Resolution of the European Parliament of 8 April 2003 concerning discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the 2001 financial year — Section IV — Court of Justice
Date: 2003-04-08
Institutions: Committee on Budgetary Control, European Parliament
Subjects: Court of Justice of the European Union, budgetary discharge, financial year, general budget (EU), implementation of the budget

L 148/46

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

16.6.2003

RESOLUTION

of the European Parliament containing the comments accompanying the decision concerning
discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the
2001 financial year — Section IV — Court of Justice

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

— having regard to the Revenue and Expenditure Account and Balance Sheet in respect of the

financial year 2001 (SEC(2002) 405 – C5-0244/2002),

— having regard to the annual report of the European Court of Auditors for the financial year 2001,

together with the institutions' replies (C5-0538/2002) (1),

— having regard to the Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality
and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the European Court of Auditors pursuant
to Article 248 of the EC Treaty (C5-0538/2002),

— having regard to the Council's recommendation of 7 March 2003 (C5-0087/2003),

— having regard to Articles 272(10) and 275 of the EC Treaty,

— having regard to Article 22(2) and (3) of the Financial Regulation of 21 December 1977 (2) and

Article 50 of the Financial Regulation of 25 June 2002 (3),

— having regard to Rule 93a and Annex V of its Rules of Procedure,

— having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A5-0101/2003/rev1),

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Welcomes with satisfaction the progress made by the Court of Justice in improving the accounting
management of its tangible fixed assets, in particular as regards its non-financial fixed assets; points
out that those improvements have made it possible inter alia to correct the errors, identified by the
Court of Auditors in its annual report for 2000, concerning the net accounting value of the
non-financial fixed assets of the Court of Justice;

Notes that the Parliament has still not been sent the expert's report on invoicing irregularities (4)
which it requested in its decision of 25 April 2002 concerning discharge for the financial year
2000 (5) and in the questionnaire sent with a view to analysis concerning discharge for the
financial year 2001; points out that the same applies to the other expert's report on determining
the expenditure which should not be included in the final statement of account;

Requests the Court of Justice to send Parliament the two reports referred to above by 1 June 2003;

Is grateful to the Court of Justice for submitting the report on its inventory (6) requested in
paragraph 15 of Parliament's discharge decision of 25 April 2002; notes the Court's conclusion that
with the introduction of the ELS (equipment logistic support) system it now has a database
recording the whole of its movable assets in accordance with the Financial Regulation;

Expects the Members of the Institutions to repay the costs incurred if they use the official cars with
which they are provided for non-official purposes; asks the Court of
Justice to forward to
Parliament by 30 June 2003 a report on the rules it has issued in this respect and on the amounts
paid by Members in 2001 and 2002;

(1) OJ C 295, 28.11.2002, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 356, 31.12.1977, p. 1.
(3) OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.
(4) Replies to questionnaire PE 315.844 (Q4).
(5) OJ L 158, 17.6.2002, p. 66.
(6) Report by the Court of Justice, 24.6.2002.

16.6.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 148/47

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

Notes the remarks (1) by the Court of Auditors that the rules applying to the emoluments of
Members of the Institutions do not provide a specific legal basis for the application of weightings
when transferring part of these emoluments to a country other than the country of employment;
considers that despite the Court of Justice's reply regarding the conclusions of its administrative
committee meeting on 25 September 2002 (referring inter alia to Annex VII
to the Staff
Regulations) (2),
in particular in view of
enlargement, and asks the Court of Justice to initiate the necessary studies in order that a legal
basis should be available for the 2004 budgetary exercise at the latest so as to permit the
harmonisation of the rules governing the transfer of the emoluments of Members of the different
Institutions to their countries of origin; requests the Court of Justice to reconsider, until a specific
legal basis is available, the need to suspend the application of these weightings;

the existence of a specific legal basis is necessary,

Notes the Court's current building projects involving the renovation of the ‘Palais', a ring-shaped
building around the ‘Palais' and two towers containing offices; asks the Court to provide a report
on the way in which it manages its existing buildings, new building projects, maintenance and
infrastructures generally;

Notes that in 2001 the Court of Justice made an advance payment of EUR 2 884 849 to the
Luxembourg authorities in respect of the lease/purchase of the annexes to the ‘Palais' with the aim
of reducing the amount payable under the 2003 budget;

Notes the Court's assessment that, with a number of pre-enlargement staff commencing already in
late 2003 and the accession date set for 1 May 2004, additional office space will be required in
order to accommodate the new Members of the Institution (up to 10 judges each for the Court of
Justice and the Court of First Instance), the staff of their respective chambers (‘cabinets'), the staff of
the translation service and many other accession-related staff; further notes that the administration
of the Court, with the help of the Luxembourg Ministry of Public Works, is currently undertaking a
search for suitable office accommodation;

Commends the willingness (3) of the Court of Justice to supply the discharge authority with a
summary of the annual activity report drawn up by the authorising officer by delegation in
accordance with Article 60(7) of the new Financial Regulation; notes that the Court of Justice
expresses this willingness to be conditional on the agreement of all the other Institutions; instructs
its President to write to the Presidents of the other Institutions to request them formally to send a
summary of their annual activity reports to the discharge authority;

Notes as regards the workload of the Court of First Instance that while the number of cases
disposed of has increased in recent years, it has invariably remained lower than the number of
cases brought, so that the backlog of pending cases has continued to grow (2001 — cases brought:
345; cases disposed of: 275; cases pending: 589) (4);

Notes the Court's assessment (5) that in 2002, the rise in potential output resulting, in quantitative
terms, from the recruitment of the new lawyer-linguists would enable the translation service of the
Court of Justice to continue to increase the number of pages translated, but that the effect which
such increased production would have on the volume of pages in stock or in the course of being
dealt with would depend on the way in which the workload developed;

13.

Asks that the discharge authority be kept informed of the evolution of the Court's workload and
translation backlog;

(1) Annual report 2001, paragraph 7.18.
(2) Replies to questionnaire PE 315.844 (Q1).
(3) Replies to questionnaire PE 315.844 (Q3).
(4) Source: Report to Committee on Budgets.
(5) Source: Report to Committee on Budgets.

L 148/48

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

16.6.2003

14.

Notes with concern that the European Union's reputation, as well as the rights of EU citizens, suffer
owing to the length of time it takes the Court of Justice to deal with its current case load; requests
the Court to provide Parliament with a report explaining how it currently organises its work, and
to detail the problems which preclude the Court from giving an efficient service; notes that
enlargement will increase the severity of the problems faced by the Court; requests that the Court
provide suggestions on how to address these problems, indicating where structural changes are
necessary, and giving a full breakdown of the additional resources that would be necessary to carry
out these improvements.