do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0987/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Use of funds from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Pistoia.
Date: 2003-03-27
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU programme, Tuscany, cultural policy, cultural promotion, financing, fund (EU)

C 242 E/198

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

9.10.2003

(2003/C 242 E/222)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0987/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Pistoia

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Pistoia, urgently need to use
European funds to enhance the common cultural area in all its diversity and respecting all its traditions,
nurturing creativity and professional mobility, and promoting access to and dissemination of art and
culture,

Can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Pistoia has submitted projects for the Culture 2000 programme?

2. whether the municipality of Pistoia has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?

(2003/C 242 E/223)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0988/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Prato

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Prato, urgently need to use
European funds to enhance the common cultural area in all its diversity and respecting all its traditions,
nurturing creativity and professional mobility, and promoting access to and dissemination of art and
culture,

Can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Prato has submitted projects for the Culture 2000 programme?

2. whether the municipality of Prato has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0980/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Use of funds from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Firenze.
Date: 2003-03-27
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, Italy, commitment of expenditure, cultural promotion, local government

C 88 E/602

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

8.4.2004

(2004/C 88 E/0617)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0980/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Firenze

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Firenze, urgently need to use
European funds to enhance the common cultural area in all its diversity and respecting all its traditions,
nurturing creativity and professional mobility, and promoting access to and dissemination of art and
culture,

can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Firenze has submitted projects for the Culture 2000 programme?

2. whether the municipality of Firenze has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?

(2004/C 88 E/0618)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0981/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Livorno

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Livorno, urgently need to use
European funds to enhance the common cultural area in all its diversity and respecting all its traditions,
nurturing creativity and professional mobility, and promoting access to and dissemination of art and
culture,

can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Livorno has submitted projects for the Culture 2000 programme?

2. whether the municipality of Livorno has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1009/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Use of funds from the Daphne programme by the municipality of Massa.
Date: 2003-03-27
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, EU programme, Tuscany, action programme, child, use of aid, violence, woman

C 51 E/58

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

26.2.2004

(2004/C 51 E/061)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1009/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the Daphne programme by the municipality of Massa

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Massa, urgently need to use
European funds to combat the abuse of women and children,

can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Massa has submitted projects for the Daphne programme?

2. whether the municipality of Massa has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?

(2004/C 51 E/062)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1010/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the Daphne programme by the municipality of Perugia

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Perugia, urgently need to use
European funds to combat the abuse of women and children,

can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Perugia has submitted projects for the Daphne programme?

2. whether the municipality of Perugia has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1015/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Use of funds from the Daphne programme by the municipality of Siena.
Date: 2003-03-27
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, EU programme, Tuscany, action programme, child, use of aid, violence, woman

26.2.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51 E/61

(2004/C 51 E/067)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1015/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the Daphne programme by the municipality of Siena

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Siena, urgently need to use
European funds to combat the abuse of women and children,

can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Siena has submitted projects for the Daphne programme?

2. whether the municipality of Siena has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?

(2004/C 51 E/068)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1016/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the Daphne programme by the municipality of Terni

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Terni, urgently need to use
European funds to combat the abuse of women and children,

can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Terni has submitted projects for the Daphne programme?

2. whether the municipality of Terni has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2003-03-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate

27.3.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 75/1

I

(Information)

COMMISSION

Euro exchange rates (1)

26 March 2003

(2003/C 75/01)

1 euro =

USD

JPY

DKK

GBP

SEK

CHF

ISK

NOK

BGN

CYP

CZK

EEK

HUF

LTL

Currency

US dollar

Japanese yen

Danish krone

Pound sterling

Swedish krona

Swiss franc

Iceland króna

Norwegian krone

Bulgarian lev

Cyprus pound

Czech koruna

Estonian kroon

Hungarian forint

Lithuanian litas

Exchange
rate

1,0667

128,19

7,4263

0,6779

9,217

1,4739

83,99

7,8135

1,9488

LVL

MTL

PLN

ROL

SIT

SKK

TRL

AUD

CAD

Currency

Latvian lats

Maltese lira

Polish zloty

Romanian leu

Slovenian tolar

Slovak koruna

Turkish lira

Australian dollar

Canadian dollar

0,58394

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

31,812

NZD

New Zealand dollar

15,6466

SGD

Singapore dollar

Exchange
rate

0,6216

0,4227

4,3348

35 917

231,6125

41,556

1 831 000

1,783

1,5669

8,319

1,941

1,8876

246,26

KRW

South Korean won

1 327,4

3,4524

ZAR

South African rand

8,5016

___________
(1) Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 551/2003 of 27 March 2003 fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 26th partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1331/2002
Date: 2003-03-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: award of contract, export levy, export refund, marketing, white sugar

28.3.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 81/21

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 551/2003

of 27 March 2003

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 26th partial
invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for
in Regulation (EC) No 1331/2002

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19
June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the
sugar sector (1), as amended by Commission Regulation (EC)
No 680/2002 (2), and in particular Article 27(5) thereof,

(3)

(4)

Following an examination of the tenders submitted in
invitation to tender, the
response to the 26th partial
provisions set out in Article 1 should be adopted.

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in
the Management
accordance with the opinion of
Committee for Sugar,

Whereas:

(1)

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1331/2002 of 23 July
2002 on a standing invitation to tender to determine
levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (3), as
amended by Regulation (EC) No 432/2003 (4), for the
2002/2003 marketing year, requires partial
invitations
to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to
certain third countries.

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1331/
2002 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the
case may be, account being taken in particular of the
state and foreseeable development of the Community
and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to
tender in question.

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 26th partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued
pursuant
to Regulation (EC) No 1331/2002 the maximum
amount of the export refund to certain third countries is fixed
at 47,640 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 March 2003.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 March 2003.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 104, 20.4.2002, p. 26.
(3) OJ L 195, 24.7.2002, p. 6.
(4) OJ L 65, 8.3.2003, p. 21.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0987/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Use of funds from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Pistoia.
Date: 2003-03-27
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, Italy, commitment of expenditure, cultural promotion, local government

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88 E/605

(2004/C 88 E/0623)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0986/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Pisa

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Pisa, urgently need to use
European funds to enhance the common cultural area in all its diversity and respecting all its traditions,
nurturing creativity and professional mobility, and promoting access to and dissemination of art and
culture,

can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Pisa has submitted projects for the Culture 2000 programme?

2. whether the municipality of Pisa has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?

(2004/C 88 E/0624)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0987/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Pistoia

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Pistoia, urgently need to use
European funds to enhance the common cultural area in all its diversity and respecting all its traditions,
nurturing creativity and professional mobility, and promoting access to and dissemination of art and
culture,

can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Pistoia has submitted projects for the Culture 2000 programme?

2. whether the municipality of Pistoia has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1019/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Use of funds from the 2000 City Twinning Programme by the municipality of Florence.
Date: 2003-03-27
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU programme, Tuscany, financing, fund (EU), twinning

9.10.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242 E/203

(2003/C 242 E/231)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1019/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the 2000 City Twinning Programme by the municipality of Florence

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that EU subsidies include a support programme to foster the twinning of European cities
and that many Italian cities, including the municipality of Florence, would be particularly appropriate for
events of this kind,

Can the Commission say:

1. whether the municipality of Florence has submitted projects to benefit from funding under the 2000

City Twinning Programme?

2. whether the municipality of Florence has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?

(2003/C 242 E/232)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1020/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the 2000 City Twinning Programme by the municipality of Livorno

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that EU subsidies include a support programme to foster the twinning of European cities
and that many Italian cities, including the municipality of Livorno, would be particularly appropriate for
events of this kind,

Can the Commission say:

1. whether the municipality of Livorno has submitted projects to benefit from funding under the 2000

City Twinning Programme?

2. whether the municipality of Livorno has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1013/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Use of funds from the Daphne programme by the municipality of Pistoia.
Date: 2003-03-27
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, EU programme, Tuscany, action programme, child, use of aid, violence, woman

C 51 E/60

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

26.2.2004

(2004/C 51 E/065)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1013/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the Daphne programme by the municipality of Pistoia

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Pistoia, urgently need to use
European funds to combat the abuse of women and children,

can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Pistoia has submitted projects for the Daphne programme?

2. whether the municipality of Pistoia has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?

(2004/C 51 E/066)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1014/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the Daphne programme by the municipality of Prato

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Prato, urgently need to use
European funds to combat the abuse of women and children,

can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Prato has submitted projects for the Daphne programme?

2. whether the municipality of Prato has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?
Ex post publicity of Eurostat grants in 2002
Date: 2003-03-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Eurostat, Internet, dissemination of EU information, economic support

C 75/10

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

27.3.2003

EX POST PUBLICITY OF EUROSTAT GRANTS IN 2002

(2003/C 75/10)

In accordance with Articles 110(2) of the Financial Regulation and 169 of its implementing rules, the
public is hereby informed of actions that benefited from a Eurostat grant during the year 2002.

The electronic file, which covers the actions in question, can be found in the form of a list on the
‘Commission’,
European Union website (http://europa.eu.int). This list can be accessed via ‘Institutions’,
‘Statistics’,
‘Eurostat Activities’ and ‘Calls for tenders and grants’ and then by entering the file ‘Ex post
publicity 2002 grants’.

The list indicates the file number, the unit concerned, the name and country of the beneficiaries, the title of
the action, the amount granted and the co-financing rate of the action.

All these actions were the subject of ex ante publicity, except in the case of the few ad hoc grants, which
are listed separately and for which justification was provided.