do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0961/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Utilisation of SAVE II and Altener II funds by the municipality of Ancona.
Date: 2003-03-26
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, Italy, action programme, local government, pollution control measures, project evaluation, reduction of gas emissions, renewable energy

C 268 E/164

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

7.11.2003

(cid:1) Ministerio de Economía y Hacienda (cid:1) Secretaría de Estado de Presupuestos y Gastos

Dirección General de Fondos Comunitarios y Financiación Territoria
Paseo de la Castellana 162
E-28071 Madrid
tel. +34.91.5837301
fax +34.91.4576173
e-mail: aplazab@sepg.minhac.es
web: Secretaría de Estado de Presupuestos y Gastos

(2003/C 268 E/179)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0961/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(26 March 2003)

Subject: Utilisation of SAVE II and Altener II funds by the municipality of Ancona

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian ministry of the economy presented its
statement on the expenditure of funding made available by the European Union.

Its research showed that some local authorities were worryingly slow and inefficient in awarding projects.

The European Commission has also emphasised concern on various occasions at the under-utilisation of
European funding by local authorities.

Considering that, in particular, some local municipalities such as Ancona are in great need of European
funding to limit carbon dioxide emissions, improve air quality and combat pollution, can the Commission
indicate:

1. whether the municipality of Ancona has submitted any projects under the SAVE II or Altener II

programmes;

2. whether the municipality of Ancona has received funding for those projects;

3. whether that funding has been utilised?

(2003/C 268 E/180)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0962/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(26 March 2003)

Subject: Utilisation of SAVE II and Altener II funds by the municipality of Carrara

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian ministry of the economy presented its
statement on the expenditure of funding made available by the European Union.

Its research showed that some local authorities were worryingly slow and inefficient in awarding projects.

The European Commission has also emphasised concern on various occasions at the under-utilisation of
European funding by local authorities.

Considering that, in particular, some local municipalities such as Carrara are in great need of European
funding to limit carbon dioxide emissions, improve air quality and combat pollution, can the Commission
indicate:

1. whether the municipality of Carrara has submitted any projects under the SAVE II or Altener II

programmes;

2. whether the municipality of Carrara has received funding for those projects;

3. whether that funding has been utilised?
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2003-03-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate

26.3.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/1

I

(Information)

COMMISSION

Euro exchange rates (1)

25 March 2003

(2003/C 72/01)

1 euro =

USD

JPY

DKK

GBP

SEK

CHF

ISK

NOK

BGN

CYP

CZK

EEK

HUF

LTL

Currency

US dollar

Japanese yen

Danish krone

Pound sterling

Swedish krona

Swiss franc

Iceland króna

Norwegian krone

Bulgarian lev

Cyprus pound

Czech koruna

Estonian kroon

Hungarian forint

Lithuanian litas

Exchange
rate

1,0691

128,22

7,4265

0,6784

9,238

1,472

83,7

7,829

1,9506

LVL

MTL

PLN

ROL

SIT

SKK

TRL

AUD

CAD

Currency

Latvian lats

Maltese lira

Polish zloty

Romanian leu

Slovenian tolar

Slovak koruna

Turkish lira

Australian dollar

Canadian dollar

0,58375

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

31,798

NZD

New Zealand dollar

15,6466

SGD

Singapore dollar

Exchange
rate

0,622

0,4225

4,3315

36 000

231,6325

41,726

1 853 000

1,7908

1,5769

8,338

1,9312

1,8867

246,16

KRW

South Korean won

1 336,8

3,4523

ZAR

South African rand

8,6383

___________
(1) Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 533/2003 of 26 March 2003 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2003-03-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, import price, perennial vegetable, pip fruit

27.3.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 80/1

I

(Acts whose publication is obligatory)

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 533/2003

of 26 March 2003

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and
vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community,

(2)

In compliance with the above criteria,
the standard
import values must be fixed at the levels set out in the
Annex to this Regulation,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of
21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the
import arrangements
last
amended by Regulation (EC) No 1947/2002 (2), and in parti-
cular Article 4(1) thereof,

fruit and vegetables (1), as

for

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Whereas:

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 lays down, pursuant to the
outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade nego-
tiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the
standard values for imports from third countries,
in
respect of the products and periods stipulated in the
Annex thereto.

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regula-
tion (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex
hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 March 2003.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 March 2003.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Agriculture Director-General

(1) OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66.
(2) OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17.

L 80/2

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

27.3.2003

to the Commission Regulation of 26 March 2003 establishing the standard import values for determining the
entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

ANNEX

CN code

0702 00 00

0707 00 05

0709 10 00

0709 90 70

0805 10 10, 0805 10 30, 0805 10 50

0808 10 20, 0808 10 50, 0808 10 90

0808 20 50

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

(EUR/100 kg)

052
204
212
999

052
096
204
999

220
999

052
204
999

052
204
212
220
600
624
999

388
400
404
508
512
524
528
720
728
999

388
512
528
720
999

106,6
56,7
123,3
95,5

135,3
84,2
74,2
97,9

190,1
190,1

142,3
159,2
150,8

75,9
50,5
52,1
33,1
62,0
58,2
55,3

88,9
91,2
94,1
75,1
86,3
65,5
82,6
92,1
96,2
85,8

69,5
64,1
60,2
43,5
59,3

(1) Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2020/2001 (OJ L 273, 16.10.2001, p. 6). Code ‘999’ stands for

‘of other origin’.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0971/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Utilisation of SAVE II and Altener II funds by the municipality of Prato.
Date: 2003-03-26
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, Italy, action programme, local government, pollution control measures, project evaluation, reduction of gas emissions, renewable energy

C 268 E/168

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

7.11.2003

(2003/C 268 E/188)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0970/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(26 March 2003)

Subject: Utilisation of SAVE II and Altener II funds by the municipality of Pistoia

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian ministry of the economy presented its
statement on the expenditure of funding made available by the European Union.

Its research showed that some local authorities were worryingly slow and inefficient in awarding projects.

The European Commission has also emphasised concern on various occasions at the under-utilisation of
European funding by local authorities.

Considering that, in particular, some local municipalities such as Pistoia are in great need of European
funding to limit carbon dioxide emissions, improve air quality and combat pollution, can the Commission
indicate:

1. whether the municipality of Pistoia has submitted any projects under the SAVE II or Altener II

programmes;

2. whether the municipality of Pistoia has received funding for those projects;

3. whether that funding has been utilised?

(2003/C 268 E/189)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0971/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(26 March 2003)

Subject: Utilisation of SAVE II and Altener II funds by the municipality of Prato

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian ministry of the economy presented its
statement on the expenditure of funding made available by the European Union.

Its research showed that some local authorities were worryingly slow and inefficient in awarding projects.

The European Commission has also emphasised concern on various occasions at the under-utilisation of
European funding by local authorities.

Considering that, in particular, some local municipalities such as Prato are in great need of European
funding to limit carbon dioxide emissions, improve air quality and combat pollution, can the Commission
indicate:

1. whether the municipality of Prato has submitted any projects under the SAVE II or Altener II

programmes;

2. whether the municipality of Prato has received funding for those projects;

3. whether that funding has been utilised?

(2003/C 268 E/190)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0972/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(26 March 2003)

Subject: Utilisation of SAVE II and Altener II funds by the municipality of Siena

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian ministry of the economy presented its
statement on the expenditure of funding made available by the European Union.

Its research showed that some local authorities were worryingly slow and inefficient in awarding projects.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 535/2003 of 26 March 2003 determining the extent to which applications lodged in March 2003 for import licences for certain egg sector products and poultrymeat pursuant to Regulations (EC) No 1474/95 and (EC) No 1251/96 can be accepted
Date: 2003-03-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: egg, import licence, poultrymeat, quantitative restriction

27.3.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 80/5

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 535/2003

of 26 March 2003

determining the extent to which applications lodged in March 2003 for import licences for certain
egg sector products and poultrymeat pursuant to Regulations (EC) No 1474/95 and (EC) No 1251/
96 can be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1474/95 (1)
the tariff
opening and providing for the administration of
quotas in the egg sector and for egg albumin, as last amended
by Regulation (EC) No 1043/2001 (2), and in particular Article
5(5) thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1251/96 of
28 June 1996 opening and providing for the administration of
tariff quotas in the poultrymeat sector and albumin (3), as last
amended by Regulation (EC) No 1043/2001 and in particular
Article 5(5) thereof,

Whereas:

The applications for import licences lodged for the second
quarter of 2003 are, in the case of certain products, for quanti-
ties less than or equal to the quantities available and can there-

fore be met in full, but in the case of other products the said
applications are for quantities greater than the quantities avail-
able and must therefore be reduced by a fixed percentage to
ensure a fair distribution,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Applications for import licences for the period 1 April to 30
June 2003 submitted pursuant to Regulations (EC) No 1474/95
and (EC) No 1251/96 shall be met as referred to in the Annex
to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 April 2003.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 March 2003.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Agriculture Director-General

(1) OJ L 145, 29.6.1995, p. 19.
(2) OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 24.
(3) OJ L 161, 29.6.1996, p. 136.

L 80/6

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

27.3.2003

ANNEX

Group

Percentage of acceptance of import licences submitted for the period 1 April to 30 June 2003

E1

E2

E3

P1

P2

P3

P4

100,00

30,75

100,00

100,00

100,00

2,34

100,00
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0953/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Utilisation by the municipality of Massa of funding under EQUAL, the ESF and the Fourth action programme on equal opportunities for women and men.
Date: 2003-03-26
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU programme, Tuscany, action programme, equal treatment, financing, fund (EU), gender equality, project management

9.10.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242 E/217

(2003/C 242 E/252)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0953/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(26 March 2003)

Subject: Utilisation by the municipality of Massa of funding under EQUAL, the ESF and the Fourth action

programme on equal opportunities for women and men

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian ministry of the economy presented its
statement on the expenditure of funding made available by the European Union.

Its research showed that some local authorities were worryingly slow and inefficient in awarding projects.

The European Commission has also emphasised concern on various occasions at the under-utilisation of
European funding by local authorities.

Considering that, in particular, some local municipalities such as Massa are in great need of European
funding for vocational training and employment, equal opportunities and social integration,

Can the Commission indicate:

1. whether the municipality of Massa has submitted any projects under EQUAL, the ESF or the Fourth

action programme on equal opportunities for women and men;

2. whether the municipality of Massa has received funding for those projects;

3. whether that funding has been utilised?

(2003/C 242 E/253)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0954/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(26 March 2003)

Subject: Utilisation by the municipality of Perugia of funding under EQUAL, the ESF and the Fourth action

programme on equal opportunities for women and men

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian ministry of the economy presented its
statement on the expenditure of funding made available by the European Union.

Its research showed that some local authorities were worryingly slow and inefficient in awarding projects.

The European Commission has also emphasised concern on various occasions at the under-utilisation of
European funding by local authorities.

Considering that, in particular, some local municipalities such as Perugia are in great need of European
funding for vocational training and employment, equal opportunities and social integration,

Can the Commission indicate:

1. whether the municipality of Perugia has submitted any projects under EQUAL, the ESF or the Fourth

action programme on equal opportunities for women and men;

2. whether the municipality of Perugia has received funding for those projects;

3. whether that funding has been utilised?
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0970/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Utilisation of SAVE II and Altener II funds by the municipality of Pistoia.
Date: 2003-03-26
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, Italy, action programme, local government, pollution control measures, project evaluation, reduction of gas emissions, renewable energy

C 268 E/168

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

7.11.2003

(2003/C 268 E/188)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0970/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(26 March 2003)

Subject: Utilisation of SAVE II and Altener II funds by the municipality of Pistoia

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian ministry of the economy presented its
statement on the expenditure of funding made available by the European Union.

Its research showed that some local authorities were worryingly slow and inefficient in awarding projects.

The European Commission has also emphasised concern on various occasions at the under-utilisation of
European funding by local authorities.

Considering that, in particular, some local municipalities such as Pistoia are in great need of European
funding to limit carbon dioxide emissions, improve air quality and combat pollution, can the Commission
indicate:

1. whether the municipality of Pistoia has submitted any projects under the SAVE II or Altener II

programmes;

2. whether the municipality of Pistoia has received funding for those projects;

3. whether that funding has been utilised?

(2003/C 268 E/189)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0971/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(26 March 2003)

Subject: Utilisation of SAVE II and Altener II funds by the municipality of Prato

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian ministry of the economy presented its
statement on the expenditure of funding made available by the European Union.

Its research showed that some local authorities were worryingly slow and inefficient in awarding projects.

The European Commission has also emphasised concern on various occasions at the under-utilisation of
European funding by local authorities.

Considering that, in particular, some local municipalities such as Prato are in great need of European
funding to limit carbon dioxide emissions, improve air quality and combat pollution, can the Commission
indicate:

1. whether the municipality of Prato has submitted any projects under the SAVE II or Altener II

programmes;

2. whether the municipality of Prato has received funding for those projects;

3. whether that funding has been utilised?

(2003/C 268 E/190)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0972/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(26 March 2003)

Subject: Utilisation of SAVE II and Altener II funds by the municipality of Siena

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian ministry of the economy presented its
statement on the expenditure of funding made available by the European Union.

Its research showed that some local authorities were worryingly slow and inefficient in awarding projects.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0957/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Utilisation by the municipality of Pistoia of funding under EQUAL, the ESF and the Fourth action programme on equal opportunities for women and men.
Date: 2003-03-26
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU programme, Tuscany, action programme, equal treatment, financing, fund (EU), gender equality, project management

9.10.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242 E/219

(2003/C 242 E/256)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0957/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(26 March 2003)

Subject: Utilisation by the municipality of Pistoia of funding under EQUAL, the ESF and the Fourth action

programme on equal opportunities for women and men

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian ministry of the economy presented its
statement on the expenditure of funding made available by the European Union.

Its research showed that some local authorities were worryingly slow and inefficient in awarding projects.

The European Commission has also emphasised concern on various occasions at the under-utilisation of
European funding by local authorities.

Considering that, in particular, some local municipalities such as Pistoia are in great need of European
funding for vocational training and employment, equal opportunities and social integration,

Can the Commission indicate:

1. whether the municipality of Pistoia has submitted any projects under EQUAL, the ESF or the Fourth

action programme on equal opportunities for women and men;

2. whether the municipality of Pistoia has received funding for those projects;

3. whether that funding has been utilised?

(2003/C 242 E/257)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0958/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(26 March 2003)

Subject: Utilisation by the municipality of Prato of funding under EQUAL, the ESF and the Fourth action

programme on equal opportunities for women and men

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian ministry of the economy presented its
statement on the expenditure of funding made available by the European Union.

Its research showed that some local authorities were worryingly slow and inefficient in awarding projects.

The European Commission has also emphasised concern on various occasions at the under-utilisation of
European funding by local authorities.

Considering that, in particular, some local municipalities such as Prato are in great need of European
funding for vocational training and employment, equal opportunities and social integration,

Can the Commission indicate:

1. whether the municipality of Prato has submitted any projects under EQUAL, the ESF or the Fourth

action programme on equal opportunities for women and men;

2. whether the municipality of Prato has received funding for those projects;

3. whether that funding has been utilised?
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0959/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Utilisation by the municipality of Siena of funding under EQUAL, the ESF and the Fourth action programme on equal opportunities for women and men.
Date: 2003-03-26
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU programme, Tuscany, action programme, equal treatment, financing, fund (EU), gender equality, project management

C 242 E/220

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

9.10.2003

(2003/C 242 E/258)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0959/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(26 March 2003)

Subject: Utilisation by the municipality of Siena of funding under EQUAL, the ESF and the Fourth action

programme on equal opportunities for women and men

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian ministry of the economy presented its
statement on the expenditure of funding made available by the European Union.

Its research showed that some local authorities were worryingly slow and inefficient in awarding projects.

The European Commission has also emphasised concern on various occasions at the under-utilisation of
European funding by local authorities.

Considering that, in particular, some local municipalities such as Siena are in great need of European
funding for vocational training and employment, equal opportunities and social integration,

Can the Commission indicate:

1. whether the municipality of Siena has submitted any projects under EQUAL, the ESF or the Fourth

action programme on equal opportunities for women and men;

2. whether the municipality of Siena has received funding for those projects;

3. whether that funding has been utilised?

(2003/C 242 E/259)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0960/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(26 March 2003)

Subject: Utilisation by the municipality of Terni of funding under EQUAL, the ESF and the Fourth action

programme on equal opportunities for women and men

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian ministry of the economy presented its
statement on the expenditure of funding made available by the European Union.

Its research showed that some local authorities were worryingly slow and inefficient in awarding projects.

The European Commission has also emphasised concern on various occasions at the under-utilisation of
European funding by local authorities.

Considering that, in particular, some local municipalities such as Terni are in great need of European
funding for vocational training and employment, equal opportunities and social integration,

Can the Commission indicate:

1. whether the municipality of Terni has submitted any projects under EQUAL, the ESF or the Fourth

action programme on equal opportunities for women and men;

2. whether the municipality of Terni has received funding for those projects;

3. whether that funding has been utilised?