Order of the Court of First Instance of 27 March 2003 in Case T-163/02: Montan Gesellschaft Voss mbH Stahlhandel and Others v Commission of the European Communities (Action for annulment — No need to give a decision — Action for damages — Admissibility — Plea of inadmissibility joined to the application on the substance)
Date: 2003-07-19
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment (EU), customs duties, import, indemnification, iron and steel product, protective clause

19.7.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/25

performance for 2001 — the Court of First Instance (Fifth
Chamber), composed of R. García-Valdecasas, President,
P. Lindh and J.D. Cooke, Judges; D. Christensen, Administrator,
for the Registrar; has given a judgment on 20 May 2003 in
which it:

1. Dismisses the application;

2. Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

( 1) OJ C 202, 24. 8. 2002.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 3 April 2003

in Case T-18/02, Anita Jannice Österholm v Commission
of the European Communities (1)

(Official — Action for damages — Inadmissible)

(2003/C 171/40)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-18/02, Anita Jannice Österholm, residing in Stockh-
olm, represented by J. R. Iturriagagoitia and K. Devolvé,
lawyers, against the Commission of the European Communi-
ties (Agent: J. Currall and V. Joris) — application for compen-
sation for the material and non-material damage caused, inter
alia, by the length of time taken to process a claim submitted
by the applicant — the Court of First Instance (Second
Chamber), composed of N. J. Forwood, President, J. Pirrung
and W. H. Meij, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on
3 April 2003, the operative part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

3.

There is no longer any need to give a decision on the action for
annulment.

The action for damages is dismissed as inadmissible.

The Commission shall pay half of the applicant’s costs as well
as its own costs. The applicant shall bear the other half of her
own costs.

( 1) OJ C 109 of 4.5.02.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 8 April 2003

in Case T-91/02: Klausner Nordic Timber GmbH & Co.
KG v Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Action for annulment — Action now devoid of purpose —
No need to give a decision)

(2003/C 171/41)

(Language of the case: German)

In Case T-91/02: Klausner Nordic Timber GmbH & Co. KG,
established in Wismar (Germany), represented by D. Reich,
lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against
the Commission of
the European Communities (Agents:
V. Kreuschitz and V. Di Bucci) — application for the annulment
of Commission Decision 2002/468/EC, of 15 January 2002
on the State aid implemented by Germany for Klausner Nordic
Timber GmbH & Co. KG, Wismar, Mecklenburg-Western
Pomerania (OJ 2002 L 165, p. 15) — the Court of First
Instance (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition), composed
of V. Tiili, President, J. Pirrung, P. Mengozzi, A. W. H. Meij and
M. Vilaras, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 8 April
2003, the operative part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

There is no need to give a decision on the present action.

The Commission shall pay the costs, including those relating to
the procedure for interim relief.

(1) OJ 156 of 29.6.02.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 27 March 2003

in Case T-163/02: Montan Gesellschaft Voss mbH
Stahlhandel and Others v Commission of the European
Communities (1)

(Action for annulment — No need to give a decision —
Action for damages — Admissibility — Plea of inadmissi-
bility joined to the application on the substance)

(2003/C 171/42)

(Language of the case: German)

In Case T-163/02: Montan Gesellschaft Voss mbH Stahlhandel,
established in Planneg (Germany), Jepsen Stahl GmbH, estab-
(Germany), LNS — Lothar Niemeyer
lished in Nittendorf

C 171/26

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

19.7.2003

Stahlhandel GmbH & Co. KG, established in Essen (Germany),
and Metal Traders Stahlhandel GmbH, established in Düssel-
dorf (Germany) represented by K. Friedrich, lawyer, with an
address for service in Luxembourg, against the Commission of
the European Communities (Agents: J. Forman and R. Raith) —
application, first, for the annulment of Commission Regulation
(EC) No 560/2002 of 27 March 2002 imposing provisional
safeguard measures against imports of certain steel products
(OJ 2002 L 85, p. 1) and, second, a claim for damages —
the Court of First Instance (First Chamber), composed of
B. Vesterdorf, President R.M. Moura Ramos and H. Legal,
Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 27 March 2003,
the operative part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

There is no need to give a decision on the claim for annulment.

The application for a ruling on the admissibility of the claim
for damages is joined to the application on the substance.

repealing Commission Directive 91/357/EEC (OJ 2002 L 63,
p. 23) and a claim for compensation for the damage allegedly
suffered — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber),
composed of V. Tiili, President of the Chamber, P. Mengozzi
and M. Vilaras, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on
21 March 2003, the operative part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible so far as it concerns
the annulment of Directive 2002/2/EC of
the European
Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 amending
Council Directive 79/373/EEC on the circulation of compound
feedingstuffs and repealing Commission Directive 91/357/
EEC.

The requests submitted by the defendants that the action, in so
far as it seeks compensation for the damage allegedly suffered,
should be held inadmissible, are reserved for final judgment.

3.

The costs are reserved.

( 1) OJ C 191 of 10.8.02.

3.

Costs are reserved.

(1) OJ 2002 C 180.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 21 March 2003

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

in Case T-167/02: Établissements Toulorge v European
Parliament and Council of the European Union (1)

of 31 March 2003

(Actions for annulment — Natural or legal persons —
Measures of direct and individual concern to them —
Directive 2002/2/EC — Inadmissibility — Claim for dam-
ages)

(2003/C 171/43)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-167/02: Établissements Toulorge, established in
Bricquebec (France),
represented by D. Waelbroeck and
D. Brinckman, lawyers, against European Parliament (Agents:
C. Pennera and Mme E. Waldherr) and Council of the European
Union (Agents: I. Diez Parra and F. P. Ruggeri Laderchi),
supported by Federal Republic of Germany (Agents: W.-
D. Plessing nad M. Lumma) and Commission of the European
Communities (Agent: A. Bordes) — application for the annul-
ment of Directive 2002/2/EC of the European Parliament and
of the Council of 28 January 2002 amending Council Directive
79/373/EEC on the circulation of compound feedingstuffs and

in Case T-226/02: André Hecq v Commission of the
European Communities (1)

(Officials — Action for annulment — Act adversely affect-
ing an official — Inadmissibility)

(2003/C 171/44)

(Language of the case: French)

the European Communities,

In Case T-226/02: André Hecq, an official of the Commission
of
residing in Mondercange
(Luxembourg), represented by L. Vogel and D. Amatulli,
lawyers, against the Commission of the European Communi-
ties (Agent: M. Currall) — application for the annulment of the
Commission decision of 15 June 2001 approving the