Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 23 January 2003 in Case T-181/01: Chantal Hectors v European Parliament (Officials — Temporary staff — Recruitment — Grounds — Manifest error of assessment — Equal treatment of men and women)
Date: 2003-03-22
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Parliament, action for annulment (EU), gender equality, political group, staff assessment, temporary employment

C 70/22

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

22.3.2003

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 23 January 2003

in Case T-181/01: Chantal Hectors v European Parlia-
ment (1)

(Officials — Temporary staff — Recruitment — Grounds
— Manifest error of assessment — Equal treatment of men
and women)

(2003/C 70/35)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-181/01: Chantal Hectors, residing in Brussels,
represented by G. Vandersanden and L. Levi, avocats, against
European Parliament (Agents: H. von Hertzen and J. F. de
Wachter) — application, in the first place, for annulment of
the decisions taken by the authority empowered to conclude
contracts of employment appointing Mr B to the post of
Dutch-language administrator in the European People’s Party
(Christian Democrats) and European Democrats Group within
the European Parliament and rejecting the applicant’s candi-
dature for that post and, second,
for an order that the
Parliament pay compensation in respect of the material and
non-material damage which the applicant claims to have
suffered — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber),
composed of: J. D. Cooke, President, R. García-Valdecasas and
P. Lindh, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator,
for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 23 January 2003,
the operative part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

The application is dismissed;

The parties shall bear their own costs.

( 1) OJ C 303 of 27.10.01.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 11 December 2002

in Case T-82/02: Wolf-Dieter Yorck von Wartenburg v
Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Officials — Period within which an action must be brought
— Manifest inadmissibility)

(2003/C 70/36)

(Language of the case: German)

Rechtsanwalt, against Commission of the European Communi-
ties (Agent:
J. Currall) and European Parliament (Agents:
U. Rösslein and L. G. Knudsen) — application for the
annulment of the Parliament’s decision of 28 May 2001
refusing to apply to the applicant’s pension the coefficient
applicable to recipients of a Community pension resident in
Germany pursuant to Article 82 of the Staff Regulations —
the Court of First Instance (First Chamber), composed of:
B. Vesterdorf, President, R. M. Moura Ramos and H. Legal,
Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has made an order on 11 December
2002, the operative part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

The application is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 156 of 29.6.02.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 16 January 2003

in Case T-201/02: Pierre Tomarchio v Court of Auditors
of the European Communities (1)

(Officials — Refusal by the parent institution of an official
to reclassify him — Action for annulment brought against
the institution to which he was transferred — Inadmissible)

(2003/C 70/37)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-201/02: Pierre Tomarchio, a former official of the
European Communities, residing in Nancy (France), represent-
ed by N. Lhoëst, avocat, with an address for service in
Luxembourg, against Court of Auditors of
the European
Communities (Agents: J.-M. Stenier and P. Giusta) — appli-
cation for annulment of the measure adopted by the Court of
Auditors on 26 February 2002 in connection with the
applicant’s request for reclassification — the Court of First
Instance (First Chamber), composed of: B. Vesterdorf, Presi-
dent, R. M. Moura Ramos and H. Legal,
Judges; H. Jung,
Registrar, has made an order on 16 January 2003, the operative
part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

The application is dismissed as being inadmissible.

The applicant’s request for joinder of Cases T-173/02 and
T-201/02 is rejected.

3.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

In Case T-82/02: Wolf-Dieter Yorck von Wartenburg, a former
the European Parliament, residing in
temporary agent of
represented by H.-H. R. Heyland,
Wittibreut

(Germany),

(1) OJ C 233 of 28.9.02.