Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 July 2002 in Case T-70/01: Pier V. Aimone v Court of Justice of the European Communities (Officials — Leave on personal grounds — Refusal to reintegrate — Automatic dismissal — Articles 40(4)(d) and 49, second paragraph, of the Staff Regulations)
Date: 2002-09-28
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: Court of Justice of the European Union, European official, action for annulment (EU), dismissal, regulations for civil servants, unpaid leave

C 233/22

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

28.9.2002

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 9 July 2002

of 9 July 2002

in Case T-233/01: Daniel Caillebout v Commission of the
European Communities (1)

in Case T-70/01: Pier V. Aimone v Court of Justice of the
European Communities (1)

(Officials — Promotion — Absence of definitive staff report
— Consideration of the comparative merits)

(Officials — Leave on personal grounds — Refusal to
reintegrate — Automatic dismissal — Articles 40(4)(d)
and 49, second paragraph, of the Staff Regulations)

(2002/C 233/41)

(Language of the case: French)

(2002/C 233/40)

(Language of the case: Italian)

In Case T-70/01: Pier V. Aimone, a former official at the Court
of Justice of the European Communities, residing in Fribourg
(Switzerland), represented by R. Ventura, lawyer, against Court
of Justice of the European Communities (Agents: M. Schauss
et A. Dal Ferro) — application for, first, annulment of the
decision of the Court of Justice of 22 May 2000 automatically
removing the official from his post with effect from 1 June
2000 and, secondly, compensation to make good the non-
material and psycho-physiological damage allegedly suffered
as a result of that decision — the Court of First Instance (Fifth
J.D. Cooke, President, R. García-
Chamber) composed of
Valdecasas and P. Lindh, Judges; J. Palacio González, Adminis-
trator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 9 July 2002, in
which it:

1.

dismisses the application for annulment;

2.

dismisses the claim for compensation;

3.

orders the parties to bear their own costs.

( 1) OJ C 150 of 19.5.2001.

(Luxembourg),

In Case T-233/01: Daniel Caillebout, an official of the Com-
mission of the European Communities, residing in Mondorf-
les-Bains
represented by J.-N. Louis and
V. Peere, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg,
against Commission of the European Communities (Agent:
the
C. Berardis-Kayser) — application for annulment of
decision of
to
the Commission of 14 August 2000 not
promote the applicant to Grade B 2 in the 2000 promotions
procedure — the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber),
composed of M. Jaeger, President, K. Lenaerts and J. Azizi,
Judges; J. Plingers, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a
judgment on 9 July 2002, in which it:

1.

annuls the decision of the Commission of 14 August 2000 not
to promote the applicant to Grade B 2 in the 2000 promotions
procedure;

2.

orders the Commission to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 331 of 24.11.2001.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 14 June 2002

in Case T-173/01: Asahi Vet SA v Commission of the
European Communities (1)

(Authorisation of an additive in animal feedingstuffs — No
need to rule)

(2002/C 233/42)

(Language of the Case: German)

In Case T-173/01: Asahi Vet SA, established in Barcelona
(Spain), represented by C. Bittner, Lawyer, against Commission