Case T-315/03: Action brought on 15 September 2003 by Hans-Peter Wilfer against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Date: 2003-11-29
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), musical instrument, sound reproduction equipment, trade-mark law

29.11.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/27

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark
sought:

The word mark ‘CLIMATIC’ —
Application No 1705557

The applicant runs a medium-sized publishing company and
publishes the Leipzig magazine ‘Kreuzer’. The magazine is
financed inter alia by tobacco advertising.

Goods or services:

Goods and services in Classes 11,
12 and 37 (inter alia, apparatus
for heating,
steam generating,
refrigerating, drying and venti-
lating; repair)

Decision
before
Appeal:

contested
the Board of

Refusal by the examiner to register
the mark in respect of goods and
services in Classes 11 and 37

Decision of the Board of
Appeal:

Dismissal of the appeal

The applicant seeks a declaration that Article 3(1) of Directive
2003/33/EC is void.
It argues that the directive breaches
Community law from several points of view. The directive
infringes Article 251 EC as the published version of the
directive differs from that adopted by the Council and the
Parliament. Further, the directive breaches Article 95 EC, as, in
the case of a local or regional magazine such as that produced
by the applicant, there are no internal market implications and
the Community legislature thus has no role to play.

Pleas in law:

— Infringement of Article 74(1)
of Regulation (EC) No 40/94

— Legally incorrect application
of Article 7(1)(b) of Regu-
lation (EC) No 40/94

The applicant submits further that the directive is vague and
thus breaches the constitutional requirement of certainty. It
also infringes the requirement under Article 253 EC that
reasons should be stated, as no reasons are actually given
regarding the existence of obstacles to trade which could be
removed by the directive.

Furthermore, the applicant submits that the directive infringes
the freedom of expression safeguarded by Article 11 of the
Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union and
Article 10(1) of the ECHR. That includes the right to ‘commer-
cial speech’. The directive prejudices the placing of advertising
and positive editorial reporting, without thereby in any way
allowing the objective of the directive to be attained. Finally,
the directive infringes entrepreneurial freedom, the property
rights of the applicant and the prohibition on going beyond
what is necessary laid down by the third paragraph of Article 5
EC.

(1) OJ 2003 L 152, p. 16.

Action brought on 11 September 2003 by Kreuzer
Medien GmbH against the European Parliament and the
Council of the European Union

(Case T-310/03)

(2003/C 289/57)

(Language of the case: German)

An action against the European Parliament and the Council of
the European Union was brought before the Court of Justice
of the European Communities on 11 September 2003 by
Kreuzer Medien GmbH, represented by Dr U. Kornmeier and
Dr D. Valbert.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

— declare Article 3(1) of Directive 2003/33/EC of

the
European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003
on the approximation of
the laws, regulations and
administrative provisions of the Member States relating
to the advertising and sponsorship of tobacco products (1)
void;

— order the defendant to bear the costs.

Action brought on 15 September 2003 by Hans-Peter
Wilfer against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
Market (Trade marks and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case T-315/03)

(2003/C 289/58)

(Language of the case: German)

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) was brought before
the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on
15 September 2003 by Hans-Peter Wilfer, represented by
A. Kockläuner, lawyer.

C 289/28

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

29.11.2003

The applicant claims that the Court should:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

— annul the Decision of the defendant’s Second Board of
Appeal of 11 July 2003 in Case R 266/2002-1 in its
entirety;

— order the defendant to pay the costs.

— annul the Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of
26 June 2003 in Case R 337/2002-4 relating to Com-
munity trade mark application 1 708 973 ‘MunichFinan-
cialServices’ (word mark);

— order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark Word mark ‘Rockbass’ — Appli-
applied for:

cation No 2401123

Pleas in law and main arguments

Goods or services:

Goods in Classes 9, 15 and 18
(inter alia, technical sound equip-
ment, musical
instruments and
containers)

Community trade mark Word mark ‘MunichFinancial-
Application
sought:

—

Services’
No 1 708 973

Decision appealed to the
Board of Appeal:

Decision of the Board of
Appeal:

Pleas in law:

Examiner’s refusal to register

Goods or services:

Services in Classes 36 (financial
services)

Dismissal of the appeal

Decision appealed to the
Board of Appeal:

Examiner’s refusal to register

Decision of the Board of
Appeal:

Dismissal of appeal

Pleas in law:

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of
Regulation (EC) No 40/94

— infringement

of
Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of
Regulation (EC) No 40/94;

— infringement of the principle
of examination of the facts
its own
by the Office of
motion
to
Article 74(1)(1) of Regu-
lation (EC) No 40/94;

pursuant

— infringement of

essential

procedural requirements.

Action brought on 23 September 2003 by E-Sim Limited
against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Action brought on 12 September 2003 by Münchener
Rückversicherungs-Gesellschaft
Aktiengesellschaft
against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
Market (Trade marks and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case T-325/03)

(2003/C 289/60)

(Case T-316/03)

(2003/C 289/59)

(Language of the case: German)

(Language of the case to be determined pursuant to Article 131(2)
of the Rules of Procedure — Language in which the application was
submitted: German)

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) was brought before
the Court of First Instance of the European Communities
on 12 September 2003 by Münchener Rückversicherungs-
Gesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft, represented by G. Würtenber-
ger and R. Kunze, lawyers.

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
Market (Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the
Court of First Instance of the European Communities on
23 September 2003 by E-Sim Limited, represented by Dr
Andreas Ebert-Weidenfeller. Druckhaus Remstal-Bote GmbH,
Waiblingen (Germany) was also a party to the proceedings
before the Board of Appeal.