WRITTEN QUESTION E-2641/02 by Daniel Hannan (PPE-DE) to the Commission. EU sanctions damaging EU businesses.
Date: 2002-09-20
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: CCT duties, United States, business activity, common commercial policy, common tariff policy, economic consequence, iron and steel product, pip fruit, small and medium-sized enterprises, trade dispute

21.11.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280 E/11

Operations are well on track.

The sixth decision amounting to EUR 17 645 million is currently at the internal consultation stage and
should be approved by the Commission shortly.

A table indicating precisely the contents of the decision is sent direct to the Honourable Member and to
Parliament’s Secretariat.

(2003/C 280 E/012)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2641/02

by Daniel Hannan (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(20 September 2002)

Subject: EU sanctions damaging EU businesses

In my constituency there is a company which imports apples from America outside the English season.
These are now subject to 100 % import duty. The result is that the company fears for its own viability and
for the futures of its 70 employees.

This seems wholly unjust, as well as illogical. EU business interests, EU jobs and EU consumer choice are
being damaged by these sanctions.

Will the Commission reconsider this question and remove apples from the list of sanctioned goods?

Answer given by Mr Lamy on behalf of the Commission

(8 October 2002)

The Honourable Member is misinformed. Apples are not currently subject to 100 per cent import duty.

In response to the protectionist and World Trade Organisation (WTO)
incompatible American steel
safeguards, the Commission acted to preserve all the Community’s rights under the WTO agreements. This
included putting forward the proposal that was adopted by the Council on 13 June 2002 (1).

The purpose of this Regulation was to encourage the United States not to apply additional tariffs to steel
products of interest to European exporters and to withdraw its safeguard measure as soon as it is
condemned by the WTO. Failing to act in this way to limit the damage the American measures will cause
to the European steel industry would indeed have threatened Union business interests and Union jobs.

The Regulation has two annexes. Annex II lists products originating in the United States on which
additional duties ranging from 8 to 30 % would be imposed unless the United States withdraws its
safeguard measures when they are condemned by the WTO (sometime next year).

Annex I lists of products on which a 100 % additional duty could be imposed before that date. However,
the effective application of this additional duty would require a new Council Decision, as specified in
Article 3 of the Regulation. This issue will be considered at the Council’s September 2002 session. As a
result, although red apples are indeed listed in Annex I, no additional duty has yet been imposed on these
or any other products.

Finally, to take account of the exclusion of some steel products from the American safeguard measures, the
Commission will re-examine all the products included on the lists before any additional duties are levied
on imports from the United States.

(1) Regulation (EC) No 1031/2002 of 13 June 2002 establishing additional customs duties on imports of certain

products originating in the United States of America (cid:1) OJ L 157, 15.6.2002.