WRITTEN QUESTION E-3190/02 by Armando Cossutta (GUE/NGL) to the Commission. TotalFina-Elf and forced labour.
Date: 2002-11-08
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: EU relations, International Labour Organisation, Myanmar/Burma, UN convention, human rights, oil industry, restriction on competition, slavery, social clause

C 11 E/34

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

15.1.2004

In this context, it is clear that neither the technical, political nor legal feasibility of such trains has been
established. The Commission has therefore made no proposal, nor the Council discussed, the prospects for
Union subsidies for any mode of transport connecting Kaliningrad with mainland Russia.

No discussions have taken place with Russia on the conversion for civil purposes of military port facilities.
Via the Tacis technical assistance programme, the Union is, however, providing on-going assistance for the
development of the Kaliningrad Port in a EUR 998 000 project aimed at strengthening its competitiveness
by attracting national and foreign investments.

The Commission is unaware of any plans to change the name of the Kaliningrad Oblast.

(2004/C 11 E/034)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3190/02

by Armando Cossutta (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(8 November 2002)

Subject: TotalFina-Elf and forced labour

According to the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU), certain multinational
companies, including TotalFina-Elf, have used forced labour in Burma. According to a 350-page report
drawn up by ICFTU, in 2002 this French company paid the ruling military junta in Burma for the use of
civilians removed by force from their villages for the construction of roads and other associated
the Yadana gas pipeline. TotalFina-Elf denies any
infrastructure connected with the completion of
involvement in the incidents referred to, but ICTFU is convinced that, unfortunately, there is a genuine link
between investment by certain multinationals in Burma and the increasing use of forced labour.

1.

Is the Commission aware of these instances of exploitation?

Does the Commission agree that it is unacceptable for European companies to be involved in

2.
situations of this kind?

3. What measures does the Commission intend to take to protect the most fundamental human rights
from abuse by European companies operating outside Union territory?

Does the Commission agree that this question involves not only an affront to human dignity, but

4.
also the infringement of the rules on fair competition?

5. Would it not be appropriate to impose a tax on all goods that Community undertakings produce
outside the Union, thus bypassing the requirements of European social legislation?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(16 December 2002)

The Honourable Member will understand that the Commission is not in a position to comment on a legal
case which currently is under investigation in one of the Member States.

in
The Union has taken a number of measures, set out in its Common Position on Burma/Myanmar,
response to the political situation in the country, as well as to widespread human rights abuses, including
forced labour.

The Common Position was first adopted in 1996 and has been strengthened on a number of occasions
since. It imposes an arms embargo, as well as a ban on the export of any equipment that might be used
for internal repression or terrorism, and suspends defence co-operation and all bilateral aid other than
strictly humanitarian assistance. High level Government visits to Burma/Myanmar are also suspended and
there is a ban on the granting of visas for entry into or transit through the Union to members of the
military regime, members of the government, senior military and security officers and their families, as

15.1.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11 E/35

well as tourism officials. Since April 2000, the list of persons covered by the visa ban has been published
and a freeze has been imposed on funds held abroad by persons included in the list. The Common Position
was recently renewed until 29 April 2003.

As regards trade relations, Community trade privileges, normally granted to developing countries, were
withdrawn from Burma/Myanmar in 1997 because of forced labour. This also means that the country is
not eligible to benefit from the Union’s ‘Everything but Arms’ initiative, launched in 2001, notwithstanding
its status of least developed country.

The Commission strongly supports the International Labour Organisation’s (ILO) role in upholding labour
standards and the significant position it has taken on Burma/Myanmar in relation to the very serious
violation of convention 29 on forced labour. The Commission in common with the Member States has
supported the ILO in using to the maximum extend the procedures foreseen by the Constitution of the
ILO as regards the violation of convention 29 by Burma/Myanmar (Article 33 of the ILO Constitution).
The Commission has informed the ILO of the Union Common Position and the measures taken in that
context. The issue of forced labour has also been raised with the Burmese Government on several
occasions, during the Union Troika visits as well as in the Union-ASEAN dialogue.

The Commission, in common with the Member States, will continue to monitor the situation closely and,
should the authorities in Burma/Myanmar fail to take the necessary steps in this respect, the Commission
will be ready to propose further measures for consideration by the Council.

The Commission has adopted on 2 July 2002 a Communication on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR).
The respect of fundamental rights at work by European companies, wherever they operate, is an important
issue in this Communication. The multi-stakeholders forum launched in October 2002 will also deal with
the development and international dimension of CSR.

The Commission supports the application of the revised (2000) Organisation for Economic Cooperation
and Development guidelines for multinational companies which are also covering the fundamental rights
at work. The Commission has recently also strengthened its cooperation with the ILO in order to promote
the application of core labour standards. In that context, a new exchange of letters has been signed
between the Commissioner responsible for Employment and Social affairs and the Director general of the
ILO, J. Somavia, on the 14 May 2001.

(2004/C 11 E/035)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3192/02

by Salvador Garriga Polledo (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(8 November 2002)

Subject: Chinese tourists in the European Union

According to the World Tourism Organisation (WTO) China will be the first tourist destination in the
world and the fourth source of tourists by 2020. National initiatives by the Member States of the EU in
their relations with China in the field of tourism led to agreements which have been nullified by
Community initiatives.

For this reason a global agreement needs to be negotiated between the European Union and China to take
account of the tourism development potential of such an enormous country, as well as the possible
implications of Chinese immigration in connection with Chinese tourism in the EU.

Can the Commission say what stage has been reached in negotiations between China and the European
Union in the overall context of tourism, in accordance with the negotiating brief it received from the
Council of Ministers and the various developments determined by the national initiatives of the Member
States outside the EU framework?