Case T-226/03: Action brought on 13 June 2003 by Ocean Trawlers Limited against the Commission of the European Communities
Date: 2003-10-04
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment (EU), carrying capacity, fishing vessel, maritime safety

C 239/12

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

4.10.2003

Pleas in law and main arguments

Action brought on 13 June 2003 by Pat Fitzpatrick against
the Commission of the European Communities

The applicant invokes the same pleas in law as in Case T-218/
03 (1).

( 1) See p. 9 of this Official Journal.

(Case T-225/03)

(2003/C 239/20)

(Language of the case: English)

Action brought on 13 June 2003 by Thomas Faherty
against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-224/03)

(2003/C 239/19)

(Language of the case: English)

An action against the Commission of the European Communi-
ties was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
European Communities on 13 June 2003 by Thomas Faherty,
Kilronan, (Ireland), represented by P. Gallagher and A. Collins,
Barristers, and D. Barry, Solicitor.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

— annul the decision contained in Article 2 of Commission
Decision of 4 April 2003 on the requests received by the
Commission to increase in MAGP IV objectives to take
into account improvements on safety, navigation at sea,
hygiene, product quality and working conditions for
vessels of more than 12 m in length overall notified
under document number C(2003) 1113 to reject a safety
capacity application for a proposed new RSW trawler
vessel to replace the MFV Westward Isle;

— order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceed-

ings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant invokes the same pleas in law as in Case T-218/
03 (1).

( 1) See p. 9 of this Official Journal.

An action against the Commission of the European Communi-
ties was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
European Communities on 13 June 2003 by Pat Fitzpatrick,
Inishmore, (Ireland), represented by P. Gallagher and A. Collins,
Barristers, and D. Barry, Solicitor.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

— annul the decision contained in Article 2 of Commission
Decision of 4 April 2003 on the requests received by the
Commission to increase in MAGP IV objectives to take
into account improvements on safety, navigation at sea,
hygiene, product quality and working conditions for
vessels of more than 12 m in length overall notified
under document number C(2003) 1113 to reject a safety
capacity application in respect of the MFV Shauan Ann;

— order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceed-

ings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant invokes the same pleas in law as in Case T-218/
03 (1).

(1) See p. 9 of this Official Journal.

Action brought on 13 June 2003 by Ocean Trawlers
Limited against the Commission of the European Com-
munities

(Case T-226/03)

(2003/C 239/21)

(Language of the case: English)

An action against the Commission of the European Communi-
ties was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
European Communities on 13 June 2003 by Ocean Trawlers
Limited, Killybegs, (Ireland), represented by P. Gallagher and
A. Collins, Barristers, and D. Barry, Solicitor.

4.10.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/13

The applicant claims that the Court should:

— order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceed-

— annul the decision contained in Article 2 of Commission
Decision of 4 April 2003 on the requests received by the
Commission to increase in MAGP IV objectives to take
into account improvements on safety, navigation at sea,
hygiene, product quality and working conditions for
vessels of more than 12 m in length overall notified
under document number C(2003) 1113 to reject a safety
capacity application for a proposed new RSW vessel,
MFV Golden Rose;

— order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceed-

ings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant invokes the same pleas in law as in Case T-218/
03 (1).

( 1) See p. 9 of this Official Journal.

Action brought on 13 June 2003 by Brendelen Limited
against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-227/03)

(2003/C 239/22)

(Language of the case: English)

An action against the Commission of the European Communi-
ties was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
European Communities on 13 June 2003 by Brendelen
Limited, Greencastle, (Ireland), represented by P. Gallagher and
A. Collins, Barristers, and D. Barry, Solicitor.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

— annul the decision contained in Article 2 of Commission
Decision of 4 April 2003 on the requests received by the
Commission to increase in MAGP IV objectives to take
into account improvements on safety, navigation at sea,
hygiene, product quality and working conditions for
vessels of more than 12 m in length overall notified
under document number C(2003) 1113 to reject a safety
capacity application to lengthen the MFV Brendelen and
for a proposed new vessel to replace the MFV Brendelen;

ings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant invokes the same pleas in law as in Case T-218/
03 (1).

(1) See p. 9 of this Official Journal.

Action brought on 13 June 2003 by Eugene Hannigan
against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-228/03)

(2003/C 239/23)

(Language of the case: English)

An action against the Commission of the European Communi-
ties was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
European Communities on 13 June 2003 by Eugene Hannigan,
Killybegs, (Ireland), represented by P. Gallagher and A. Collins,
Barristers, and D. Barry, Solicitor.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

— annul the decision contained in Article 2 of Commission
Decision of 4 April 2003 on the requests received by the
Commission to increase in MAGP IV objectives to take
into account improvements on safety, navigation at sea,
hygiene, product quality and working conditions for
vessels of more than 12 m in length overall notified
under document number C(2003) 1113 to reject a safety
capacity application for a proposed new vessel MFV
Niamh Eoghan;

— order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceed-

ings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant invokes the same pleas in law as in Case T-218/
03 (1).

(1) See p. 9 of this Official Journal.