Order of the Court of First Instance of 13 December 2002 in Case T-112/02: Gustaaf Van Dyck v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Classification of grade upon recruitment — Application for reclassification — New fact — Meaning)
Date: 2003-03-08
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, European official, action for annulment (EU), professional experience, promotion, regulations for civil servants, vocational training

8.3.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/25

— Schneider-Legrand) — the Court of First Instance (First
Chamber), composed of B. Vesterdorf, President, N.J. Forwood
Judges; B. Pastor, Deputy Registrar, for the
and H. Legal,
Registrar, has given a judgment on 22 October 2002, in which
it:

1. Annuls Commission Decision C(2001)3014 final of 10 Octo-
ber 2001 declaring a concentration to be incompatible with the
common market and the EEA Agreement
(Case COMP/
M.2283 — Schneider-Legrand);

2. Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and, in addition,

to pay those incurred by Schneider Electric SA;

3. Orders the Comité Central d’Entreprise de SA Legrand and the
Comité Européeen du Groupe Legrand to bear their own costs;

4. Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs.

( 1) OJ C 56 of 2.3.2002.

(1) Annuls Commission Decision C (2002) 360 final of 30 Janu-
ary 2002 ordering the separation of undertakings (Case
COMP/M.2283 — Schneider — Legrand);

(2) Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the
including the costs of the

costs incurred by the applicant,
interlocutory proceedings in Case T-77/02 R;

(3) Orders Legrand SA, the Comité Central d’Entreprise de la SA
Legrand and the Comité Européen du Groupe Legrand to bear
their own costs.

(1) OJ C 118 of 18.5.2002.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 13 December 2002

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

in Case T-112/02: Gustaaf Van Dyck v Commission of the
European Communities (1)

of 22 October 2002

in Case T-77/02: Schneider Electric SA v Commission of
the European Communities (1)

(Competition — Regulation No 4064/89 — Decision
ordering separation of undertakings — Article 8(4) of
Regulation No 4064/89 — Illegality of the decision declaring
a concentration incompatible with the common market —
Ensuing illegality of the divestiture decision)

(2003/C 55/71)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-77/02: Schneider Electric SA, established in Rueil-
Malmaison (France), represented by A. Winckler and É. de La
Serre,
lawyers, against Commission of the European Com-
munities (Agents: P. Oliver, P. Hellström and F. Lelièvre),
supported by Legrand SA, established in Limoges (France),
represented by H. Calvet, lawyer, Comité central d’entreprise
de la SA Legrand, Comité européen du Groupe Legrand,
established in Limoges, represented by H. Masse-Dessen,
lawyer — application for annulment of Commission Decision
C (2002) 360 final of 30 January 2002, ordering a separation
of undertakings (Case COMP/M.2282 — Schneider-Legrand)
— the Court of First Instance (First Chamber), composed of
B. Vesterdorf, President, N.J. Forwood and H. Legal, Judges;
B. Pastor, Deputy Registrar, for the Registrar, has given a
judgment on 22 October 2002, in which it:

(Officials — Classification of grade upon recruitment —
Application for reclassification — New fact — Meaning)

(2003/C 55/72)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

against

resident

the European Communities,

In Case T-112/02, Gustaaf Van Dyck, an official of the
Commission of
in
(Belgium), represented by M.E. Storme and
Wuustwezel
A. Gobien,
the
avocats,
European Communities (agents: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and
H.M.H. Speyart), seeking to set aside the Commission’s refusal
to accede to the applicant’s request for reclassification, the
Court of First
(First Chamber), composed of
B. Vesterdorf, President, and R.M. Moura Ramos and H. Legal,
Judges; Registrar: H. Jung, made an order on 13 December
2002 in which it:

the Commission of

Instance

(1) Dismissed the application as inadmissible.

(2) Ordered the parties to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ 2002 C 131, p. 26.