Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 5 December 2002 in Case T-70/00: Paul Edwin Hoyer v Commission of the European Communities (Temporary agents — Execution of a judgment of the Court of First Instance — Dismissal)
Date: 2003-02-22
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: action for annulment (EU), competition (EU), dismissal, servant (EU)

C 44/22

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

22.2.2003

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 5 December 2002

in Case T-70/00: Paul Edwin Hoyer v Commission of the
European Communities (1)

(Temporary agents — Execution of a judgment of the Court
of First Instance — Dismissal)

(Agents: D. Triantafyllou and K.-D. Borchardt), supported by
Federal Republic of Germany (Agents: initially W.-D. Plessing
and T. Jürgensen, and, subsequently, Plessing and M. Lumma):
Application for the annulment of the Commission’s decision
of 22 December 1999 relating to proposed State Aid No 506/
99, the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber, Extended
Composition), composed of: M. Vilaras, President, V. Tiili,
J. Pirrung, P. Mengozzi and A.W.H. Meij, Judges; D. Christen-
sen, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on
5 December 2002, in which it:

(2003/C 44/38)

(Language of the case: Dutch)

In Case T-70/00: Paul Edwin Hoyer, formerly a temporary
agent of the Commission of the European Communities,
residing in Hoeilaart, Belgium, represented by G. van der Wal,
Lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against
Commission of the European Communities (Agents: initially
G. Valsesia and C. Van der Hauwaert, subsequently F. Clotuche-
Duvieusart and H.M.H. Speyart) — application for annulment
of the Commission’s decision of 24 January 2000 terminating
the applicant’s contract of employment as temporary agent —
the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of
M. Vilaras, President, and V.Tiili and P. Mengozzi,
Judges;
J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar,
gave a judgment on 5 December 2002, in which it:

1. Dismissed the application;

2. Ordered each of the parties to bear its own costs.

( 1) OJ C 149 of 27.5.2000.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 5 December 2002

in Case T-114/00: Aktionsgemeinschaft Recht und Eigen-
tum eV v Commission of the European Communities (1)

(State aid — Scheme for the acquisition of agricultural and
forestry land in the former German Democratic Republic —
Failure to initiate the formal review procedure provided for
in Article 88(2) EC — System of aid — Action for annulment
— Association — Admissibility)

(2003/C 44/39)

(Language of the case: German)

In Case T-114/00, Aktionsgemeinschaft Recht und Eigentum
eV, established in Borken (Germany), represented by M. Pech-
stein, professor, v Commission of the European Communities

1. Dismisses the objection of inadmissibility;

2.

Reserves costs.

(1) OJ C 192 of 8.7.2000.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 10 December 2002

in Case T-123/00: Dr. Karl Thomae GmbH v Commission
of the European Communities (1)

(Medicinal products for human use — Regulation (EEC)
No 2309/93 — Community marketing authorisation —
Regulation (EC) No 542/95 — Variation of the terms of the
authorisation — Name and package layout of the medicinal
product)

(2003/C 44/40)

(Language of the case: English)

In Case T-123/00, Dr Karl Thomae GmbH, established in
Biberach an der Riß (Germany), represented by D. Waelbroeck
and D. Brinckman, Lawyers, with an address for service in
Luxembourg, supported by European Federation of Pharma-
ceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA), established in
Brussels (Belgium), represented by D. Perkins, Solicitor, and
M. Van Kerckhove, Lawyer, with an address for service in
Luxembourg, v Commission of the European Communities
(Agents: R. Wainwright and H. Støvlbæk), supported by
Council of the European Union (Agents: M.-C. Giorgi and
G. Houttuin): Application for annulment of the decision of
1 March 2000 of the European Agency for the Evaluation of
Medicinal Products, rejecting an application for variation of
certain terms of the marketing authorisation for the medicinal
product, ‘Daquiran’, the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber),
composed of: J.D. Cooke, President, R. García-Valdecasas and
P. Lindh, Judges; J. Plingers, Administrator, for the Registrar,
has given a judgment on 10 December 2002, in which it: