Order of the Court of First Instance of 4 June 2003 in Case T-224/99: The European Council of Transport Users ASBL and Others v Commission of the European Communities (Actions for annulment — Action become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2003-09-06
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment (EU), combined transport, maritime transport, road transport, transport price

C 213/34

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

6.9.2003

Judges; J. Plingers, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a
judgment on 3 April 2003, in which it:

1. Dismisses the application;

2. Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay those

incurred by the Commission and SEB;

3. Orders De’Longhi to bear its own costs;

4. Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs.

( 1) OJ C 169 of 13.7.2002.

inland waterway (OJ, English Special Edition 1968 (I), p. 302),
concerning the revised version of the Trans-Atlantic Confer-
ence Agreement (TACA), the Court of First Instance (Third
Chamber), composed of: K. Lenaerts, President, J. Azizi and
M. Jaeger, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has made an order on
4 June 2003, the operative part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

The parties shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 6 of 8.1.2000.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 4 June 2003

of 13 May 2003

in Case T-224/99: The European Council of Transport
Users ASBL and Others v Commission of the European
Communities (1)

in Case T-97/01 DEP, Christos Gogos v Commission of
the European Communities (1)

(Actions for annulment — Action become devoid of purpose
— No need to adjudicate)

(2003/C 213/66)

(Language of the case: English)

In Case T-224/99, The European Council of Transport Users
ASBL, established in Brussels, The Freight Transport Associ-
ation, established in Tunbridge Wells (United Kingdom),
Association des Utilisateurs de Transport de Fret
(AUTF),
established in Paris, and Industrieförbundet, established in
Stockholm, represented by M. Clough QC, with an address for
service in Luxembourg, v Commission of
the European
Communities (Agent: R. Lyal), supported by Atlantic Container
Line AB, established in Göteborg (Sweden), Hapag-Lloyd AG,
established in Hamburg (Germany), Mediterranean Shipping
Company SA, established in Geneva (Switzerland), A.P. Møller-
Mærsk Line, established in Copenhagen, Nippon Yusen Kaisha,
established in Tokyo (Japan), Orient Overseas Container Line
(UK) Ltd, established in London and P & O Nedlloyd Container
Line Ltd, established in London, represented by J. Pheasant and
M. Levitt, Solicitors, with an address for service in Luxembourg:
Application for annulment of the decision of the Commission,
communicated to the applicants by letter of 6 August 1999,
not to raise serious doubts, within the meaning of Article 12
of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1017/68 of 19 July 1968
applying rules of competition to transport by rail, road and

(Taxation of recoverable costs)

(2003/C 213/67)

(Language of the case: Greek)

In Case T-97/01 DEP, Christos Gogos, an official of the
Commission of the European Communities, represented by
C. Tagaras, lawyer, v Commission of the European Communi-
ties (Agents: H. Tserepa-Lacombe and J. Currall) — application
for taxation of costs to be paid by the defendant to the
applicant following the order of the Court of First Instance of
21 October 2002 in Case T-97/01 Gogos v Commission (not
published in the Reports of Cases) — the Court of First
Instance (Second Chamber), composed of: N.J. Forwood,
President, J. Pirrung and A.W.H. Meij, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar,
made an order on 13 May 2003 the operative part of which is
as follows:

The total amount of costs recoverable by the applicant in Case T-97/
01 is fixed at EUR 11 000

(1) OJ C 186 of 30.6.01.