2002/177/: EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 177/02/COL of 30 October 2002 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings
Date: 2002-10-30
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: administrative procedure, competition, competition law, economic concentration, merger control, self-employed person

27.3.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 80/27

EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA

EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY

EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY DECISION

No 177/02/COL

of 30 October 2002

on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings

THE EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (1), in particular Article 55 thereto,

Having regard to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the establishment of a Surveillance Authority
and a Court of Justice (2), in particular Articles 13 and 14 thereof,

Having consulted the EFTA States,

Having consulted the Commission of the European Communities,

Whereas the right of the parties concerned in competition matters, and of third parties, to be heard before
a final decision affecting their interests is taken, is a fundamental principle of EEA law;

Whereas that right is set out in Chapters IV, XIII and XIV of Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court
Agreement;

Whereas the EFTA Surveillance Authority must ensure that that right is guaranteed in its competition
proceedings;

Whereas conduct of administrative proceedings should therefore be entrusted to an independent person
experienced in competition matters who has the integrity necessary to contribute to the objectivity, trans-
parency and efficiency of those proceedings;

Whereas in order to ensure the independence of the Hearing Officers, that person should be attached, for
administrative purposes, to the College Member responsible for Competition;

Whereas the terms of reference of the Hearing Officers in competition proceedings should be framed in
such a way as to safeguard the right of persons to be heard throughout the whole procedure;

Whereas this Decision should be without prejudice to the general rules granting or excluding access to
documents in the possession of the EFTA Surveillance Authority,

(1) Hereinafter referred to as the EEA Agreement.
(2) Hereinafter referred to as the Surveillance and Court Agreement.

L 80/28

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

27.3.2003

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

I

Article 1

The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall, when necessary for the conduct of its proceedings in competition
cases, appoint one or more Hearing Officers (hereinafter ‘the Hearing Officers’), who shall ensure that the
effective exercise of the right to be heard is respected in competition proceedings before the Authority
under Articles 53, 54 and 57 of the EEA Agreement (1).

Article 2

Any interruption, termination of appointment or transfer of a Hearing Officer by whatever proce-

1.
dure, shall be the subject of a reasoned decision of the College.

2.
In the performance of their duties, Hearing Officers shall act independently and shall be attached, for
administrative purposes to the College Member responsible for Competition (hereinafter ‘the responsible
College Member’).

3. Where a Hearing Officer is unable to act, the responsible College Member, where appropriate after
consultation of the Hearing Officer, shall designate another official, who is not involved in the case in ques-
tion, to carry out the Hearing Officer's duties.

Article 3

In performing their duties, Hearing Officers shall take account of the need for effective application of
1.
the competition rules in accordance with the EEA legislation in force and the principles laid down by the
EFTA Court (2) and the Court of Justice and Court of First Instance of the European Communities.

The Hearing Officers shall be kept informed by the Director responsible for Competition about the
2.
development of the procedure up to the stage of the draft decision to be submitted to the responsible
College Member.

The Hearing Officers may present observations on any matter arising out of any competition

3.
proceedings initiated by the EFTA Surveillance Authority to the responsible College Member.

1.
The Hearing Officers shall organise and conduct the hearings provided for in the provisions imple-
menting Articles 53, 54 and 57 of the EEA Agreement, in accordance with Articles 5 to 13 of this Deci-
sion.

Article 4

2.

The provisions referred to in paragraph 1 are:

(a) Chapter IV of Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement;

(b) Chapter XIV of Protocol 4 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement.

(1) The competence to handle individual cases falling under Articles 53 and 54 of the EEA Agreement is divided between
the EFTA Surveillance Authority and the Commission of the European Communities according to the rules laid down
in Article 56 of the EEA Agreement. Only one authority is competent to handle any given case.

(2) Article 6 of the EEA Agreement provides that, ‘without prejudice to future developments of case law, the provisions
of this Agreement, in so far as they are identical in substance to corresponding rules of the Treaty establishing the
European Community and the Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community and to acts adopted in
application of these two treaties, shall in their implementation and application, be interpreted in conformity with the
relevant rulings of the Court of Justice of the European Communities given prior to the date of signature of this
Agreement’. As regards relevant rulings given after the date of signature of the EEA Agreement, it follows from
Article 3(2) of the Surveillance and Court Agreement that the EFTA Surveillance Authority and the EFTA Court shall
pay due account to the principles laid down by these.

27.3.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 80/29

Article 5

The Hearing Officers shall ensure that the hearing is properly conducted and contributes to the objectivity
of the hearing itself and of any decision taken subsequently. The Hearing Officers shall seek to ensure, in
particular that, in the preparation of draft decisions by the EFTA Surveillance Authority, due account is
taken of all the relevant facts, whether favourable or unfavourable to the parties concerned, including the
factual elements related to the gravity of any infringement.

Article 6

1.
Applications to be heard from third parties, be they persons, undertakings or associations of persons
or undertakings, shall be submitted in writing, together with a written statement explaining the applicant's
interest in the outcome of the procedure.

Decisions as to whether third parties are to be heard shall be taken after consulting the Director

2.
responsible for Competition.

3. Where it is found that an applicant has not shown a sufficient interest to be heard, that person shall
be informed in writing of the reasons for such a finding. A time limit shall be fixed within which that
person may submit any further written comments.

Applications to be heard orally shall be made in the applicant's written comments on letters which

1.
the EFTA Surveillance Authority has addressed to that person.

Article 7

2.

The letters referred to in paragraph 1 are those:

(a) communicating a statement of objections;

(b) inviting the written comments of a third party having shown sufficient interest to be heard;

(c) informing a complainant that, in the EFTA Surveillance Authority's view, there are insufficient grounds
for finding an infringement and inviting that complainant to submit any further written comments.

Decisions as to whether applicants are to be heard orally shall be taken after consulting the Director

3.
responsible for Competition.

Article 8

1. Where a person, an undertaking or an association of persons or undertakings has received one or
more of the letters listed in Article 7(2) of this Decision and has reason to believe that the EFTA Surveil-
lance Authority has in its possession documents which have not been disclosed to it and that those docu-
ments are necessary for the proper exercise of the right to be heard, access to those documents may be
sought by means of a reasoned request.

2.
The reasoned decision on any such request shall be communicated to the person, undertaking or
association that made the request and to any other person, undertaking or association concerned by the
procedure.

Article 9

Where it is intended to disclose information which may constitute a business secret of an undertaking, that
undertaking shall be informed in writing of this intention and the reasons for it. A time limit shall be fixed
within which the undertaking concerned may submit any written comments.

Where the undertaking concerned objects to the disclosure of the information, but it is found that the
information is not protected and may therefore be disclosed, that finding shall be stated in a reasoned deci-
sion which shall be notified to the undertaking concerned. The decision shall specify the date after which
the information will be disclosed. This date shall not be less than one week from the date of notification.

The first and second paragraphs shall apply mutatis mutandis to the disclosure of information by publication
in the EEA section of the Official Journal of the European Union and the EEA supplement to the Official
Journal of the European Union.

L 80/30

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

27.3.2003

Article 10

Where a person, undertaking or association of persons or undertakings considers that the time limit
imposed for its reply to a letter referred to in Article 7(2) of this Decision is too short, it may, within the
original time limit, seek an extension of that time limit by means of a reasoned request. The applicant shall
be informed in writing whether the request has been granted.

Article 11

Where appropriate, in view of the need to ensure that the hearing is properly prepared, and particularly
that questions of fact are clarified as far as possible, the Hearing Officers may, after consulting the Director
responsible for Competition, supply to the parties invited to the hearing a list of the questions on which
the Hearing Officers wish them to make known their views in advance.

For this purpose, after consulting the Director responsible for Competition, the Hearing Officers may hold
a meeting with the parties invited to the hearing and, where appropriate, the staff of the EFTA Surveillance
Authority, in order to prepare for the hearing itself.

The Hearing Officers may also ask for prior written notification of the essential contents of the intended
statement of persons whom the parties invited to the hearing have proposed for hearing.

Article 12

1.
After consulting the Director responsible for Competition, the Hearing Officers shall determine the
date, the duration and the place of the hearing. Where a postponement is requested, the Hearing Officers
shall decide whether or not to allow it.

2.

The Hearing Officers shall be fully responsible for the conduct of the hearing.

3.
The Hearing Officers shall decide whether fresh documents should be admitted during the hearing,
what persons should be heard on behalf of a party and whether the persons concerned should be heard
separately or in the presence of other persons attending the hearing.

4. Where appropriate, in view of the need to ensure the right to be heard, the Hearing Officers may,
after consulting the Director responsible for Competition, afford persons, undertakings, and associations of
persons or undertakings the opportunity of submitting further written comments after the oral hearing.
The Hearing Officers shall fix a date by which such submissions may be made. The EFTA Surveillance
Authority shall not be obliged to take into account written comments received after that date.

Article 13

1.
The Hearing Officers shall report to the responsible College Member on the hearing and the conclu-
sions the Hearing Officers have drawn from it, with regard to the respect of the right to be heard. The
observations in this report shall concern procedural issues, including disclosure of documents and access to
the file, time limits for replying to the statement of objections and the proper conduct of the oral hearing.

A copy of the report shall be given to the Director responsible for Competition.

In addition to the report referred to in paragraph 1, the Hearing Officers may make observations on
2.
the further progress of the proceedings. Such observations may relate, among other things, to the need for
further information, the withdrawal of certain objections, or the formulation of further objections.

Article 14

Where appropriate, the Hearing Officers may report on the objectivity of any enquiry conducted in order
to assess the competition impact of commitments proposed in relation to any proceeding initiated by the
EFTA Surveillance Authority in application of the provisions referred to in Article 1 of this Decision. This
shall cover in particular the selection of respondents and the methodology used.

27.3.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 80/31

Article 15

The Hearing Officers shall, on the basis of the draft decision to be submitted to the Advisory Committee
established in furtherance to Articles 53, 54 and 57 of the EEA Agreement, in the case in question prepare
a final report in writing on the respect of the right to be heard, as referred to in Article 13(1) of this Deci-
sion. This report will also consider whether the draft decision deals only with objections in respect of
which the parties have been afforded the opportunity of making known their views, and, where appro-
priate, the objectivity of any enquiry within the meaning of Article 14 of this Decision.

The final report shall be submitted to the responsible College Member and the Director responsible for
Competition. It shall be communicated to the competent authorities of the EFTA States and, in accordance
with the provisions on cooperation laid down in Protocol 23 and Protocol 24 of the EEA Agreement, to
the Commission of the European Communities.

Article 16

The Hearing Officers' final report shall be attached to the draft decision submitted to the College, in
1.
order to ensure that, when it reaches a decision on an individual case, the College is fully appraised of all
relevant information as regards the course of the procedure and respect of the right to be heard.

The final report may be modified by the Hearing Officers in the light of any amendments to the draft

2.
decision up to the time the decision is adopted by the College.

3.
The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall communicate the Hearing Officers' final report, together with
the decision, to the addressees of the decision. It shall publish the Hearing Officers' final report in the EEA
Section of the Official Journal of the European Union and the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the
European Union, together with the decision, having regard to the legitimate interest of undertakings in the
protection of their business secrets.

This decision shall be authentic in the English language and shall be published in the EEA Section of the
Official Journal of the European Union and the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union.

II

The EFTA States shall be informed by means of a copy of the Decision.

III

IV

The Commission of the European Communities shall be informed by means of a copy of the Decision.

Done at Brussels, 30 October 2002.

For the EFTA Surveillance Authority

The President

Einar M. BULL