WRITTEN QUESTION E-2236/02 by Gabriele Stauner (PPE-DE) to the Commission. Award of Commission contracts to audit firms.
Date: 2002-07-23
Institutions: European Parliament, Provisional data
Subjects: European Commission, administration of the Institutions, audit, invitation to tender, outsourcing

C 137 E/58

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

12.6.2003

Answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(3 September 2002)

Since 1999 the Commission’s Legal Service has awarded to outside experts contracts dealing with the

1.
following subjects:

(cid:1) respect for human rights in the applicant countries;

(cid:1) intellectual property and liability in the case of emails;

(cid:1) scope and protection of confidentiality;

(cid:1) legal issues and the millennium bug;

(cid:1) legal structure and membership of the International Doping Agency;

(cid:1) right of reply in Spanish media legislation;

(cid:1) legal protection against defamation and damage compensation;

(cid:1) attachment of debt in international private law;

(cid:1) access to disciplinary acts;

(cid:1) the Member States and the Commission as amicus curiae before the US Supreme Court;

(cid:1) Belgian tenancy and property law.

2.
A list of the experts who have worked for the Commission’s Legal Service since 1999 and the total
value of the contracts awarded to them are being sent separately to the Honourable Member as the
information in question has to be handled confidentially in accordance with Article 287 of the EC Treaty.

3.

The contracts have been awarded properly in accordance with Article 59 of the Financial Regulation.

(2003/C 137 E/065)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2236/02

by Gabriele Stauner (PPE-DE) to the Commission

Subject: Award of Commission contracts to audit firms

(23 July 2002)

I gather from Mrs Schreyer’s answer to written questions E-0372/02, P-0443/02 and E-0450/02 (1) that the
Commission awarded contracts in 1999-2001 for a total value of EUR 77 million to the private auditing
firms of KPMG, Andersen Group, Deloitte & Touche, Ernst & Young and PriceWaterhouseCoopers.

1.

Can the Commission provide me with a full and detailed list of these contracts, stating for each one:

(a)

the subject of the contract;

(b)

the agreed fee;

(c) whether the contract was the subject of a proper tendering procedure in accordance with the Financial

Regulation?

2.
Can the Commission explain why contracts of this magnitude were given to private firms, even
though the Commission has its own audit services and is also subject to detailed auditing by the European
Court of Auditors?

(1) OJ C 229 E, 26.9.2002, p. 82.

12.6.2003

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137 E/59

Answer given by Ms Schreyer on behalf of the Commission

(9 September 2002)

The Commission would inform the Honourable Member that her question requires detailed research by its
departments and that their findings will be set out in a supplementary answer.

(2003/C 137 E/066)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2242/02

by James Nicholson (PPE-DE) to the Council

(23 July 2002)

Subject: Oppression of North Korean refugees

Some 150 000 refugees are believed to be in hiding on the Chinese side of the border between China and
North Vietnam. These people have been denied refugee status by China and are liable to brutal and
inhumane treatment if captured and repatriated to North Vietnam. If it is suspected that there has been
any contact with Christians they are subjected to the most brutal of punishments.

If it is discovered that a prisoner has converted to Christianity then severe torture, detention in horrific
work camps or summary execution may follow.

Would the Council indicate the nature of representations made to the authorities in China and North
Vietnam regarding the plight of these refugees and advise what undertakings have been received to indicate
that such abuses will cease.

Reply

(6 February 2003)

1.
The Council is aware of the serious situation of North Korean refugees and shares the preoccupations
raised by the Honourable Member in his question. The EU has repeatedly raised its grave concerns in high-
level contacts with Beijing and Pyongyang. The EU will continue to urge both parties concerned to respect
to which they are party,
human rights and international humanitarian law,
irrespective of whether the motives for border crossings are humanitarian or political in nature.

including refugee law,

2.
The EU brought up the issue with the North Korean side during the last Human Rights briefing for
EU Heads of Mission in mid-May, and during the last EU Troika visit to Pyongyang in mid-June 2002.
On these occasions, the EU urged in particular the DPRK to respect the human rights of persons who are
detained at the border or forcibly repatriated by China. The EU also urged the DPRK Government to make
further efforts to raise living standards for its population in isolated areas bordering China.

The EU has also held several frank and detailed discussions with the Chinese authorities, both in the
3.
context of the EU’s regular political dialogue and of the human rights dialogue; the last session was held in
Madrid in early March. The EU invited the Chinese side to pursue its pragmatic approach concerning
asylum seekers who have sought refuge in EU embassies, and to address the root causes of the problems
while fulfilling its obligations under the Convention of 28 July 1951 relating to the Status of Refugees.
The EU invited Beijing to encourage the DPRK not to punish those who return, and expressed the hope
that forced repatriations would not continue while punishments occurred. Finally, the EU declared its
readiness to work with the Chinese authorities, NGOs and UN Agencies to improve the situation of North
Koreans in China.