Order of the Court of First Instance of 11 February 2003 in Case T-83/02: Jan Pflugradt v European Central Bank (Staff of the European Central Bank — Formal warning — Measure having an adverse effect — Pre-litigation procedure — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2003-04-26
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Central Bank, action for annulment (EU), data protection, labour relations, work contract

C 101/34

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

26.4.2003

(Belgium), represented by M. van Dam, Avocat, against the
Commission of the European Communities (Agents: H. van
Vliet and W. Wils) — application for the annulment of
Commission Decision SG (2001) D/286098 of 9 February
2001, whereby the Commission rejected the application by
the applicant for exclusion of the boat Arizona from the scope
of Council Regulation (EC) No 718/1999 of 29 March 1999
on a Community-fleet capacity policy to promote inland
waterway transport (OJ 1999 L 90, p. 1) — the Court of First
Instance (Third Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, President,
J. Azizi and M. Jaeger, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has made an
order on 13 December 2002, in which it:

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST
INSTANCE

of 31 January 2003

in Case T-224/02 R: Miguel Forcat Icardo v Commission
of the European Communities

(Proceedings for interim measures — Officials — Inadmissi-
bility — Urgency — No urgency)

1) Declares that there is no further need to adjudicate;

2) Orders the Commission to pay the costs.

( 1) OJ C 186, 30.6.2001.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 11 February 2003

in Case T-83/02: Jan Pflugradt v European Central Bank (1)

(Staff of the European Central Bank — Formal warning —
Measure having an adverse effect — Pre-litigation procedure
— Inadmissibility)

(2003/C 101/62)

(Language of the case: German)

In Case T-83/02: Jan Pflugradt, residing in Frankfurt-am-Main
(Germany), represented by N. Pflüger, Rechtsanwalt, with an
address for service in Luxembourg, against European Central
Bank (Agents: V. Saintot, T. Gilliams and B. Wägenbaur) —
application for the annulment of the letter of 28 February
2002 by which the European Central Bank informed the
applicant that a formal-warning procedure was being instituted
against him — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber),
composed of: R. García-Valdecasas, President, P. Lindh and
J.D. Cooke, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has made an order on
11 February 2003, the operative part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

The application is inadmissible.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

( 1) OJ C 118 of 18.5.2002.

(2003/C 101/63)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-224/02 R: Miguel Forcat Icardo, an official of
the Commission of the European Communities, residing in
Brussels, represented by M.A. Lucas, avocat, against Com-
mission of the European Communities (Agents: J. Currall and
H. Tserepa-Lacombe) — application, essentially, in the first
place, for compliance with the Commission’s undertaking to
second the applicant to the United Nations Organisation for
Food and Agriculture in Rome and, second, for suspension of
the applicant’s staff report of 18 March 2002 covering the
period from 1999 to 2001 — the President of the Court of
First Instance has made an order on 31 January 2003, the
operative part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

The costs are reserved.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 3 February 2003

in Case T-253/02: Chafiq Ayadi v Council of the European
Union and Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Action for annulment — Council Regulation — Action
brought against the Council and the commission — Partial
inadmissibility)

(2003/C 101/64)

(Language of the case: English)

In Case T-253/02: Chafiq Ayadi, residing in Dublin, represent-
ed by A. Lyon, Solicitor, and S. Cox, Barrister, against Council
of the European Union (Agents: M. Vitsentzatos and M. Bishop)
and Commission of
the European Communities (Agents:
M. Wilderspin and C. Brown) — application for partial