Judgment of the Court of First Instance 11 July 2002 in Case T-205/99: Hyper Srl v Commission of the European Communities (Customs duties — Importation of television sets from India — Invalid certificates of origin — Application for remission of import duties — Article 13(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1430/79 — Rights of the defence — Special situation)
Date: 2002-09-14
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: CCT duties, Italy, action for annulment (EU), import, television equipment

C 219/16

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

14.9.2002

2. Annuls Articles 3 of Decision 1999/84 in so far as it obliges
the Kingdom of Spain to recover State aid granted in the form
of debt cancellation by public bodies.

3. Dismisses the remainder of the application.

4. Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and 30 % of the

costs incurred by the applicant.

5. Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 12 June 2002

in Case T-66/00: B v Commission of the European
Communities (1)

(Officials — Education allowance — Dependent child allow-
ance — Conditions of grant — Recovery of undue payment)

( 1) OJ C 246 of 28.8.1999.

(2002/C 219/41)

(Language of the case: French)

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

11 July 2002

in Case T-205/99: Hyper Srl v Commission of the Euro-
pean Communities (1)

In Case T-66/00: B, an official of the Commission of the
European Communities, residing at Tervuren (Belgium), rep-
resented by J.-N. Louis, G.-F. Parmentier and V. Peere, lawyers,
with an address for service in Luxembourg, v Commission of
the European Communities (Agent: J. Currall) — application
for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 4 March
1999 discontinuing, with effect from 1 September 1997, the
education allowance and dependent child allowance paid to
the applicant — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber),
composed of: M. Vilaras, President, and V. Tiili and P. Mengoz-
zi, Judges; D. Christensen, Administrator, for the Registrar, has
given a judgment on 12 June 2002, in which it:

(Customs duties — Importation of television sets from India
— Invalid certificates of origin — Application for remission
of import duties — Article 13(1) of Regulation (EEC)
No 1430/79 — Rights of the defence — Special situation)

1. Dismisses the application;

2. Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

(2002/C 219/40)

(1) OJ C 135 of 13.5.2000.

(Language of the case: German)

In Case T-205/99, Hyper Srl, established in Limena (Italy),
represented by D. Ehle and D. Ehle, Rechtsanwälte, with an
address for service in Luxembourg, v Commission of the
European Communities (Agents: J.-C. Schieferer and M. Nun˜ez-
Müller): Application for annulment of Commission Decision
REM 14/98 of 5 February 1999 finding that the remission of
import duties due from the applicant in respect of television
sets imported from India is not justified, the Court of First
Instance (Third Chamber), composed of: M. Jaeger, President,
K. Lenaerts and J. Azizi, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has given a
judgment on 11 July 2002, in which it:

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

9 July 2002

in Case T-333/00: Rougemarine SARL v Commission of
the European Communities (1)

(Programme encouraging the development and distribution
of European audiovisual works (MEDIA II) — Decision to
award financial support — Refusal — Implied reasons)

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

( 1) OJ C 333 of 20.11.1999.

(2002/C 219/42)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-333/00, Rougemarine SARL, established in Paris
(France), represented by T. Levy and O. Rezlan, lawyers, with