WRITTEN QUESTION E-2425/03 by Maurizio Turco (NI) to the Council. Harmonisation of tax on the income from the savings of non-resident Union citizens and abolition of banking secrecy.
Date: 2003-07-21
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: OECD, banking secrecy, exchange of information, overseas countries and territories, payment, savings, tax harmonisation, tax on income, tax system, third country

C 70 E/98

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

20.3.2004

Turning to the second question, the Commission has no indication of how Member States will apply in
practice the existing Community disclosure obligations to third country issuers when the IAS Regulation
enters into force. It is, however, unlikely that Member States will consider any accounting standards in the
world as acceptable when raising capital on their territory. For the time being, the Commission believes
that Members States will maintain their national practices that derive from existing Community legislation
until the implementing measures of the new prospectus Directive and the proposed transparency Directive
are adopted.

The new prospectus Directive and the proposed transparency Directive should bring more consistency and
harmonisation regarding the financial information to be disclosed by third country issuers who wish to
raise capital within the Union. It will also cover securities aimed at wholesale investors. The content of the
implementing measures of the prospectus Directive is not yet known and the proposed transparency
Directive is in the early stages of the co-decision procedure.

(1) OJ L 243, 11.9.2002.
(2) OJ L 184, 6.7.2001.

(2004/C 70 E/100)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2425/03

by Maurizio Turco (NI) to the Council

(21 July 2003)

Subject: Harmonisation of tax on the income from the savings of non-resident Union citizens and abolition

of banking secrecy

Knowing that:

(cid:1) At the Feira summit on 19/20 June 2000 the EU finance ministers decided that as of 2011 the
automatic exchange of information would be introduced for all Union countries in the interests of
harmonising, at Community level, the tax on income from the savings of Union citizens.

(cid:1) On 21 January 2003 the EU finance ministers initialled a policy agreement, which is subject to

acceptance of equivalent measures by other third countries and stipulates that:

(a) as of 1 January 2004 twelve Member States will initiate the automatic exchange of information;

(b) Luxembourg, Austria and Belgium will initiate the automatic exchange of information ‘if and
when’ the Council unanimously agrees that Switzerland, the United States, Liechtenstein, Andorra,
San Maríno and Monaco accept the exchange of information on the basis of OECD’s 2002
parameters, which define criminal and civil offences in the areas of taxation and fraud.

(cid:1) On 3 June 2003 the EU finance ministers approved an arrangement negotiated with Switzerland.

Can the Council answer the following questions:

1. Why do the third countries do not include the Vatican State, despite the fact that:

(a)

(b)

the central bank, the Istituto Opere di Religione (IOR) does not belong to any international
monitoring body;

the IOR takes part indirectly in the payment systems of the euro zone (cid:1) with dual access via two
major banks, one of them German, the other Italian, which are themselves linked to the system (cid:1)
thereby evading surveillance by the banking authorities to which only direct participants are
subjected;

(c)

it has no legislation to combat money-laundering;

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70 E/99

(d)

(e)

it has not accepted the exchange of information on the basis of the 2002 OECD parameters,
which define criminal and civil offences in the areas of taxation and fraud;

it has on several occasions been involved in financial transactions with serious implications,
which have never been the subject of legal proceedings because of the concordat with the Italian
Republic guaranteeing the Catholic hierarchy absolute impunity?

2. What arrangements will apply in overseas territories,

in particular British ones, and, apart from
Switzerland, which has signed a negotiated solution, what are the current positions of the United
States, Liechtenstein, Andorra, San Maríno and Monaco on the exchange of information on the basis
of the 2002 OECD parameters?

3. Can the Council give an assurance that in Luxembourg, Austria and Belgium banking secrecy will be
maintained at least until 2011, and say under what conditions it might remain in force even after that
date?

Reply

(8 December 2003)

1.
The European Council meeting in Santa Maria da Feira on 19/20 June 2000 decided that, as soon as
agreement has been reached by the Council on the substantial content of the Directive and before its
adoption, the Presidency and the Commission will enter into discussions immediately with the US and key
third countries (Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Monaco, Andorra, San Maríno) to promote the adoption of
measures in those countries equivalent to those to be applied within the EU.

Moreover, at its meeting on 21 January 2003, the Council asked the Commission to enter into discussions
with other important financial centres, so that they will adopt measures equivalent to those to be applied
within the EU.

2. With regard to arrangements in dependent or associated territories, at the Council meeting on 3 June
2003 the Council and the representatives of the governments of the Member States, meeting within the
Council, stated in their resolution on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments that ‘the
United Kingdom and the Netherlands will do their utmost, within the framework of their constitutional
arrangements, to ensure that appropriate measures in respect of the relevant dependent or associated
territories (the Channel
Islands, the Isle of Man and the dependent or associated territories in the
Caribbean) are in place in sufficient time to enable the provisions of Directive 2003/…/EC to be applied
from 1 January 2005 in accordance with Article 17 thereof, and for the application of automatic exchange
of information (or, during the transitional period defined in Article 10, the application of a withholding
tax) not later than 1 January 2005.’

The Council is not in a position to inform the Honourable Member about the positions of Liechtenstein,
Andorra, San Maríno and Monaco concerning exchange of information on the basis of the OECD’s 2002
parameters as the Commission is conducting negotiations with those countries on the subject.

With regard to the United States of America, the Council would remind the Honourable Member that, at
its meeting on 21 January 2003, it considered on the basis of a Commission report submitted to the
Ecofin Council on 3 December 2002 that sufficient assurances had been obtained from the United States
concerning the application of ‘equivalent measures’ to those provided for in the draft Directive.

3.
Articles 10 and 17 of Council Directive 2003/48/EC on taxation of savings income in the form of
interest payments lay down the transitional periods for the Member States mentioned by the Honourable
Member and the conditions for implementing the provisions of the Directive.