do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3683/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update on use of funding from the Ecos-Ouverture II programme by the municipality of Carrara.
Date: 2003-12-09
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU programme, Tuscany, eligibility criteria, fund (EU), local authority, project evaluation, regional and local authorities, regional cooperation

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84 E/83

(2004/C 84 E/0090)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3681/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(9 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the Ecos-Ouverture II programme by the municipality of Pisa

In its answer to question E-1112/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Pisa had submitted
projects and secured funding under the Ecos-Ouverture programme, the Commission stated that no
funding had been granted by 1999.

Can the Commission say whether the municipality submitted any projects and obtained and used any
funding in the subsequent budget years?

Has the Commission completed its examination of the final reports mentioned in its answers and, if so,
can it supply any information on the outcome?

(1) OJ C 11 E, 15.1.2004, p. 139.

(2004/C 84 E/0091)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3682/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(9 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the Ecos-Ouverture II programme by the municipality of Ancona

In its answer to question E-1104/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Ancona had submitted
projects and secured funding under the Ecos-Ouverture programme, the Commission stated that no
funding had been granted by 1999.

Can the Commission say whether the municipality submitted any projects and obtained and used any
funding in the subsequent budget years?

Has the Commission completed its examination of the final reports mentioned in its answers and, if so,
can it supply any information on the outcome?

(1) OJ C 11 E, 15.1.2004, p. 139.

(2004/C 84 E/0092)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3683/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(9 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the Ecos-Ouverture II programme by the municipality of Carrara

In its answer to question E-1105/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Carrara had submitted
projects and secured funding under the Ecos-Ouverture programme, the Commission stated that no
funding had been granted by 1999.

Can the Commission say whether the municipality submitted any projects and obtained and used any
funding in the subsequent budget years?

Has the Commission completed its examination of the final reports mentioned in its answers and, if so,
can it supply any information on the outcome?

(1) OJ C 11 E, 15.1.2004, p. 139.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3130 — Arla Foods/Express Dairies (M.2579)) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2003-12-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: dairy industry, economic concentration, exchange of information, merger control

9.12.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/25

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3130 — Arla Foods/Express Dairies (M.2579))

(2003/C 297/12)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 10 June 2003, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare
it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation
(EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in English and will be made public after it
is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

— in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document No 303M3130. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3688/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update on use of funding from the Ecos-Ouverture II programme by the municipality of Perugia.
Date: 2003-12-09
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU programme, Umbria, eligibility criteria, fund (EU), local authority, project evaluation, regional and local authorities, regional cooperation

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84 E/85

(2004/C 84 E/0096)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3687/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(9 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the Ecos-Ouverture II programme by the municipality of Pistoia

In its answer to question E-1113/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Pistoia had submitted
projects and secured funding under the Ecos-Ouverture programme, the Commission stated that no
funding had been granted by 1999.

Can the Commission say whether the municipality submitted any projects and obtained and used any
funding in the subsequent budget years?

Has the Commission completed its examination of the final reports mentioned in its answers and, if so,
can it supply any information on the outcome?

(1) OJ C 11 E, 15.1.2004, p. 139.

(2004/C 84 E/0097)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3688/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(9 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the Ecos-Ouverture II programme by the municipality of Perugia

In its answer to question E-1110/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Perugia had submitted
projects and secured funding under the Ecos-Ouverture programme, the Commission stated that the city
had applied twice, in 1997 and 1999, but that it had not received funding in either case.

Can the Commission say why the projects were not considered suitable?

Has the Commission completed its examination of the final reports mentioned in its answers and, if so,
can it supply any information on the outcome?

(1) OJ C 11 E, 15.1.2004, p. 139.

(2004/C 84 E/0098)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3689/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(9 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the Ecos-Ouverture II programme by the municipality of Siena

In its answer to question E-1115/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Siena had submitted
projects and secured funding under the Ecos-Ouverture programme, the Commission stated that the city
had applied with two projects in 1999, but that neither of them had received funding.

Can the Commission say why the projects were not considered suitable?

Has the Commission completed its examination of the final reports mentioned in its answers and, if so,
can it supply any information on the outcome?

(1) OJ C 11 E, 15.1.2004, p. 139.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3678/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update on use of funding from the Ecos-Ouverture II programme by the municipality of Terni.
Date: 2003-12-09
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU programme, Umbria, eligibility criteria, fund (EU), local authority, project evaluation, regional and local authorities, regional cooperation

C 84 E/82

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

3.4.2004

(2004/C 84 E/0087)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3678/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(9 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the Ecos-Ouverture II programme by the municipality of Terni

In its answer to question E-1116/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Terni had submitted
projects and secured funding under the Ecos-Ouverture programme, the Commission stated that the city
had applied but had not been been selected for funding.

Can the Commission say why the projects were not considered suitable?

Has the Commission completed its examination of the final reports mentioned in its answers and, if so,
can it supply any information on the outcome?

(1) OJ C 11 E, 15.1.2004, p. 139.

(2004/C 84 E/0088)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3679/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(9 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the Ecos-Ouverture II programme by the municipality of Pesaro

In its answer to question E-1111/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Pesaro had submitted
projects and secured funding under the Ecos-Ouverture programme, the Commission stated that no
funding had been granted by 1999.

Can the Commission say whether the municipality submitted any projects and obtained and used any
funding in the subsequent budget years?

Has the Commission completed its examination of the final reports mentioned in its answers and, if so,
can it supply any information on the outcome?

(1) OJ C 11 E, 15.1.2004, p. 139.

(2004/C 84 E/0089)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3680/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(9 December 2003)

Subject: Update on use of funding from the Ecos-Ouverture II programme by the municipality of Florence

In its answer to question E-1106/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Florence had submitted
projects and secured funding under the Ecos-Ouverture programme, the Commission stated that the city
had applied but had not been been selected for funding.

Can the Commission say why the projects were not considered suitable?

Has the Commission completed its examination of the final reports mentioned in its answers and, if so,
can it supply any information on the outcome?

(1) OJ C 11 E, 15.1.2004, p. 139.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3268 — Sydkraft/Graninge) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2003-12-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electrical industry, exchange of information, heating, merger control

C 297/22

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

9.12.2003

As a result of the above, the Commission is of the opinion that

— EN 61242 as listed in the above mentioned publication in
the Official
is not
regarded as giving a presumption of conformity with
regard to the risk of fire and of electrical shock in cases
of foreseeable overload;

the European Communities

Journal of

— Manufacturers of the relevant products may use thermal or
current cut-outs or other appropriate means to ensure that
the risk of fire and electrical shock, in cases of foreseeable
overload, are adequately addressed;

— Member States' Authorities take account of this opinion in
the context of market surveillance. Member States should
base their market surveillance measures on a case-by-case
evaluation and respect the principle of proportionality.

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3268 — Sydkraft/Graninge)

(2003/C 297/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 30 October 2003, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to
declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council
Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in English and will be
made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

— in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document No 303M3268. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.