Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 27 June 2002 of 27 June 2002 in Joined Cases T-373/00, T-27/01, T-56/01 and T-69/01: Carmine Salvatore Tralli v European Central Bank (Officials — Staff of the European Central Bank — Extension of trial period — Dismissal during trial period — Admissibility — Manifest error of assessment — Statement of reasons — Costs)
Date: 2002-08-24
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Central Bank, European official, action for annulment (EU), dismissal, probationary period, servant (EU), work contract

C 202/24

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

24.8.2002

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 11 June 2002

of 27 June 2002

in Case T-365/00: Alsace International Car Service SARL
(AICS) v European Parliament (1)

(Public contracts for the provision of services — Transport
of persons using vehicles with drivers during sessions of the
Parliament in Strasbourg — Conformity with French law)

of 27 June 2002 in Joined Cases T-373/00, T-27/01, T-56/
01 and T-69/01: Carmine Salvatore Tralli v European
Central Bank (1)

(Officials — Staff of the European Central Bank — Exten-
sion of trial period — Dismissal during trial period —
Admissibility — Manifest error of assessment — Statement
of reasons — Costs)

(2002/C 202/36)

(2002/C 202/35)

(Language of the case: German)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-365/00, Alsace International Car Service SARL
(AICS), established in Strasbourg (France), represented by
lawyers, with an address
J.C. Fourgoux and J.L. Fourgoux,
for service in Luxembourg, v European Parliament (Agents:
O. Caisou-Rousseau and D. Peterheim): Application for annul-
ment of the European Parliament’s decision of 4 October
2000 rejecting the applicant’s request of 5 September 2000
concerning the validity of the contract entered into between
the Parliament and Coopérative Taxi 13 and, secondly, for
damages for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicant as a
result of that decision, the Court of First Instance (Fifth
Chamber), composed of: J.D. Cooke, President, R. Garcı´a-
Valdecasas and P. Lindh, Judges; D. Christensen, Administrator,
for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 11 June 2002, in
which it:

In Joined Cases T-373/00, T-27/01, T-56/01 et T-69/01:
Carmine Salvatore Tralli, former employee of the European
Central Bank, residing in Nidderau (Germany), represented by
lawyers, with an
N. Pflüger, R. Steiner and S. Mittländer,
address for service in Luxembourg, against European Central
Bank (Agents: A. Sa´inz de Vicun˜ a Barroso, M. Benisch,
V. Saintot and B. Wägenbaur) — applications for annulment
of the decision of 18 September 2000 extending the trial
period in respect of the applicant’s employment contract, the
decision of 29 November 2000 dismissing the applicant, the
decisions rejecting complaints relating to the abovementioned
decisions to extend the trial period and to dismiss the applicant
and an application for a finding that the President of the
European Central Bank failed to act when he unlawfully
refrained from replying to the complaint
lodged by the
applicant against the decision to extend the trial period — the
Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of M. Jae-
ger, President, K. Lenaerts and J. Azizi, Judges; D. Christensen,
Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 27 June
2002, in which it:

1.

Joined Cases T-373/00, T-27/01, T-56/01 and T-69/01 for
the purposes of the judgment.

1. Annuls the Parliament’s decision of 4 October 2000 rejecting

the applicant’s request of 5 September 2000;

2. Dismisses Case T-373/00.

2.

Rejects the claim for compensation;

3. Orders the Parliament to pay the costs including those reserved
by the order of the Court of First Instance of 8 May 2001.

(1) OJ C 28 of 27.1.2001.

3.

Finds that there is no need to adjudicate in Cases T-27/01,
T-56/01 and T-69/01.

4. Orders each party in Case T-373/00 to bear its own costs.

5. Orders the applicant in Cases T-27/01, T-56/01 and T-69/
01 to bear his own costs and pay a third of those incurred by
the defendant.

(1) OJ C 61 of 24.2.2001, C 134 of 5.5.2001, C 150 of 19.5.2001

and C 173 of 16.6.2001.