do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3082 — PON/Nimbus/Geveke) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2003-04-01
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, industrial equipment, investment company, merger control, production, provision of services, restrictive-practice authorisation, storage, telecommunications, transport company

1.4.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/5

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3082 — PON/Nimbus/Geveke)

(2003/C 78/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 24 February 2003, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to
declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council
Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in English and will be
made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

— in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document No 303M3082. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3049 — Alcan/Flexpack)

(2003/C 78/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 24 February 2003, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to
declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council
Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in English and will be
made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

— in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document No 303M3049. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1136/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Use of funds from the action programme for migrant workers by the municipality of Prato.
Date: 2003-04-01
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Tuscany, action programme, financing, fund (EU), integration of migrants, migrant worker

9.10.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242 E/191

(2003/C 242 E/208)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1136/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(1 April 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the action programme for migrant workers by the municipality of Prato

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Prato, urgently need to use
European funds to support migrant workers, including those from outside the Community, in order to
guarantee them the best conditions in which to live and integrate with the local community, in terms of
both work and social conditions,

Can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Prato has submitted projects for the action programme for migrant

workers?

2. whether the municipality of Prato has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?

(2003/C 242 E/209)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1137/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(1 April 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the action programme for migrant workers by the municipality of Siena

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Siena, urgently need to use
European funds to support migrant workers, including those from outside the Community, in order to
guarantee them the best conditions in which to live and integrate with the local community, in terms of
both work and social conditions,

Can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Siena has submitted projects for the action programme for migrant

workers?

2. whether the municipality of Siena has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?
Commission Regulation (EC) No 600/2003 of 1 April 2003 granting no award with regard to beef put up for sale under the fourth invitation to tender referred to in Regulation (EC) No 219/2003
Date: 2003-04-01
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: award of contract, beef, food processing, intervention agency, sale

2.4.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 85/17

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 600/2003

of 1 April 2003

granting no award with regard to beef put up for sale under the fourth invitation to tender
referred to in Regulation (EC) No 219/2003

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17
May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef
and veal (1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC)
No 2345/2001 (2), and in particular Article 28(2) thereof,

(3)

(4)

No tenders were submitted under the fourth invitation
to tender by the time limit provided for by Regulation
(EC) No 219/2003. Consequently, no award can be
made.

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in
accordance with the opinion of
the Management
Committee for Beef and Veal,

Whereas:

(1)

(2)

Tenders have been invited for certain quantities of beef
fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 219/2003 of 4
February 2003 on periodical sales by tender of beef held
by certain intervention agencies and intended for proces-
sing within the Community (3).

Pursuant to Article 9 of Commission Regulation (EEC)
No 2173/79 of 4 October 1979 on detailed rules of
application for the disposal of beef bought in by inter-
vention agencies and repealing Regulation (EEC) No
216/69 (4), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2417/
95 (5), the minimum selling prices for meat put up for
sale by tender should be fixed,
taking into account
tenders submitted.

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No award is made against the fourth invitation to tender held
in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 219/2003 for which
the time limit for the submission of tenders was 25 March
2003.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 2 April 2003.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 April 2003.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21.
(2) OJ L 315, 1.12.2001, p. 29.
(3) OJ L 29, 5.2.2003, p. 7.
(4) OJ L 251, 5.10.1979, p. 12.
(5) OJ L 248, 14.10.1995, p. 39.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 595/2003 of 1 April 2003 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2003-04-01
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, import price, perennial vegetable, pip fruit

2.4.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 85/1

I

(Acts whose publication is obligatory)

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 595/2003

of 1 April 2003

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and
vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community,

(2)

In compliance with the above criteria,
the standard
import values must be fixed at the levels set out in the
Annex to this Regulation,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of
21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the
import arrangements
last
amended by Regulation (EC) No 1947/2002 (2), and in parti-
cular Article 4(1) thereof,

fruit and vegetables (1), as

for

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Whereas:

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 lays down, pursuant to the
outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade nego-
tiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the
standard values for imports from third countries,
in
respect of the products and periods stipulated in the
Annex thereto.

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regula-
tion (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex
hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 2 April 2003.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 April 2003.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Agriculture Director-General

(1) OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66.
(2) OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17.

L 85/2

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

2.4.2003

to the Commission Regulation of 1 April 2003 establishing the standard import values for determining the
entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

ANNEX

CN code

0702 00 00

0707 00 05

0709 10 00

0709 90 70

0805 10 10, 0805 10 30, 0805 10 50

0808 10 20, 0808 10 50, 0808 10 90

0808 20 50

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

(EUR/100 kg)

052
204
212
999

052
096
204
999

220
999

052
204
999

052
204
212
220
624
999

060
388
400
404
508
512
524
528
720
728
999

388
512
528
720
999

106,8
90,8
107,6
101,7

131,9
48,8
74,2
85,0

187,0
187,0

110,0
145,0
127,5

65,8
45,6
61,6
42,8
72,7
57,7

64,4
80,4
104,9
94,1
81,7
82,6
70,7
76,2
118,1
102,5
87,6

69,3
67,5
62,1
49,1
62,0

(1) Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2020/2001 (OJ L 273, 16.10.2001, p. 6). Code ‘999’ stands for

‘of other origin’.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1199/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Use of funds under the Sport for the Disabled programme by the municipality of Pisa.
Date: 2003-04-01
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU programme, Tuscany, fund (EU), integration of people with disabilities, local government, project evaluation, sport, use of aid

C 11 E/146

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

15.1.2004

(2004/C 11 E/164)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1198/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(1 April 2003)

Subject: Use of funds under the Sport for the Disabled programme by the municipality of Pesaro

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Pesaro, urgently need to use
European funds for the integration of disabled people through sport,

can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Pesaro has submitted projects for the Sport for the Disabled programme?

2. whether the municipality of Pesaro has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?

(2004/C 11 E/165)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1199/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(1 April 2003)

Subject: Use of funds under the Sport for the Disabled programme by the municipality of Pisa

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Pisa, urgently need to use
European funds for the integration of disabled people through sport,

can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Pisa has submitted projects for the Sport for the Disabled programme?

2. whether the municipality of Pisa has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?

(2004/C 11 E/166)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1200/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(1 April 2003)

Subject: Use of funds under the Sport for the Disabled programme by the municipality of Pistoia

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1132/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Use of funds from the action programme for migrant workers by the municipality of Perugia.
Date: 2003-04-01
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Umbria, action programme, financing, fund (EU), integration of migrants, migrant worker

9.10.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242 E/189

(2003/C 242 E/204)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1132/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(1 April 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the action programme for migrant workers by the municipality of Perugia

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Perugia, urgently need to use
European funds to support migrant workers, including those from outside the Community, in order to
guarantee them the best conditions in which to live and integrate with the local community, in terms of
both work and social conditions,

Can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Perugia has submitted projects for the action programme for migrant

workers?

2. whether the municipality of Perugia has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?

(2003/C 242 E/205)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1133/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(1 April 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the action programme for migrant workers by the municipality of Pesaro

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Pesaro, urgently need to use
European funds to support migrant workers, including those from outside the Community, in order to
guarantee them the best conditions in which to live and integrate with the local community, in terms of
both work and social conditions,

Can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Pesaro has submitted projects for the action programme for migrant

workers?

2. whether the municipality of Pesaro has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1196/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Use of funds under the Sport for the Disabled programme by the municipality of Massa.
Date: 2003-04-01
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU programme, Tuscany, fund (EU), integration of people with disabilities, local government, project evaluation, sport, use of aid

15.1.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11 E/145

(2004/C 11 E/162)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1196/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(1 April 2003)

Subject: Use of funds under the Sport for the Disabled programme by the municipality of Massa

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Massa, urgently need to use
European funds for the integration of disabled people through sport,

can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Massa has submitted projects for the Sport for the Disabled programme?

2. whether the municipality of Massa has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?

(2004/C 11 E/163)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1197/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(1 April 2003)

Subject: Use of funds under the Sport for the Disabled programme by the municipality of Perugia

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Perugia, urgently need to use
European funds for the integration of disabled people through sport,

can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Perugia has submitted projects for the Sport for the Disabled programme?

2. whether the municipality of Perugia has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1164/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Use of funds from the Tempus III programme by the municipality of Ancona.
Date: 2003-04-01
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU Member State, EU programme, Marches, cooperation policy, financial aid, higher education, university

9.10.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242 E/181

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the City of Frosinone, urgently need to use European
funds to help promote cooperation between university students across Europe, and to foster cultural and
scientific exchange in higher education, can the Commission state:

1. whether the City of Frosinone has submitted projects for the Tempus III programme?

2. whether the City of Frosinone has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?

(2003/C 242 E/189)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1164/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(1 April 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the Tempus III programme by the municipality of Ancona

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Ancona, urgently need to use
European funds to help promote cooperation between university students across Europe, and to foster
cultural and scientific exchange in higher education,

Can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Ancona has submitted projects for the Tempus III programme?

2. whether the municipality of Ancona has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?

(2003/C 242 E/190)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1165/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(1 April 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the Tempus III programme by the municipality of Florence

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Florence, urgently need to use
European funds to help promote cooperation between university students across Europe, and to foster
cultural and scientific exchange in higher education,
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3122 — Dupont/Statoil/JV) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2003-04-01
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: aquaculture, chemical product, economic concentration, gas, merger control, petroleum, pharmaceutical product, protein products, restrictive-practice authorisation

C 78/6

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

1.4.2003

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3060 — UCB/Solutia)

(2003/C 78/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 31 January 2003, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to
declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council
Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in English and will be
made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

— in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document No 303M3060. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3122 — Dupont/Statoil/JV)

(2003/C 78/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 25 March 2003, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to
declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council
Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in English and will be
made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

— in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document No 303M3122. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.