do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1971/2003 of 10 November 2003 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2003-11-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, grape, import price, pip fruit, stone fruit

11.11.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 293/1

I

(Acts whose publication is obligatory)

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1971/2003

of 10 November 2003

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and
vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community,

(2)

In compliance with the above criteria,
the standard
import values must be fixed at the levels set out in the
Annex to this Regulation,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of
21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the
import arrangements
last
amended by Regulation (EC) No 1947/2002 (2), and in parti-
cular Article 4(1) thereof,

fruit and vegetables (1), as

for

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Whereas:

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 lays down, pursuant to the
outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade nego-
tiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the
standard values for imports from third countries,
in
respect of the products and periods stipulated in the
Annex thereto.

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regula-
tion (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex
hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 November 2003.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 November 2003.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Agriculture Director-General

(1) OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66.
(2) OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17.

L 293/2

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

11.11.2003

to the Commission Regulation of 10 November 2003 establishing the standard import values for determining
the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

ANNEX

CN code

0702 00 00

0707 00 05

0709 90 70

0805 20 10

0805 20 30, 0805 20 50, 0805 20 70,
0805 20 90

0805 50 10

0806 10 10

0808 10 20, 0808 10 50, 0808 10 90

0808 20 50

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

(EUR/100 kg)

052
063
096
204
999

052
220
999

052
204
999

204
512
999

052
464
504
999

052
388
524
528
600
999

052
400
508
999

060
064
388
400
404
720
800
804
999

052
060
064
400
720
999

55,0
93,3
47,8
54,6
62,7

136,3
139,2
137,8

120,2
66,7
93,5

66,9
116,3
91,6

82,9
124,6
97,5
101,7

86,2
67,9
80,9
81,9
88,6
81,1

110,8
228,3
222,8
187,3

38,7
48,5
67,7
81,1
80,1
63,5
148,1
238,9
95,8

112,0
51,4
59,9
71,1
52,4
69,4

(1) Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2020/2001 (OJ L 273, 16.10.2001, p. 6). Code ‘999’ stands for

‘of other origin’.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3316/03 by Konstantinos Hatzidakis (PPE-DE) to the Commission. EAGGF corrections.
Date: 2003-11-10
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EAGGF Guarantee Section, EU Member State, EU statistics, auditing, financial management

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78 E/801

(2004/C 78 E/0850)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3316/03

by Konstantinos Hatzidakis (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(10 November 2003)

Subject: EAGGF corrections

Could the Commission provide information on the level of corrections imposed over the last five years by
the European Agriculture Guidance and Guarantee Fund, Guarantee Section, for each Member State of the
European Union?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(6 January 2004)

Since its reform in 1995, clearance of accounts has comprised two separate procedures:

(cid:1) an annual financial clearance procedure based on certification of accounts submitted by independent

bodies;

(cid:1) a compliance clearance procedure through which expenditure is recovered (by means of financial
corrections) where Commission checks have found payments not effected in accordance with
Community rules. Corrections relate to the 24 months preceding notification of the results of those
checks to the Member State concerned (Article 7(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 (1)). Financial
corrections are made by Commission decisions.

The financial corrections made over the past five years were all decided under the reformed procedure and
by means of the 15 Commission decisions resulting from compliance clearance (up to 23 July 2003, the
date of the latest decision). A sixteenth decision is currently being prepared.

The total of EUR 2,27 billion recovered over that period breaks down as follows:

Member State

Amount recovered

(euro)

Belgium

Denmark

Germany

Greece

Spain

France

Ireland

Italy

Luxembourg

Netherlands

Austria

Portugal

Finland

Sweden

7 873 259,91

32 415 872,67

106 099 916,44

519 551 784,76

474 884 455,96

325 740 770,28

26 291 003,76

575 928 793,49

403 570,23

11 737 138,74

938 528,59

51 945 010,91

4 565 590,64

3 185 416,91

United Kingdom

129 294 789,14

Total:

2 270 855 902,43

(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the financing of the common agricultural policy (cid:1)

OJ L 160, 26.6.1999.
WRITTEN QUESTION P-3391/03 by Luigi Vinci (GUE/NGL) to the Commission. Negotiations between Turkey and the Commission on the case against Leyla Zana.
Date: 2003-11-10
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU relations, Kurdistan question, Türkiye, accession criteria, terrorism

C 88 E/648

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

8.4.2004

The Commission is following this case and has been in contact with the Greek and the Egyptian
authorities.

The Commission is prepared to support any further diplomatic effort by Greece or by the Union
Presidency for the transfer on humanitarian grounds of Mr Kastanias to Greece by virtue of the existing
bilateral agreement on the exchange of detainees.

(2004/C 88 E/0664)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-3391/03

by Luigi Vinci (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(10 November 2003)

Subject: Negotiations between Turkey and the Commission on the case against Leyla Zana

the Turkish daily newspaper Hurriyet mentions
A recent article by the Brussels correspondent of
negotiations between Turkey and the European Commission based on the Turkish proposal
for a
favourable judgment in the case against Leyla Zana in exchange for the inclusion of KADEK on Europe’s
list of terrorist organisations.

Can the Commission either confirm this report or officially deny it?

Answer given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(5 December 2003)

The Commission would like to inform the Honourable Member that the article referred to has no basis in
fact. There are no negotiations between the Commission and the Turkish Government on the subjects
mentioned in the question.

The Commission provided its assessment of the ongoing re-trial in the Sadak, Zana, Dicle and Dogan case
in its 2003 Regular Report, which was published on 5 November 2003 (1), and will continue to monitor
this closely.

(1) COM(2003) 676 final.

(2004/C 88 E/0665)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3396/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(17 November 2003)

Subject: Failure to pay compensation to Italian exiles in former Yugoslavia

The cultural association ‘Movimento nazionale Istria Fiume Dalmazia’ has for many years now been
campaigning for recognition of the rights of the 350 000 Italian exiles who were obliged to leave
Yugoslavia for historical reasons that are sufficiently well known.

Two agreements were concluded, at Osimo in 1975 and Rome in 1983, recognising the right to fair
compensation of the Italian exiles who had been obliged to abandon their entire property. However, with
the break-up of Yugoslavia, the successor states, Slovenia and Croatia, have failed to pay the agreed
instalments. According to a recent study by the technical commission set up by Trieste province in
cooperation with Rome province and the Trieste city council, the 1983 agreements need to be revised in
order to put an end to the exclusion of foreign citizens under the ‘denationalisation’ laws and remove the
bureaucratic obstacles to the purchase of property in Slovenia.