Order of the Court of First Instance of 30 April 2003 in Case T-155/02: VVG International Handelsgesellschaft mbH and Others v Commission of the European Communities (Regulation (EC) No 3285/94 — Regulation (EC) No 560/2002 — Provisional safeguard measures — Actions for annulment — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2003-08-23
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment (EU), import, infringement of EU law, iron and steel product, steel, tariff quota

C 200/22

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

23.8.2003

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks
and Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: J. F. Crespo Carrillo), the other
party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks
and Designs) being:
JESMAR, SA, established in Alicante
(Spain): Action brought against the decision of the First Board
of Appeal of
the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 October 2001 (Case
served on the applicant on
R 418/2000-1), which was
5 November 2001, relating to opposition proceedings between
ZAPF Creation AG and JESMAR SA, the Court of First Instance
(Fourth Chamber), composed of: V. Tiili, President, P. Mengozzi
and M. Vilaras, Judges, Registrar: H. Jung, has made an order
on 26 February 2003,
the operative part of which is as
follows:

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2.

The applicant shall pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 109 of 4.5.2002.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 26 February 2003

in Case T-7/02: ZAPF Creation AG v Office for Harmoni-
sation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
(OHIM) (1)

(Community trade mark — Opposition — Amicable settle-
ment — No need to adjudicate)

(2003/C 200/38)

(Language of the case: English)

In Case T-7/02, ZAPF Creation AG, established in Rödental/
lawyer, v
Coburg (Germany), represented by A. Kockläuner,
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks
and Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: J. F. Crespo Carrillo), the other
party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks
JESMAR, SA, established in Alicante
and Designs) being:
(Spain): Action brought against the decision of the First Board
of Appeal of
the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 October 2001 (Case
R 1123/2000-1), which was
served on the applicant on
29 October 2001, relating to opposition proceedings between
ZAPF Creation AG and JESMAR SA, the Court of First Instance
(Fourth Chamber), composed of: V. Tiili, President, P. Mengozzi
and M. Vilaras, Judges, Registrar: H. Jung, has made an order
on 26 February 2003,
the operative part of which is as
follows:

1.

2.

There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

The applicant shall pay the costs.

of 30 April 2003

(1) OJ C 109 of 4.5.2002.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 26 February 2003

in Case T-8/02: ZAPF Creation AG v Office for Harmoni-
sation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
(OHIM) (1)

(Community trade mark — Opposition — Amicable settle-
ment — No need to adjudicate)

(2003/C 200/39)

(Language of the case: English)

in Case T-155/02: VVG International Handelsgesellschaft
mbH and Others v Commission of the European Commu-
nities (1)

(Regulation (EC) No 3285/94 — Regulation (EC) No 560/
2002 — Provisional safeguard measures — Actions for
annulment — Inadmissibility)

(2003/C 200/40)

(Language of the case: German)

In Case T-8/02, ZAPF Creation AG, established in Rödental/
lawyer, v
Coburg (Germany), represented by A. Kockläuner,

In Case T-155/02: VVG International Handelsgesellschaft mbH,
established in Salzburg (Austria), VVG (International) Ltd,
established in Gibraltar (United Kingdom), Metalsivas Metall-
warenhandelsgesellschaft mbH, established in Vienna (Austria),

23.8.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/23

represented by W. Schuler, lawyer, against Commission of the
European Communities (Agents: G. zur Hausen and B. Eggers)
— application for annulment of Commission Regulation (EC)
No 560/2002 of 27 March 2002 imposing provisional safe-
guard measures against imports of certain steel products (OJ
2002 L 85, p. 1) — the Court of First Instance (First Chamber),
composed of B. Vesterdorf, President, R.M. Moura Ramos and
H. Legal, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 30 April
2003, in which it:

1. Dismissed the action as inadmissible.

2.

The applicants shall bear their own costs and those incurred by
the Commission.

(1) OJ C 289, 23.11.2002.

2. Ordered the applicants to bear their own costs and those of the
including the costs relating to the procedure for

Commission,
interim relief.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 6 May 2003

(1) OJ C 191 of 10.8.02.

in Case T-321/02:
European Parliament

Paul Vannieuwenhuyze-Morin
and Council of
Union (1)

v
the European

(Application for annulment — Directive 2002/58/EC —
Natural or legal persons — Standing to bring proceedings
— Inadmissibility)

(2003/C 200/42)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-321/02: Paul Vannieuwenhuyze-Morin, residing in
Grigny (France), represented by G. Dupaigne,
lawyer, against
(Agents: H. Duintjer Tebbens and
the European Parliament
A. Caiola) and the Council of
the European Union (Agent:
M.-C. Giorgi Fort) — application for partial annulment of
Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the
Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal
data and the protection of privacy in the electronic commu-
nications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic commu-
(OJ 2002 L 201, p. 37) — the Court of First
nications)
Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of V. Tiili, President,
P. Mengozzi and M. Vilaras, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made
an order on 6 May 2003, the operative part of which is as
follows:

1.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

2.

3.

is unnecessary to rule on the applications

to
It
intervene lodged by the Kingdom of Spain and the Commission.

leave

for

The applicant shall bear his own costs and those incurred by
the Parliament and the Council.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 9 April 2003

in Case T-280/02: Johannes Jacobus Pikaart and Others v
Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Application for annulment — Actionable measures — Inad-
missibility)

(2003/C 200/41)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

(Netherlands),

lawyers, against

In Case T-280/02: Johannes Jacobus Pikaart, residing in Papen-
drecht
Johanna Cornelia Pikaart-Leeuwestein,
residing in Papendrecht, Scheepvaartonderneming ‘Factotum’
vof, established in Papendrecht, represented by J. van Dam
the
and D. Ouwerling,
European Communities (Agent: W. Wils) — application for
annulment of the decision of the Commission contained in
the letter addressed to the applicants by its services on 16 July
2002 (D (2002) 11796) — the Court of First Instance (Third
J. Azizi and
Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, President,
M. Jaeger, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 9 April
2003, the operative part of which is as follows:

the Commission of

1.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 7, 11.1.2003.