Order of the Court of First Instance of 21 March 2003 in Case T-167/02: Établissements Toulorge v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (Actions for annulment — Natural or legal persons — Measures of direct and individual concern to them — Directive 2002/2/EC — Inadmissibility — Claim for damages)
Date: 2003-07-19
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: Council of the European Union, European Parliament, action for annulment (EU), animal nutrition, free movement of goods, infringement of EU law, manufactured feedingstuffs, public health

C 171/26

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

19.7.2003

Stahlhandel GmbH & Co. KG, established in Essen (Germany),
and Metal Traders Stahlhandel GmbH, established in Düssel-
dorf (Germany) represented by K. Friedrich, lawyer, with an
address for service in Luxembourg, against the Commission of
the European Communities (Agents: J. Forman and R. Raith) —
application, first, for the annulment of Commission Regulation
(EC) No 560/2002 of 27 March 2002 imposing provisional
safeguard measures against imports of certain steel products
(OJ 2002 L 85, p. 1) and, second, a claim for damages —
the Court of First Instance (First Chamber), composed of
B. Vesterdorf, President R.M. Moura Ramos and H. Legal,
Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 27 March 2003,
the operative part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

There is no need to give a decision on the claim for annulment.

The application for a ruling on the admissibility of the claim
for damages is joined to the application on the substance.

repealing Commission Directive 91/357/EEC (OJ 2002 L 63,
p. 23) and a claim for compensation for the damage allegedly
suffered — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber),
composed of V. Tiili, President of the Chamber, P. Mengozzi
and M. Vilaras, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on
21 March 2003, the operative part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible so far as it concerns
the annulment of Directive 2002/2/EC of
the European
Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 amending
Council Directive 79/373/EEC on the circulation of compound
feedingstuffs and repealing Commission Directive 91/357/
EEC.

The requests submitted by the defendants that the action, in so
far as it seeks compensation for the damage allegedly suffered,
should be held inadmissible, are reserved for final judgment.

3.

The costs are reserved.

( 1) OJ C 191 of 10.8.02.

3.

Costs are reserved.

(1) OJ 2002 C 180.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 21 March 2003

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

in Case T-167/02: Établissements Toulorge v European
Parliament and Council of the European Union (1)

of 31 March 2003

(Actions for annulment — Natural or legal persons —
Measures of direct and individual concern to them —
Directive 2002/2/EC — Inadmissibility — Claim for dam-
ages)

(2003/C 171/43)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-167/02: Établissements Toulorge, established in
Bricquebec (France),
represented by D. Waelbroeck and
D. Brinckman, lawyers, against European Parliament (Agents:
C. Pennera and Mme E. Waldherr) and Council of the European
Union (Agents: I. Diez Parra and F. P. Ruggeri Laderchi),
supported by Federal Republic of Germany (Agents: W.-
D. Plessing nad M. Lumma) and Commission of the European
Communities (Agent: A. Bordes) — application for the annul-
ment of Directive 2002/2/EC of the European Parliament and
of the Council of 28 January 2002 amending Council Directive
79/373/EEC on the circulation of compound feedingstuffs and

in Case T-226/02: André Hecq v Commission of the
European Communities (1)

(Officials — Action for annulment — Act adversely affect-
ing an official — Inadmissibility)

(2003/C 171/44)

(Language of the case: French)

the European Communities,

In Case T-226/02: André Hecq, an official of the Commission
of
residing in Mondercange
(Luxembourg), represented by L. Vogel and D. Amatulli,
lawyers, against the Commission of the European Communi-
ties (Agent: M. Currall) — application for the annulment of the
Commission decision of 15 June 2001 approving the