Order of the Court of First Instance of 31 March 2003 in Case T-226/02: André Hecq v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Action for annulment — Act adversely affecting an official — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2003-07-19
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment (EU), civil servants’ union, equal treatment

C 171/26

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

19.7.2003

Stahlhandel GmbH & Co. KG, established in Essen (Germany),
and Metal Traders Stahlhandel GmbH, established in Düssel-
dorf (Germany) represented by K. Friedrich, lawyer, with an
address for service in Luxembourg, against the Commission of
the European Communities (Agents: J. Forman and R. Raith) —
application, first, for the annulment of Commission Regulation
(EC) No 560/2002 of 27 March 2002 imposing provisional
safeguard measures against imports of certain steel products
(OJ 2002 L 85, p. 1) and, second, a claim for damages —
the Court of First Instance (First Chamber), composed of
B. Vesterdorf, President R.M. Moura Ramos and H. Legal,
Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 27 March 2003,
the operative part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

There is no need to give a decision on the claim for annulment.

The application for a ruling on the admissibility of the claim
for damages is joined to the application on the substance.

repealing Commission Directive 91/357/EEC (OJ 2002 L 63,
p. 23) and a claim for compensation for the damage allegedly
suffered — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber),
composed of V. Tiili, President of the Chamber, P. Mengozzi
and M. Vilaras, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on
21 March 2003, the operative part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible so far as it concerns
the annulment of Directive 2002/2/EC of
the European
Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 amending
Council Directive 79/373/EEC on the circulation of compound
feedingstuffs and repealing Commission Directive 91/357/
EEC.

The requests submitted by the defendants that the action, in so
far as it seeks compensation for the damage allegedly suffered,
should be held inadmissible, are reserved for final judgment.

3.

The costs are reserved.

( 1) OJ C 191 of 10.8.02.

3.

Costs are reserved.

(1) OJ 2002 C 180.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 21 March 2003

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

in Case T-167/02: Établissements Toulorge v European
Parliament and Council of the European Union (1)

of 31 March 2003

(Actions for annulment — Natural or legal persons —
Measures of direct and individual concern to them —
Directive 2002/2/EC — Inadmissibility — Claim for dam-
ages)

(2003/C 171/43)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-167/02: Établissements Toulorge, established in
Bricquebec (France),
represented by D. Waelbroeck and
D. Brinckman, lawyers, against European Parliament (Agents:
C. Pennera and Mme E. Waldherr) and Council of the European
Union (Agents: I. Diez Parra and F. P. Ruggeri Laderchi),
supported by Federal Republic of Germany (Agents: W.-
D. Plessing nad M. Lumma) and Commission of the European
Communities (Agent: A. Bordes) — application for the annul-
ment of Directive 2002/2/EC of the European Parliament and
of the Council of 28 January 2002 amending Council Directive
79/373/EEC on the circulation of compound feedingstuffs and

in Case T-226/02: André Hecq v Commission of the
European Communities (1)

(Officials — Action for annulment — Act adversely affect-
ing an official — Inadmissibility)

(2003/C 171/44)

(Language of the case: French)

the European Communities,

In Case T-226/02: André Hecq, an official of the Commission
of
residing in Mondercange
(Luxembourg), represented by L. Vogel and D. Amatulli,
lawyers, against the Commission of the European Communi-
ties (Agent: M. Currall) — application for the annulment of the
Commission decision of 15 June 2001 approving the

19.7.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/27

agreement between Vice-President Kinnock and the trade
unions and staff associations of the Commission concerning
the resources available to staff representatives and the rules on
the resources available to staff representatives from 1 January
2002 — the Court of First Instance (First Chamber), composed
of B. Vesterdorf, President, R. M. Moura Ramos and H. Legal,
Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 31 March 2003,
the operative part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

Each party shall pay its own costs.

(1) OJ C 247 of 12.10.02.

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2.

Each party shall pay its own costs.

( 1) OJ C 247 of 12.10.02.

of 3 April 2003

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

in Case T-258/02: Hendrikus Boukes v European Parlia-
ment (1)

(Officials — Action for annulment — Action now devoid of
purpose — No need to give a decision)

(2003/C 171/46)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-258/02: Hendrikus Boukes, a former official of the
European Parliament, residing in Waldbredimus (Luxem-
bourg), represented by E. Boigelot, lawyer, with an address for
service in Luxembourg, against the European Parliament
(Agents: H. von Hertzen and L. G. Knudsen) — application for
annulment of the decision of the Secretary-General of the
European Parliament of 4 January 2002 refusing to treat his
marriage to a person of the same sex, contracted under the
Netherlands Law of 21 December 2000, as falling within the
definition of marriage for the purpose of the Staff Regulations
and to grant him all the rights, privileges and immunities
arising from the applicable Community provisions — the
Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of V. Tiili,
President, P. Mengozzi and M. Vilaras,
Jung,
Registrar, made an order on 3 April 2003, the operative part
of which is as follows:

Judges; H.

1)

2)

There is no longer any need to give a decision on the present
action.

There is no need to give a decision on the Kingdom of the
Netherlands’ application to intervene.

3)

The Parliament shall pay both the applicant’s and its own costs.

(1) OJ C 274 of 9.11.02.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 31 March 2003

in Case T-227/02: André Hecq v Commission of the
European Communities (1)

(Action for annulment — Time-limits — Inadmissibility)

(2003/C 171/45)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-227/02: André Hecq, Secretary-General and rep-
resentative of the Syndicat des Fonctionnaires Internationaux
et Européens (SFIE), residing in Mondercange (Luxembourg),
represented by L. Vogel and D. Amatulli, lawyers, against the
Commission of the European Communities (Agent: J. Currall)
— application for the annulment of the Commission decision
of 15 June 2001, approving the agreement between Vice
President Kinnock and the trade unions and staff associations
of the Commission concerning the resources available to staff
representatives and the rules on the resources available to staff
representatives from 1 January 2002 — the Court of First
Instance (First Chamber), composed of B. Vesterdorf, President
and R.M. Moura Ramos and H. Legal, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar,
made an order on 31 March 2003, the operative part of which
is as follows: