Order of the Court of First Instance of 3 July 2003 in Case T-257/01, Frosch Touristik GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Amicable settlement — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2003-10-04
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), brand name, tourism

C 239/8

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

4.10.2003

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 3 July 2003

of 3 July 2003

in Case T-257/01, Frosch Touristik GmbH v Office for
Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and
Designs) (OHIM) (1)

in Case T-34/03: André Hecq and Syndicat des Fonction-
naires Internationaux et Européens (SFIE) v Commission
of the European Communities (1)

(Community trade mark — Opposition — Amicable settle-
ment — No need to adjudicate)

(Formal inadmissibility of the application — Legal person
governed by private law — Instructions given to lawyer)

(2003/C 239/10)

(2003/C 239/11)

(Language of the case: German)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-257/01: Frosch Touristik GmbH, established in
Munich (Germany), represented by G. Zeiner and B. Heaman-
Dunn, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg v
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks
and Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: G. Schneider), the intervener
before the Court of First Instance being Air Marin Flugreisen
GmbH, established in Bonn (Germany), represented by C. Don-
le, lawyer — Action brought against the decision of the Office
for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and
Designs) of 31 July 2001 (Case R 789/1999-2) relating to
opposition proceedings between Frosch Touristik GmbH and
Air Marin Flugreisen GmbH — the Court of First Instance
(Fourth Chamber), composed of V. Tiili, President and P. Men-
gozzi and M. Vilaras, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has made an
order on 3 July 2003, the operative part of which is as follows:

In Case T-34/03: André Hecq, official of the Commission,
residing in Mondercange (Luxembourg), and Syndicat des
fonctionnaires internationaux et européen (SFIE), established
in Brussels (Belgium), represented by L. Vogel, lawyer, against
Commission of the European Communities — application for
annulment of the decision of the Commission of 4 October
2002 rejecting the complaint lodged by Mr André Hecq, acting
in his own name and in his capacity as Secretary-General of
the SFIE union against the decisions of the Commission laying
down the rules on resources available to staff representatives
from 1 January 2002 and against the decision on the budgetary
resources to be allocated to the SFIE union led by Mr Hecq and
for damages — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber),
composed of R. García-Valdecasas, President, P. Lindh and
J. D. Cooke, judges; H. Jung, registrar, has given an order on
3 July 2003, the operative part of which is as follows:

1)

There is no further need to adjudicate in this action;

2)

The applicant shall bear its own costs and those of the Office;

1.

The action is inadmissible insofar as it is brought by the
Syndicat des fonctionnaires internationaux et européens (SFIE).

3)

The intervener shall bear its own costs.

2.

The SFIE shall bear its own costs.

( 1) OJ C 3 of 5.1.02.

(1) OJ C 101, 26.4.2003.