Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 11 April 2003 in Case T-392/02 R: Solvay Pharmaceuticals BV v Council of the European Union (Procedure for interim relief — Directive 70/524/EEC — Withdrawal of authorisation for the placing on the market of an additive in feedingstuffs — Regulation (EC) No 1756/2002 — Application for suspension of operation — Admissibility — Prima facie case — Urgency — Balancing of interests)
Date: 2003-07-19
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: animal nutrition, food additive, foodstuffs legislation, veterinary drug, withdrawal from the market

C 171/28

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

19.7.2003

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST
INSTANCE

of 11 April 2003

in Case T-392/02 R: Solvay Pharmaceuticals BV v Council
of the European Union

(Procedure for interim relief — Directive 70/524/EEC —
Withdrawal of authorisation for the placing on the market
of an additive in feedingstuffs — Regulation (EC) No 1756/
2002 — Application for suspension of operation — Admissi-
bility — Prima facie case — Urgency — Balancing of
interests)

(2003/C 171/47)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-392/01 R: Solvay Pharmaceuticals BV, established in
Weesp (Netherlands) represented by C. Meijer, F. Herbert and
M. L. Struys, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxem-
bourg, against the Council of the European Union (Agents:
M. Balta and M. Ruggeri Laderchi) — application for the
suspension of operation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1756/
2002 of 23 September 2002 amending Council Directive 70/
524/EEC concerning additives in feedingstuffs as regards
withdrawal of the authorisation of an additive and amending
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2430/1999 (OJ 2002 L 265,
p. 1) — the President of the Court of First Instance made an
order on 11 April 2003, the operative part of which is as
follows:

1.

2.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

The costs are reserved.

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST
INSTANCE

of 27 March 2003

in Case T-398/02 R: Linea GIG Srl v Commission of the
European Communities

(Application for interim relief — Competition — Payment
of fines — Bank guarantee — Urgency — Exceptional
circumstances — Balancing of interests)

(2003/C 171/48)

(Language of the case: Italian)

In Case T-398/02 R: Linea GIG Srl, having its registered office
in Florence (Italy), represented by L. D’Amario and B. Calzia,

lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against
Commission of the European Communities (Agents: L. Pignat-
aro-Nolin and O. Beynets) — application for suspension of the
operation of the decision of the Commission of 30 October
2002 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 EC and
Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (COMP/35.587 PO Video
Games, COMP/35.706 PO Nintendo Distribution and COMP/
36.321 Omega — Nintendo) — the President of the Court of
First Instance made an order on 27 March 2003, the operative
part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

The application is dismissed.

Costs are reserved.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 28 April 2003

in Case T-15/03: José Luis Zuazaga Meabe against Office
for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks
and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

(Community trade mark — Annulment — Time limits —
Manifest Inadmissibility)

(2003/C 171/49)

(Language of the case: Spanish)

In Case T-15/03: José Luis Zuazaga Meabe, residing in Bilbao
(Spain), against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), the other party to
proceedings being: Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA,
established in Madrid, — appeal against the decision of the
Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in
the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 24 October
2002 in Case R-918/2001-2 relating to the opposition pro-
ceedings between José Luis Zuazaga Meabe and Banco Bilbao
Vizcaya Argentaria SA — the Court of First Instance (Second
Chamber), composed of N.J. Forwood, President, and J. Pirrung
and A.W.H. Meij, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar; has made an order
on 28 April 2003 by which it:

1. Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

2. Orders the applicant to pay its own costs.

(1) OJ C 70, 22.3.2003.