2003/200/EC: Commission Decision of 14 February 2003 establishing revised ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to laundry detergents and amending Decision 1999/476/EC (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2003) 143)
Date: 2003-02-14
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European standard, consumer information, eco-label, polishing and scouring preparations, quality label, textile product

22.3.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 76/25

COMMISSION

COMMISSION DECISION

of 14 February 2003

establishing revised ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to laundry
detergents and amending Decision 1999/476/EC

(notified under document number C(2003) 143)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2003/200/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community,

the
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 of
European Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 on a
revised Community eco-label award scheme (1), and in parti-
cular the second subparagraph of Article 6(1) thereof,

Whereas:

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

Under Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 the Community
eco-label may be awarded to a product possessing char-
acteristics which enable it to contribute significantly to
improvements in relation to key environmental aspects.

Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 provides that specific
eco-label criteria are to be established according to
product groups.

It also provides that the review of the eco-label criteria,
as well as of the assessment and verification require-
ments related to the criteria, is to take place in due time
before the end of the period of validity of the criteria
specified for each product group.

It is appropriate to revise the ecological criteria that were
established by Commission Decision 1999/476/EC of 10
June 1999 establishing ecological criteria for the award
of the Community eco-label to laundry detergents (2) in
order to reflect the developments in the market. At the
same time, the period of validity of that Decision as
extended by Decision 2002/172/EC (3) and the definition
of the product group should be modified.

(1) OJ L 237, 21.9.2000, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 187, 20.7.1999, p. 52.
(3) OJ L 56, 27.2.2002, p. 32.

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

A new Decision should be adopted establishing the
specific ecological criteria for this product group, which
will be valid for a period of five years.

It is appropriate that, for a limited period of not more
than 18 months, both the new criteria and the criteria
established by Decision 1999/476/EC should be valid
concurrently,
time for
companies that have been awarded or that have applied
for the award of the eco-label for their products prior to
the date of application of this Decision to adapt those
products to comply with the new criteria.

to allow sufficient

in order

The measures provided for in this Decision are based on
the draft criteria developed by the European Union Eco-
labelling Board established under Article 13 of Regula-
tion (EC) No 1980/2000.

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accor-
dance with the opinion of the Committee instituted by
Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In order to be awarded the Community eco-label under Regula-
tion (EC) No 1980/2000, a laundry detergent must fall within
the product group ‘laundry detergents’ as defined in Article 2,
and must comply with the ecological criteria set out in the
Annex to this Decision.

L 76/26

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

22.3.2003

Article 2

The product group ‘laundry detergents’ shall comprise all
laundry detergents, in powder, liquid or any other form, for the
washing of textiles, and which are intended to be used princi-
pally in household machines, but not excluding the use in laun-
derettes and common laundries.

Article 3

For administrative purposes the product group code number
assigned to this product group shall be ‘6’.

Producers of products falling within the product group ‘laundry
detergents’ which have already been awarded the eco-label
before 1 March 2003 may continue to use that label until 31
August 2004.

Producers of products falling within the product group ‘laundry
detergents’ which have already applied for the award of the
eco-label before 1 March 2003 may be awarded the eco-label
under the terms of Decision 1999/476/EC. In these cases the
label may be used until 31 August 2004.

Article 4

Article 6

Article 3 of Decision 1999/476/EC is
following:

replaced by the

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

‘Article 3

The product group definition and the specific ecological
criteria for the product group shall be valid until 31 August
2004.’

Article 5

This Decision shall apply from 1 March 2003 until 29 February
2008.

Done at Brussels, 14 February 2003.

For the Commission

Margot WALLSTRÖM

Member of the Commission

22.3.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 76/27

ANNEX

FRAMEWORK

The aims of the criteria

These criteria aim in particular at promoting:

— savings of transport and energy by favouring compact laundry detergents,

— reduction of water pollution by reducing the volume of total chemicals used in the products and by limiting the use

of potentially hazardous ingredients,

— the minimisation of waste production by reducing the amount of primary packaging.

Additionally, the criteria enhance the consumers' environmental awareness. The criteria are set at levels that promote
the labelling of laundry detergents that have a low environmental impact.

Assessment and verification requirements

The specific assessment and verification requirements are indicated within each criterion.

Where the applicant is required to provide declarations, documentation, analyses test reports, or other evidence to show
compliance with the criteria, it is understood that these may originate from the applicant and/or his supplier(s) and/or
their supplier(s), et cetera, as appropriate.

Where possible, the testing should be performed by laboratories that meet the general requirements of EN ISO 17025 or
equivalent.

Where appropriate, test methods other than those indicated for each criterion may be used if the Competent Body asses-
sing the application accepts their equivalence.

The concentration of ingredients in the product, which implies a requirement for documentation of compliance with the
ecological criteria, is generally defined at ≥ 0,1 % by weight of the preparation. This concentration is defined at ≥ 0,01 %
by weight of the preparation for the criterion on dangerous, hazardous or toxic substances or preparations.

Appendix IA. presents the detergent ingredient database (DID list) which contains the most widely used ingredients used
in detergent formulations. It shall be used for deriving the data for the calculations of CDVtox and for the assessment of
the biodegradability of surfactants.

Where appropriate, the applicant may use subsequent revisions of the detergent ingredient database as they become
available.

For ingredients which are not included in the DID list, the applicant shall, under his own responsibility, find the appro-
priate values for the relevant parameters by using the approach described in Appendix IB.

For ingredients, which are not listed in the DID list, the applicant may use an approach to provide the necessary docu-
mentation of anaerobic degradability described in Appendix IC.

Where appropriate, Competent Bodies may require supporting documentation and may carry out
verifications.

independent

The Competent Bodies are recommended to take into account the implementation of recognised environmental manage-
ment schemes, such as EMAS or ISO 14001, when assessing applications and monitoring compliance with the criteria
(note: it is not required to implement such management schemes).

Functional unit and reference dosage

The functional unit is expressed in g/wash (grams per wash). For heavy-duty detergents this is related to the dosage per
4,5 kg load (dry textiles) and for low-duty detergents to the dosage per 2,5 kg load (dry textiles) in the washing
machine. The dosage recommended by the manufacturer to consumers for the water hardness of 2,5 mmol CaCO3/l
and ‘normally soiled’ textiles is taken as the reference dosage for the calculation of the ecological criteria, and the test of
washing performance. If the water hardness of 2,5 mmol CaCO3/l is not relevant in the Member States in which the
detergent is marketed, the applicant shall specify the dosage used as the reference.

L 76/28

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

22.3.2003

CRITERIA

1. Total chemicals

Total chemicals are the recommended dosage in g/wash minus the water content.

The amount of total chemicals shall not exceed 100 g/wash.

Assessment and verification: the exact formulation of the product shall be provided to the Competent Body, together with
the details of the calculations showing compliance with this criterion.

2. Insoluble inorganic ingredients

The total amount of insoluble inorganic ingredients at the recommended dosage shall be less than 30 g/wash.

Assessment and verification: the exact formulation of the product shall be provided to the Competent Body, together with
the details of the calculations showing compliance with this criterion.

The critical dilution volume toxicity (CDVtox) is calculated for each ingredient (i) using the following equation:

3. Toxicity to aquatic organisms

where weight (i) is the weight of the ingredient per recommended dose, LF is the loading factor and LTE is the long-term
toxicity effect concentration of the ingredient.

The values of the LF and LTE parameters shall be as given in the detergent ingredient database list (DID list) in Appendix
1A. If the ingredient in question is not included in the DID list, the applicant shall estimate their values following the
approach described in Appendix 1B. The CDVtox is summed for each ingredient, making the CDVtox for the product:

The CDVtox of the recommended dosage shall not exceed 4 500 l/wash.

CDVtox= Σ CDVtox(ingredient)

Assessment and verification: the exact formulation of the product shall be provided to the Competent Body, together with
the details of the CDVtox calculations showing compliance with this criterion.

4. Phosphates

The total amount of phosphates (as sodium tripolyphosphate-STPP) at the recommended dosage shall not exceed 25 g/
wash.

Assessment and verification: the exact formulation of the product shall be provided to the Competent Body, together with
the details of the calculations showing compliance with this criterion.

5. Biodegradability of surfactants

(a) R e a dy bi odeg ra da bi li ty (a er obi c)

Each surfactant used in the product shall be readily biodegradable.

Assessment and verification: the exact formulation of the product shall be provided to the Competent Body. The DID
list (see Appendix IA) indicates whether a specific surfactant is aerobically biodegradable or not (i.e. those that have
an entry of ‘Y’ in the column on aerobic non-biodegradability shall not be used). For surfactants which are not
included in the DID list, the relevant information from literature or other sources, or appropriate test results,
showing that they are aerobically biodegradable shall be provided. The tests for ready biodegradability shall be as
referred to in Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and admin-
istrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances (1), and its subse-
quent amendments, in particular the methods detailed in Annex V.C4, or their equivalent OECD 301 A-F test
methods, or their equivalent ISO tests. The 10 days window principle shall not apply. The pass levels shall be 70 %
for the tests referred to in Annex V.C4(A) and C4(B) of Directive 67/548/EEC (and their equivalent OECD 301 A
and E tests and ISO equivalents), and shall be 60 % for tests C4-C, D, E and F (and their equivalent OECD 301 B, C,
D and F tests and ISO equivalents).

(1) OJ L 196, 16.8.1967, p. 1.

22.3.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 76/29

(b) Anae robi c bi ode g ra dabili ty

Each surfactant used in the product shall be anaerobically biodegradable.

Assessment and verification: the exact formulation of the product shall be provided. The DID list (see Appendix IA)
indicates whether a specific surfactant is anaerobically biodegradable or not (i.e. those that have an entry of ‘Y’ in the
column on anaerobic biodegradability shall not be used). For surfactants which are not included in the DID list, the
relevant information from literature or other sources, or appropriate test results, showing that they are anaerobically
biodegradable shall be provided. The reference test for anaerobic degradability shall be ISO 11734, ECETOC No 28
(June 1988) or an equivalent test method, with the requirement of 60 % ultimate degradability under anaerobic
conditions. Test methods simulating the conditions in a relevant anaerobic environment may also be used to docu-
ment that 60 % ultimate degradability has been attained under anaerobic conditions (see Appendix IC).

6. Dangerous, hazardous or toxic substances or preparations

(a) The following ingredients shall not be included in the product, either as part of the formulation or as part of any

preparation included in the formulation:

— alkyl phenol ethoxylates (APEOs) and derivatives thereof,

— nitromusks and polycyclic musks, including for example:

— musk xylene: 5-tert-butyl-2,4,6-trinitro-m-xylene,

— musk ambrette: 4-tert–butyl-3-methoxy-2,6-dinitrotoluene,

— moskene: 1,1,3,3,5-pentamethyl-4,6-dinitroindan,

— musk tibetine: 1-tert-butyl-3,4,5-trimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzene,

— musk ketone: 4'-tert-butyl-2',6'-dimethyl-3',5'-dinitroacetaphenone,

— HHCB:1,3,4,6,7,8-hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8,-hexamethylcyclopenta(g)-2- benzopyran,

— AHTN: 6-acetyl-1,1,2,4,4,7-hexamethyltetralin,

— EDTA (ethylenediamine tetraacetate),

— NTA (nitrilotriacetate).

Assessment and verification: the applicant shall provide a declaration that the listed substances have not been included
in the product.

(b) Quaternary ammonium salts that are not readily biodegradable shall not be used.

Assessment and verification: the applicant shall provide the exact formulation of the product, together with documen-
tation showing the biodegradability of any quaternary ammonium salts used, and a declaration of compliance with
this requirement.

(c) The total amount of phosphonates that are not readily biodegradable (aerobically) shall not exceed 0,5 g/wash at the

recommended dosage.

Assessment and verification: the applicant shall provide the exact formulation of the product, together with documen-
tation showing the biodegradability of any phosphonates used, and a declaration of compliance with this require-
ment.

(d) No ingredient shall be included in the product that is classified or may be classified as:

— R40 (limited evidence of a carcinogenic effect),

— R45 (may cause cancer),

— R46 (may cause heritable genetic damage),

— R49 (may cause cancer by inhalation),

— R50-53 (very toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment),

— R51-53 (toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment),

— R59 (dangerous to the ozone layer),

— R60 (may impair fertility),

— R61 (may cause harm to the unborn child),

— R62 (possible risk of impaired fertility),

— R63 (possible risk of harm to the unborn child),

— R64 (may cause harm to breastfed babies),

— R68 (possible risks of irreversible effects),

L 76/30

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

22.3.2003

or any combination thereof, according to Directive 67/548/EEC and its subsequent amendments, or according to
Directive 1999/45/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 1999 concerning the approxima-
tion of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the classification, packa-
ging and labelling of dangerous preparations (1), and its subsequent amendments.

Each substance or ingredient of any preparation used in the formulation that exceeds 0,01 % of the final product
shall also meet the above requirements.

No preservatives shall be used that are or may be classified as R50-53, whatever their amount.

Assessment and verification: the exact formulation of the product shall be provided to the Competent Body. Copies of
the material safety data sheets shall be provided for all ingredients (whether substances or preparations). A declara-
tion of compliance with this criterion shall be provided by the applicant.

(e) The product shall not be classified as R43 (may cause sensitisation by skin contact) according to Directive 1999/45/
EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 1999 concerning the approximation of the laws, regu-
lations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of
dangerous preparations.

Assessment and verification: the exact formulation of the product shall be provided to the Competent Body, together
with copies of the material safety data sheets of each ingredient which shall indicate the relevant classification or lack
thereof of each ingredient, and also a declaration of compliance with this criterion.

(f) Any ingredients added to the product as a fragrance shall have been manufactured and/or handled following the

code of practice of the International Fragrance Association.

Assessment and verification: a declaration of compliance shall be provided.

The enzyme production micro-organism shall be absent from the final enzyme preparation.

7. Purity of enzymes

Assessment and verification: a test report or certificate from the enzyme producer shall be provided to the Competent
Body.

8. Packaging requirements

(a) If refills are not provided, the weight of the total primary packaging shall not exceed 3,7 g per wash for tablets and

1,7 g per wash for all other products.

(b) If refills are provided the weight of total primary packaging shall not exceed 7 g per wash and the manufacturer

shall provide refills. The weight of refill packaging shall not exceed 1,7 g per wash.

(c) The cardboard packaging shall consist of ≥ 80 % recycled material.

(d) Plastic primary packaging shall be labelled according to ISO 1043.

Assessment and verification: the applicant shall supply a sample of the packaging, together with a declaration indicating
compliance with each part of this criterion. A calculation of the weight of primary packaging and a declaration
regarding the percentage of recycled material shall be provided to the Competent Body. Primary packaging is as defined
in the Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 1994 on packaging and
packaging waste (2).

9. Washing performance

The product shall be compared in its washing performance with reference detergents of the same type according to the
EU eco-detergents performance test ‘Award of the EU eco-label to laundry detergents: performance test of household
detergents’ (version 4 December 2002 and its subsequent amendments).

Assessment and verification: the applicant shall provide a test report indicating that the product fulfils the minimum
requirements defined in this test.

(1) OJ L 200, 30.7.1999, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 365, 31.12.1994, p. 10.

22.3.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 76/31

10. Consumer information

(a) Inf or ma ti on on the pa c ka g i ng

The following text (or equivalent) shall appear on or in all eco-labelled products within the product group:

‘ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND WASHING MEANS:

— pre-sort laundry (for example, by colour, degree of soiling, type of fibre),

— wash with full load,

— avoid using too much detergent, follow dosage instructions,

— choose low-temperature washing cycles.

Using this eco-labelled product and following these instructions will contribute to the reduction of water pollu-
tion, waste production and energy consumption. For more information visit the EU eco-label website: http://
europa.eu.int/ecolabel.’

More information on the detergent shall be made available on request. For this purpose, a sentence shall appear on
the packaging saying that if the consumer wants to know more about the detergent, he or she should contact the
consumer department of the company or the retailer.

(b) Dosa g e i n str uc ti on s

If the number of CPU (clearing performance units) in the washing performance test is higher than 24 the following
text (or equivalent) shall be enclosed: ‘Difficult stains need special treatment before washing’.

Dosage recommendations shall appear on the product packaging, together with a recommendation to the consumer
to contact his water supplier or local authority in order to find out the degree of hardness of his tap water.

The recommended dosages shall be specified for ‘normally’ and ‘heavily’ soiled textiles and the various water hard-
ness ranges relevant for the countries concerned and referred as appropriate to the weight of textile. If dosage
instructions are given by way of dosage device, the volume of the device (in ml) should also appear clearly on the
packaging.

In order to encourage the consumer to avoid using too much detergent and to follow the dosage instruction, a
dosage device (cup) showing a scale of at least 10 ml steps shall be available on request if it is not included in the
packaging.

The washing efficiency shall be indicated and relate to ‘normally soiled’ and the various water hardness ranges
considered.

The dosage recommendations between water hardness range 1 (soft), ‘normally soiled’ and the highest water hard-
ness range (3 or 4), ‘heavily soiled’ may not differ by more than a factor of 2.

The reference dosage used for the washing performance test and for assessment of compliance with the ecological
criteria on ingredients shall be the same as the recommended dosage for ‘normally soiled’ and the water hardness
corresponding to 2,5 mmol CaCO3/l in the Member State in which the test has been performed.

If only water hardness lower than 2,5 mmol CaCO3/l are included in the recommendations, the maximum dosage
recommended for ‘normally soiled’ shall be lower than the reference dosage mentioned in the previous paragraph.

(c) In formation a nd la belling of i ng redi ents

Commission recommendation 89/542/EEC of 13 September 1989 concerning the labelling of detergents and
cleaning agents (1) shall be applied.

The following groups of ingredients shall be labelled independently from their mass content:

— enzymes: indication of the type of enzymes (e.g. protease, lipase);

— preservation agents: characterisation and labelling according to IUPAC nomenclature;

— disinfectants: characterisation and labelling according to IUPAC nomenclature.

If the product contains perfumes, it shall be indicated on the packaging.

Assessment and verification: a sample of product packaging shall be provided to the Competent Body, together with a
declaration of compliance with each part of this criterion.

(1) OJ L 291, 10.10.1989, p. 55.

L 76/32

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

22.3.2003

11. Information appearing on the eco-label

Box 2 of the eco-label shall contain the following text:

‘* Helps reduce water pollution

* Helps reduce resource consumption’.

Assessment and verification: the applicant shall provide a sample of the product packages showing the label, together with
a declaration of compliance with this criterion.

Appendix I.A

DID-LIST

Detergents ingredients database and approach to be followed for ingredients not listed in the database

A. The data given below on the most commonly used detergent ingredients shall be used for the calculation of the ecological criteria

Note: the parameters a NBO, SI II, THOD as well as the CF-factors for an NBO are not used within this product group)

Detergent ingredients database (DID-list; version 29.9.98)

DID No

Ingredients

Toxicity

NOEC measured

LTE

Loading factor (LF)

Anaerobic non-
biodegradable (a
NBO)

Aerobic non-
biodegradable (a
NBO)

Soluble inorganics
(SI)

Insoluble
inorganics (II)

THOD

Anionic surfactants
C 10-13 LAS (Na ø 11.5-11.8, C14 < 1 %)
other LAS (C14 > 1 %)

C 14/17 Alk. Sulfonate

C 8/10 Alkylsulfate

C 12-15 AS

C 12-18 AS

C 16/18 FAS

C 12-15 A 1-3 EO sulphate

C 16/18 A 3-4 EO sulphate

C8–Dialkylsulfosuccinate

C 12/14 sulpho-fat.-acid methylester

0,3

0,12

0,27

EC50 = 2,9

0,1

LC50 = 3

0,55

0,15

no valid data

LC50 = 7,5

EC50 = 5

C 16/18 sulpho-fat.-acid methylester

0,15

C 14/16 alpha olefine sulphonate

C 14-18 alpha olefine sulphonate

SOAPS (C12 — 22)

Nonionic surfactants
C 9/11 A > 3-6 EO lin. or mono br.
C 9/11 A > 6-9 EO lin. or mono br.

LC50 = 2,5

LC50 = 1,4

EC0 = 1,6

EC50 = 3,3

EC50 = 5,4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

0,3

0,12

0,27

0,15

0,1

0,15

0,55

0,15

0,1

0,4

0,25

0,15

0,13

0,07

1,6

0,7

1,1

0,05

0,05

0,03

0,02

0,02

0,02

0,02

0,03

0,03

0,5

0,05

0,05

0,05

0,05

0,05

0,03

0,03

Y, CF = 0,75

Y, CF = 1,5

Y, CF = 0,75

O

O

O

O

O

O

Y, CF = 1,5

Y, CF = 0,75

Y, CF = 0,75

Y, CF = 0,75

Y, CF = 2,0

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

2,3

2,3

2,5

1,9

2,2

2,3

2,5

2,1

2,2

2

2,1

2,3

2,3

2,4

2,9

2,4

2,2

.

.

2
2
3
2
0
0
3

E
N

O

f
f
i
c
i
a
l

J
o
u
r
n
a
l

o
f

t
h
e

E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
U
n
o
n

i

L

7
6
/
3
3

DID No

Ingredients

Toxicity

NOEC measured

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

C 12-15 A 2-6 EO lin. or mono br.
C 12-15 (Avg. C < 14) A > 6-9 EO lin. or
mono br.
C 12-15 (Avg. C > 14) A > 6-9 EO
C 12-15 A > 9-12 EO

C 12-15 A 20-30 EO
C 12-15 A > 30 EO

C 12/18 A 0-3 EO

C 12-18 A 9 EO

C 16/18 A 2-6 EO
C 16/18 A > 9-12 EO

C 16/18 A 20-30 EO
C 16/18 A > 30 EO

C 12/14 Glucose Amide

C 16/18 Glucose Amide

C 12/14 Alkylpolyglucoside

Amphoteric surfactants

C 12-15 Alkyl dimethylbetaine

C12-18 Alkyl amidopropylbetaine

Sud controllers

Silicone

Paraffin

0,18

0,24

0,17

LC50 = 0,8

EC50 = 13

LC50 = 130

no data

0,2

0,03

LC50 = 0,5

EC50 = 18

LC50 = 50

4,3

0,116

1

0,03

0,03

EC0 = 241

no data

LTE

0,18

0,24

0,17

0,3

0,65

6,5

0,01

0,2

0,03

0,05

0,36

2,5

4,3

0,116

1

0,03

0,03

4,82

100

Fabric softening

37

Glycerol

LC50 > 5-10 gl

1 000

as Sodium-tri-polyphosphate

Builders

Phosphate
(STPP)

Zeolite A

Citrate

Polycarboxylates and related derivates

Clay

Carbonate/bicarbonate
Fatty acid (C ≥ 14)

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

120

EC50 = 85

124

LC50 = 250

EC0 = 1,6

1 000

120

85

124

1 000

250

1,6

Loading factor (LF)

Anaerobic non-
biodegradable (a
NBO)

Aerobic non-
biodegradable (a
NBO)

Soluble inorganics
(SI)

Insoluble
inorganics (II)

THOD

0,03

0,03

0,03

0,03

0,05

0,75

0,03

0,03

0,03

0,03

0,05

0,75

0,03

0,03

0,03

0,05

0,05

0,4

0,4

0,13

0,6

0,05

0,07

0,4

0,05

0,8

0,05

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

Y, CF = 2,5

Y, CF = 2,5

Y, CF = 0,75

O

O

O

O

O

Y, CF = 0,1

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

Y

O

O

O

O

O

Y

O

O

O

O

O

Y

Y

O

O

O

O

Y

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

Y

O

O

O

O

Y

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

Y

O

O

Y

O

O

2,5

2,3

2,3

2,2

2

0 (*)

2,9

2,4

2,6

2,3

2,1

0 (*)

2,2

2,5

2,3

2,9

2,8

0,0

0 (*)

1,2

0,0

0,0

0,6

0 (*)

0,0

0,0

2,9

L

7
6
/
3
4

E
N

O

f
f
i
c
i
a
l

J
o
u
r
n
a
l

o
f

t
h
e

E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
U
n
o
n

i

.

.

2
2
3
2
0
0
3

DID No

Ingredients

Toxicity

NOEC measured

LTE

Loading factor (LF)

Anaerobic non-
biodegradable (a
NBO)

Aerobic non-
biodegradable (a
NBO)

Soluble inorganics
(SI)

Insoluble
inorganics (II)

THOD

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

Silicate/disilicate

NTA

Polyaspartic acid. Na salt

Bleaching

Perborate mono (as borate)

Perborate tetra (as borate)

EC50 > 1 000

19

125

1-10

1-10

1 000

19

12,5

6

6

Percarbonate (see carbonate)

LC50 = 250

250

EC0 = 500

EC0 = 500

TAED

Solvents

C 1- C 4 alcohols

Monoethanolamine

Diethanolamine

Triethanolamine

Miscellaneous

LC50 = 8 000

0,78

0,78

0,78

Polyvinylpyrrolidon (PVP/PVNO/PVPVI)

EC50 > 100

Phosphonates

EDTA

CMC

Na Sulphate

Mg Sulphate

Na Chloride

Urea

Maleic acid

Malic acid

Ca formiate

Silica

High MW polymers PEG > 4000

7,4

LOEC = 11

LC50 > 250

EC50 = 2 460

EC50 = 788

EC50 = 650

LC50 > 10 000

LC50 = 106

LC50 = 106

100

0,78

0,78

0,78

100

7

11

250

1 000

800

650

100

2,1

2,1

100

100

100

0,8

0,13

0,13

1

1

0,8

0,13

0,13

0,13

0,13

0,13

0,75

0,4

1

0,75

1

1

1

0,13

0,13

0,13

0,13

0,05

0,4

O

O

Y, CF = 0,1

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

Y, CF = 0,1

Y, CF = 0,5

Y, CF = 0,1

Y, CF = 0,1

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

Y

Y

Y

Y

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

Y

Y

O

O

Y

Y

Y

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

Y

Y

Y

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

Y

O

0,0

0,6

1,2

0,0

0,0

0,0

2,0

2,3

2,4

2,3

2

0 (*)

0 (*)

0 (*)

0 (*)

0,0

0,0

0,0

2,1

0,8

0,6

2,0

0,0

0 (*)

.

.

2
2
3
2
0
0
3

E
N

O

f
f
i
c
i
a
l

J
o
u
r
n
a
l

o
f

t
h
e

E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
U
n
o
n

i

L

7
6
/
3
5

DID No

Ingredients

Toxicity

NOEC measured

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

Low MW polymers PEG < 4000
Cumene Sulfonate

Xylene Sulfonate

Toluene Sulfonates

Na-/Mg-/KOH

Enzymes

Perfume formulation as used

Dyes

Starch

Zn Phthalocyanine Sulfonate

LC50 = 66

LC50 = 66

LC50 = 66

LC50 = 25

LC50 = 2-10

LC50 = 10

no data

0,16

Anionic Polyester (Soil release polymer)

EC50 = 310

Iminodisuccinate

Optical brighteners = FWA

FWA 1 (1)

FWA 5 (2)

Additional ingredients

Alkyl Aminoxides (C12-18)

Glycereth (6-17EO) cocoate

Phosphate esters (C12-18)

23

LC0 = 10

3,13

0,08

EC50 = 32

EC50 = 38

LTE

100

6,6

6,6

6,6

100

25

0,02

0,1

250

0,016

310

2,3

1,0

3,13

0,08

1,6

1,9

FWA 1 = Disodium 4.4-bis (4-anilino-5-morpholino-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino stilbene-2.2-disulfonate.
FWA 5 = Disodium 4.4-bis(2-sulfostryryl)biphenyl.

(1)
(2)
(*) THOD for aerobically non degradable organic substances is set to zero.
(**) rapid photodegradation.

Notes:

Loading factor (LF)

Anaerobic non-
biodegradable (a
NBO)

Aerobic non-
biodegradable (a
NBO)

Soluble inorganics
(SI)

Insoluble
inorganics (II)

THOD

0,13

0,13

0,13

0,13

1

0,13

0,1

0,4

0,1

0,07 (**)

0,4

0,13

0,4

0,4

0,05

0,05

0,05

O

Y, CF = 0,25

Y, CF = 0,25

Y, CF = 0,25

O

O

Y, CF = 3,0

Y, CF = 3,0

O

Y, CF = 2,5

Y, CF = 0,1

Y, CF = 0,25

Y,CF = 1,5

Y, CF = 0.5

Y, CF = 2,5

O

Y, CF = 0,25

O

O

O

O

O

O

Y

Y

O

Y

Y

O

Y

Y

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

Y

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

1,1

1,7

1,6

1,4

0,0

2,0

0 (*)

0 (*)

0,97

0 (*)

0 (*)

1,1

0 (*)

0 (*)

3,2

2,1

2,3

L

7
6
/
3
6

E
N

O

f
f
i
c
i
a
l

J
o
u
r
n
a
l

o
f

t
h
e

E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
U
n
o
n

i

= yes, criterion applies.
= no, criterion does not apply.
= long term effect concentration.

Y
O
LTE
NOEC = non observed effect concentration.
CF
THOD = theoretical oxygen demand.

= correction factor for anaerobic non degradable organic substances.

.

.

2
2
3
2
0
0
3

22.3.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 76/37

The following approach applies, as appropriate in the case of ingredients that are not listed on the DID list

Appendix I.B

A q u a t i c to x i c i ty

The lowest validated long-term effect (LTE) data on fish, daphnia magna or algae should be considered for the calculation
of the critical dilution volume criterion (toxicity).

In cases where data on homologues and/or QSARs (quantitative structure activity relationships) are used, a correction
could be considered for the finally selected LTE data.

In the absence of LTE data the following procedure has to be applied in order to estimate the LTE data by using the
specified uncertainty factor (UF) on the data of the most sensitive species:

Non su r fac tants

DATA AVAILABLE

UF TO BE USED

At least 2 acute LC50 on fish or daphnia or algae

1 NOEC on fish or daphnia or algae

2 NOEC on fish or daphnia or algae

3 NOEC on fish, daphnia or algae

100

10

5

1
Take lowest validated NOEC

Deviation from this rule may be admitted if evidence can be provided that lower factors or data can be scientifically
justified. NOEC is the no observed effect concentration (in a chronic toxicity test).

Surfacta nts

DATA AVAILABLE

UF TO BE USED

At least 2 NOECs on fish or daphnia or algae

1 (lowest NOEC)

1 NOEC on fish or daphnia or algae

1 (NOEC, if species is most sensitive in acute toxicity)
10 (NOEC, if species is not the most sensitive in acute
toxicity)

3 LC50 on fish or daphnia or algae

20 (lowest LC50)

At least 1 LC50 on fish, daphnia or algae

50 (lowest LC50)
or 20 in specific cases (see below)

In the last case referred to above, an uncertainty factor of 20 may be used instead of 50 only if 1-2 L(E)C50 (LC50 in case
of fish toxicity, EC50 in case of daphnia or algal toxicity) data are available and if it can be concluded from the informa-
tion for other compounds that the most sensitive species have been tested. Such a rule can be applied only within a
group of homologues. It should be emphasised that the LTEs (long-term effects) used must be consistent within a group
of homologues with respect to the influence of, for example, length of alkyl chain for LAS (linear alkylbenzene sulpho-
nate) or number of EOs (ethoxy groups) for alcohol-ethoxylate if such QSARs can be established.

Any deviation from the described scheme has to be well reasoned for the specific chemical.

Loadi ng factors

Loading factors shall be established according to Commission Directive 93/67/EEC of 20 July 1993 laying down the
principles for assessment of risk to man and the environment of substances (1) notified in accordance with Council Direc-
tive 67/548/EEC and to Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 (2).

(1) OJ L 227, 8.9.1993, p. 9.
(2) OJ L 84, 5.4.1993, p. 1.

L 76/38

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

22.3.2003

Non -bi ode g ra da ble or g a ni c s (a na e r ob i c ): f low di a g ra m to de fi ne c orr e c ti on f a c tor s (CF) ( 1)

RB:

ready aerobic biodegradability

LTE:

long-term effect

CF:

correction factor

(1) The correction factors are to be established on the basis of the ingredient properties and applied to the dosage expressed in g/wash.

22.3.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 76/39

Appendix I.C

Doc u me ntati on of a nae r ob i c bi ode g ra da bi li ty

The following approach may be used to provide the necessary documentation of anaerobic degradability in the case of
ingredients that are not listed in the DID list.

1. Apply reasonable extrapolation. Use test results obtained with one raw material to extrapolate the ultimate anaerobic
degradability of structurally related surfactants. If anaerobic biodegradability has been confirmed for a surfactant (or a
group of homologues) according to the DID list, it can be assumed that a similar type of surfactant is also anaerobi-
cally biodegradable (for example, C12-15 A 1-3 EO sulphate (DID No 8) is anaerobically biodegradable, and a similar
anaerobic biodegradability may also be assumed for C12-15 A 6 EO sulphate). If anaerobic biodegradability has been
confirmed for a surfactant by use of an appropriate test method, it can be assumed that a similar type of surfactant is
also anaerobically biodegradable (for example, literature data confirming the anaerobic biodegradability of surfactants
belonging to the group alkyl ester ammonium salts may be used as documentation for a similar anaerobic biodegrad-
ability of other quaternary ammonium salts containing ester-linkages in the alkyl chain(s)).

2. Perform screening test for anaerobic degradability. If new testing is necessary, perform a screening test by use of ISO

11734, ECETOC No 28 (June 1988) or an equivalent method.

3. Perform low-dosage degradability test. If new testing is necessary, and in the case of experimental problems in the
screening test (for example, inhibition due to toxicity of test substance), repeat testing by using a low dosage of
surfactant and monitor degradation by 14C measurements or chemical analyses. Testing at low dosages may be
performed by use of OECD 308 (August 2000) or an equivalent method.