do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0989/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Use of funds from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Siena.
Date: 2003-03-27
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, Italy, commitment of expenditure, cultural promotion, local government

C 88 E/606

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

8.4.2004

(2004/C 88 E/0625)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0988/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Prato

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Prato, urgently need to use
European funds to enhance the common cultural area in all its diversity and respecting all its traditions,
nurturing creativity and professional mobility, and promoting access to and dissemination of art and
culture,

can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Prato has submitted projects for the Culture 2000 programme?

2. whether the municipality of Prato has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?

(2004/C 88 E/0626)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0989/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Siena

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Siena, urgently need to use
European funds to enhance the common cultural area in all its diversity and respecting all its traditions,
nurturing creativity and professional mobility, and promoting access to and dissemination of art and
culture,

can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Siena has submitted projects for the Culture 2000 programme?

2. whether the municipality of Siena has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0991/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Use of funds from the decentralised cooperation programme by the municipality of Ancona.
Date: 2003-03-27
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: European Regional Development Fund, Marches, cooperation policy, developing countries, fund (EU), local government, project evaluation, regional policy, sustainable development, use of aid

15.1.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11 E/125

(2004/C 11 E/125)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0991/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the decentralised cooperation programme by the municipality of Ancona

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Ancona, urgently need to use
European funds to support actions and initiatives encouraging sustainable development undertaken by
operators in the Community and in developing countries,

can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Ancona has submitted projects for the decentralised cooperation

programme?

2. whether the municipality of Ancona has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?

(2004/C 11 E/126)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0992/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the decentralised cooperation programme by the municipality of Carrara

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Carrara, urgently need to use
European funds to support actions and initiatives encouraging sustainable development undertaken by
operators in the Community and in developing countries,

can the Commission state:

1. whether

the municipality of Carrara has submitted projects for the decentralised cooperation

programme?

2. whether the municipality of Carrara has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1005/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Use of funds from the Daphne programme by the municipality of Carrara.
Date: 2003-03-27
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, EU programme, Tuscany, action programme, child, use of aid, violence, woman

C 51 E/56

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

26.2.2004

(2004/C 51 E/057)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1005/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the Daphne programme by the municipality of Carrara

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Carrara, urgently need to use
European funds to combat the abuse of women and children,

can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Carrara has submitted projects for the Daphne programme?

2. whether the municipality of Carrara has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?

(2004/C 51 E/058)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1006/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the Daphne programme by the municipality of Florence

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Florence, urgently need to use
European funds to combat the abuse of women and children,

can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Florence has submitted projects for the Daphne programme?

2. whether the municipality of Florence has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0983/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Use of funds from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Massa.
Date: 2003-03-27
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU programme, Tuscany, cultural policy, cultural promotion, financing, fund (EU)

C 242 E/196

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

9.10.2003

(2003/C 242 E/218)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0983/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Massa

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Massa, urgently need to use
European funds to enhance the common cultural area in all its diversity and respecting all its traditions,
nurturing creativity and professional mobility, and promoting access to and dissemination of art and
culture,

Can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Massa has submitted projects for the Culture 2000 programme?

2. whether the municipality of Massa has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?

(2003/C 242 E/219)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0984/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Perugia

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Perugia, urgently need to use
European funds to enhance the common cultural area in all its diversity and respecting all its traditions,
nurturing creativity and professional mobility, and promoting access to and dissemination of art and
culture,

Can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Perugia has submitted projects for the Culture 2000 programme?

2. whether the municipality of Perugia has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?
Commission Regulation (EC) No 543/2003 of 27 March 2003 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2003-03-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, import price, perennial vegetable, pip fruit

28.3.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 81/5

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 543/2003

of 27 March 2003

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and
vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community,

(2)

In compliance with the above criteria,
the standard
import values must be fixed at the levels set out in the
Annex to this Regulation,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of
21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the
import arrangements
last
amended by Regulation (EC) No 1947/2002 (2), and in parti-
cular Article 4(1) thereof,

fruit and vegetables (1), as

for

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Whereas:

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 lays down, pursuant to the
outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade nego-
tiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the
standard values for imports from third countries,
in
respect of the products and periods stipulated in the
Annex thereto.

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regula-
tion (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex
hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 March 2003.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 March 2003.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Agriculture Director-General

(1) OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66.
(2) OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17.

L 81/6

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

28.3.2003

to the Commission Regulation of 27 March 2003 establishing the standard import values for determining the
entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

ANNEX

CN code

0702 00 00

0707 00 05

0709 10 00

0709 90 70

0805 10 10, 0805 10 30, 0805 10 50

0808 10 20, 0808 10 50, 0808 10 90

0808 20 50

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

(EUR/100 kg)

052
204
212
999

052
096
204
999

220
999

052
204
999

052
204
212
220
600
624
999

388
400
404
508
512
524
528
720
999

388
512
528
720
999

85,8
64,6
123,3
91,2

87,0
75,4
74,2
78,9

91,5
91,5

101,6
144,8
123,2

58,3
45,6
58,2
42,2
62,0
59,2
54,3

80,2
96,0
94,1
76,8
83,1
65,1
75,1
132,3
87,8

69,9
69,8
71,9
49,1
65,2

(1) Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2020/2001 (OJ L 273, 16.10.2001, p. 6). Code ‘999’ stands for

‘of other origin’.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 555/2003 of 27 March 2003 on the issuing of export licences for wine-sector products
Date: 2003-03-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Africa, export licence, export refund, viticulture

28.3.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 81/31

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 555/2003

of 27 March 2003

on the issuing of export licences for wine-sector products

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 883/2001 of
24 April 2001, laying down detailed rules for implementing
Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 as regards trade with
third countries in products in the wine sector (1), as last
amended by Regulation (EC) No 2380/2002 (2), and in parti-
cular Article 7 and Article 9(3) thereof,

Whereas:

(1)

(2)

(3)

Article 63(7) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999
of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the
market in wine (3), as last amended by Regulation (EC)
No 2585/2001 (4), limits the grant of export refunds for
wine-sector products to the volumes and expenditure
contained in the Agreement on Agriculture concluded
during the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotia-
tions.

Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2001 lays down the
conditions under which the Commission may take
specific measures to prevent an overrun of the quantity
laid down or the budget available under the said Agree-
ment.

On the basis of information on export licence applica-
tions available to the Commission on 26 March 2003,
the quantity still available for the period until 30 April

2003,
for destination zone 1: Africa, referred to in
Article 9(5) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2001, could be
exceeded unless the issue of export licences with advance
fixing of the refund is restricted. Therefore, the submis-
sion of applications and the issue of licences should be
suspended for this zone until 1 May 2003,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.
Export licences with advance fixing of the refund for
wine-sector products for which applications are submitted from
19 to 25 March 2003 under Regulation (EC) No 883/2001
shall be issued in concurrence with 100 % of the quantities
requested for zone 1: Africa.

The issue of export

2.
licences for wine-sector products
referred to in paragraph 1 for which applications are submitted
from 26 March 2003 and the submission of export licence
applications from 28 March 2003 for destination zone 1:
Africa shall be suspended until 1 May 2003.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 March 2003.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 March 2003.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Agriculture Director-General

(1) OJ L 128, 10.5.2001, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 358, 31.12.2002, p. 117.
(3) OJ L 179, 14.7.1999, p. 1.
(4) OJ L 345, 29.12.2001, p. 10.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1007/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Use of funds from the Daphne programme by the municipality of Livorno.
Date: 2003-03-27
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, EU programme, Tuscany, action programme, child, use of aid, violence, woman

26.2.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51 E/57

(2004/C 51 E/059)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1007/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the Daphne programme by the municipality of Livorno

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Livorno, urgently need to use
European funds to combat the abuse of women and children,

can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Livorno has submitted projects for the Daphne programme?

2. whether the municipality of Livorno has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?

(2004/C 51 E/060)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1008/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject: Use of funds from the Daphne programme by the municipality of Macerata

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report
on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by
some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been
echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Macerata, urgently need to use
European funds to combat the abuse of women and children,

can the Commission state:

1. whether the municipality of Macerata has submitted projects for the Daphne programme?

2. whether the municipality of Macerata has secured funding for these projects?

3. whether this funding has been used?
Conclusion of Memorandum of Understanding with Cyprus on its participation in the Community Programmes Media Plus and Media-Training
Date: 2003-03-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Cyprus, EU programme, audiovisual communications policy, audiovisual programme, in-service training, protocol to an agreement, vocational training

C 75/4

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

27.3.2003

Conclusion of Memorandum of Understanding with Cyprus on its participation in the Community
Programmes Media Plus and Media-Training

(2003/C 75/04)

On 13 February 2003 the Memorandum of Understanding between the European Commission, on behalf
of the European Community, and the Government of the Republic of Cyprus on Cyprus' participation in
the Community Programmes Media Plus and Media-Training has been signed.

The full text in English of the Memorandum of Understanding can be found on the following web page:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/avpolicy/media/enlarg_en.html

Conclusion of Memorandum of Understanding with Cyprus on its participation in the Culture
2000 Programme

(2003/C 75/05)

On 11 March 2003 the Memorandum of Understanding between the European Commission, on behalf of
the European Community, and the Government of the Republic of Cyprus on Cyprus' participation in the
Culture 2000 Programme has been signed.

The full text in English of the Memorandum of Understanding can be found on the following web page:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/culture/eac/index_en.html

Conclusion of Memorandum of Understanding with Malta on its participation in the Culture 2000
Programme

(2003/C 75/06)

On 26 February 2003 the Memorandum of Understanding between the European Commission, on behalf
of the European Community, and the Government of Malta on Malta's participation in the Culture 2000
Programme has been signed.

The full text in English of the Memorandum of Understanding can be found on the following web page:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/culture/eac/index_en.html
Commission notice pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 — Amendment of public service obligations imposed on certain scheduled air services within Portugal (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2003-03-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Portugal, air freight rate, air transport, airline, public service

27.3.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 75/3

Commission notice pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92

Amendment of public service obligations imposed on certain scheduled air services within
Portugal

(2003/C 75/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

Pursuant to the Commission notice (2001/C 271/03) of
1.
26 September 2001, the Portuguese Government has revised
the fares for the amended public service obligations imposed
on scheduled air services operated on the following routes:

(c) reduced fares for residents of the Autonomous Region of
the Azores and students whose place of residence is within
the Autonomous Region of the Azores and who study
elsewhere in Portugal or vice versa. These fares shall be
as follows:

— Lisbon/Ponta Delgada/Lisbon,

— Lisbon/Terceira/Lisbon,

— Lisbon/Horta/Lisbon,

— Funchal/Ponta Delgada/Funchal,

— Oporto/Ponta Delgada/Oporto.

2. Fares

The fare structure must include:

(a) a fully flexible economy reference fare of:

(i) EUR 174 return for residents, on flights between the

Azores and the mainland;

(ii) EUR 135 return for students, on flights between the

Azores and the mainland;

(iii) EUR 95 return for students, on flights between Ponta

Delgada and Funchal.

(d) Freight tariffs on services between the mainland and the
Autonomous Region of the Azores shall be as follows:

(i) between Lisbon and Ponta Delgada, and Horta and

Terceira: EUR 332 return;

(ii) between Oporto and Ponta Delgada: EUR 332 return;

(iii) between Funchal and Ponta Delgada: EUR 236 return;

Minimum

Normal

Quantity

LIS, OPO/Azores

FNC/Azores

EUR 8,07

EUR 8,07

EUR 0,97/kg

EUR 0,78/kg

EUR 0,86/kg

EUR 0,59/kg

(b) a range of special fares with special conditions adapted to
including at least one PEX

demand (e.g. excursion, etc.),
fare of:

Perishable goods

EUR 0,60/kg

EUR 0,51/kg

Special goods (1)

EUR 0,76/kg

EUR 0,56/kg

Special goods/quantity (1)

EUR 0,70/kg

(i) EUR 209 return between the mainland and the

(1) According to IATA regulations.

Azores;

(ii) EUR 153 return between Funchal and the Azores;

3.

This notice shall enter into force on 1 April 2003.