do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.2862 — Kone/Partek) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2002-08-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agricultural machinery, building services, economic concentration, hoisting equipment, lift, machinery, merger control, restrictive-practice authorisation

24.8.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 201/17

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

— Magna: supplier for the car industry,

— Donnelly: supplier for the car industry.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified concentration could fall within

3.
the scope of Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit

4.
proposed operation.

their possible observations on the

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication.
Observations can be sent by fax (No (32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference
COMP/M.2901 — Magna/Donnelly, to:

European Commission,
Directorate-General for Competition,
Directorate B — Merger Task Force,
J-70,
B-1049 Brussels.

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.2862 — Kone/Partek)

(2002/C 201/06)

On 1 August 2002 the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare
it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation
(EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in English and will be made public after it
is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

— in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document No 302M2862. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.
Case T-183/02: Action brought on 11 June 2002 by El Corte Inglés, S.A. against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market
Date: 2002-08-24
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), paints and varnishes

24.8.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 202/33

Grounds of claim:

— Irregularity of the procedure
in that the appeal was reas-
signed to another Board of
appeal and that the applicant
the
was not
informed of
change of name of
the
opponent.

— Failure of

the Board of
Appeal to provide reasons
for its decision.

— Breach of

the concept of

‘likelihood of confusion’.

— Misuse of

rights by the
opponent in that it has not
made any use of the mark
objected to.

Action brought on 11 June 2002 by El Corte Inglés, S.A.
against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
Market

(Case T-183/02)

(2002/C 202/54)

(Language of the case: Spanish)

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Com-
munity trade mark:

The applicant.

Community trade mark Word mark MUNDICOR (appli-
cation published in Community
applied for:
Trade Mark Bulletin No 27/98,
p. 600, 14 April 1998) for goods
in the 42 classes of the nomencla-
ture.

Owner of the mark or
sign relied on in the
opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign opposed:

Gonza´lez Cabello S.A.

Spanish mark MUNDICOLOR for
goods in class 2 (colours, varnish-
es, lacquers, preservatives against
rust and against deterioration of
wood; colorants; mordants; raw
natural resins; metals in foil and
powder form for painters, decor-
ators, printers and artists).

Decision of
sition division:

the oppo-

Application allowed.

Decision of the Board of
Appeal:

Dismissal of the appeal brought
by El Corte Inglés S.A.

Pleas in law relied on:

Misapplication of Article 8(1)(b)
of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (like-
lihood of confusion).

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
Market was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
European Communities on 11 June 2002 by El Corte Inglés,
S.A. of Madrid, represented by Juan Luis Rivas Zurdo.

Action brought on 11 June 2002 by El Corte Inglés, S.A.
against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
Market

The applicant claims that the Court should:

— annul the decision of 22.3.02 of OHIM’s First Board of
Appeal and the decision of 17.9.99 of OHIM’s opposition
division;

— allow registration of Community Trade Mark No 557108
‘MUNDICOR’ to proceed for all goods claimed in Class 2;

— order the opponent(s) to pay the costs.

(Case T-184/02)

(2002/C 202/55)

(Language of the case: Spanish)

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
Market was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
European Communities on 11 June 2002 by El Corte Inglés,
S.A. of Madrid, represented by Juan Luis Rivas Zurdo.
Order of the Court of First Instance of 29 May 2002 in Case T-21/02: Giuseppe Atzeni and Others v Commission of the European Communities (Action for annulment — Commission Decision 97/612/EC — State aid — Agricultural sector — Time-limits for bringing proceedings — Time-bar — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2002-08-24
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, Italy, State aid, action for annulment (EU), aid to agriculture, company in difficulties, competition, farming sector, infringement of EU law

C 202/28

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

24.8.2002

1.

2.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

The applicant is ordered to pay the costs.

of 29 May 2002

(1) OJ C 212 of 28.7.01.

in Case T-21/02: Giuseppe Atzeni and Others v Com-
mission of the European Communities (1)

(Action for annulment — Commission Decision 97/612/EC
— State aid — Agricultural sector — Time-limits for
bringing proceedings — Time-bar — Inadmissibility)

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(2002/C 202/46)

of 7 June 2002

(Language of the case: Italian)

in Case T-290/01: Land Brandenburg v Commission of the
European Communities (1)

(Action for annulment — No need to adjudicate)

(2002/C 202/45)

(Language of the case: German)

In Case T-290/01: Land Brandenburg, represented by the
Ministry of Agriculture, Environment and Land Management,
Potsdam (Germany), represented by G. Schohe and T. Masing,
lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against
Commission of the European Communities (Agents: G. zur
Hausen and M. Nu´ n˜ ez-Müllers) — application for annulment
of the decision of the Commission contained in order for
recovery No 3240305411 of 13 September 2001 — the Court
of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of J.D. Cooke,
President, R. Garcı´a-Valdecasas and P. Lindh, Judges; H. Jung,
Registrar, made an order on 7 June 2002, the operative part of
which is as follows:

1.

2.

There is no need to adjudicate on the present action.

The Commission shall bear the costs.

(1) OJ 2002 C 44.

In Case T-21/02: Giuseppe Atzeni, residing at Serdiana (Italy),
and Others, represented by G. Dore and F. Ciulli, lawyers,
v Commission of the European Communities (Agents: D. Tri-
antafyllou and V. Di Bucci) — application, principally, for
annulment of Commission Decision 97/612/EC of 16 April
1997 on aid granted by the Region of Sardinia, Italy, in the
agriculture sector (OJ 1997 L 248, p. 27), alternatively for
partial annulment of that decision to the extent that it provides
for repayment of the aid granted — the Court of First Instance
(Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition),
composed of:
J.D. Cooke, President, and R. Garcı´a-Valdecasas, P. Lindh,
N.J. Forwood and H. Legal, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an
order on 29 May 2002, the operative part of which is as
follows:

1.

2.

3.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

There is no need to rule on the Council’s application for leave to
intervene.

The applicants are to bear their own costs and to pay the costs
of the Commission, including those relating to the procedure
for interim measures.

(1) OJ C 118 of 18.5.2002.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.2803 — Telia/Sonera) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2002-08-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Finland, Sweden, economic concentration, merger control, restrictive-practice authorisation, telecommunications

24.8.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 201/19

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.2821 — Hitachi/IBM Harddisk Business)

(2002/C 201/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 2 August 2002 the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare
it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation
(EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in English and will be made public after it
is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

— in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document No 302M2821. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.2803 — Telia/Sonera)

(2002/C 201/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 10 July 2002 the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it
compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EEC)
No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in English and will be made public after it is
cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

— in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document No 302M2803. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.
Removal from the register of Case T-382/00
Date: 2002-08-24
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: Council of the European Union, United States, action for annulment (EU), drafting of EU law, hormone, veterinary medicinal product

24.8.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 202/39

Removal from the register of Case T-382/00 (1)

Removal from the register of Case T-238/01 (1)

(2002/C 202/66)

(Language of the Case: English)

(2002/C 202/68)

(Language of the Case: French)

By order of 30 May 2002 the President of the Second Chamber
of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities
ordered the removal from the register of Case T-382/00:
Monsanto Company v Council of the European Union.

(1) OJ C 61 of 24.2.2001.

By order of 28 May 2002 the President of the Fifth Chamber
of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities
ordered the removal from the register of Case T-238/01:
Centre Européen pour la statistique et le développement A.s.b.l.
(CESD — Communautaire, A.s.b.l.) v Commission of the
European Communities.

(1) OJ C 331 of 24.11.2001.

Removal from the register of Joined Cases T-143/01 and
T-161/01 (1)

(2002/C 202/67)

(Language of the Case: French)

By order of 4 June 2002 the President of the Second Chamber
of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities
ordered the removal from the register of Joined Cases T-143/
01 and T-161/01: Raymond Maxwell and Liam O’Bradaigh
v Commission of the European Communities.

(1) OJ C 245 of 01.09.2001 and C 289 of 13.10.2001.

Removal from the register of Case T-2/02 (1)

(2002/C 202/69)

(Language of the Case: Spanish)

By order of 7 June 2002 the President of the Second Chamber
of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities
ordered the removal from the register of Case T-2/02: Guiller-
mo Balmori Abella v Commission of the European Communi-
ties.

(1) OJ C 68 of 16.3.2002.
Removal from the register of Joined Cases T-143/01 and T-161/01
Date: 2002-08-24
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU national, European Commission, action for annulment (EU), competition (EU), equal treatment

24.8.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 202/39

Removal from the register of Case T-382/00 (1)

Removal from the register of Case T-238/01 (1)

(2002/C 202/66)

(Language of the Case: English)

(2002/C 202/68)

(Language of the Case: French)

By order of 30 May 2002 the President of the Second Chamber
of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities
ordered the removal from the register of Case T-382/00:
Monsanto Company v Council of the European Union.

(1) OJ C 61 of 24.2.2001.

By order of 28 May 2002 the President of the Fifth Chamber
of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities
ordered the removal from the register of Case T-238/01:
Centre Européen pour la statistique et le développement A.s.b.l.
(CESD — Communautaire, A.s.b.l.) v Commission of the
European Communities.

(1) OJ C 331 of 24.11.2001.

Removal from the register of Joined Cases T-143/01 and
T-161/01 (1)

(2002/C 202/67)

(Language of the Case: French)

By order of 4 June 2002 the President of the Second Chamber
of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities
ordered the removal from the register of Joined Cases T-143/
01 and T-161/01: Raymond Maxwell and Liam O’Bradaigh
v Commission of the European Communities.

(1) OJ C 245 of 01.09.2001 and C 289 of 13.10.2001.

Removal from the register of Case T-2/02 (1)

(2002/C 202/69)

(Language of the Case: Spanish)

By order of 7 June 2002 the President of the Second Chamber
of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities
ordered the removal from the register of Case T-2/02: Guiller-
mo Balmori Abella v Commission of the European Communi-
ties.

(1) OJ C 68 of 16.3.2002.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.2821 — Hitachi/IBM Harddisk Business) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2002-08-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electrical industry, information technology industry, merger control, restrictive-practice authorisation

24.8.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 201/19

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.2821 — Hitachi/IBM Harddisk Business)

(2002/C 201/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 2 August 2002 the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare
it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation
(EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in English and will be made public after it
is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

— in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document No 302M2821. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.2803 — Telia/Sonera)

(2002/C 201/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 10 July 2002 the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it
compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EEC)
No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in English and will be made public after it is
cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

— in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document No 302M2803. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.2761 — BP/VEBA OEL) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2002-08-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, natural gas, oil refining, petroleum exploration, petroleum product, production, restrictive-practice authorisation, sale, solar energy

C 201/20

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

24.8.2002

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.2723 — RTL/Prosiebensat.1/VG Media)

(2002/C 201/11)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 21 May 2002 the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare
it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation
(EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in German and will be made public after
it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

— in electronic form in the ‘CDE’ version of the CELEX database, under document No 302M2723. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.2761 — BP/VEBA OEL)

(2002/C 201/12)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 1 July 2002 the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it
compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EEC)
No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in English and will be made public after it is
cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

— in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document No 302M2761. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.2723 — RTL/Prosiebensat.1/VG Media) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2002-08-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: copyright, economic concentration, management, merger control, restrictive-practice authorisation, television

C 201/20

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

24.8.2002

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.2723 — RTL/Prosiebensat.1/VG Media)

(2002/C 201/11)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 21 May 2002 the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare
it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation
(EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in German and will be made public after
it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

— in electronic form in the ‘CDE’ version of the CELEX database, under document No 302M2723. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.2761 — BP/VEBA OEL)

(2002/C 201/12)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 1 July 2002 the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it
compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EEC)
No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in English and will be made public after it is
cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

— in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document No 302M2761. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.2885 — Corus/Redrow/JV) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2002-08-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: business lease, economic concentration, iron and steel industry, merger control, purchase, residence, restrictive-practice authorisation, sale

C 201/18

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

24.8.2002

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.2847 — CVC/Six Vendex KBB)

(2002/C 201/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 18 July 2002 the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it
compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC)
No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in English and will be made public after it is
cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

— in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document No 302M2847. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.2885 — Corus/Redrow/JV)

(2002/C 201/08)

On 9 August 2002 the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare
it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation
(EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is only available in English and will be made public after it
is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European

Communities (see list on the last page),

— in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document No 302M2885. CELEX

is the computerised documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

EUR-OP,
Information, Marketing and Public Relations,
2, rue Mercier,
L-2985 Luxembourg.
Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.