Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 June 2003 in Case T-385/00 Jean-Paul Seiller v European Investment Bank (European Investment Bank — Staff — Admissibility — Clarity of the application — Confirmatory act — Action brought late — Previous conciliation procedure — Pension rights — Luxembourg law — Settlement — Fraudulent misrepresentation)
Date: 2003-09-20
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Investment Bank, European official, appeal to the Court (EU), termination of a contract, transfer of pension rights, work contract

C 226/16

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

20.9.2003

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 17 June 2003

in Case T-385/00 Jean-Paul Seiller v European Investment
Bank (1)

(European Investment Bank — Staff — Admissibility —
Clarity of the application — Confirmatory act — Action
brought late — Previous conciliation procedure — Pension
rights — Luxembourg law — Settlement — Fraudulent mis-
representation)

(2003/C 226/32)

(Language of the case: French)

for

In Case T-385/00 Jean-Paul Seiller, residing in Luxembourg,
represented by D. Chouanier and L. Thielen,
lawyers, with
service in Luxembourg, against European
an address
Investment Bank (Agents: E. Uhlmann, C. Gómez de la Cruz
and P. Mousel) — application for payment of the sum of
LUF 4779652, together with interest, due to him in respect of
his pension rights — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber),
composed of R. García-Valdecasas, President, and P. Lindh and
J.D. Cooke,
the
Registrar, has given a judgment on 17 June 2003 in which it:

Judges; D. Christensen, Administrator,

for

of

the

European Communities

represented by D. Voillemot and O. Prost, lawyers, supported
by the Kingdom of Spain (Agent: L. Fraguas Gadea), against
Commission
(Agents:
V. Kreuschitz, S. Meany and A.P. Bentley), supported by TNC
Kazchrome, established in Almaty (Kazakhstan) and by Alloy
2000 SA, established in Strassen (Luxembourg), represented by
J. Flynn, J. Magnin and S. Mills — application for partial annul-
ment of Commission Decision 2001/230/EC of 21 February
2001 terminating the anti-dumping proceeding concerning
the People's
ferro-silicon originating in Brazil,
imports of
Republic of China, Kazakhstan, Russia, Ukraine
and
Venezuela (OJ 2001 L 84, p. 36) in so far it concerns imports
originating in the People's Republic of China, Russia, Ukraine
and Kazakhstan — the Court of First
Instance (Second
Chamber, Extended Composition), composed of N.J. Forwood,
President, J. Pirrung, P. Mengozzi, A.W.H. Meij and M. Vilaras,
Judges; Registrar: J. Palacio Gonzalez, Principal Administrator,
has given a judgment on 8 July 2003, in which it:

1. Dismissed the action;

2. Ordered the applicants to bear their own costs and, jointly and
severally, those incurred by the Commission and by the interve-
ners TNC Kazchrome and Alloy 2000, including the costs of the
interlocutory proceedings;

3. Ordered the Kingdom of Spain, intervener, to bear its own costs.

1. Dismisses the application;

2. Orders the applicant to bear his own costs and to pay those

incurred by the EIB.

(1) OJ No C 227 of 11.8.01.

(1) OJ C 61 of 24 February 2001.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 8 July 2003

in Case T-132/01: Euroalliages and Others v Commission
of the European Communities (1)

(Dumping — Decision terminating expiry review —
Community interest — Application for annulment)

(2003/C 226/33)

(Language of the case: French)

established in Brussels
In Case T-132/01: Euroalliages,
(Belgium),
in
Péchiney
Courbevoie (France), Vargön Alloys AB, established in Vargön
(Sweden), Ferroatlántica, SL, established in Madrid (Spain),

électrométallurgie,

established

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 17 July 2003

in Case T-81/02 Margot Wagemann-Reuter v Court of
Auditors of the European Communities (1)

(Staff case — Leave on personal grounds — Vacant post —
Upgrading of post — Reinstatement)

(2003/C 226/34)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-81/02 Margot Wagemann-Reuter, an official of the
Court of Auditors of the European Communities, residing in
lawyer, with an
Luxembourg, represented by M.-A. Lucas,
address for service in Luxembourg, against
the Court of
Auditors of the European Communities (Agents: originally,
later J.-M. Stenier,
J.-M. Stenier, P. Giusta and B. Schäfer,
M. Bavendam and I. Riagáin) — application for,
first,