Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 June 2002 in Case C-211/00 P: Ciments Français SA v Commission of the European Communities (Appeals — Competition — Cement — Article 85(1) of the EC Treaty (now, Article 81(1) EC) — Appeal in part manifestly unfounded)
Date: 2002-08-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EC Decision, European Commission, action for annulment (EU), cement, inter-company cooperation

C 191/10

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

10.8.2002

The second ground of appeal is dismissed in its entirety as in
part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.

— the second, third and seventh heads of the fourth plea in

law,

1.

2.

Costs are reserved.

(1) OJ C 247 of 26.8.2000.

with the exception, as regards the fourteenth head of the third
plea in law and the third head of the fourth plea in law, of the
arguments based on the Court of First Instance’s assessment of
the overall responsibility of the undertakings involved in the
single infringement;

2.

Costs are reserved.

(1) OJ C 247 of 26.8.2000.

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 5 June 2002

in Case C-205/00: Irish Cement Ltd v Commission of the
European Communities (1)

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 5 June 2002

(Appeal — Competition — Cement — Article 85(1) of the
EC Treaty (now Article 81(1) EC) — Appeal
in part
manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

in Case C-211/00 P: Ciments Français SA v Commission
of the European Communities (1)

(2002/C 191/16)

(Language of the case: English)

(Appeals — Competition — Cement — Article 85(1) of the
in part
EC Treaty (now, Article 81(1) EC) — Appeal

manifestly unfounded)

the judgment of

In Case C-205/00 P, Irish Cement Ltd, established in Dublin
(Ireland), represented by P. Sreenan, SC, instructed by J. Glack-
in, solicitor, with an address for service in Luxembourg: Appeal
the Fourth Chamber, Extended
against
Composition, of the Court of First Instance of the European
Communities in Joined Cases T-25/95, T-26/95, T-30/95 to
T-32/95, T-34/95 to T-39/95, T-42/95 to T-46/95, T-48/95,
T-50/95 to T-65/95, T-68/95 to T-71/95, T-87/95, T-88/95,
T-103/95 and T-104/95 Cimenteries CBR and Others v
Commission [2000] ECR II-491, seeking to have that judgment
set aside in part, the other party to the proceedings being:
Commission of the European Communities (Agent: R. Lyal),
the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of: P. Jann, President of
the Chamber, D.A.O. Edward (Rapporteur), A. La Pergola,
M. Wathelet and A. Rosas, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer,
Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has made an order on
5 June 2002, the operative part of which is as follows:

1.

The following are rejected as manifestly inadmissible and
manifestly unfounded:

— the first to third, ninth to twelfth and fourteenth heads of

the third plea in law,

(2002/C 191/17)

(Language of the case: French)

(Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published
in the European Court Reports)

In Case C-211/00 P: Ciments Français SA, established in Paris,
represented by A. Winckler, lawyers — appeal against the
judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European
Communities, Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition, of
15 March 2000 in Joined Cases T-25/95, T-36/95, T-30/95 to
T-32/95, T-34/95 to T-39/95, T-42/95 to T-46/95, T-48/95,
T-50/95 to T-65/95, T-68/95 to T-71/95, T-87/95 to T-88/95
and T-103/95 to T-104/95 Cimenteries CBR and Others v
Commission [2000] ECR II-491, seeking to have that judgment
partially set aside, the other party to the proceedings being
Commission of the European Communities (Agents: R. Lyal,
assisted by N. Coutrelis) — the Court
(Fifth Chamber),
composed of P. Jann, President of the Chamber, D.A.O. Edward
(Rapporteur), A. La Pergola, M. Wathelet and A. Rosas, Judges;
D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar,
made an order on 5 June 2002, the operative part of which is
as follows:

10.8.2002

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

C 191/11

1.

2.

The first and fourth grounds of appeal are dismissed as
manifestly unfounded.

Costs are reserved.

1.

2.

The fourth, fifth and sixth grounds of appeal are dismissed in
their entirety as manifestly unfounded.

Costs are reserved.

(1) OJ C 247 of 26.8.2000.

(1) OJ C 247 of 26.8.2000.

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 5 June 2002

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 5 June 2002

in Case C-213/00 P: Italcementi — Fabbriche Riunite
Cemento SpA v Commission of the European Communi-
ties (1)

in Case C-217/00 P: Buzzi Unicem SpA v Commission of
the European Communities (1)

(Appeals — Competition — Cement — Article 85(1) of the
in part
EC Treaty (now, Article 81(1) EC) — Appeal

manifestly unfounded)

(Appeals — Competition — Cement — Article 85(1) of the
EC Treaty (now, Article 81(1) EC) — Appeal
in part
manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

(2002/C 191/18)

(Language of the case: Italian)

(2002/C 191/19)

(Language of the case: Italian)

(Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published
in the European Court Reports)

(Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published
in the European Court Reports)

In Case C-219/00 P: Italcementi — Fabbriche Riunite Cemento
SpA, established in Bergamo, Italy, represented by A. Predieri,
M. Siragusa, M. Beretta, C. Lanciani and F. M. Moretti, lawyers
— appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance
of the European Communities, Fourth Chamber, Extended
Composition, of 15 March 2000 in Joined Cases T-25/95,
T-36/95, T-30/95 to T-32/95, T-34/95 to T-39/95, T-42/95
to T-46/95, T-48/95, T-50/95 to T-65/95, T-68/95 to T-71/
95, T-87/95 to T-88/95 and T-103/95 to T-104/95 Cimente-
ries CBR and Others v Commission [2000] ECR II-491, seeking
to have that judgment set aside, the other party to the
proceedings being Commission of the European Communities
(Agents: R. Lyal, assisted by A. Dal Ferro) — the Court (Fifth
Chamber), composed of P. Jann, Presidents of the Chamber,
D.A.O. Edward (Rapporteur), A. La Pergola, M. Wathelet and
A. Rosas, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General;
R. Grass, Registrar, made an order on 5 June 2002, the
operative part of which is as follows:

In Case C-217/00 P: Buzzi Unicem SpA, formerly Unicem
SpA, established in Casale Monferrato (Italy), represented by
C. Osti and A. Prastaro, lawyers — appeal against the judgment
of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities,
Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition, of 15 March 2000
in Joined Cases T-25/95, T-36/95, T-30/95 to T-32/95, T-34/
95 to T-39/95, T-42/95 to T-46/95, T-48/95, T-50/95 to
T-65/95, T-68/95 to T-71/95, T-87/95 to T-88/95 and T-103/
95 to T-104/95 Cimenteries CBR and Others v Commission
[2000] ECR II-491, seeking to have that judgment set aside,
the other party to the proceedings being Commission of the
European Communities (Agents: R. Lyal, assisted by A. Dal
Ferro) — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of P. Jann,
Presidents of the Chamber, D.A.O. Edward (Rapporteur), A. La
Pergola, M. Wathelet and A. Rosas, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo
Colomer, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, made an order
on 5 June 2002, the operative part of which is as follows: