Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 September 2003 in Case T-233/02: Charis Alexandratos and Maria Panagiotou v Council of the European Union (Officials — Action for annulment — Open competition — Decision of the selection board refusing admission to the oral tests — Scope of the obligation to state reasons — Scope of judicial review — Compliance with the rules governing the deliberations of the selection board)
Date: 2003-11-29
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: Council of the European Union, action for annulment (EU), administrative transparency, equal treatment, infringement of EU law, lay magistrate, staff assessment

C 289/22

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

29.11.2003

3. Dismisses the remainder of the application.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

4. Orders the Parliament to bear its own costs and to pay half of

of 17 September 2003

the costs incurred by the applicant.

5. Orders the applicant to bear one half of her own costs.

(1) OJ 2002 C 219 of 14.09.02.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 18 September 2003

In Case T-221/02 Giorgio Lebedef and Others against the
Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Officials — Pay — Travelling expenses — Method of
calculation)

(2003/C 289/46)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-221/02: Giorgio Lebedef, an official of the Com-
mission of the European Communities, resident in Senningen-
berg (Luxembourg), and 63 other officials, represented by
G. Bounéou and F. Frabetti,
lawyers, with an address for
service in Luxembourg, against Commission of the European
Communities (Agents: J. Currall and V. Joris) — application
for annulment of the Commission’s decision changing, with
effect from 1996 or 1997, the procedure for calculating the
annual expense of travelling to Greece in respect of the journey
via Brindisi and annulment of the applicants’ reimbursement
statements implementing that decision — the Court of First
Instance (Third Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, President,
J. Azizi and M. Jaeger, Judges; J. Plingers, Administrator, has
given a judgment on 18 September 2003 in which it:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 247 of 12 October 2002.

in Case T-233/02: Charis Alexandratos and Maria Pana-
giotou v Council of the European Union (1)

(Officials — Action for annulment — Open competition —
Decision of the selection board refusing admission to the
oral tests — Scope of the obligation to state reasons —
Scope of judicial review — Compliance with the rules
governing the deliberations of the selection board)

(2003/C 289/47)

(Language of the case: Greek)

In Case T-233/02, Charis Alexandratos and Maria Panagiotou,
residing in Brussels (Belgium), represented by C. Tagaras,
lawyer, v Council of the European Union, (Agents: F. Anton
and D. Zahariou) — application for annulment of the decision
of the selection board in the Council’s open competition A/
393 (2000/C98 A/02) refusing to admit the applicants to the
oral tests for that competition, — the Court of First Instance
(Fourth Chamber), composed of V. Tiili, President of the
Chamber, P. Mengozzi and M. Vilaras,
Judges; Registrar:
I. Natsinas, Administrator, delivered a judgment on 17 Septem-
ber 2003, the operative part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

The action is dismissed.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ 2002 C 233 of 28.9.02.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 30 September 2003

in Case T-302/02 Michael Kenny v Court of Justice of the
European Communities (1)

(Officials — Appointment — Discretion of the appointing
authority — Interests of the service)

(2003/C 289/48)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-302/02 Michael Kenny, an official of the Court of
Justice of the European Communities, residing at Roodt-sur-
Syre (Luxembourg), represented by G. Vandersanden and