Order of the Court of First Instance of 21 October 2002 in Case T-97/01: Christos Gogos v Commission of the European Communities (No need to give a judgment)
Date: 2003-01-25
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment (EU), competition (EU), equal treatment, staff assessment

25.1.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 19/35

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 7 October 2002

in Case T-24/01: Claire Staelen v Council of the European
Union and European Parliament (1)

(Officials — Open competition — Delegation of the appoint-
ing authority’s powers — Inadmissibility)

(2003/C 19/66)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-24/01: Claire Staelen, member of the temporary staff
of the European Parliament, residing in Bridel (Luxembourg),
represented by J. Choucroun,
lawyer, with an address for
service in Luxembourg, against Council of the European Union
(Agents: F. Anton and A. Pilette) and European Parliament
(Agents: J.F. De Wachter and D. Moore) — application for
annulment of the entire marking procedure in respect of the
written tests for Competition EUR/A/151/98 or, otherwise,
annulment of the decision of the selection board refusing to
admit her to the tests subsequent to test VII.A.d) and, in the
alternative, for compensation in respect of the non-material
damage allegedly suffered — the Court of First Instance (Fourth
Chamber), composed of M. Vilaras, President of the Chamber,
V. Tiili and P. Mengozzi, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an
order on 7 October 2002, the operative part of which is as
follows:

1.

2.

The application in Case T-24/01 is dismissed as clearly
inadmissible in so far as it is brought against the Council.

Each of the parties shall bear its own costs in the present action
in so far as it is brought against the Council, including those
relating to the proceedings for interim relief.

( 1) OJ C 95, 24.3.2001.

lawyer, against Commission of the European Communities
(Agents: H. Tserepa-Lacombe and J. Currall) — application for,
essentially, annulment of the decision of the selection board
for internal competition COM/A/17/96 not to include the
applicant in the list of successful candidates on the ground
that he did not obtain the minimum requisite number of
marks in the oral test and seeking compensation for the
material and non-material damage allegedly suffered — the
Court of First
Instance (Second Chamber), composed of
N.J. Forwood , President, J. Pirrung and A.W.H. Meij, Judges;
H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 21 October 2002, the
operative part of which is as follows:

1.

2.

There is no need to adjudicate on the present application.

The Commission shall bear the whole of the costs.

(1) OJ C 186, 30.6.2001.

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST
INSTANCE

of 17 October 2002

in Case T-215/02 R: Santiago Gómez-Reino v Commission
of the European Communities

(Procedure for interim relief — Officials — Admissibility —
Act adversely affecting an official)

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(2003/C 19/68)

of 21 October 2002

(Language of the case: French)

in Case T-97/01: Christos Gogos v Commission of the
European Communities (1)

(No need to give a judgment)

(2003/C 19/67)

(Language of the case: Greek)

In Case T-97/01: Christos Gogos, an official of the Commission
of the European Communities, represented by C. Tagaras,

In Case T-215/02 R: Santiago Gómez-Reino, an official of
the Commission of the European Communities, residing in
Brussels, represented by M.-A. Lucas, lawyer, against Com-
mission of the European Communities (Agents: H.P. Hartvig
and J. Currall) — application for interim measures requiring,
first, the production of certain documents, second, the suspen-
sion of a number of decisions or prohibiting decisions to be
investigations conducted by the
taken relating to internal
European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and, third, the adoption of
measures under Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — the