WRITTEN QUESTION E-0587/03 by Jan Mulder (ELDR) to the Commission. Balkan sugar.
Date: 2003-02-28
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: Serbia and Montenegro, agricultural trade, import (EU), import policy, import restriction, originating product, protective clause, sugar

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84 E/717

(2004/C 84 E/0805)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0562/03

by Juan Ojeda Sanz (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(27 February 2003)

Subject: Arrest of journalists in Gibraltar

As the Commission is aware, on 20 January 2003 a group of journalists who were preparing to film the
action being taken by the environmentalist group Greenpeace in protest against the oil tanker Vemamagna
in Gibraltar were arrested.

Members of the Campo de Gibraltar Press Association have reported that the officers manning the
Gibraltarian patrol boats behaved in a violent and arbitrary fashion and then proceeded to arrest some of
the journalists present and to detain them in police cells for a nine-hour period, following which they were
released without charge.

The above-mentioned Association deems such behaviour to constitute a direct attack on freedom of
speech, on the right to report freely and on the right of the general public to be informed.

Could the Commission seek information from the Gibraltar authorities as to the reasons which prompted
the officers of the Royal Gibraltar Police to arrest the journalists?

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(27 March 2003)

The Commission would refer the Honourable Member to its answer to written E-0201/03 by Mr Menéndez
del Valle (1)

(1) OJ C 78 E, 27.3.2004, p. 13.

(2004/C 84 E/0806)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0587/03

by Jan Mulder (ELDR) to the Commission

(28 February 2003)

Subject: Balkan sugar

Can the European Commission define the concept of ‘massive increase of exports into the European
Community above the level of normal production and export capacity’ to which Article 12 of Regulation
(EC) No 2007/2000 (1) refers to allow possible measures of suspension of the arrangements provided for in
this Regulation?

Does the Commission consider the current level of importation of sugar (205 000 tonnes from January
2002 to November 2002) as ‘usual’ compared to 70 132 tonnes in 2001 and 613 tonnes in 2000?

Following a recent report by OLAF (European Anti-Fraud Office) on imports of sugar from FRY, the
European Commission is expected to propose a clause of temporary suspension of the Balkans regulation
(EC) No 2007/2000 of 18.9.2000 (Article 12) for this country. However, a temporary suspension can take
effect for a period of three months only.

What steps is the Commission intending to take after this three month delay? Will the Commission make
sure that, in this space of time, Serbia will find an efficient way of providing proof of origin for the sugar
which will be exported to the European Union?

C 84 E/718

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

3.4.2004

FRY and the EU are supposed to prepare an Association and Stabilisation agreement in the near future.
Taking into account FRY’s current difficulties in establishing proof of origin, as well as their intention to
join the EU, has the Commission considered the possibility of arranging limited export quotas on the basis
of the commercial sugar trade for the last five years, with a possible increase in these quotas if Serbian
production increases?

(1) OJ L 240, 23.9.2000, p. 1.

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(2 April 2003)

Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2000 of 18 September 2000 introducing exceptional trade measures for
countries and territories participating in or linked to the European Union’s Stabilisation and Association
process, amending Regulation (EC) No 2820/1998, and repealing Regulations (EC) No 1763/1999 and (EC)
No 6/2000 was adopted to provide the Western Balkans with the greatest possible opportunities to export
to the Community in order to support the economic development of the region. This development is a
necessary condition for political stability and peace and is consequently one of the pillars of the Union’s
Stabilization and Association Process.

As regards possible measures, Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2000, as amended by Council Regulation
(EC) No 2563/2000 of 20 November 2000 (1), provides two safeguard provisions: Article 12 and
Article 4(3).

Sugar imports from the Western Balkan have indeed increased significantly. The Commission is aware of
this increase and is monitoring the imports very closely by means of a surveillance program, whereby
customs administrations of Member States report on a weekly basis. Furthermore,
the Commission
abolished export refunds for sugar exports with destination to the Western Balkans in view to limit the
incentive for the current trade pattern.

The Commission is considering all measures to address the issue of proper enforcement of rules of origin
on imports of sugar from Serbia and Montenegro, including a temporary suspension of trade preferences.
Under Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2000, the Commission may take measures to suspend in whole
or in part the preferential arrangements for a period of three months, subject to certain conditions. The
period could be renewed, if no substantial improvement of the situation in the country happened.

The Commission works on a daily basis with Serbia and Montenegro to improve the functioning of
customs operations. A Community-funded Customs Assistance Mission (CAFAO) is very active throughout
the country in advising the authorities. The Commission clearly expects that Serbia and Montenegro will
do their utmost to provide for a reliable system of certification and verification of origin.

The start of negotiations on a Stabilization and Association Agreement with Serbia and Montenegro is
subject to a positive assessment (feasibility report) from the Commission on the readiness of the country to
negotiate and implement such an Agreement.

The Commission considers that subjecting duty-free imports of sugar from Serbia and Montenegro to a
quota would not efficiently address this issue of proper enforcement of rules of origin.

The Commission would envisage quotas only as a possible measure against the risk of serious market
disturbances through excessive imports.

(1) OJ L 295, 23.11.2000.