to require tobacco manufacturers to print such visual warnings on cigarette packs be able
to do so?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(19 January 2004)

The Commission expects the work on the library of colour photographs, or other illustrations intended to
be used to complement written health warnings on cigarette packets, to be completed by 30 September
2004. The library will be at the disposal of the Member States after this time.

(2004/C 78 E/0712)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3894/03

by Ian Hudghton (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Objective One status (cid:1) Highlands and Islands of Scotland

With reference to Oral Question and Answer H-0809/02 (1), has the Commission been informed by the UK
Office of National Statistics, or by the UK Government, that the data compiled in preparation for the 1999
funding bid for Objective One status for the Scottish Highlands and Islands may have been inaccurate?

What is the view of the Commission should the data prove to have been inaccurate?

What is the view of the Commission on the interpretation of Regulation 1260/1999 (2) should data used in
the consideration of eligibility for Objective One funding prove to have been inaccurate, as opposed to
unavailable, at the requisite time?

Is the Commission aware of any Community law provision which would prevent a Member State
Government from compensating a region of that state for the loss of Objective One funding, should the
Member State Government have submitted a defective funding bid?

(1) Written answer of 17.12.2002.
(2) OJ L 161, 26.6.1999, p. 1.

Answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(22 January 2004)

The Commission confirms that it has received no communication from the Office for National Statistics
(ONS) or the United Kingdom Government on the accuracy of data relating to the Highlands and Islands.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3725/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update concerning the funds for the SAVE II programme for the municipality of Ancona.
Date: 2003-12-10
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, EU programme, Marches, energy saving, energy use, local government

C 84 E/92

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

3.4.2004

(2004/C 84 E/0115)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3723/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update concerning the funds for the SAVE II programme for the municipality of Livorno

With reference to question E-0964/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of
Livorno (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the SAVE II programme, the Commission
replied on 25 April 2003 to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

Can the Commission state whether, since then and up to the present, it has received any SAVE II projects
from that municipality?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.

(2004/C 84 E/0116)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3724/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update concerning the funds for the SAVE II programme for the municipality of Macerata

With reference to question E-0965/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of
Macerata (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the SAVE II programme, the Commission
replied on 25 April 2003 to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

Can the Commission state whether, since then and up to the present, it has received any SAVE II projects
from that municipality?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.

(2004/C 84 E/0117)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3725/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update concerning the funds for the SAVE II programme for the municipality of Ancona

With reference to question E-0961/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of
Ancona (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the SAVE II programme, the Commission
replied on 25 April 2003 to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

Can the Commission state whether, since then and up to the present, it has received any SAVE II projects
from that municipality?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3752/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update on use of funding from the 2000 City Twinning Programme by the municipality of Ancona.
Date: 2003-12-10
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, EU programme, Marches, aid system, financial year, support policy, twinning

C 78 E/640

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

27.3.2004

Can the Commission say whether the municipality has submitted any projects and obtained and used any
funding in the budget years since then?

(1) OJ C 242 E, 9.10.2003, p. 208.

(2004/C 78 E/0675)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3752/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the 2000 City Twinning Programme by the municipality of

Ancona

In its answer to question E-1017/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Ancona had submitted
projects and secured funding under the 2000 City Twinning Programme, the Commission stated that no
funding had been granted for the year 2000.

Can the Commission say whether the municipality has submitted any projects and obtained and used any
funding in the budget years since then?

(1) OJ C 242 E, 9.10.2003, p. 208.

(2004/C 78 E/0676)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3753/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the 2000 City Twinning Programme by the municipality of

Florence

In its answer to question E-1019/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Florence had submitted
projects and secured funding under the 2000 City Twinning Programme, the Commission stated that no
funding had been granted for the year 2000.

Can the Commission say whether the municipality has submitted any projects and obtained and used any
funding in the budget years since then?

(1) OJ C 242 E, 9.10.2003, p. 208.

(2004/C 78 E/0677)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3754/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the 2000 City Twinning Programme by the municipality of

Livorno

In its answer to question E-1020/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Livorno had submitted
projects and secured funding under the 2000 City Twinning Programme, the Commission stated that no
funding had been granted for the year 2000.

Can the Commission say whether the municipality has submitted any projects and obtained and used any
funding in the budget years since then?

(1) OJ C 242 E, 9.10.2003, p. 208.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3749/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update on use of funding from the LIFE III programme by the municipality of Massa.
Date: 2003-12-10
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, Italy, eligibility criteria, environmental protection, local government

C 78 E/854

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

27.3.2004

In view of the increasing number of complaints received on the cost of permanent resident cards by Union
nationals, the Commission will contact the Dutch authorities in order to verify what are the current costs
of permanent residence cards and ask them whether, and in what way, Union nationals are informed about
their right to obtain only a temporary residence permit at the same price as that charged to nationals for
identity cards.

(2004/C 78 E/0906)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3749/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the LIFE III programme by the municipality of Massa

In its answer to question E-1052/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Massa had submitted
projects and secured funding under the LIFE III programme, the Commission stated that a number of
proposals had been submitted but they had not been funded.

Can the Commission say why the projects submitted were not considered suitable?

(1) OJ C 280 E, 21.11.2003, p. 104.

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(16 January 2004)

The Commission informs the Honourable Member that the proposal submitted by the municipality of
Massa under the LIFE III Programme for 2000 was not co-financed. The Commission informed the
applicant of the reasons in its letter of 10 September 2001. The municipality of Massa did not submit any
proposals in 2002 or 2003.

(2004/C 78 E/0907)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3750/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the LIFE III programme by the municipality of Florence

In its answer to question E-1049/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Florence had submitted
projects and secured funding under the LIFE III programme, the Commission stated that a number of
proposals had been submitted but they had not been funded.

Can the Commission say why the projects submitted were not considered suitable?

(1) OJ C 280 E, 21.11.2003, p. 104.

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(20 January 2004)

The Commission informs the Honourable Member that the two proposals submitted by the municipality of
Firenze under the LIFE III Programme for 2002 were not co-financed.

Proposal LIFE02 ENV/IT/000074 failed criterion 3 ‘Coherence and quality’. The beneficiary was informed
in the Commission’s letter of 2 September 2002.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3711/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update concerning the funds for the Altener II programme for the municipality of Perugia.
Date: 2003-12-10
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, EU programme, Umbria, local government, pollution control measures, reduction of gas emissions, renewable energy

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84 E/89

(2004/C 84 E/0106)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3711/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update concerning the funds for the Altener II programme for the municipality of Perugia

With reference to question E-0967/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of
Perugia (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the Altener II programme, the Commission
replied to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

Can the Commission provide information on any projects submitted since the date of its reply (25 April
2003)?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.

(2004/C 84 E/0107)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3712/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update concerning the funds for the Altener II programme for the municipality of Pesaro

With reference to question E-0968/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of
Pesaro (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the Altener II programme, the Commission
replied to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

Can the Commission provide information on any projects submitted since the date of its reply (25 April
2003)?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.

(2004/C 84 E/0108)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3713/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update concerning the funds for the Altener II programme for the municipality of Pisa

With reference to question E-0969/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of
Pisa (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the Altener II programme, the Commission
replied to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

Can the Commission provide information on any projects submitted since the date of its reply (25 April
2003)?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3709/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update concerning the funds for the Altener II programme for the municipality of Macerata.
Date: 2003-12-10
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, EU programme, Marches, local government, pollution control measures, reduction of gas emissions, renewable energy

C 84 E/88

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

3.4.2004

(2004/C 84 E/0103)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3708/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update concerning the funds for the Altener II programme for the municipality of Livorno

With reference to question E-0964/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of
Livorno (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under
the
Commission replied to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

II programme,

the Altener

Can the Commission provide information on any projects submitted since the date of its reply (25 April
2003)?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.

(2004/C 84 E/0104)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3709/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update concerning the funds for the Altener II programme for the municipality of Macerata

With reference to question E-0965/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of
Macerata (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the Altener II programme,
the
Commission replied to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

Can the Commission provide information on any projects submitted since the date of its reply (25 April
2003)?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.

(2004/C 84 E/0105)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3710/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update concerning the funds for the Altener II programme for the municipality of Massa

With reference to question E-0966/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of
Massa (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the Altener II programme, the Commission
replied to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

Can the Commission provide information on any projects submitted since the date of its reply (25 April
2003)?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3727/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update concerning the funds for the SAVE II programme for the municipality of Pisa.
Date: 2003-12-10
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, EU programme, Tuscany, energy saving, energy use, local government

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84 E/93

(2004/C 84 E/0118)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3726/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update concerning the funds for the SAVE II programme for the municipality of Pesaro

With reference to question E-0968/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of
Pesaro (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the SAVE II programme, the Commission
replied on 25 April 2003 to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

Can the Commission state whether, since then and up to the present, it has received any SAVE II projects
from that municipality?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.

(2004/C 84 E/0119)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3727/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update concerning the funds for the SAVE II programme for the municipality of Pisa

With reference to question E-0969/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of
Pisa (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the SAVE II programme, the Commission
replied on 25 April 2003 to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

Can the Commission state whether, since then and up to the present, it has received any SAVE II projects
from that municipality?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.

(2004/C 84 E/0120)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3728/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update concerning the funds for the SAVE II programme for the municipality of Pistoia

With reference to question E-0970/03 (1), in which the Commission was asked whether the municipality of
Pistoia (Italy) had submitted projects and obtained funds under the SAVE II programme, the Commission
replied on 25 April 2003 to the effect that no proposal had been submitted.

Can the Commission state whether, since then and up to the present, it has received any SAVE II projects
from that municipality?

(1) OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 169.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3753/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update on use of funding from the 2000 City Twinning Programme by the municipality of Florence.
Date: 2003-12-10
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, EU programme, Tuscany, aid system, financial year, support policy, twinning

C 78 E/640

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

27.3.2004

Can the Commission say whether the municipality has submitted any projects and obtained and used any
funding in the budget years since then?

(1) OJ C 242 E, 9.10.2003, p. 208.

(2004/C 78 E/0675)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3752/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the 2000 City Twinning Programme by the municipality of

Ancona

In its answer to question E-1017/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Ancona had submitted
projects and secured funding under the 2000 City Twinning Programme, the Commission stated that no
funding had been granted for the year 2000.

Can the Commission say whether the municipality has submitted any projects and obtained and used any
funding in the budget years since then?

(1) OJ C 242 E, 9.10.2003, p. 208.

(2004/C 78 E/0676)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3753/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the 2000 City Twinning Programme by the municipality of

Florence

In its answer to question E-1019/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Florence had submitted
projects and secured funding under the 2000 City Twinning Programme, the Commission stated that no
funding had been granted for the year 2000.

Can the Commission say whether the municipality has submitted any projects and obtained and used any
funding in the budget years since then?

(1) OJ C 242 E, 9.10.2003, p. 208.

(2004/C 78 E/0677)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3754/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(10 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the 2000 City Twinning Programme by the municipality of

Livorno

In its answer to question E-1020/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Livorno had submitted
projects and secured funding under the 2000 City Twinning Programme, the Commission stated that no
funding had been granted for the year 2000.

Can the Commission say whether the municipality has submitted any projects and obtained and used any
funding in the budget years since then?

(1) OJ C 242 E, 9.10.2003, p. 208.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2153/2003 of 10 December 2003 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2003-12-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, import price, pip fruit, stone fruit

11.12.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 324/9

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2153/2003

of 10 December 2003

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and
vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community,

(2)

In compliance with the above criteria,
the standard
import values must be fixed at the levels set out in the
Annex to this Regulation,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of
21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the
last
import arrangements
amended by Regulation (EC) No 1947/2002 (2), and in particu-
lar Article 4(1) thereof,

fruit and vegetables (1), as

for

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Whereas:

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 lays down, pursuant to the
outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade nego-
tiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the
standard values for imports from third countries,
in
respect of the products and periods stipulated in the
Annex thereto.

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regu-
lation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex
hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 December 2003.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 December 2003.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Agriculture Director-General

(1) OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66.
(2) OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17.

L 324/10

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

11.12.2003

to the Commission Regulation of 10 December 2003 establishing the standard import values for determining
the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

ANNEX

CN code

0702 00 00

0707 00 05

0709 90 70

0805 10 10, 0805 10 30, 0805 10 50

0805 20 10

0805 20 30, 0805 20 50, 0805 20 70,
0805 20 90

0805 50 10

0808 10 20, 0808 10 50, 0808 10 90

0808 20 50

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

(EUR/100 kg)

052
204
212
624
999

052
999

052
204
999

052
204
388
999

052
204
999

052
464
999

052
388
400
600
999

060
064
400
404
720
800
999

052
060
064
400
528
720
999

79,5
63,5
108,5
111,0
90,6

34,1
34,1

120,2
124,4
122,3

39,3
40,9
38,0
39,4

62,0
61,2
61,6

67,9
138,2
103,1

73,8
77,8
38,8
86,7
69,3

41,1
51,2
77,6
84,8
82,5
135,4
78,8

90,0
53,5
60,8
102,6
218,0
129,9
109,1

(1) Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2020/2001 (OJ L 273, 16.10.2001, p. 6). Code ‘999’ stands for

‘of other origin’.