do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0964/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Utilisation of SAVE II and Altener II funds by the municipality of Livorno.
Date: 2003-03-26
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, Italy, action programme, local government, pollution control measures, project evaluation, reduction of gas emissions, renewable energy

7.11.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 268 E/165

(2003/C 268 E/181)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0963/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(26 March 2003)

Subject: Utilisation of SAVE II and Altener II funds by the municipality of Florence

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian ministry of the economy presented its
statement on the expenditure of funding made available by the European Union.

Its research showed that some local authorities were worryingly slow and inefficient in awarding projects.

The European Commission has also emphasised concern on various occasions at the under-utilisation of
European funding by local authorities.

Considering that, in particular, some local municipalities such as Florence are in great need of European
funding to limit carbon dioxide emissions, improve air quality and combat pollution, can the Commission
indicate:

1. whether the municipality of Florence has submitted any projects under the SAVE II or Altener II

programmes;

2. whether the municipality of Florence has received funding for those projects;

3. whether that funding has been utilised?

(2003/C 268 E/182)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0964/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(26 March 2003)

Subject: Utilisation of SAVE II and Altener II funds by the municipality of Livorno

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian ministry of the economy presented its
statement on the expenditure of funding made available by the European Union.

Its research showed that some local authorities were worryingly slow and inefficient in awarding projects.

The European Commission has also emphasised concern on various occasions at the under-utilisation of
European funding by local authorities.

Considering that, in particular, some local municipalities such as Livorno are in great need of European
funding to limit carbon dioxide emissions, improve air quality and combat pollution, can the Commission
indicate:

1. whether the municipality of Livorno has submitted any projects under the SAVE II or Altener II

programmes;

2. whether the municipality of Livorno has received funding for those projects;

3. whether that funding has been utilised?

(2003/C 268 E/183)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0965/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(26 March 2003)

Subject: Utilisation of SAVE II and Altener II funds by the municipality of Macerata

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian ministry of the economy presented its
statement on the expenditure of funding made available by the European Union.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0949/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Utilisation by the municipality of Carrara of funding under EQUAL, the ESF and the Fourth action programme on equal opportunities for women and men.
Date: 2003-03-26
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU programme, Tuscany, action programme, equal treatment, financing, fund (EU), gender equality, project management

9.10.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242 E/215

(2003/C 242 E/248)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0949/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(26 March 2003)

Subject: Utilisation by the municipality of Carrara of funding under EQUAL, the ESF and the Fourth action

programme on equal opportunities for women and men

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian ministry of the economy presented its
statement on the expenditure of funding made available by the European Union.

Its research showed that some local authorities were worryingly slow and inefficient in awarding projects.

The European Commission has also emphasised concern on various occasions at the under-utilisation of
European funding by local authorities.

Considering that, in particular, some local municipalities such as Carrara are in great need of European
funding for vocational training and employment, equal opportunities and social integration,

Can the Commission indicate:

1. whether the municipality of Carrara has submitted any projects under EQUAL, the ESF or the Fourth

action programme on equal opportunities for women and men;

2. whether the municipality of Carrara has received funding for those projects;

3. whether that funding has been utilised?

(2003/C 242 E/249)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0950/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(26 March 2003)

Subject: Utilisation by the municipality of Florence of funding under EQUAL, the ESF and the Fourth

action programme on equal opportunities for women and men

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian ministry of the economy presented its
statement on the expenditure of funding made available by the European Union.

Its research showed that some local authorities were worryingly slow and inefficient in awarding projects.

The European Commission has also emphasised concern on various occasions at the under-utilisation of
European funding by local authorities.

Considering that, in particular, some local municipalities such as Florence are in great need of European
funding for vocational training and employment, equal opportunities and social integration,

Can the Commission indicate:

1. whether the municipality of Florence has submitted any projects under EQUAL, the ESF or the Fourth

action programme on equal opportunities for women and men;

2. whether the municipality of Florence has received funding for those projects;

3. whether that funding has been utilised?
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0966/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Utilisation of SAVE II and Altener II funds by the municipality of Massa.
Date: 2003-03-26
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU financing, Italy, action programme, local government, pollution control measures, project evaluation, reduction of gas emissions, renewable energy

C 268 E/166

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

7.11.2003

Its research showed that some local authorities were worryingly slow and inefficient in awarding projects.

The European Commission has also emphasised concern on various occasions at the under-utilisation of
European funding by local authorities.

Considering that, in particular, some local municipalities such as Macerata are in great need of European
funding to limit carbon dioxide emissions, improve air quality and combat pollution, can the Commission
indicate:

1. whether the municipality of Macerata has submitted any projects under the SAVE II or Altener II

programmes;

2. whether the municipality of Macerata has received funding for those projects;

3. whether that funding has been utilised?

(2003/C 268 E/184)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0966/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(26 March 2003)

Subject: Utilisation of SAVE II and Altener II funds by the municipality of Massa

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian ministry of the economy presented its
statement on the expenditure of funding made available by the European Union.

Its research showed that some local authorities were worryingly slow and inefficient in awarding projects.

The European Commission has also emphasised concern on various occasions at the under-utilisation of
European funding by local authorities.

Considering that, in particular, some local municipalities such as Massa are in great need of European
funding to limit carbon dioxide emissions, improve air quality and combat pollution, can the Commission
indicate:

1. whether the municipality of Massa has submitted any projects under the SAVE II or Altener II

programmes;

2. whether the municipality of Massa has received funding for those projects;

3. whether that funding has been utilised?

(2003/C 268 E/185)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0967/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(26 March 2003)

Subject: Utilisation of SAVE II and Altener II funds by the municipality of Perugia

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian ministry of the economy presented its
statement on the expenditure of funding made available by the European Union.

Its research showed that some local authorities were worryingly slow and inefficient in awarding projects.

The European Commission has also emphasised concern on various occasions at the under-utilisation of
European funding by local authorities.
Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
Date: 2003-03-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: China, anti-dumping duty, anti-dumping legislation, cereal product, chemical industry, import, oil industry, originating product

C 72/2

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

26.3.2003

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2003/C 72/02)

The Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following
1.
procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table
below, as provided in Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2722/1999 of 17 December 1999 (1)
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of furfuraldehyde originating in the People's Republic
of China.

2. Procedure

Community producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient
evidence that the removal of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of
dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of
the exporting country and Community producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify,
rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3. Time limit

Community producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the
European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Division B-1), J-79 5/16, B-1049 Brussels (2) at
any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before
the date mentioned in the table below.

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22

4.
December 1995 (3).

Product

Country(ies) of origin
or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Furfuraldehyde

People's Republic of
China

Duty

Regulation (EC) No 2722/1999
(OJ L 328, 22.12.1999)

23.12.2003

(1) OJ L 328, 22.12.1999, p. 1.
(2) Telex COMEU B 21877; Telefax (32-2) 295 65 05.
(3) OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1, as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1972/2002 (OJ L 305, 7.11.2002, p. 1).
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0951/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Utilisation by the municipality of Livorno of funding under EQUAL, the ESF and the Fourth action programme on equal opportunities for women and men.
Date: 2003-03-26
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU programme, Tuscany, action programme, equal treatment, financing, fund (EU), gender equality, project management

C 242 E/216

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

9.10.2003

(2003/C 242 E/250)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0951/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(26 March 2003)

Subject: Utilisation by the municipality of Livorno of funding under EQUAL, the ESF and the Fourth action

programme on equal opportunities for women and men

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian ministry of the economy presented its
statement on the expenditure of funding made available by the European Union.

Its research showed that some local authorities were worryingly slow and inefficient in awarding projects.

The European Commission has also emphasised concern on various occasions at the under-utilisation of
European funding by local authorities.

Considering that, in particular, some local municipalities such as Livorno are in great need of European
funding for vocational training and employment, equal opportunities and social integration,

Can the Commission indicate:

1. whether the municipality of Livorno has submitted any projects under EQUAL, the ESF or the Fourth

action programme on equal opportunities for women and men;

2. whether the municipality of Livorno has received funding for those projects;

3. whether that funding has been utilised?

(2003/C 242 E/251)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0952/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(26 March 2003)

Subject: Utilisation by the municipality of Macerata of funding under EQUAL, the ESF and the Fourth

action programme on equal opportunities for women and men

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian ministry of the economy presented its
statement on the expenditure of funding made available by the European Union.

Its research showed that some local authorities were worryingly slow and inefficient in awarding projects.

The European Commission has also emphasised concern on various occasions at the under-utilisation of
European funding by local authorities.

Considering that, in particular, some local municipalities such as Macerata are in great need of European
funding for vocational training and employment, equal opportunities and social integration,

Can the Commission indicate:

1. whether the municipality of Macerata has submitted any projects under EQUAL, the ESF or the Fourth

action programme on equal opportunities for women and men;

2. whether the municipality of Macerata has received funding for those projects;

3. whether that funding has been utilised?