Case C-216/02: Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Verwaltungsgerichtshof by order of that Court of 23 May 2002 in the action of the Österreichischer Zuchtverband für Ponys, Kleinpferde und Spezialrassen; intervener: Österreichischer Shetlandponyzuchtverband
Date: 2002-08-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: animal breeding, association, dissemination of information, equidae, interpretation of the law, zoology

C 191/20

EN

Official Journal of the European Communities

10.8.2002

only the right to be heard in proceedings before the
competent authority for the recognition of another
breeding organisation (breeding association) but
not the right to have recognition of that other
organisation (association) refused where recognition
would endanger the preservation of the breed or
jeopardise the operation or the improvement or
selection programme of an existing organisation or
association, and

(b) no right to challenge the grant of recognition by the
authority in the courts (the Verwaltungsgerichtshof),
even where the existing organisation or association
made submissions opposing recognition?

(1) OJ L 192, p. 63.

e)

f)

In upholding the Commission in its use of the turnover
method of assessing rent subsidy,

(a)

In concluding that non-contractual benefits said to be
provided by Bass plc can be off-set against the price
differentials.

(1) OJ C 6, 8.1.2000, p. 29.
(2) Commission Regulation (EEC) No. 1984/83 of 22 June 1983 on
the application of Article 85(3) of categories of exclusive purchas-
ing agreements (OJ L 173, 30.6.1983, p. 5).

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Verwaltungs-
gerichtshof by order of that Court of 23 May 2002 in the
action of the O¨ sterreichischer Zuchtverband für Ponys,
intervener: O¨ sterrei-
Kleinpferde und Spezialrassen;

chischer Shetlandponyzuchtverband

(Case C-216/02)

(2002/C 191/32)

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Conseil d’E´ tat,
Section d’Administration (Belgium) by judgment of that
Court of 28 May 2002 in the case of Michel Tillieut,
Association des habitants de Louvain-La-Neuve, Willy
Gregoire and Association L’E´ pine Blanche against Région
wallonne; intervener: Propreté, Assainissement, Gestion
de l’Environnement SA (‘PAGE’)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the
European Communities by order of the Verwaltungsgerichts-
hof (Administrative Court) of 23 May 2002, received at the
Court Registry on 12 June 2002, for a preliminary ruling in
the action of the O¨ sterreichischer Zuchtverband für Ponys,
intervener: O¨ sterreichischer
Kleinpferde und Spezialrassen;
Shetlandponyzuchtverband, on the following questions:

1. Does Article 2(2), first indent, of Commission Decision
92/353/EEC (1) of 11 June 1992 laying down the criteria
for the approval or recognition of organisations and
associations which maintain or establish stud-books for
registered equidae (OJ 1992 L 192, p. 63) confer on
existing breeding organisations (breeding associations) a
right to have the competent authority refuse recognition
of another breeding organisation (another breeding
association) if recognition of that other breeding organis-
ation (breeding association) would endanger the preser-
vation of the breed or jeopardise the operation or the
improvement or selection programme of an existing
organisation or association?

2. Does Article 2(2),

first

indent, of

the Commission
Decision referred to in the first question preclude the
application of a provision of national law which confers
on an existing breeding organisation or breeding associ-
ation

(Case C-217/02)

(2002/C 191/33)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the
European Communities by judgment of the Conseil d’E´ tat,
Section d’Administration (Belgium) (Council of State, Adminis-
trative Section) of 28 May 2002, received at the Court Registry
on 13 June 2002, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Michel
Tillieut, Association des habitants de Louvain-La-Neuve, Willy
Gregoire and Association L’E´ pine Blanche against Région
intervener: Propreté, Assainissement, Gestion de
wallonne;
l’Environnement SA (‘PAGE’) on the following questions:

1. Does the obligation imposed on Member States by
Article 7 of Directive 75/442/EEC of 15 July 1975
on waste (1), as amended by Directive 91/156/EEC of
18 March 1991 (2), to draw up one or more waste
management plans relating in particular to ‘suitable
disposal sites or installations’ mean that the States to
which the Directive is addressed are required to mark on
a geographical map the precise locations of the planned