do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1523/2002 of 26 August 2002 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2002-08-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, grape, import price, perennial vegetable, pip fruit, stone fruit

27.8.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

L 229/5

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1523/2002

of 26 August 2002

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and
vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

(2)

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community,

In compliance with the above criteria,
the standard
import values must be fixed at the levels set out in the
Annex to this Regulation,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of
21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the
import arrangements
last
amended by Regulation (EC) No 1498/98 (2), and in particular
Article 4(1) thereof,

fruit and vegetables (1), as

for

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Whereas:

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 lays down, pursuant to the
outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade nego-
tiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the
standard values for imports from third countries,
in
respect of the products and periods stipulated in the
Annex thereto.

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regula-
tion (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex
hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 August 2002.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 August 2002.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Agriculture Director-General

(1) OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66.
(2) OJ L 198, 15.7.1998, p. 4.

L 229/6

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

27.8.2002

to the Commission Regulation of 26 August 2002 establishing the standard import values for determining the
entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

ANNEX

CN code

0702 00 00

0707 00 05

0709 90 70

0805 50 10

0806 10 10

0808 10 20, 0808 10 50, 0808 10 90

0808 20 50

0809 30 10, 0809 30 90

0809 40 05

Third country
code (1)

Standard import
value

(EUR/100 kg)

052
999
052
999
052
999
388
528
999
052
220
400
999
388
400
508
512
528
720
800
804
999
052
388
512
528
999
052
999
052
060
064
066
624
999

68,0
68,0
88,5
88,5
78,8
78,8
57,8
51,5
54,6
77,2
270,7
196,7
181,5
84,4
96,3
97,3
83,2
51,4
70,9
182,5
88,7
94,3
114,9
84,0
97,8
93,1
97,5
109,2
109,2
70,3
63,5
58,0
56,1
184,4
86,5

(1) Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2020/2001 (OJ L 273, 16.10.2001, p. 6). Code ‘999’ stands for ‘of

other origin’.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1528/2002 of 26 August 2002 on the issue of system B export licences in the fruit and vegetables sector
Date: 2002-08-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: export licence, export refund, pip fruit

L 229/14

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

27.8.2002

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1528/2002

of 26 August 2002

on the issue of system B export licences in the fruit and vegetables sector

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Community,

(3)

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1961/2001
of 8 October 2001 on detailed rules for implementing Council
Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 as regards export refunds on fruit
and vegetables (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No
1176/2002 (2), and in particular Article 6(6) thereof,

Whereas:

(1)

(2)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1110/2002 (3) fixes the
indicative quantities for system B export licences other
than those sought in the context of food aid.

In the light of the information available to the Commis-
sion today, there is a risk that the indicative quantities
laid down for the current export period for apples will
shortly be exceeded. This overrun will prejudice the

proper working of the export refund scheme in the fruit
and vegetables sector.

To avoid this situation, applications for system B licences
for apples exported after 26 August 2002 should be
rejected until the end of the current export period,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Applications for system B export licences for apples submitted
pursuant to Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1110/2002, export
declarations for which are accepted after 26 August 2002 and
before 17 September 2002, are hereby rejected.

This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 August 2002.

Article 2

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 August 2002.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Agriculture Director-General

(1) OJ L 268, 9.10.2001, p. 8.
(2) OJ L 170, 29.6.2002, p. 69.
(3) OJ L 168, 27.6.2002, p. 8.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2431/02 by Graham Watson (ELDR) to the Commission. Injection of growth hormone into dairy cattle.
Date: 2002-08-26
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: dairy cow, hormone, marketing, veterinary legislation

C 28 E/238

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

6.2.2003

The Commission is fully aware of the potential conflict between public health objectives and commercial
interests of
the
industry. But as a consequence of
Commission usually is not informed about particular advertising campaigns in the Member States. This is
also true for the campaign by Novartis for Lamisil®.

the shared responsibilities,

the pharmaceutical

(1) OJ L 311, 28.11.2001.

(2003/C 28 E/268)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2431/02

by Graham Watson (ELDR) to the Commission

(26 August 2002)

Subject: Injection of growth hormone into dairy cattle

With the current EU moratorium due to expire on 16 December 2002, what steps is the Commission
taking in order to ensure the continued ban on the injection of growth hormone into dairy cattle to
promote bigger milk yields?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(24 September 2002)

It is assumed that the question of the Honourable Member refers to the prohibition of use of bovine
somatotrophin (BST) established by Council Decision 1999/879/EC of 17 December 1999 concerning the
placing on the market and administration of bovine somatotrophin (BST) and repealing Decision 90/218/
EEC (1). The prohibition of use in this Decision has no time limit.

(1) OJ L 331, 23.12.1999.

(2003/C 28 E/269)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2435/02

by Christoph Konrad (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(26 August 2002)

Subject: Varying age limits for appointment to and exercise of the profession of notary in the EU

1.
In view of the principle of equal rights, how does the Commission view the fact that varying national
provisions are in force in the EU Member States with regard to age limits for appointment to and exercise
of the profession of notary?

2.
Is it aware that, in the Netherlands and in Belgium, for example, there are no age limits for notaries,
while an age limit of 70 is to be introduced in Germany? What rules are in force in other EU Member
States?

Has consideration been given to how this unequal treatment should be combated in the internal

3.
market, or have decisions already been taken on the subject?

Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(1 October 2002)

The question seems to imply that the existence in the Member States of various rules regarding access to
the profession of notary might constitute a breach of the principle of equal treatment. It derives from
consistent case-law (1) that the principle of equal treatment enshrined in Article 12 of the EC Treaty is not
concerned with disparities in treatment or the distortions which may result from divergences existing
between the laws of the various Member States, so long as the latter affect all persons subject to them, in